Project Management migration

Migrate from Ganttic to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Ganttic and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Ganttic logo

Ganttic

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

83%

10 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Ganttic and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Ganttic to Asana is a conceptual migration, not a direct record copy. Ganttic plans around Resources — people, rooms, vehicles, equipment — with no required fields and nine distinct Data Field types. Asana plans around Tasks assigned to team members within Projects, with a simpler custom field model and per-seat licensing. The most significant shift is that Ganttic's Resources are not the same as Asana's Assignees: a Ganttic Resource can be a piece of equipment or a room, while Asana tasks assign to People only. We resolve this during scoping by mapping human Resources to Asana Members and flagging non-human Resources for conversion to Projects, Sections, or custom placeholders depending on the customer's workflow. We preserve all Ganttic Data Fields, migrate Milestones through Asana's native feature, and deliver a written inventory of Ganttic Reports, Custom Views, and automations requiring manual rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Ganttic logo

Ganttic

What's pushing teams away

  • The user interface is described as clumsy by some reviewers, making navigation unintuitive compared to competitors like Wrike
  • Limited review volume (29 G2 reviews) makes it hard to gauge long-term satisfaction and support quality before committing
  • Teams outgrow Ganttic as they scale and need stronger integrations, advanced reporting, or enterprise features not fully available
  • API documentation is sparse and rate limits are not publicly documented, creating friction for automated workflows and migration tooling
  • Mid-market focus means large enterprises with complex org structures find the platform insufficient for their needs

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Ganttic objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Ganttic object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Ganttic

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Ganttic Projects map directly to Asana Projects. Project name, description, start date, and end date transfer as Project name, Project Notes, and start/completion dates. Ganttic's time period and shift operations are captured as date metadata. Projects with no assigned Resources map to Projects with no Members in Asana initially, to be populated during team onboarding.

Ganttic

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Ganttic Tasks map to Asana Tasks within the corresponding Project. Start date, due date, and any Task-level Data Field values transfer directly. Task assignees in Ganttic (which reference Resources) must resolve to Asana Members; see Resource mapping for the non-human Resource handling strategy. Tasks without assignees in Ganttic become unassigned Tasks in Asana pending team assignment.

Ganttic

Resource (person-type)

maps to

Asana

Member

1:1
Fully supported

Human Resources in Ganttic (people, employees, contractors) map to Asana workspace Members. We resolve by email address where available, and create Member invitations for any human Resource without an existing Asana account. The customer's admin provisions Asana seats for the migrated Members post-migration, as Asana licenses are per-seat.

Ganttic

Resource (non-human)

maps to

Asana

Section or Custom Placeholder Field

1:many
Fully supported

Ganttic Resources can be rooms, vehicles, machinery, or equipment. These do not map to Asana Members. We map them by converting each unique non-human Resource type to a Project-level Section (for room/vehicle assignments on a per-task basis) or to a custom Multi-Select field (Equipment Type, Room Booking) that the customer's admin pre-seeds with the available values before import. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping.

Ganttic

Resource Data Fields

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (Project-level or workspace-level)

1:1
Mapping required

Ganttic Resource Data Fields (department, skillset, location, role) map to Asana custom fields on Projects or as workspace-level custom fields if the same field applies across all Projects. List and Multi-Select Data Field values require pre-seeding as picklist options in Asana before any records import. We extract all unique List and Multi-Select values during discovery and generate a seed script for the customer's Asana admin.

Ganttic

Project Data Fields

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Ganttic Project Data Fields (nine types) map to Asana custom field types by type: Text to Text, Number to Number, Date to Date, List to Dropdown, Multi-Select to Multi-Select. Required field flags from Ganttic carry over as required validation in Asana custom fields, though Asana enforces required at the task level differently than Ganttic's per-field per-object model.

Ganttic

Task Data Fields

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Ganttic Task Data Fields follow the same nine-type system as Projects and Resources. We perform type-aware mapping and flag any task fields marked as mandatory in Ganttic to ensure required validation is replicated in Asana. Multi-Select and List values are pre-seeded in Asana before import, same as Resource and Project Data Fields.

Ganttic

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Milestone

lossy
Fully supported

Ganttic Milestones are implemented as date-type Data Fields on Projects rather than a distinct object. We convert them to Asana's native Milestone feature: the milestone date becomes the Milestone's Due Date, and the milestone name comes from the Data Field label. This conversion is available from Asana Premium ($10.99/user/month); teams on Asana's free tier will see Milestones as regular Tasks marked complete, and we document this tier constraint in the scope.

Ganttic

Resource Grouping

maps to

Asana

Tags or Custom Field Groups

1:1
Mapping required

Ganttic Resources can be grouped by any Data Field value, creating nested group hierarchies for resource pool visualization. Asana does not have a native resource grouping model. We map these to Asana Tags on Tasks (for ad-hoc grouping) or to custom fields (Department, Team, Location) depending on whether the grouping represents a planning attribute (custom field) or a collaborative tag (Tag). Nested Ganttic hierarchies flatten to top-level groups with a naming convention preserved.

Ganttic

Custom Views

maps to

Asana

Portfolio and Project Dashboard

1:1
Mapping required

Ganttic Custom Views define per-view time periods, groupings, and filtering criteria. Asana's Portfolio view provides high-level project status, progress, and due-date tracking across Projects but does not replicate Ganttic's resource-centric grouping. We export View configurations during discovery and map them to a written View-equivalent document: which Projects are included, what time period is active, and what grouping applies. The customer's admin recreates these as Asana Portfolios or filtered Project lists.

Ganttic

Reports

maps to

Asana

Asana Dashboard (Premium+) or CSV Export

1:1
Mapping required

Ganttic Reports export as CSV or PDF and may contain calculated fields, utilization summaries, and capacity metrics that exist only in the view. We extract CSV exports during discovery and map them to a written report inventory. Asana's native reporting (Dashboard, Custom Fields, progress tracking) is available from Premium tier. We do not migrate Ganttic Reports as live Asana Dashboards; we deliver the report definitions for the customer's admin to rebuild as Asana Dashboards or to continue using in a BI tool.

Ganttic

Shift Operations

maps to

Asana

Date delta record

1:1
Fully supported

Ganttic's shift feature moves an entire Project and all its Tasks along the timeline. This action cannot be automatically reverted in Ganttic (per Ganttic documentation). We capture the pre-shift state of all Project dates during discovery export so the Ganttic instance remains undisturbed during parallel-run validation. The shift dates themselves are recorded as metadata and applied as the final Project start/end dates in Asana, preserving the migrated timeline accurately.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Ganttic logo

Ganttic gotchas

Medium

Data Field type mapping requires pre-seeded picklist values

Low

Resource-based pricing means only active resources cost money

Medium

Project shifting cannot be automatically reversed

High

API rate limits are not publicly documented

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Resource-to-Assignee data model mismatch requires manual resolution

    Ganttic's core entity is a Resource that can be a person, room, vehicle, or piece of equipment. Asana's core entity is a Task assigned to a Member. There is no native concept of assigning a Task to a room or a vehicle in Asana. We map human Resources to Asana Members and non-human Resources to Sections or custom Multi-Select fields, but this is a semantic conversion, not a structural equivalence. Teams that rely on Ganttic's resource-booking model (booking a room for a meeting, scheduling a vehicle for a delivery) must redesign this workflow in Asana. We document the recommended approach during scoping and flag which workflows require redesign versus simple field mapping.

  • Asana's free tier omits Timeline, Milestones, reporting, and Goals

    Asana's free plan caps at 10 seats, no Timeline view, no reporting, no Goals, and no Portfolios. Ganttic's free plan supports up to 10 Resources with all features included. Teams migrating from Ganttic's free tier to Asana's free tier will lose the Gantt-style Timeline view, Milestone tracking, and cross-project reporting immediately. We explicitly scope the target Asana tier during discovery: Premium ($10.99/user/month) restores Timeline and Milestones; Business ($24.99/user/month) adds Portfolios and Workload. We include the tier recommendation in the scope document before any migration work begins.

  • List and Multi-Select Data Field values must be pre-seeded in Asana

    Ganttic's nine Data Field types include List and Multi-Select fields with custom value sets. Asana's Dropdown and Multi-Select custom fields require those options to exist in the destination before records can import — Asana rejects records with undefined picklist values. We extract all unique List and Multi-Select values during discovery, generate a pre-migration seed script for the customer's Asana admin to run, and only proceed to record import once the picklist values are confirmed present. Skipping this step results in record rejection on import.

  • Ganttic API rate limits are undocumented — CSV fallback required for large volumes

    Ganttic's Help Center documents API endpoints but publishes no rate limits or quota thresholds. For migrations with fewer than 500 Resources and 2,000 Tasks, we attempt API extraction first and fall back to CSV export if we encounter unexplained throttling. For migrations exceeding these thresholds, we default to CSV export from Ganttic (available for Resources, Tasks, Projects, and Data Fields) and bulk-import into Asana via CSV or the Asana API in parallel. Adaptive throttling with exponential backoff applies to any API calls we make to Ganttic.

  • Ganttic Shift Operations cannot be reversed — pre-shift state must be captured

    Ganttic's shift feature moves an entire Project with all Tasks and Milestones along the timeline. The documentation states this cannot be automatically reverted; it must be undone Task by Task manually. When migrating project timelines, we capture the full pre-shift state of all affected records during discovery so the Ganttic instance remains undisturbed during parallel-run validation. Any date discrepancies between Ganttic and Asana post-migration that result from shift operations are traceable to the original pre-shift dates.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Ganttic to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the source Ganttic instance: Resource count (human versus non-human), Project count, Task count, Data Field inventory per object (with field types, required flags, and visibility rules), Milestone list, Custom View count, and Report list. We extract CSV exports for Resources, Projects, Tasks, and Data Fields. We also document any Shift Operations applied within the past 90 days and capture the pre-shift state for each affected Project. The discovery output is a written scope document including the target Asana tier recommendation (Premium or Business), the non-human Resource handling strategy, and the Milestone conversion plan.

  2. Picklist pre-seeding and custom field schema

    We extract all unique List and Multi-Select Data Field values from Ganttic and generate a pre-migration seed script for the customer's Asana admin. The admin runs the seed script in the destination Asana workspace, confirming all picklist values are present before record import begins. We also create the custom field schema in Asana — mapping each Ganttic Data Field type to its Asana equivalent (Text, Number, Date, Dropdown, Multi-Select, Checkbox) — with required flags and visibility rules replicated where Asana supports them. This schema deploys to a staging workspace first for validation.

  3. Resource classification and Member provisioning

    We classify every Ganttic Resource as human or non-human. Human Resources map to Asana Members. We extract email addresses where present and match against existing Asana workspace members. The customer's admin provisions Asana seats for any human Resources without existing accounts. Non-human Resources (rooms, vehicles, equipment) are mapped to the pre-agreed strategy (Sections or custom Multi-Select field). Resource groupings are preserved as a naming convention or as Tags, depending on the customer's workflow preference identified during scoping.

  4. Project and Task import in dependency order

    We import into Asana in record-dependency order: Projects first (as empty shells with name, description, and dates), then Tasks with assignees resolved to Asana Members and non-human Resource assignments mapped to the chosen placeholder strategy. Data Fields on Projects and Tasks are imported after the base records exist, using Asana custom field API endpoints. Milestones are created last using Asana's native Milestone endpoint, with dates sourced from the Ganttic date-type Data Field values. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report showing source count versus destination count.

  5. Milestone, View, and Report inventory delivery

    Ganttic Milestones are confirmed as converted to Asana native Milestones (or documented as requiring Asana Premium). We deliver the Custom View inventory: which Ganttic views exist, what Projects and time periods they cover, and what grouping applies. We deliver the Report inventory: each Ganttic Report's CSV export, its calculated fields, and a written recommendation for the closest Asana Dashboard equivalent or BI-tool export path. We do not rebuild Ganttic Views or Reports as live Asana Dashboards inside the migration scope.

  6. Cutover, delta sync, and automation handoff

    We freeze Ganttic writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration of any records created or modified since the initial export, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the automation inventory document: Ganttic shift operations and Data Field triggers are documented with their trigger conditions, affected records, and recommended Asana Rules equivalents. The customer's admin or an Asana implementation partner rebuilds automations in Asana's Rules engine post-migration. We do not migrate Ganttic automations as code.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Ganttic logo

Ganttic

Source

Strengths

  • Resource-based pricing aligns cost with actual usage — archived resources do not count toward billing
  • Unlimited users across all plans means no per-seat cost friction when scaling teams
  • Flexible Data Field system with nine types and no required fields suits diverse industries
  • Visual Gantt scheduling with drag-and-drop makes capacity conflicts easy to spot
  • CSV import and export for Resources, Tasks, Projects, and Data Fields supports data portability

Weaknesses

  • Sparse public API documentation and undocumented rate limits complicate automated migrations
  • Clumsy UI reported by some reviewers; less intuitive than competitors like Wrike
  • Small review volume (29 G2 reviews) makes it difficult to assess support quality reliably
  • Limited enterprise feature set causes some mid-market teams to outgrow the platform
  • Shift operations (moving project timelines) cannot be automatically reverted in Ganttic
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Ganttic and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Ganttic: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Ganttic doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Ganttic to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Ganttic to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Ganttic to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Ganttic to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts with under 500 Resources, 100 Projects, and 2,000 Tasks with straightforward Data Field mapping. Migrations with non-human Resources requiring custom placeholder logic, many List/Multi-Select Data Fields with extensive picklist values, or large Milestone sets move to eight to twelve weeks because of schema design, picklist pre-seeding, and Milestone conversion validation. Timeline depends on the customer's Asana admin availability for seat provisioning and picklist seeding.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Ganttic.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day