Project Management migration

Migrate from Redmine to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Redmine and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Redmine logo

Redmine

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

69%

9 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Redmine and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Redmine and Asana share a project-task metaphor but differ fundamentally in their data model. Redmine organizes work into Projects containing Issues with a tracker enum (Bug, Feature, Support) and a status enum tied to a workflow; Asana organizes work into Teams containing Projects containing Tasks with Sections and subtasks. We resolve that structural difference by mapping Redmine Trackers to Asana Projects or Project-level labels, and Redmine Issue hierarchies (parent-child) to Asana subtask nesting. Custom Fields in Redmine are defined once per installation and applied per-object-type; Asana custom fields are workspace-level and must be consolidated before import. Redmine's attachment files live on the server filesystem, not the database, so we enumerate the /files directory during discovery, copy each file, and re-upload to Asana while preserving the task relationship. Redmine's built-in CSV export captures no issue history (journals, time entries, comments), so we supplement CSV with direct database access or REST API calls to extract the journals and time_entries tables. Automations and wiki pages do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory for your admin to recreate.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Redmine logo

Redmine

What's pushing teams away

  • Installation and initial configuration are consistently described as difficult, with a steep learning curve for server administrators new to Ruby on Rails.
  • The user interface is widely criticized as dated and unintuitive, with cluttered project screens and confusing role-based permission setup.
  • Email notifications lag and feel outdated compared to modern real-time collaboration tools, frustrating teams expecting Slack-style updates.
  • Performance degrades with large numbers of projects and issues, and no native mobile app forces reliance on a mobile-unfriendly web interface.
  • Hidden costs accumulate through required hosting fees, paid plugins for enterprise features, and ongoing IT maintenance overhead.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Redmine objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Redmine object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Redmine

Project

maps to

Asana

Team + Project

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine Projects map to Asana Teams (organizational unit) containing one or more Projects. We preserve the project hierarchy: top-level Redmine projects become Asana Teams with a root Project; subprojects become Asana Projects within that Team. Project status (active/closed/locked) maps to Asana Project archived status. If the Redmine project contains only one subproject, we may collapse the hierarchy into a single Asana Team for simplicity.

Redmine

Issue

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Issues map to Asana Tasks. The Redmine tracker (Bug, Feature, Support, etc.) maps to an Asana Project or a Project-level label that we create during schema setup. Redmine status (New, In Progress, Resolved, Closed, etc.) maps to Asana task completion status (complete/incomplete) plus an optional custom status field if multi-stage tracking is required. Parent-child Issue relationships in Redmine map to Asana subtasks; we handle single-level nesting by default and flag deeper hierarchies for flattening during scoping.

Redmine

Version

maps to

Asana

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Versions (also called Milestones) carry a name, description, due date, and status. They map directly to Asana Milestones within the corresponding Project. The version due date becomes the Milestone due date, and the version description becomes the Milestone notes. We resolve the parent Project reference by matching the Version's project_id to the mapped Asana Project.

Redmine

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields or Task Notes

lossy
Fully supported

Asana has no native Time Entry object in its base tiers; time tracking requires the Time Tracking add-on or custom fields. We discuss the customer's preference during scoping. If the Time Tracking add-on is available on the destination Asana plan, we map Time Entries to Asana time-tracking entries linked to the Task. If not, we create custom fields (Hours, Date, User) and populate them as structured custom field values or as formatted notes on the Task, preserving hours, the logged date, and the original Redmine user reference.

Redmine

User

maps to

Asana

Member

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Users include login name, email, first/last name, admin flag, and custom fields. We match Redmine Users to Asana Members by email address. Any Redmine User without a matching Asana email is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import. Redmine does not store passwords in a format compatible with Asana, so no password migration is attempted. The user's language preference and time zone map to Asana profile settings if available via API.

Redmine

Group

maps to

Asana

Team

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Groups are used for organizing Users for role-based access control. We map each Redmine Group to an Asana Team, preserving membership. If the customer uses Groups only for notification routing rather than access control, we may alternatively map Groups to Asana Tags or custom fields. This is decided during scoping based on how the customer uses Groups in Redmine.

Redmine

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine attachments are stored as metadata in the database (filename, content_type, description, disk_path) with the actual file on disk under the /files directory. We enumerate the /files directory during discovery, copy each file to a staging location, and upload it to Asana via the Asana Attachments API using the original filename and content_type. The attachment is linked to the target Task by resolving the Issue identifier stored in the Redmine attachment record. Files larger than 100 MB require chunked upload handling.

Redmine

Issue Comment

maps to

Asana

Subtask or Task Notes

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Issue journals capture status changes, priority changes, and comments. We separate comments (journalized_notes with author and created_on) from system status-change entries. Comments migrate to Asana as Task notes (appended in chronological order) or as subtasks with a 'Comment' label depending on the customer's preference for preserving conversation context. We resolve the comment author to the corresponding Asana Member by email.

Redmine

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine Custom Fields are defined once at the installation level via /custom_fields.json and applied to specific object types (Issue, Project, Time Entry). Asana custom fields are workspace-level and shared across all projects. We consolidate all Redmine custom field definitions during discovery, deduplicate by name, and create corresponding Asana workspace custom fields of matching types (text, number, date, enum dropdown, multi-enum checkbox). For enumeration-type custom fields, we map the possible_values list to Asana custom field enum options. Custom field values on Issues are populated during the Issue migration phase.

Redmine

Tracker

maps to

Asana

Project or Label

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine Trackers (Bug, Feature, Support, etc.) categorize Issues. Asana has no direct Tracker object. During scoping we decide whether to map each Tracker to a separate Asana Project (one Project per tracker type) or to use Project-level Labels. The choice depends on whether the customer wants cross-tracker views. If Asana's free-tier plan is in scope, we use Labels because the customer may not have project creation capacity on all tiers.

Redmine

Wiki Page

maps to

Asana

Task or external document

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Wiki Pages are stored as separate objects with wiki text and attachment references. Asana has no native wiki. We evaluate the content and either convert wiki text to a formatted Task (with the Task description carrying the wiki body) or export to an external document format (Markdown or HTML) that the customer stores in a linked Google Drive or SharePoint integration. This is a migration gap the customer must address as part of post-migration cleanup.

Redmine

Document

maps to

Asana

Attachment or Task

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Documents are project-level file attachments with titles and descriptions but no direct Issue linkage. We map Documents to Asana Attachments linked to the corresponding Project task or to a standalone documentation Task. The document title and description migrate to the attachment or task notes.

Redmine

Issue Relations

maps to

Asana

Dependency or Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Issue Relations include blocker, duplicates, precedes, follows, and Blocks/Blocked by types. Asana supports dependency arrows (finish-to-start) via the dependencies field on Task. We map Redmine precedes/follows to Asana dependencies and flag blocker relations as a custom field (redmine_blocker_type__c) because Asana does not distinguish between 'blocks' and 'is blocked by' directionality. Duplicate relations have no Asana equivalent and are recorded in a custom field for manual cleanup.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Redmine logo

Redmine gotchas

High

No built-in CSV import function for Issues

High

Uploaded files stored on filesystem, not in the database

Medium

CSV exports exclude issue history and journals

Medium

Custom field definitions require a separate API call

Medium

REST API disabled by default on most installations

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Redmine REST API is disabled by default

    Most Redmine installations ship with the REST API disabled. We check API availability during the discovery phase by attempting a GET request to /issues.json. If the API is unavailable or returns a 403 response, we fall back to direct database access (MySQL or PostgreSQL) to extract Issues, Time Entries, and Journals. We flag this gap in the scoping report and work with the customer's Redmine administrator to either enable the API (Administration > Settings > API > Enable REST API) or provide read-only database credentials for the migration duration.

  • CSV exports exclude issue history and journals

    Redmine's built-in CSV export captures only the current state of each Issue record. Journal entries (status changes, comments, field edits), time entries, and system-generated notes are not included. We supplement CSV exports with direct database queries against the journals, time_entries, and journal_details tables when available. This adds complexity and time to the migration scope because the database query must join Issue IDs to their history tables without relying on the web UI.

  • Uploaded files are stored on the filesystem, not the database

    Redmine stores uploaded attachments on disk under the /files directory (or a configured storage path), not as BLOBs in the database. A database-only migration will lose all uploaded files entirely. We enumerate the /files directory during discovery, copy its contents to a staging location, and re-upload each file to Asana via the Attachments API using the Issue identifier as the lookup key. Files larger than 100 MB require chunked upload handling. We recommend confirming the file inventory before committing to the migration scope.

  • Asana custom fields are workspace-level, not project-level

    Redmine custom fields are defined once and applied per object type across all projects. Asana custom fields are defined once at the workspace level and appear in every project. If the Redmine installation uses the same custom field name across projects with different value sets or formats, those values will collide in Asana. We deduplicate field names during scoping and map each to a single Asana workspace custom field, with enum options consolidated from all Redmine definitions. If the customer's Redmine uses project-specific custom field value sets that are mutually exclusive, we flag this as a data-loss risk during scoping.

  • Automations, workflows, and wiki pages do not migrate as code

    Redmine's Workflows (status enums per role and tracker) and wiki pages are structurally incompatible with Asana's Rules automations and have no native Asana equivalent respectively. We do not migrate them as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active Redmine Workflow transition rule (tracker, role, old status, new status, allowed fields) for the customer's Asana admin to recreate using Asana Rules. Wiki pages are converted to Tasks or exported as Markdown documents and linked to the corresponding Asana Project. This is documented as a post-migration rebuild task, not a migration deliverable.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Redmine to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and API availability check

    We audit the source Redmine installation: version, database type (MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQLite), active plugins, and whether the REST API is enabled. We enumerate all Projects, Trackers, Enumerations (status, priority, activity), Custom Field definitions via /custom_fields.json, and Users. We inventory the /files directory for attachment count and size. We also extract the project hierarchy to understand subproject nesting. If the API is disabled, we negotiate database credentials or request API enablement before proceeding.

  2. Schema design and Asana workspace setup

    We design the Asana workspace structure: Teams for each Redmine project (or group of related projects), Projects within each Team, and Milestones from Redmine Versions. We create workspace-level custom fields that consolidate all Redmine custom field definitions by name, mapping Redmine field types (string, integer, date, list, bool, text) to their Asana equivalents. We decide on Tracker-to-Project or Tracker-to-Label mapping based on the customer's Asana plan tier and workspace size. Schema is validated in Asana before any data import begins.

  3. Test migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a clean Asana workspace using production-like data volume. The customer reviews a sample of migrated records (Projects, Tasks, Milestones, and Time Entries) against the Redmine source, verifies custom field values, and confirms that attachment filenames and links are correct. We reconcile record counts: Projects in equals Teams+Projects out, Issues in equals Tasks out (accounting for any flattening of hierarchy), and attachment count in equals attachment count out. Mapping corrections are made before production migration begins.

  4. File system enumeration and attachment staging

    We enumerate the Redmine /files directory during discovery, generate a manifest of every attachment with its disk path, content_type, and associated Issue identifier. We copy all files to a secure staging area, validate each file's integrity by comparing file size and checksum against the Redmine database attachment record, and group files by target Task. Files are uploaded to Asana in the production migration phase using the Asana Attachments API with the original filename preserved.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams and Projects first (establishing the organizational structure), then Milestones (which reference Projects), then Users (for member resolution), then Issues with custom fields and parent relationships resolved (Issues must reference the correct Asana Project gid), then Time Entries, then Comments as Task notes, then Attachments. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We handle Asana API rate limiting with exponential backoff and batch sizes of 100-500 records per request.

  6. Cutover, delta migration, and workflow inventory handoff

    We freeze Redmine writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration for any records modified during migration, then enable Asana as the system of record. We disable Redmine email notifications before cutover to prevent notification spam during the delta window. We deliver the Workflow transition matrix and a list of any wiki pages converted to Tasks. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Redmine Workflows as Asana Rules or recreate wiki pages natively in Asana; those are documented rebuild tasks for the customer's admin.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Redmine logo

Redmine

Source

Strengths

  • Completely free with no licensing or user-count constraints.
  • Self-hosted with full source-code access and no vendor lock-in.
  • Rich built-in feature set: Gantt charts, time tracking, wikis, forums, VCS integration.
  • Large community plugin ecosystem extending functionality.
  • Supports 49 languages, cross-platform, and multiple databases.

Weaknesses

  • No native bulk import UI—data entry relies on CSV exports or direct DB access.
  • REST API is read-only by default and must be explicitly enabled by an administrator.
  • Dated, unintuitive interface with steep initial learning curve.
  • No mobile app; mobile web experience is poor.
  • Performance degrades with large data volumes.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Redmine and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Redmine: Not publicly documented; varies by host server configuration.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Redmine doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Redmine to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Redmine to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Redmine to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Redmine to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 10,000 Issues with no custom fields, no historical journals, and under 2,000 attachment files. Migrations with extensive attachment sets, custom field consolidation across many projects, historical journal extraction from the database, or multi-level subproject hierarchies move to six to ten weeks because of filesystem copy operations, database-level history queries, and custom-field deduplication work.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Redmine.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day