Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Swit and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Swit
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
8 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Swit and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Swit and Asana share a task-centric data model, but the structural difference that drives migration complexity is Swit's per-project custom field schema versus Asana's global custom fields. A customer with 20 Swit projects may have 20 different custom field sets, each of which we must discover, classify, and map individually before any data moves. We extract task cards with all standard fields (assignees, priority, status, timeline), reconstruct the project hierarchy, preserve checklist state and subtask ordering, and carry forward Swit's tag vocabulary as Asana labels. Hub plan task-to-chat links do not exist in the source for non-Hub-plan accounts and are flagged during discovery. Time entries migrate to Asana time tracking if the destination is Premium or above; otherwise they land in a custom duration field. Automations, forms, and dashboards do not migrate as code. We deliver a written inventory of Swit automations for your admin to rebuild in Asana Rules.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Swit object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Swit
Task
Asana
Task
1:1Swit task cards migrate directly to Asana tasks with all standard fields preserved: name, description (rich text), due date, start date (Premium only), assignee, priority, and status. Swit's task priority levels (Low, Medium, High or custom labels) map to an Asana custom field of enum type since Asana has no native priority field. Timeline data (start and end dates) migrates as start_date and due_on; if the destination Asana is on Starter tier, start dates require a custom date field workaround.
Swit
Project
Asana
Project
1:1Swit projects map to Asana projects. Each project's name, description, and dashboard configuration are preserved as project metadata. As Asana does not migrate dashboard widgets, we flag dashboard structure in the handoff inventory. Swit's project-level workload charts and time-tracking summaries do not transfer; time-tracking data migrates as individual time-entry records or a custom duration field on each task.
Swit
Subtask
Asana
Subtask
1:1Swit subtasks are nested under parent task cards and carry their own completion status and assignee. We reconstruct the parent-child hierarchy in Asana using Asana's subtask model. Subtask ordering is preserved as displayed in Swit by setting the sort_order field during migration. Each subtask inherits the parent's project assignment implicitly through the parent task.
Swit
Checklist
Asana
Checklist
1:1Swit checklists embedded within task cards migrate as Asana checklist items on the corresponding task. Each checklist item is a discrete record with a checked/unchecked state that we preserve at migration time. The Swit checklist name (if named separately from the task) does not have a direct Asana equivalent; we append it as a prefixed line in the task description or omit it depending on scoping preference.
Swit
Assignee
Asana
Assignee
1:1Swit tasks and subtasks can have multiple assignees. We resolve each assignee by email lookup against the Swit user roster extracted during discovery, then match to the corresponding Asana user by email. Any assignee without a matching Asana user is flagged in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Multi-assignee tasks on Swit map to multi-assignee tasks in Asana (available on Starter and above).
Swit
Comment
Asana
Comment
1:1Swit task comments migrate to Asana task comments with full text, author, and timestamp preserved. Threading structure in Swit flattens to chronological comment ordering in Asana since Asana does not expose nested reply threads in the same way. Author mapping resolves by email to the Asana user. If the Swit account is on a tier below Hub, task-to-channel share links do not exist in source and are not created.
Swit
Attachment
Asana
Attachment
1:1Swit attachment metadata (filename, size, type, URL) exports for each task. We migrate attachment references to Asana attachments on the corresponding task. If the file body is inaccessible via Swit's export (depends on storage configuration), we flag the attachment as requiring re-upload and list it in the handoff inventory. Asana's API enforces a 100 MB per-file maximum; any attachment exceeding this threshold is skipped and documented for manual re-upload.
Swit
Tag
Asana
Label
1:1Swit tags label tasks for filtering and categorization. We map tag names directly to Asana labels on the corresponding tasks. Color mapping is approximate since Swit and Asana use different color palettes; we apply Asana's default color or the closest match. Swit tag counts and tag usage frequency are preserved so the customer's admin can prioritize label cleanup post-migration.
Swit
Time Entry
Asana
Time Tracking or Custom Field
lossySwit task-level time tracking records hours logged per task by user. If the destination Asana workspace is on Premium tier or above, we migrate time entries to Asana's native time-tracking feature using the tasks/{gid}/time_tracking_entries endpoint. On Starter tier, Asana's native time tracking is unavailable; we migrate logged hours to a custom number field (Hours_Logged__c) and document the limitation. Duration, user, and associated task reference all carry forward.
Swit
Custom Field
Asana
Custom Field
lossySwit applies custom fields per-project rather than globally. This is the highest-complexity dimension of the migration. For each Swit project, we enumerate the complete custom field schema (field name, type, and options), map each to an Asana global custom field of the equivalent type (text, number, date, enum), and apply it to the corresponding Asana project during migration. Type transformations are required: Swit multi-select fields map to Asana enum with multiple values; Swit date fields map to Asana date fields or custom date fields depending on tier.
Swit
Priority Level
Asana
Custom Enum Field
lossySwit task cards carry priority values (Low, Medium, High or custom team-defined labels). Asana has no native priority field at any tier. We create a custom enum field (e.g., Priority__c) in Asana, populate it with the exact label values from the Swit account, and apply it to all migrated tasks. Teams that used only numeric priority scores in Swit map those to an Asana number custom field.
Swit
Task Status
Asana
Section or Status
lossySwit task status values are team-configurable and vary by project. We extract the actual status values from each Swit project during discovery, then map them to Asana's status model. On Asana Starter tier, status is unavailable; we use Sections to replicate Swit's pipeline stages. On Asana Premium and above, we configure custom Status options to match the Swit pipeline stages exactly, preserving both the label and the stage order. Value transformations are required when Swit's status count exceeds Asana's section limit per project (up to 500 sections, typically not a constraint).
| Swit | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Subtask | Subtask1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Checklist | Checklist1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Assignee | Assignee1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Time Tracking or Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Priority Level | Custom Enum Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Task Status | Section or Statuslossy | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Swit gotchas
Custom field schema varies per project
Task status values are team-configurable
Hub plan required for task-chat linking
Attachment content retrieval may require re-upload
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and project schema enumeration
We audit every Swit workspace and project in the source account. For each project, we extract the complete custom field schema (field name, type, options, and usage count), task count, subtask count, comment count, attachment metadata, time-entry volume, and tag vocabulary. We also extract team member rosters, owner assignments, and the full list of pipeline stages and status values per project. The discovery output includes a per-project field enumeration table, total record counts by object, and a preliminary mapping matrix. We confirm the destination Asana edition during this phase (Starter, Premium, Business) since Start Date support and time-tracking availability depend on the tier.
Schema design and custom field creation
We design the destination Asana structure: organization-level custom fields, projects, and sections. For each Swit project, we create the corresponding Asana project and apply the mapped custom fields. Status values from Swit become either Sections (Starter) or Status options (Premium+). Priority levels become a custom enum field. Time entries map to native time tracking or a custom field depending on the confirmed Asana edition. Schema is designed in a staging environment first, validated against the discovery output, and approved by the customer's project manager before any data moves.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a staging Asana workspace using production data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (tasks in, projects in, subtasks in, comments in, attachments in), spot-checks 25-50 randomly sampled records against the Swit source for field-level accuracy, and approves the mapping before production migration. Any custom field type mismatches, status mapping gaps, or assignee resolution failures surface here and are corrected before the production run. This step typically takes three to five business days depending on the customer's review cadence.
Owner and user reconciliation
We extract every distinct Swit user referenced as a task owner or assignee across all projects. Each user is matched by email address to the destination Asana workspace. Users without a matching Asana account go into a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing Asana users and confirms active/inactive status. Migration cannot proceed past this step because OwnerId and assignee references on Asana tasks require valid User GIDs. We provide a spreadsheet of unmatched users with their Swit role for admin resolution.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in strict record-dependency order: projects first (no dependencies), then tasks, then subtasks (dependent on parent task GID), then checklists, then comments, then attachments, then labels, then custom field values, then time entries. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. API writes use Asana's REST API with rate-limit handling and exponential backoff: 150 requests per minute on Starter, 1,500 per minute on paid plans. Batch chunking limits concurrent POST requests to 15 per worker to stay within Asana's concurrent request ceiling.
Cutover, validation, and automation handoff
We freeze Swit writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the handoff inventory: list of skipped attachments (file size exceeds 100 MB), per-project custom field mapping summary, time-entry migration status (native or custom field), and the written automation inventory for Swit automations. We support a one-week post-cutover window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Swit automations as Asana Rules; that work is documented and scoped separately for the customer's admin.
Platform deep dives
Swit
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Swit and Asana.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Swit: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Swit doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Swit to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Swit to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Swit
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.