Project Management migration

Migrate from Avaza to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Avaza and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Avaza logo

Avaza

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

85%

11 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Avaza and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Avaza to Trello is a structural narrowing: Avaza bundles project management, time tracking, expense management, and invoicing under one roof; Trello is a kanban-style task board with no native billing, time-tracking, or financial reporting layer. We migrate Avaza Projects as Trello Boards, Avaza Sections as Trello Lists or Labels, and Avaza Tasks as Trello Cards with assignees, due dates, priorities, and flat-rate amounts preserved. We use Avaza admin credentials to extract Cost Rates and Billable Rates that are role-restricted to Project Manager and Finance Manager roles, and we preserve frozen rate values from historical timesheet entries rather than recomputing from current project settings. Team Chat, Invoices, Expenses, Timesheets, Quotes, and Custom Fields are explicitly scoped out of the migration and documented in the Statement of Work. This is a PM-only migration; financial reconstruction happens in a separate accounting tool post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Avaza logo

Avaza

What's pushing teams away

  • Advanced task management features are limited compared to dedicated tools, causing teams managing complex project hierarchies to look elsewhere.
  • Reporting requires navigating role-based permissions and is described as difficult to access, create, and use for real-time profit-and-loss visibility.
  • Teams scaling beyond small-business size find the platform lacks the depth needed for multi-project portfolio management and enterprise workflows.
  • Integration capabilities are considered limited, prompting teams with complex toolchains to migrate to platforms with richer marketplace ecosystems.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Avaza objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Avaza object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Avaza

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Projects map directly to Trello Boards. Project name, description, billing method (Time & Materials, Fixed Fee, Internal), budget, and active/archived status transfer. Avaza project-level cost rates and billable rates are exposed to Project Manager and Finance Manager roles only; we require admin credentials and verify rate visibility in a test export before migration. Archived projects map to archived Trello boards. Projects with over 500 tasks may warrant a second Board to avoid Trello performance degradation on large boards.

Avaza

Section

maps to

Trello

List or Label Set

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza Sections are grouping containers inside a project used to organize Tasks. We map them to Trello Lists within the Board by default, preserving display order. For teams that used Sections as category tags (e.g., 'Design', 'Development', 'QA') rather than sequential phases, we offer a Label-based alternative mapping where each Section becomes a Label color group. The customer chooses during scoping. Sections have no independent metadata beyond name and order.

Avaza

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Tasks map to Trello Cards with full hierarchy preserved. Assignees transfer as Card members, due dates as the Card due date field, priorities as Labels (High=Red, Medium=Yellow, Low=Green by default), and flat-rate amounts as a custom field or card description note. Subtasks do not exist as independent Avaza objects; any subtask pattern used in Avaza migrates as a separate Card with a cross-board or checklist relationship the customer defines during scoping.

Avaza

Timesheet Entry

maps to

Trello

Not Migrated

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza timesheet entries are linked to a project, section, task, user, and timesheet category, with Billable Rate and Cost Rate copied into each entry at the time of logging. Trello has no time-tracking, time-log, or timesheet object. We do not migrate timesheet data. The frozen rate values stored in historical Avaza timesheets are preserved as a written extract for the customer to use in their destination accounting tool.

Avaza

Expense

maps to

Trello

Not Migrated

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza expenses are linked to a project and carry amount, currency, category, billable flag, and receipt attachments. Trello has no expense tracking object. We do not migrate expenses. Billable expenses flagged in Avaza are preserved as a written extract for import into the customer's accounting platform (Xero, QuickBooks, or similar). Non-billable expense history is documented as a reconciliation report.

Avaza

Invoice

maps to

Trello

Not Migrated

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza invoices are composite financial records built from free-form line items, uninvoiced timesheet blocks, uninvoiced expenses, and task fixed amounts. Each invoice can reference customers and carry payment status. Trello has no invoicing, billing, or financial record object. We do not migrate invoices. Invoice data is preserved as a written extract from the Avaza Invoice Detail report for reconstruction in the customer's accounting platform.

Avaza

Quote and Estimate

maps to

Trello

Not Migrated

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza quotes are distinct from invoices with their own approval statuses and client-view links. Avaza can convert a quote to a project in one click. Trello has no quoting or estimate object. We do not migrate quotes. Quote line items and approval status are preserved as a written extract for reconstruction in the customer's CRM or accounting tool.

Avaza

Customer and External Contact

maps to

Trello

Board Member or Workspace Guest

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Customers and External Contacts map to Trello Board members on the corresponding Board. We use the contact's email address as the member identifier and send Trello workspace invitations. Clients who were External Contacts or project collaborators in Avaza become Workspace Guests or Board members in Trello. Contact billing and payment-term settings have no Trello equivalent and are preserved as a written contact profile extract.

Avaza

User and Team Member

maps to

Trello

Workspace Member

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza differentiates between Project Collaborators, Timesheet/Expense Users, Admin/Finance Users, Resource Schedulers, and Chat-access Team Members with role-based limits varying by tier. We map active Avaza users to Trello workspace members by email. Users who were only assigned Chat or Resource Scheduling roles in Avaza (and had no project task assignments) are documented for the customer's admin to provision manually in Trello.

Avaza

Timesheet Category

maps to

Trello

Label Group

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza timesheet categories define work types and carry default billable and cost rates that cascade into projects and timesheet entries. Trello has no timesheet category object. If the customer used Avaza timesheet categories as work-type tags (e.g., 'Design', 'Development', 'Consulting'), we offer to map these as Label color groups in Trello for visual filtering across cards. This is a discretionary mapping determined during scoping.

Avaza

Custom Field (Project and Task level)

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza custom fields on Projects and Tasks appear only in filtered report views and require the correct filter context to export. We map named custom fields to Trello Card Custom Fields (available on Standard and Business Class plans). Custom field types (text, number, date, dropdown) map to the closest Trello custom field type. Project-level custom fields become Board-level custom fields on the target Board.

Avaza

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza file attachments on tasks, expenses, and invoices are stored internally. We migrate file references and re-attach files where the export includes the blob or a reachable URL. Files without a reachable URL are flagged for manual re-upload. Trello card attachments inherit the same 10MB per file and 250MB per Board limits on Standard plan.

Avaza

Team Chat Channel

maps to

Trello

Not Migrated

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Team Chat stores messages in an internal messaging layer with no documented API endpoint for message history export. Chat channels, direct messages, and file attachments shared in chat are not included in any data export. We explicitly scope chat out of the migration and disclose this gap in the Statement of Work. The customer should communicate this to their team before the migration date.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Avaza logo

Avaza gotchas

High

Cost Rates and Billable Rates are role-restricted

Medium

Timesheet rate values are copied at entry time

Medium

Invoice data spans multiple linked entities

Medium

Tier-based limits on active projects and users

Low

Team Chat has no export capability

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Archived Trello cards must be restored before export

    Trello boards can contain archived cards that are not included in standard board exports. If the Avaza migration scope includes Projects that contained archived Tasks, those archived cards will not appear in the exported board JSON. We require the customer to unarchive all relevant cards before the export date, or accept that archived Avaza tasks will not migrate. For boards with hundreds of archived cards, this is a manual step that can take significant time and should be scheduled before migration begins.

  • Financial data has no Trello equivalent

    Avaza invoices, expenses, timesheets, quotes, and billable/cost rate configuration are financial records with no structural home in Trello. Trello has no time-tracking, expense-logging, billing, or quoting object. We do not migrate these records. The customer must have a destination accounting tool (Xero, QuickBooks, FreshBooks, or similar) ready to receive this data as a written extract. If the customer has no such tool, we recommend establishing one before migration begins to avoid financial data loss.

  • Cost Rates and Billable Rates are role-restricted in Avaza

    Billable Rates and Cost Rates configured in Avaza are visible only to users with the Project Manager, Finance Manager, or Admin role. If our migration access account lacks one of these roles, these fields may not appear in exports even though they exist in the database. We require Admin-level credentials for the migration account and verify that Cost and Billable rates are visible in a test export before running the full job. If they are absent, we reconstruct rate values from the contact or timesheet-category level source records.

  • Avaza Free plan caps active projects at 5

    Avaza Free tier limits active projects to 5 and customers to 10. If the source account is on the Free plan but has more than 5 active projects, we flag the overage and ask the customer to archive projects before migration. Exceeding plan limits post-migration causes billing issues and potential data gaps on the destination. This is a scoping constraint we raise during discovery.

  • Trello free tier limits workspace boards to 10

    Trello Free plan allows 10 boards per workspace. Teams migrating more than 10 Avaza projects must either purchase Trello Standard ($5/user/month) or consolidate multiple Avaza projects into fewer Trello boards using the List or Label segmentation strategy. We flag this constraint during scoping if the migration scope exceeds 10 projects.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Avaza to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and credential verification

    We audit the source Avaza account across tier, active project count, archived project count, user count, and timesheet category list. We verify Admin-level access for the migration account and confirm Cost Rates and Billable Rates are visible in a test export. We audit the destination Trello workspace: existing boards, member list, Power-Up status, and free-tier board count. If the destination is on a Free plan and the migration scope exceeds 10 boards, we raise the upgrade requirement before proceeding.

  2. Board and list architecture design

    We design the Trello board structure: one Board per Avaza Project by default, or consolidated Boards for customers who want phase-based grouping. We design List names (from Avaza Sections) and default Label colors for priorities and timesheet categories. We design member access: which Avaza users become Board members, which become Workspace Guests. We confirm the archived-card retrieval schedule with the customer's Avaza admin before the export date.

  3. Data extraction with admin credentials

    We extract Avaza data using Admin credentials to ensure Cost Rates and Billable Rates are present in all exports. We pull Projects, Sections, Tasks, and assignees from the Project Management export grid. We pull Custom Field definitions from the filtered report views where they surface. We pull file attachment URLs from the document export layer. We do not extract Team Chat history, invoices, expenses, or timesheet entries as they are out of scope for Trello migration.

  4. Transform and load into Trello

    We transform Avaza records into Trello JSON format: Projects become Boards, Sections become Lists or Labels, Tasks become Cards with members and due dates. Custom fields map to Trello Card Custom Fields on Standard and Business plans. We use the Trello API with rate-limit handling to create boards, lists, and cards in dependency order. We preserve Avaza task display order within sections as card position within Trello lists.

  5. Sandbox validation and member reconciliation

    We run the migration into a test Trello workspace first. The customer reconciles a sample of boards and cards against the Avaza source, verifies assignee mapping, due-date accuracy, and label application, and signs off before production migration. Any List-to-Section remapping corrections happen here. Member reconciliation confirms all Avaza users have Trello workspace accounts or are flagged for manual provisioning.

  6. Production cutover and financial data handoff

    We run production migration into the live Trello workspace. We freeze Avaza writes during cutover, extract a final delta of any modified records, and load into Trello. We deliver the financial data extract (invoices, expenses, timesheet summary, customer contact profiles, and rate schedule) as a structured CSV for import into the customer's accounting platform. We do not import financial records into Trello. We do not rebuild Avaza workflows, automations, or Team Chat. We deliver a written Statement of Work documenting every object that was scoped out and the recommended accounting tool for financial reconstruction.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Avaza logo

Avaza

Source

Strengths

  • Unified platform covering projects, time tracking, expenses, and invoicing under one login.
  • Free tier with unlimited contacts and project collaborators for small teams to evaluate fit.
  • Time logged against tasks can flow directly into invoices without re-entry.
  • Cost rate and billable rate configuration at contact or category level cascades through to timesheet entries.
  • Resource scheduling calendar shows team allocation across projects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting is role-restricted and difficult to navigate, particularly for real-time profit-and-loss visibility.
  • Task management lacks depth for complex project hierarchies — suitable primarily for small to mid-sized projects.
  • Custom fields only appear in filtered report views and require explicit configuration to export.
  • Integration ecosystem is smaller than major PSA competitors, limiting connectivity for complex toolchains.
  • Team Chat history is not exportable through any documented API endpoint.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Avaza and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Avaza: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Avaza exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Avaza to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Avaza to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Avaza to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Avaza to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts under 20 projects and 2,000 tasks. Migrations with large task volumes (over 10,000 cards), archived-card retrieval requirements, or multi-workspace Trello destinations move to four to eight weeks because of board-by-board validation, label-system redesign, and member reconciliation. The archived-card retrieval step (unarchiving hundreds of cards in Avaza before export) is a customer responsibility that can extend the timeline if not started early.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Avaza.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day