HRMS migration

Migrate from TalentWall to Crelate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TalentWall and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.

TalentWall logo

TalentWall

Source

Crelate

Destination

Crelate logo

Compatibility

69%

9 of 13

objects map 1:1 between TalentWall and Crelate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from TalentWall to Crelate is an architectural shift from a pipeline visualization overlay into a fully self-contained ATS and recruiting CRM. TalentWall does not function as a standalone system of record — all Jobs, Candidates, and Stages originate in your connected ATS (Greenhouse, Lever, or Jobvite) and sync to TalentWall for visual management. Crelate combines applicant tracking, recruiting CRM, AI-assisted sourcing, and customizable workflows in one platform, eliminating the need for a separate overlay tool. We extract the canonical record set from the upstream ATS API and supplement it with a TalentWall-specific data pull to capture job health rankings, candidate freshness scores, and custom widget configurations that live only in TalentWall's own storage. Scorecard data that was entered directly into TalentWall rather than the ATS requires a separate audit before extraction. We do not migrate TalentWall's visualization settings, wall layouts, or any pipeline-configuration state; these are recreated manually in Crelate or documented for your admin to rebuild as custom fields and pipeline stages.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TalentWall logo

TalentWall

What's pushing teams away

  • Public pricing is not surfaced — quote-only model complicates budget evaluation.
  • Coverage is limited to a handful of supported ATSs (Greenhouse, Lever, Jobvite primarily) — teams on other ATSs can't use TalentWall at all.
  • All ATS-side data lives in the upstream system — when TalentWall is removed, custom widgets, job-health rankings and freshness scores are lost unless explicitly exported.
  • AS a thin visualisation layer, TalentWall doesn't replace any core ATS functionality, so customers paying for both eventually evaluate whether their ATS's native dashboards have caught up.
  • Brand confusion with similarly named recruiting/HR tools; ensure the customer is on TalentWall.io specifically before scoping.

Choosing

Crelate logo

Crelate

What's pulling them in

  • Affordable per-seat pricing with transparent tiers makes Crelate accessible for small-to-mid staffing firms evaluating ATS platforms for the first time.
  • Fast implementation reported by customers—some describe getting live in a matter of minutes with support team assistance.
  • Unified ATS + CRM in a single product eliminates the need to buy and synchronize separate recruiting and sales tools.
  • Flexible custom fields across Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities allow recruiting teams to capture firm-specific data without developer involvement.
  • Positive reviews highlight the product's intuitive interface and functional breadth for teams that need recruiting workflows without enterprise overhead.

Object mapping

How TalentWall objects map to Crelate

Each row shows how a TalentWall object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TalentWall

Job

maps to

Crelate

Job

1:1
Fully supported

Jobs originate in the connected ATS (Greenhouse, Lever, or Jobvite) and sync to TalentWall as the pipeline visualization frame. We extract Jobs directly from the upstream ATS API using the ATS's native endpoints rather than TalentWall, since the ATS holds the canonical job record. We pull job title, department, location, open date, close date, hiring manager, and job description. In Crelate, the Job maps to the Crelate Job object with status, assigned recruiter, and custom properties populated from the ATS export. If TalentWall carries job health rankings (Red/Yellow/Green) for an open role, we extract those from TalentWall's storage and write them as custom fields on the corresponding Crelate Job record.

TalentWall

Candidate

maps to

Crelate

Person (Candidate)

1:1
Fully supported

Candidates are surfaced on TalentWall as interactive pipeline cards but their canonical record lives in the upstream ATS. We extract all candidate data from the ATS API — name, email, phone, current company, current title, application date, source, and pipeline stage — and map it to the Crelate Person object. Crelate unifies candidate and contact records under the Person model, which eliminates the separate company-and-candidate object split that some ATS platforms require. Historical stage assignments and movement timestamps transfer to Crelate's activity timeline as StageHistory entries.

TalentWall

Pipeline Stage

maps to

Crelate

Pipeline Stage

lossy
Fully supported

Stage names and ordering are defined per job in the upstream ATS and reflected as columns on TalentWall's visual wall. We pull stage definitions from the ATS job configuration, not from TalentWall's visual layout. Crelate uses a pipeline-and-stage model that maps directly: each upstream ATS pipeline becomes a Crelate Pipeline, and each stage within it becomes a Crelate Stage with its sequence order preserved. If the customer used TalentWall's custom widget library to display additional stage metadata (e.g., stage-specific notes or target days-in-stage), we capture that as stage-level custom fields in Crelate.

TalentWall

Custom Field (Job-level)

maps to

Crelate

Job Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

TalentWall allows custom widgets bound to job-level custom fields. These are TalentWall-native and not stored in the upstream ATS. We extract the job-level custom field definitions and values from TalentWall's storage (coordinating with TalentWall support for a full data export if no self-service mechanism exists) and map them to Crelate Job-level custom properties. We validate field scope at extraction time: a job-level TalentWall custom field must map to a job-level Crelate custom field, not an offer-level or candidate-level one, or the widget reference breaks silently in the destination.

TalentWall

Custom Field (Offer-level)

maps to

Crelate

Offer Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Offer-level custom fields in TalentWall track compensation details, start date contingencies, and offer letter metadata specific to an individual offer on a job. We extract these as key-value pairs from TalentWall's storage and map them to Crelate Offer-level custom properties. If Crelate does not have a dedicated Offer object in the customer's tier, offer-level custom fields map to the Candidate custom properties or as linked records. We flag this scope constraint during discovery so the mapping decision is made before data transformation begins.

TalentWall

Custom Widget

maps to

Crelate

Custom Field + Widget Metadata

lossy
Fully supported

TalentWall's custom widget library maps visual widgets (kanban cards, summary tiles, pipeline metrics) to underlying custom fields. The widget-to-field binding lives in TalentWall. We extract the widget configuration and the field it references, then recreate the equivalent in Crelate: custom field for the data, and stage layout configuration for the visual representation. TalentWall's widget layout state (card positioning, column width, collapsed sections) has no Crelate equivalent and is not migrated — we document the widget inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Crelate's pipeline configuration UI.

TalentWall

Job Health Ranking

maps to

Crelate

Job Custom Field (health status)

1:1
Fully supported

Job health (Red/Yellow/Green status with associated notes) is a TalentWall-computed or recruiter-entered annotation that lives exclusively in TalentWall's database and is not written back to the ATS. We extract this data during the TalentWall-specific extraction phase, pairing each ranking with the corresponding job ID from the ATS. We write the health status as a custom picklist field on the Crelate Job record and the health notes as a custom text area field. If no job health annotation exists in TalentWall for a given role, no value is written.

TalentWall

Candidate Freshness Data

maps to

Crelate

Person Custom Field (freshness indicator)

1:1
Mapping required

Candidate freshness — a TalentWall-computed or recruiter-entered metric reflecting last activity and pipeline position — is TalentWall-specific and not stored in the upstream ATS. We extract freshness scores and associated timestamps from TalentWall's storage and write them as custom numeric or picklist fields on the Crelate Person record. Freshness is used by recruiters for prioritization; Crelate's Activity Last Touched date and custom date fields provide an equivalent signal once the migration is complete, but the original TalentWall freshness value is preserved for historical continuity during the transition period.

TalentWall

Interview

maps to

Crelate

Activity (interview event)

1:1
Fully supported

Interview scheduling data shown in TalentWall's calendar view originates from the ATS calendar integration. We extract interview records (scheduled time, interviewer, interview type, location or meeting link, candidate reference, and job reference) from the upstream ATS API, which is the authoritative source. We map these to Crelate Activity records of type Interview with the scheduled date, assigned recruiter, and candidate link preserved. Interview scorecards that live in TalentWall rather than the ATS require the separate TalentWall extraction audit step; if found in TalentWall, they migrate as evaluation custom fields on the Crelate Activity record.

TalentWall

Scorecard / Evaluation

maps to

Crelate

Activity Custom Field or Candidate Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Interview scorecards may be entered directly into TalentWall by some teams rather than into the ATS, depending on workflow. We audit both TalentWall and the connected ATS during discovery to determine where the authoritative evaluation record lives. If scorecards are in TalentWall, we extract them from TalentWall's storage and write them to Crelate as custom fields on the Activity record (for interviewer-specific evaluations) or as Candidate-level custom properties (for aggregate scoring). If scorecards are in the ATS, we pull from the ATS export. This dual-audit step prevents silent data loss on evaluations that recruiters rely on for hiring decisions.

TalentWall

Attachment / Resume

maps to

Crelate

Document

1:1
Fully supported

Resumes and attachments are stored in the ATS as the system of record. We export all file attachments from the ATS file storage — typically via the ATS's document download endpoints or bulk export — and deliver them as a structured file package indexed by candidate ID and file type. Files are ingested into Crelate's document storage and linked to the corresponding Person record. File naming conventions from the ATS are preserved to simplify reconciliation.

TalentWall

Tag / Label

maps to

Crelate

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Recruiters may apply tags or pipeline labels directly on TalentWall cards that are not mirrored back to the ATS. We extract TalentWall-native tags and map them to Crelate Tags on the corresponding Person record. Tags used for candidate segmentation in TalentWall map to Crelate Tags which support filtering and bulk operations. If a tag in TalentWall represents a pipeline-stage-specific flag rather than a global candidate label, we document it for the customer to either create as a stage-level custom field in Crelate or fold into the existing Tags model.

TalentWall

Owner / Recruiter

maps to

Crelate

User

1:1
Fully supported

TalentWall surfaces owner assignments from the upstream ATS. We extract distinct owner records from the ATS export and match by email against the Crelate destination's User table. Any TalentWall owner without a matching Crelate User is held in a reconciliation queue, and the customer's admin provisions the missing user before the production migration phase begins. Owner assignments on Jobs, Candidates, and Activities resolve via the User ID once provisioning is complete.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TalentWall logo

TalentWall gotchas

High

TalentWall-native annotations are not in the ATS

Medium

Scorecard data may reside in TalentWall or the ATS

Medium

Custom fields have job-level vs. offer-level scoping

High

No publicly documented API for programmatic migration

Crelate logo

Crelate gotchas

High

120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations

High

20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions

Medium

15,000-record export ceiling on single operations

Medium

Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate

Low

API key is a querystring parameter, not a header

Pair-specific challenges

  • TalentWall has no public API — extraction requires two-source coordination

    TalentWall does not publish a public REST API with documented endpoints for programmatic data extraction. All integrations referenced in the research are ATS-side API connections that TalentWall initiates to read the upstream ATS. This means migration cannot be performed against TalentWall alone. We default to the connected ATS as the primary data source for Jobs, Candidates, Interviews, and Attachments, and coordinate directly with TalentWall support to retrieve a full snapshot of TalentWall-native data (health rankings, freshness scores, custom widget configurations, and any scorecards entered in TalentWall rather than the ATS). If a customer cannot obtain a TalentWall data export, we flag the scope reduction and document what TalentWall-native data will not migrate before any extraction begins.

  • TalentWall-native annotations (health, freshness) are not in the ATS

    Job health rankings (Red/Yellow/Green), candidate freshness scores, and custom widget-to-field bindings live exclusively in TalentWall's own storage — they are not written back to the connected ATS. A standard ATS export will not include these annotations. We explicitly scope the extraction to include TalentWall's own database for these objects. If the customer's instance does not expose a self-service data export mechanism, we coordinate with TalentWall support to retrieve a full snapshot before cutting over. Without this step, the migration proceeds without the TalentWall-specific enrichment data, and the customer loses visibility into which roles were flagged as at-risk or which candidates needed prioritization.

  • Scorecard data residency must be audited before extraction

    Some teams enter interview scorecards directly into TalentWall rather than the upstream ATS, depending on their internal workflow. This creates ambiguity at migration time about which system holds the authoritative evaluation record. We audit both systems during the discovery phase: if TalentWall holds scorecard data not present in the ATS, we flag it for extraction from TalentWall; if the ATS is the source of truth, we pull from there. Migrations that skip this dual-audit step silently lose evaluation records, leaving hiring managers without the historical scoring data they rely on for decisions.

  • Job-level vs. offer-level custom field scope must be validated

    TalentWall's custom widget library tracks widgets against either a job-level custom field or an offer-level custom field, which are separate namespaces. When mapping custom fields to Crelate, we validate the field scope during discovery: a job-level custom field in TalentWall must map to a job-level custom property in Crelate, and offer-level must map to offer-level or candidate-level. Mixing scopes causes the widget reference to target a non-existent field and fail silently. We generate a scope-validation report before transformation begins so this class of mapping error is caught in discovery rather than after records land in Crelate.

  • Migration scope directly affects timeline and cost

    Crelate's professional services documentation notes that the more data retained during migration, the longer the timeline and the higher the cost. TalentWall's split storage model means customers often underestimate how much data lives in TalentWall versus the ATS. We scope each migration by asking the customer to confirm which TalentWall-native data (health rankings, freshness scores, tags, custom widgets, scorecards) they want to retain. Retaining all TalentWall enrichment requires the two-source extraction, which adds time compared to an ATS-only migration. We document the scope trade-offs explicitly before extraction begins so the customer can make an informed decision.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TalentWall to Crelate data migration

  1. Discovery and upstream ATS identification

    We begin by confirming which upstream ATS is connected to TalentWall (Greenhouse, Lever, Jobvite, or another supported platform) and obtain the ATS credentials needed for API access. We audit the TalentWall instance for any TalentWall-native data objects — job health rankings, candidate freshness scores, custom widget configurations, and scorecards — and assess whether the customer has self-service export access or requires TalentWall support to produce a snapshot. The discovery output is a written scope document specifying which records migrate from the ATS, which migrate from TalentWall, and which require manual handoff or are scoped out of the migration entirely.

  2. Dual-source data extraction

    We run the primary extraction from the upstream ATS API — pulling Jobs, Candidates, Pipeline Stage definitions, Interviews, Attachments, and Owner records — using the ATS's native endpoints with pagination and rate-limit handling. In parallel or as a separate coordinated step, we extract TalentWall-native data (health rankings, freshness scores, custom field definitions, widget configurations, and any scorecards confirmed as TalentWall-resident during audit) from the TalentWall data snapshot provided by the customer or arranged with TalentWall support. The two extracts are stored separately and reconciled by job ID and candidate email before transformation.

  3. Mapping design and Crelate schema configuration

    We design the field mapping for every ATS object to its Crelate equivalent, including pipeline and stage configuration (each upstream ATS pipeline becomes a Crelate Pipeline with corresponding Stages), custom field creation in Crelate for TalentWall-native job-level and offer-level fields, and health ranking and freshness score fields on Job and Person records. We create Crelate Users for any Owner records matched by email and flag any owners that cannot be resolved for admin provisioning. If scorecard data resides in TalentWall, we design the mapping to Activity or Candidate custom fields in Crelate based on the audit findings.

  4. Test migration and reconciliation

    We run a full test migration into a Crelate sandbox or staging environment using production-like data volume. The customer's recruiting operations lead reviews the migrated records against the source data — spot-checking job health rankings, candidate freshness scores, custom field values, stage assignments, and interview records. We reconcile record counts across both extraction sources and correct any mapping errors before the production migration begins. Any scorecard or annotation data found to be missing triggers a supplemental extraction from the alternate source.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run the production migration in dependency order: Crelate Users (if manually provisioned owners are confirmed), Jobs (with health ranking custom fields populated), Pipelines and Stages (configured before candidate import), Persons/Candidates (with freshness and tag fields populated), Activities/Interviews (with scorecard data on Activity records where applicable), and Attachments (linked to Person records). TalentWall-native data (health rankings, freshness scores, custom widget metadata) lands as supplemental custom field writes after the primary record import. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, verification, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze writes in TalentWall and the connected ATS during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records created or modified during the migration window, then enable Crelate as the system of record. We perform a final reconciliation pass comparing record counts and spot-checking 25-50 records across Jobs, Candidates, and Activities. We deliver a written inventory of TalentWall's custom widget configurations and visualization layout state for the customer's admin to rebuild in Crelate's pipeline configuration UI. We do not migrate TalentWall's wall layouts, kanban column preferences, or visualization state as these are recreated manually in Crelate. Workflows, automation rules, and any TalentWall scheduling or sequence features do not migrate; we deliver a written map of any workflow-like behaviors detected for admin documentation.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TalentWall logo

TalentWall

Source

Strengths

  • Real-time bidirectional sync with Greenhouse, Lever, Jobvite, and other major ATS platforms
  • Kanban-style drag-and-drop candidate management on an intuitive visual Wall
  • Built-in job health tracking with Red/Yellow/Green status per open role
  • Candidate freshness indicators showing which candidates need prioritization
  • Hiring analytics dashboards with visualizations for time-to-hire and pipeline health

Weaknesses

  • Does not function as a standalone ATS — requires an active upstream ATS integration
  • Core feature set rated lower (4.3/5) than ease-of-use and customer service scores on Capterra
  • TalentWall-native data (freshness, health, custom widgets) not stored in the ATS and requires separate extraction
  • Public API documentation not readily accessible for programmatic extraction
  • Limited to teams already invested in a supported ATS with which TalentWall can integrate
Crelate logo

Crelate

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM in a single platform reduces data synchronization overhead for recruiting teams.
  • Fast setup with guided implementation reported as a significant time saver for small teams.
  • Transparent per-seat pricing without surprise fees at the base tier.
  • Flexible custom field configuration across core objects without developer dependency.
  • Export capability supports up to 15,000 records per operation for Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limit of 120 requests per minute restricts bulk migration throughput.
  • Custom field cap of 20 per entity requires field consolidation for complex recruiting schemas.
  • All advanced features (Activities, Activity Forms, Core Record Field customization) are tier-gated add-ons.
  • Customer service responsiveness receives consistent negative feedback in reviews.
  • Resume parsing quality trails competitors and generates support requests.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TalentWall and Crelate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TalentWall: Not publicly documented — TalentWall is constrained by the upstream ATS's API rate limits rather than its own published quota.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    TalentWall doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your TalentWall to Crelate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TalentWall to Crelate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TalentWall to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TalentWall to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and eight weeks for accounts under 15,000 active Candidates and 500 open Jobs with a straightforward Greenhouse or Lever source. Migrations with large engagement histories, TalentWall-native scorecard data held outside the ATS, multiple pipeline configurations, or a Jobvite source requiring non-standard API extraction move to ten to sixteen weeks because of the dual-extraction requirement, TalentWall support coordination for data snapshots, and stage configuration scope. The timeline includes discovery, dual-source extraction, mapping design, test migration with reconciliation, and production cutover.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TalentWall.
Land in Crelate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day