HRMS migration

Migrate from StaffingSoft to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between StaffingSoft and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

StaffingSoft logo

StaffingSoft

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between StaffingSoft and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

StaffingSoft and Bullhorn both manage the staffing-agency lifecycle from candidate intake through placement, but their data models diverge in ways that make a scripted one-to-one import fail without careful design. StaffingSoft treats Assignments as the central entity linking a Candidate to a Job Order with bill rate, pay rate, and assignment dates; Bullhorn separates Placements (the placed record) from the Job Order and Candidate relationship with timekeeping and payroll fields stored on the Placement object. We resolve that structural difference at migration time by mapping StaffingSoft assignment records to Bullhorn Placements while preserving the Candidate-to-JobOrder link. StaffingSoft has no documented public API, so migrations require manual export or direct database access, which we coordinate with the customer's IT team. Custom workflow automation, job board cross-posting credentials, and report definitions do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

StaffingSoft logo

StaffingSoft

What's pushing teams away

  • Dated interface — reviewers explicitly note the visual design 'looks like it hasn't changed much since the early 2000s,' pushing modernization-focused buyers toward newer ATS competitors (Bullhorn, JobAdder, Recruit CRM).
  • Lacks pre-hire candidate assessment and workflow automation features that competing ATS platforms include, prompting teams needing automated screening to migrate.
  • Reporting interface limited in customization and visualization, with reviewers requesting more flexible BI capabilities.
  • Steeper learning curve due to feature depth combined with dated UX, slowing onboarding for new staff members.
  • Smaller fit for very small staffing firms — scalability and comprehensive toolset push it toward mid-to-large firms, leaving cost-conscious small agencies looking elsewhere.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How StaffingSoft objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a StaffingSoft object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

StaffingSoft

Candidate

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft candidate records (name, contact details, employment history, skills, status) map directly to Bullhorn Candidate. StaffingSoft's multi-state location fields map to Bullhorn Candidate address fields and a custom CandidateState__c field if the deployment requires region-level segmentation. Resume files export as binary from StaffingSoft's document module and re-attach to Bullhorn Candidate as file entities. Any StaffingSoft candidate status value (active, passive, placed, archived) maps to the corresponding Bullhorn Candidate status with a migration audit flag preserved in a custom field ss_original_status__c.

StaffingSoft

Job Order

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft job postings (title, requirements, qualifications, opening dates, pipeline stages) map to Bullhorn JobOrder. StaffingSoft's per-job-order stage configuration maps to Bullhorn's JobOrder stage values, with a custom field ss_original_stage__c holding the StaffingSoft stage name for reconciliation. JobOrder type (direct hire, contract, temp-to-perm) maps to Bullhorn JobOrder employmentType and a custom JobOrderType__c field. Any StaffingSoft job order with multiple assigned recruiters maps to Bullhorn JobOrder users via a JobSubmission or JobOrderUserAssociation record created at migration time.

StaffingSoft

Assignment

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Placement

1:1
Fully supported

The StaffingSoft Assignment is the core entity linking Candidate to Job Order with bill rate, pay rate, start date, and end date. Bullhorn's Placement object serves the same linking function with fields for billRate, payRate, dateBegin, and dateEnd. We map each StaffingSoft Assignment to a Bullhorn Placement, setting the CandidateID and JobOrderID references and preserving the bill-to-client and pay-to-candidate rates as Placement properties. Any assignment-level custom fields map to Bullhorn Placement custom fields, subject to the Bullhorn edition's custom object limits. Placement status (active, completed, terminated) migrates from StaffingSoft assignment status.

StaffingSoft

Client

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation and ClientContact

1:many
Fully supported

StaffingSoft client records contain both company information (name, address, billing preferences) and primary contact details. We split this into Bullhorn ClientCorporation (the employing organization or client company) and ClientContact (the hiring manager or client-side recruiter). StaffingSoft's client billing preferences map to Bullhorn ClientCorporation fields. Multiple StaffingSoft client contacts map to separate ClientContact records linked to the ClientCorporation.

StaffingSoft

User / Recruiter

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft user accounts (recruiter name, email, team structure, permission roles) map to Bullhorn User records. We resolve StaffingSoft owner IDs referenced on candidate, job order, and assignment records to corresponding Bullhorn User IDs by email match. Any StaffingSoft owner without a matching Bullhorn User is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import proceeds, because OwnerId references are required on most Bullhorn standard objects.

StaffingSoft

Pipeline Stage

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder Stage

lossy
Fully supported

StaffingSoft pipeline stages are configurable per job order or globally. We export the stage names and ordering and configure Bullhorn JobOrder stages to match. Custom stage-specific automation (which StaffingSoft allows per-stage) does not migrate; we document the stage transition matrix as a written handoff so the customer's Bullhorn admin can rebuild any required workflow logic in Bullhorn.

StaffingSoft

Resume / Document

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate File Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft resume files stored in its document management module export as binary files. We re-attach each file to the corresponding Bullhorn Candidate record. File naming conventions vary across StaffingSoft deployments, so we audit the file-to-candidate linkage during discovery and create a mapping table before migration. PDF and Word resume content does not parse into Bullhorn custom fields unless the customer licenses Bullhorn's Resume Parser or Textkernel integration separately.

StaffingSoft

Interview Notes and Ratings

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Note and Task (interview)

1:1
Mapping required

StaffingSoft interview feedback, scorecards, and scheduling notes are stored as activities against the candidate record. We extract the content and attach it to Bullhorn Candidate as Note records or Task records with a TaskSubtype of Meeting, depending on the StaffingSoft activity type. Rating scores migrate to a custom CandidateRating__c field if the rating scale maps cleanly; otherwise the scorecard content migrates as a Note.

StaffingSoft

Custom Field (Candidates, Job Orders, Assignments)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields and Custom Objects

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft custom fields on candidates, job orders, and assignments require field-level mapping during scoping. Text, number, date, and dropdown field types map to Bullhorn equivalents. Bullhorn edition limits apply: ATS Growth allows no custom objects, ATS Standard allows two, and Front Office Growth and Enterprise allow ten with up to 55 fields each. We pre-create the destination schema before data import, deploying custom fields and custom objects via Bullhorn's API or admin interface into a Sandbox first for validation. Any custom field that references a StaffingSoft ID as a lookup is resolved to the corresponding Bullhorn record ID at migration time.

StaffingSoft

Job Board Posting Configuration

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Job Board Site Credential Re-entry

lossy
Fully supported

StaffingSoft stores cross-posting site associations (Indeed, LinkedIn, ZipRecruiter) as properties on the job order. We export the posting URLs and dates as a written document, but the active posting credentials (username, password, API key per job board) do not export from StaffingSoft and must be re-entered in Bullhorn's job board integration settings. We flag this as a manual step in the handoff document and provide a per-job-board re-entry checklist.

StaffingSoft

Report Definition and Saved Filter

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Report Export and Rebuild

lossy
Fully supported

StaffingSoft report definitions and saved filters are not exportable as portable artifacts. We export report data as CSV where feasible before migration, but the report definition itself — including filter logic, grouping, and column ordering — must be rebuilt in Bullhorn. We deliver a written inventory of every StaffingSoft report with its data scope, filter criteria, and recommended Bullhorn Report equivalent.

StaffingSoft

Onboarding Record

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Onboarding Task

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft onboarding task checklists and document collection status transfer as candidate properties in Bullhorn. Any e-signature configuration or I-9 integration linked to onboarding does not migrate; we document these as reconfiguration tasks for the customer's Bullhorn admin to address post-migration. The onboarding task list itself migrates as Bullhorn Task records linked to the Candidate Placement.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

StaffingSoft logo

StaffingSoft gotchas

Medium

Dated UI requires extra training time and ongoing change-management

Medium

Limited workflow automation forces manual processes around the platform

Low

Reporting customization gaps require external BI

Low

Mid-to-large firm scale economics — small firms may overpay

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • StaffingSoft has no public API — data export requires IT involvement

    StaffingSoft does not publish a REST or Bulk API, which means migrations cannot use programmatic extraction like Bullhorn's documented REST API. FlitStack AI coordinates with the customer's IT team to obtain a direct database export or to validate manually exported CSVs for data completeness, field accuracy, and referential integrity before any Bullhorn import begins. This coordination step adds time to the discovery phase and can extend timelines if the database export requires database administrator availability or a vendor support request to StaffingSoft.

  • Bullhorn edition caps custom objects and custom fields by tier

    Bullhorn ATS Growth allows no custom objects, Bullhorn ATS Standard allows two custom objects, and Bullhorn Front Office Growth and Enterprise allow ten custom objects with 55 fields each. StaffingSoft's custom field model does not impose edition-gated limits in the same way. During scoping, we audit every StaffingSoft custom field to determine which map to Bullhorn standard fields, which fit within the permitted custom object count for the customer's Bullhorn edition, and which require the customer to upgrade Bullhorn tiers before migration proceeds.

  • Assignment-to-Placement link resolution requires parent-record ordering

    StaffingSoft assignments reference candidate and job order by internal ID. Bullhorn Placements reference CandidateID and JobOrderID by Bullhorn-assigned record IDs. We cannot insert Placement records until the corresponding Candidate and JobOrder records exist in Bullhorn with their final Bullhorn IDs. We sequence the migration: Candidates first, then JobOrders, then Assignments as Placements — with a mapping table correlating StaffingSoft IDs to Bullhorn IDs at each step. A single StaffingSoft assignment referencing a non-existent candidate or job order fails silently without this mapping table.

  • StaffingSoft bill-rate and pay-rate fields are entity-level, not field-level

    StaffingSoft stores bill rate and pay rate as properties on the Assignment entity itself, with the assignment serving as the central linking record. Bullhorn separates these: Placement holds the primary bill/pay fields, but for temp staffing workflows the pay and bill information may live in Bullhorn Time & Expense or a Bullhorn-native payroll module. We map the assignment-level rates directly to Placement billRate and payRate fields for straightforward migrations. If the customer's Bullhorn deployment includes Bullhorn Payroll or a third-party VMS integration, the placement rates may need to sync through that module rather than residing solely on the Placement record.

  • Workflow automation and job board credentials do not migrate

    StaffingSoft custom workflow automation (per-job-order stage triggers, assignment notifications, client follow-up actions) does not export as a portable artifact and must be rebuilt in Bullhorn. We deliver a written inventory of every StaffingSoft automation with its trigger, conditions, and recommended Bullhorn Automation equivalent, but we do not rebuild them as Bullhorn workflows inside the migration scope. Similarly, StaffingSoft job board cross-posting credentials (Indeed API key, LinkedIn Recruiter credentials, ZipRecruiter login) do not transfer. We export the posting history and URLs, but the customer re-enters credentials in Bullhorn's job board integration settings post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful StaffingSoft to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and export coordination

    We audit the StaffingSoft deployment for record counts (candidates, job orders, assignments, clients, users), custom field inventory, and any StaffingSoft-specific configurations. Because StaffingSoft lacks a public API, we coordinate with the customer's IT team to establish either a direct database export (preferred for large datasets) or a manual CSV export with a defined field layout. We also confirm the customer's Bullhorn edition (ATS Growth, ATS Standard, Front Office Growth, or Enterprise) because edition determines custom object limits that affect field mapping decisions.

  2. Field mapping and schema design

    We produce a field-level mapping document for every StaffingSoft standard and custom field, classifying each as 1:1 standard field, custom field, or custom object candidate. For Bullhorn editions with custom object limits, we resolve which StaffingSoft custom fields map to Bullhorn standard fields versus custom objects. We design the Bullhorn JobOrder stages to match StaffingSoft stage names, configure Placement object fields for bill rate and pay rate, and set up ClientCorporation and ClientContact hierarchies. The schema deploys into a Bullhorn Sandbox first for validation.

  3. Data extraction and reconciliation

    We extract StaffingSoft data via the coordinated export method (database dump or validated CSV). We reconcile record counts against the StaffingSoft source, check for orphaned records (assignments referencing non-existent candidates, job orders with no assignments), and flag any StaffingSoft IDs that lack a clear Bullhorn destination. Resume files export as binary attachments. Interview notes and rating data extract as structured records. Any export gaps are reported to the customer's IT team for re-extraction before migration proceeds.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into Bullhorn Sandbox using production-like data volume. The customer's Bullhorn admin reconciles record counts across all objects, spot-checks 25-50 candidate, job order, and assignment records against the StaffingSoft source, and validates that Placement bill rates and pay rates are correct. The admin also confirms that ClientCorporation and ClientContact hierarchy is intact. Any mapping corrections are made and re-validated in Sandbox before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: ClientCorporations first, ClientContacts next, then Candidates, then JobOrders, then Placements (StaffingSoft Assignments) last because they require both CandidateID and JobOrderID to be resolved. Resume files attach to the corresponding Bullhorn Candidate record after candidate insert. Interview notes and ratings attach as Note or Task records. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Owner (User) resolution runs in parallel, matching StaffingSoft owner IDs to Bullhorn User records by email.

  6. Cutover, delta migration, and workflow handoff

    We freeze StaffingSoft writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration, and enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver the workflow automation inventory, job board re-entry checklist, and report rebuild document to the customer's Bullhorn admin. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild StaffingSoft workflow automation as Bullhorn Automation inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

StaffingSoft logo

StaffingSoft

Source

Strengths

  • Comprehensive ATS covering the full recruiting lifecycle from application through onboarding
  • Dual-edition model separates corporate HR and staffing agency workflows natively
  • Multi-state and multi-location organization support built into the core data model
  • Strong customer service reputation with responsive issue resolution documented in reviews
  • Competitive pricing relative to enterprise ATS competitors with comparable feature depth

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented API means migrations require manual export or direct database access
  • Very small vendor footprint (5 employees, 10-person company) raises long-term viability concerns
  • Extremely limited recent review data — no verified reviews post-2015 makes current quality assessment difficult
  • Custom workflow automation does not export and must be rebuilt in the destination ATS
  • Pricing tiers and limits are not published, requiring direct sales inquiry
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across StaffingSoft and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    StaffingSoft: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    StaffingSoft doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your StaffingSoft to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about StaffingSoft to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during StaffingSoft to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your StaffingSoft to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for accounts under 15,000 candidates, 3,000 job orders, and 5,000 assignments with no custom objects and a StaffingSoft export that can be obtained without a vendor support request. Migrations requiring a StaffingSoft vendor-assisted database export, those with large assignment histories across multiple years, or those with extensive custom fields mapped to Bullhorn custom objects extend to eight to twelve weeks because of the export coordination phase and Bullhorn edition-based custom object planning.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from StaffingSoft.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day