HRMS migration

Migrate from StaffingSoft to Crelate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between StaffingSoft and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.

StaffingSoft logo

StaffingSoft

Source

Crelate

Destination

Crelate logo

Compatibility

83%

10 of 12

objects map 1:1 between StaffingSoft and Crelate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from StaffingSoft to Crelate is a structural migration from an assignment-centric entity model to a CRM-based ATS architecture. StaffingSoft treats the Assignment as the central entity linking a Candidate to a Job Order with bill rate, pay rate, start date, and end date; Crelate uses a CRM-oriented model where Candidates, Companies, and Job Orders are independent records with lookup relationships. We resolve that structural difference during scoping, map StaffingSoft assignments to Crelate Placements with all rate and date properties preserved, and maintain the Client-to-Company relationship through Crelate's Companies object. Activity history including interview notes, ratings, and scheduling records migrates as Crelate Activities linked to the parent Candidate. Since StaffingSoft has no documented public API, we work from direct database access or structured manual exports. Custom workflow automation, saved reports, and job-board cross-posting configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Crelate's workflow builder and reporting module.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

StaffingSoft logo

StaffingSoft

What's pushing teams away

  • Dated interface — reviewers explicitly note the visual design 'looks like it hasn't changed much since the early 2000s,' pushing modernization-focused buyers toward newer ATS competitors (Bullhorn, JobAdder, Recruit CRM).
  • Lacks pre-hire candidate assessment and workflow automation features that competing ATS platforms include, prompting teams needing automated screening to migrate.
  • Reporting interface limited in customization and visualization, with reviewers requesting more flexible BI capabilities.
  • Steeper learning curve due to feature depth combined with dated UX, slowing onboarding for new staff members.
  • Smaller fit for very small staffing firms — scalability and comprehensive toolset push it toward mid-to-large firms, leaving cost-conscious small agencies looking elsewhere.

Choosing

Crelate logo

Crelate

What's pulling them in

  • Affordable per-seat pricing with transparent tiers makes Crelate accessible for small-to-mid staffing firms evaluating ATS platforms for the first time.
  • Fast implementation reported by customers—some describe getting live in a matter of minutes with support team assistance.
  • Unified ATS + CRM in a single product eliminates the need to buy and synchronize separate recruiting and sales tools.
  • Flexible custom fields across Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities allow recruiting teams to capture firm-specific data without developer involvement.
  • Positive reviews highlight the product's intuitive interface and functional breadth for teams that need recruiting workflows without enterprise overhead.

Object mapping

How StaffingSoft objects map to Crelate

Each row shows how a StaffingSoft object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

StaffingSoft

Candidate

maps to

Crelate

Contact

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft Candidate records map to Crelate Contact. We preserve contact details, employment history, skills, and status as Crelate standard fields. StaffingSoft's custom candidate properties migrate to Crelate custom fields on Contact. Email serves as the primary dedupe key. Resume files export as document attachments and re-attach to the corresponding Crelate Contact record. StaffingSoft's candidate status pipeline stages map to Crelate's candidate workflow stages.

StaffingSoft

Job Order

maps to

Crelate

Job Order

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft Job Order records map to Crelate Job Order. We preserve requirements, qualifications, opening dates, and pipeline stage assignments. StaffingSoft's pipeline stages transfer to Crelate's job pipeline stages, but any custom stage-specific automation must be rebuilt in Crelate's workflow builder. Job Order owner maps to the corresponding Crelate User by email match.

StaffingSoft

Assignment

maps to

Crelate

Placement

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft Assignment is the core entity linking a Candidate to a Job Order with bill rate, pay rate, start date, and end date. Crelate uses a Placement record type to represent the same concept. We preserve bill_rate and pay_rate as typed Crelate fields on the Placement, map the assignment start/end dates, and resolve the StaffingSoft Candidate-to-Crelate Contact and Job-Order-to-Job-Order lookup at migration time. Placement status (active, completed, terminated) migrates as the Crelate Placement status.

StaffingSoft

Client

maps to

Crelate

Company

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft Client records map to Crelate Company. We preserve company name, contact information, address, and billing preferences. In StaffingSoft's HR edition, the Client object functions as the employing organization; we map this to the Crelate Company that represents the hiring client for each Job Order. Company serves as the parent record for Job Orders in Crelate's data model.

StaffingSoft

Resume and Document

maps to

Crelate

Contact Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Resume files stored in StaffingSoft's document management module export as binary files and re-attach to the corresponding Crelate Contact record. File naming conventions vary by export method; we standardize to a [CandidateID]_[DocumentType].[ext] format. StaffingSoft supports multiple document types per candidate; each migrates as a separate Crelate document attachment.

StaffingSoft

User and Recruiter

maps to

Crelate

User

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft User accounts including recruiter assignments, team structures, and permission roles export cleanly. We map owner IDs to corresponding Crelate Users by email match. Any StaffingSoft User without a matching Crelate User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer to provision before record import completes. Team structures and role hierarchies migrate as Crelate team configurations.

StaffingSoft

Pipeline Stage

maps to

Crelate

Job Pipeline Stage

lossy
Fully supported

StaffingSoft pipeline stages are configurable per job order or globally. Stage names and order transfer to Crelate's job pipeline configuration. Custom stage-specific automation, if any, must be rebuilt in Crelate's workflow builder. Stage-specific custom fields require field-level mapping during migration scoping.

StaffingSoft

Custom Field

maps to

Crelate

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

StaffingSoft custom fields on Candidates, Job Orders, and Assignments require field-level mapping. Field types (text, dropdown, date, numeric) are preserved and mapped to equivalent Crelate custom field types. StaffingSoft ID references embedded in custom field values must be resolved to corresponding Crelate record IDs during transformation. Custom field configurations are documented in the field mapping deliverable.

StaffingSoft

Interview Notes and Ratings

maps to

Crelate

Activity

1:1
Mapping required

StaffingSoft interview feedback, scorecards, and scheduling notes store as activities against the Candidate record. We extract the content and attach it as Crelate Activity records linked to the corresponding Contact. Rating scores migrate as custom numeric fields on the Activity. Interview scheduling details (date, time, interviewer name) preserve on the Activity.

StaffingSoft

Job Board Posting History

maps to

Crelate

Job Distribution Configuration

1:1
Fully supported

Cross-posting configuration to external job boards stores as site associations on the StaffingSoft Job Order. We export the posting URLs and posting dates as Crelate Job Distribution records. Active posting credentials (Indeed, Dice, CareerBuilder, Monster) must be re-entered in Crelate's job distribution settings post-migration because credentials do not export from StaffingSoft. Posting history is informational in Crelate.

StaffingSoft

Onboarding Record

maps to

Crelate

Candidate Properties

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft onboarding task checklists and document collection status transfer as Crelate Contact custom fields and task lists. Any e-signature or I-9 integration configurations must be reconfigured in Crelate. Onboarding status (documents received, background check pending, etc.) migrates as a Contact property with a status dropdown.

StaffingSoft

Report

maps to

Crelate

Report

1:1
Fully supported

StaffingSoft custom report definitions and saved filters are not exportable as portable artifacts. We recommend exporting report data as CSV before migration and rebuilding reports in Crelate's Advanced Reports and Analytics module (available on Business plan). Report rebuilding is outside standard migration scope; we deliver a written list of source reports requiring rebuild.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

StaffingSoft logo

StaffingSoft gotchas

Medium

Dated UI requires extra training time and ongoing change-management

Medium

Limited workflow automation forces manual processes around the platform

Low

Reporting customization gaps require external BI

Low

Mid-to-large firm scale economics — small firms may overpay

Crelate logo

Crelate gotchas

High

120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations

High

20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions

Medium

15,000-record export ceiling on single operations

Medium

Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate

Low

API key is a querystring parameter, not a header

Pair-specific challenges

  • StaffingSoft has no documented public API

    StaffingSoft does not expose a documented REST or Bulk API for automated data export. Migrations depend on structured manual exports from the StaffingSoft admin interface or direct database access granted by the customer. Manual export formats vary by StaffingSoft version and configuration, which requires pre-migration scoping to confirm the available export format and field coverage. We cannot apply API-based import strategies that work on other ATS platforms; the export method constrains the migration timeline and increases pre-scoping effort.

  • Assignment entity must split into Contact, Job Order, and Placement

    StaffingSoft's assignment-centric model treats the Assignment as the central entity with bill rate, pay rate, start date, and end date linking a Candidate to a Job Order. Crelate uses a CRM-based model where Candidates map to Contacts, Job Orders remain as Job Orders, and Placements represent the placement separately. The StaffingSoft assignment cannot migrate as a single record; it must decompose into three Crelate records with lookups resolved at migration time. We pre-map the StaffingSoft assignment record ID to Crelate Contact ID and Job Order ID before placement records are created to avoid orphaned relationships.

  • Custom workflow automation does not migrate

    StaffingSoft custom workflow automation, including stage-based triggers and action configurations, does not export as a portable artifact. Crelate workflow automation (available on Business Plus and Enterprise plans) must be rebuilt from scratch by the customer's admin. We deliver a written inventory of every active StaffingSoft workflow with its trigger conditions, actions, and recommended Crelate workflow equivalent during migration handoff. Automations involving custom fields require those fields to be mapped first, which we complete before the workflow inventory is delivered.

  • Bill rate and pay rate fields require type mapping

    StaffingSoft stores bill rate and pay rate as properties on the Assignment object. Crelate Placement records have dedicated rate fields, but the field type (currency, decimal, with or without formatting) must be confirmed during scoping. Rates may be stored in StaffingSoft with different decimal precision or currency formatting depending on the export method. We validate rate field types against the StaffingSoft export, map to the appropriate Crelate Placement field type, and flag any currency conversion requirements if the customer's billing operates across multiple currencies.

  • Job board credentials must be re-entered in Crelate

    StaffingSoft's cross-posting configuration to external job boards (Indeed, Dice, CareerBuilder, Monster) stores posting URLs and dates but not active posting credentials. We export the posting history as reference data in Crelate, but the customer must re-enter their job board API credentials and re-activate postings in Crelate's job distribution module post-migration. This is a manual post-migration task that typically takes 30-60 minutes per job board and is documented in the migration handoff checklist.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful StaffingSoft to Crelate data migration

  1. Export method confirmation and data audit

    We confirm the available StaffingSoft export method with the customer's admin: manual export from the StaffingSoft admin interface (CSV or structured file) or direct database access. We audit the StaffingSoft database or export file for record counts across all objects (Candidates, Job Orders, Assignments, Clients, Users), identify custom field configurations, confirm resume and document file locations, and review pipeline stage definitions. This scoping call produces a written data inventory and export method recommendation. StaffingSoft's lack of a public API means the export method is the primary constraint on migration timeline and cost.

  2. Crelate instance provisioning and schema design

    The customer provisions a Crelate Business or Business Plus instance before migration begins. We design the Crelate schema including custom fields mapped to every StaffingSoft custom field (with type mapping confirmed from the export audit), pipeline stage configuration mapped from StaffingSoft pipeline definitions, user roles matched to StaffingSoft recruiter and admin roles, and Company records created in advance for all StaffingSoft Clients so that Job Order imports have a valid parent Company reference.

  3. Test migration and reconciliation

    We run a test migration using a representative sample (typically 10-15% of total record volume) into a Crelate sandbox or parallel environment. The customer reconciles test records against the StaffingSoft source: record counts per object, field-level accuracy on 25-50 spot-checked records, placement rate and date accuracy, and document attachment presence. Any mapping corrections are documented and applied before production migration begins. The test migration also surfaces any StaffingSoft data quality issues (duplicate records, missing required fields, inconsistent date formats) that need customer approval before production load.

  4. Assignment decomposition and placement reconstruction

    We run a pre-processing step to decompose every StaffingSoft Assignment into three records: a Crelate Contact (mapped from the Assignment's Candidate reference), a Crelate Job Order (mapped from the Assignment's Job Order reference), and a Crelate Placement record linking them with bill_rate, pay_rate, start_date, end_date, and placement_status. We resolve StaffingSoft Candidate IDs to Crelate Contact IDs and StaffingSoft Job Order IDs to Crelate Job Order IDs during this step using the ID mapping table built from the contact and job order migrations.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (validated against Crelate User provisioning), Companies (from StaffingSoft Clients), Job Orders (with CompanyId resolved), Contacts (with owner UserId resolved), Placements (with ContactId and JobOrderId resolved from the decomposition step), Activities (interview notes, ratings from StaffingSoft), and Documents (resumes attached to Contacts). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Resume file migration runs as a parallel stream to avoid blocking record migration.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff

    We freeze StaffingSoft writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then mark Crelate as the system of record. We deliver the workflow inventory document (every StaffingSoft automation requiring rebuild in Crelate's workflow builder), the report rebuild list, and the job board credential re-entry checklist. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild StaffingSoft workflows as Crelate automations within standard migration scope; that work is documented for the customer's admin or a separate Crelate implementation engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

StaffingSoft logo

StaffingSoft

Source

Strengths

  • Comprehensive ATS covering the full recruiting lifecycle from application through onboarding
  • Dual-edition model separates corporate HR and staffing agency workflows natively
  • Multi-state and multi-location organization support built into the core data model
  • Strong customer service reputation with responsive issue resolution documented in reviews
  • Competitive pricing relative to enterprise ATS competitors with comparable feature depth

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented API means migrations require manual export or direct database access
  • Very small vendor footprint (5 employees, 10-person company) raises long-term viability concerns
  • Extremely limited recent review data — no verified reviews post-2015 makes current quality assessment difficult
  • Custom workflow automation does not export and must be rebuilt in the destination ATS
  • Pricing tiers and limits are not published, requiring direct sales inquiry
Crelate logo

Crelate

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM in a single platform reduces data synchronization overhead for recruiting teams.
  • Fast setup with guided implementation reported as a significant time saver for small teams.
  • Transparent per-seat pricing without surprise fees at the base tier.
  • Flexible custom field configuration across core objects without developer dependency.
  • Export capability supports up to 15,000 records per operation for Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limit of 120 requests per minute restricts bulk migration throughput.
  • Custom field cap of 20 per entity requires field consolidation for complex recruiting schemas.
  • All advanced features (Activities, Activity Forms, Core Record Field customization) are tier-gated add-ons.
  • Customer service responsiveness receives consistent negative feedback in reviews.
  • Resume parsing quality trails competitors and generates support requests.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across StaffingSoft and Crelate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    StaffingSoft: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    StaffingSoft doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your StaffingSoft to Crelate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about StaffingSoft to Crelate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during StaffingSoft to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your StaffingSoft to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 10,000 Candidates and 3,000 Job Orders with a straightforward export method. StaffingSoft's lack of a public API means migrations depend on manual export or database access, which adds one to two weeks of scoping and export preparation compared to API-first platforms. Migrations with large assignment histories (over 5,000 placements), dual-edition deployments, or complex custom field configurations move to eight to twelve weeks because of export method constraints and placement decomposition overhead.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from StaffingSoft.
Land in Crelate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day