HRMS migration

Migrate from Cavu HCM to Crelate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Cavu HCM and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.

Cavu HCM logo

Cavu HCM

Source

Crelate

Destination

Crelate logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Cavu HCM and Crelate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Cavu HCM to Crelate is a cross-category migration: Cavu HCM is a full payroll and HR suite built around employment records, benefits enrollments, PTO accruals, and tax withholdings, while Crelate is a recruiting ATS built around People, Organizations, and Job records. There is no direct field-level correspondence between the two platforms. We handle this by extracting Cavu's structured employment data through its Employer on Demand portal, transforming each record type to a Crelate-compatible format, creating destination custom fields for payroll, benefits, PTO, and tax data that have no native Crelate equivalent, and loading via Crelate's REST API with batch chunking at 60 requests per minute. Deduplication is required because Cavu maintains separate employer, employee, time supervisor, and HR self-service portals that create duplicate employee records. We do not migrate Cavu workflows, HR sequences, or payroll automations; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Crelate's workflow model.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Cavu HCM logo

Cavu HCM

What's pushing teams away

  • No public API means any migration requires manual export from the Employer on Demand portal, making bulk data extraction slow and error-prone for mid-sized workforces.
  • Occasional payroll issues including double payments and technical errors erode trust among bookkeepers and HR administrators managing high-volume payrolls.
  • Transition to IRIS Software Group following the 2023 acquisition created uncertainty about product roadmap, support tiers, and future pricing for existing customers.
  • Resource intensity complaints appear in reviews — some customers report the platform is heavier than expected for smaller teams with straightforward payroll needs.
  • Third-party integration information is not publicly disclosed, making it difficult for customers to assess compatibility with existing tool stacks before committing.

Choosing

Crelate logo

Crelate

What's pulling them in

  • Affordable per-seat pricing with transparent tiers makes Crelate accessible for small-to-mid staffing firms evaluating ATS platforms for the first time.
  • Fast implementation reported by customers—some describe getting live in a matter of minutes with support team assistance.
  • Unified ATS + CRM in a single product eliminates the need to buy and synchronize separate recruiting and sales tools.
  • Flexible custom fields across Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities allow recruiting teams to capture firm-specific data without developer involvement.
  • Positive reviews highlight the product's intuitive interface and functional breadth for teams that need recruiting workflows without enterprise overhead.

Object mapping

How Cavu HCM objects map to Crelate

Each row shows how a Cavu HCM object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Cavu HCM

Employee

maps to

Crelate

Person

1:1
Fully supported

Cavu HCM employee records export from the Employer on Demand portal with name, address, job title, department, hire date, and compensation fields. We map these to Crelate Person records, using email as the primary deduplication key. Because Cavu maintains separate portal logins for employer and employee views, a single individual may appear in multiple portal exports; we run email-based deduplication before insert and flag any records with identical names but different SSNs for the customer's HR administrator to resolve.

Cavu HCM

Company (Employer)

maps to

Crelate

Organization

1:1
Fully supported

The Cavu HCM employer entity maps directly to a Crelate Organization record. The organization's legal name, address, and business type export cleanly from the portal and load as a single Organization record in Crelate. We use the employer legal name as the Organization Name and preserve the full postal address in Crelate's address fields.

Cavu HCM

Applicant Profile

maps to

Crelate

Job + Activity

1:1
Fully supported

Cavu HCM's talent management module stores applicant data including application status, screening results, and onboarding task completion. We migrate the most recent application per candidate into Crelate's Job record with the application status preserved as a custom field and the pipeline stage mapped to a Crelate Job status. Screening results and onboarding task completion migrate as Activity records linked to the Job, maintaining the candidate's progression history.

Cavu HCM

Documents

maps to

Crelate

Person → Custom Fields + Attachments

1:1
Mapping required

Cavu employee documents including new hire forms, tax withholdings, and performance reviews are extracted as files and attached to the corresponding Crelate Person record. We retain folder structure metadata in custom fields on the Person record so the customer's recruiters can locate documents without manual re-filing. Any compliance-required documents are noted in the migration inventory for the customer's admin to verify completeness post-load.

Cavu HCM

Time Entries

maps to

Crelate

Person → Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Time and attendance records export from Cavu's time-tracking module as clock-in and clock-out events. We map these to custom fields on the Crelate Person record, preserving the most recent entry's hours and overtime flags. We flag any entries that were edited or approved after the fact in a separate custom field to preserve audit context for the customer's payroll administrator.

Cavu HCM

Benefits Enrollments

maps to

Crelate

Person → Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Benefit elections including health, dental, vision, and 401k with effective dates are stored as custom fields on the Crelate Person record. We sequence elections chronologically to show the active coverage state at migration time. Crelate's ATS model does not represent benefit enrollment as a structured object, so historical enrollment details are preserved as structured text fields rather than a native data type; the customer's HR administrator reviews the custom field contents for completeness.

Cavu HCM

PTO Balances

maps to

Crelate

Person → Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

PTO accrual balances and usage history per employee are extracted as structured custom fields on the Crelate Person record. Multiple leave types including vacation, sick, and personal with accrual rules that vary by employee class are preserved in custom fields as references for the customer's HR administrator. We do not create a native leave management workflow in Crelate since Crelate is a recruiting ATS and does not have a PTO management module.

Cavu HCM

Payroll Records

maps to

Crelate

Person → Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Historical payroll data including earnings, deductions, taxes, and direct deposit details are preserved in a structured summary as custom fields on the Crelate Person record. Garnishment orders and Workers' Comp rates require separate extraction and are stored as structured text custom fields for the customer's finance team reconciliation. We do not recreate a payroll processing workflow in Crelate; the payroll summary is provided for record continuity only.

Cavu HCM

Pay Schedules

maps to

Crelate

Configuration → Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Pay schedule configuration including weekly, bi-weekly, semi-monthly, and monthly frequencies along with GL mapping export cleanly and are stored as structured fields on the Crelate Organization record. Crelate does not have a native pay schedule object; the configuration is preserved as reference data for the customer's finance team.

Cavu HCM

Tax Configurations

maps to

Crelate

Person → Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Federal, state, and local tax withholding setups including LDG assignments for multi-state employers are stored as structured custom fields on the Crelate Person record. Field-level mapping handles Cavu's internal tax jurisdiction codes by creating a corresponding picklist or text custom field in Crelate for each tax configuration type. Multi-state employers with complex LDG assignments may require additional custom field creation time during schema design.

Cavu HCM

Scheduled Shifts

maps to

Crelate

Person → Custom Fields + Activity

1:1
Mapping required

Workforce scheduling data including shift records with employee assignment, start and end times, and location are extracted as structured records. We map these to a combination of custom fields on the Crelate Person record (for current shift patterns) and Activity records (for historical shift entries), preserving the temporal history. Recurring schedule templates are extracted separately and provided as a written inventory for the customer's admin to reconstitute as Crelate Workflows if applicable.

Cavu HCM

Companies (Client Accounts)

maps to

Crelate

Organization

1:1
Fully supported

Cavu HCM employer-level company data (distinct from the employer entity) representing client businesses or divisions within the organization map to Crelate Organization records. We map company name, industry, address, and any client-specific custom fields to the corresponding Organization fields. Parent-child company hierarchies in Cavu are preserved as Organization hierarchy custom fields in Crelate.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Cavu HCM logo

Cavu HCM gotchas

High

No public API means migrations rely on manual portal exports

Medium

Dual login portals fragment employee and employer data access

Medium

IRIS Software Group acquisition may alter support tiers

Low

Per-employee tier pricing inflates at 50-employee threshold

Crelate logo

Crelate gotchas

High

120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations

High

20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions

Medium

15,000-record export ceiling on single operations

Medium

Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate

Low

API key is a querystring parameter, not a header

Pair-specific challenges

  • Cavu HCM has no API — all extraction is manual portal work

    Cavu HCM does not expose a documented REST or bulk API for programmatic data extraction. Every data type — employee records, payroll summaries, benefits enrollments, PTO balances, tax configurations, time entries, and documents — requires manual navigation and download from the Employer on Demand portal. Portal sessions impose row-level download limits and session timeouts on large workforces. We handle this by chunking exports into sequential portal sessions, stitching the results, and flagging any export failures that require re-authentication and re-downloading specific data sets. This extends migration timelines compared to API-based migrations and adds risk of export errors on workforces over 200 employees.

  • Cavu's multi-portal architecture creates duplicate employee records

    Cavu HCM maintains separate login portals for employers (employeronthego.com), employees (my.employeronthego.com), time supervisors (cavu.payrollservers.us), and HR self-service (selfservice.employerondemand.com). When migrating, we must pull from multiple portal exports to assemble a complete employee record. Records appearing in multiple portals with identical names but different internal IDs require email-based or SSN-based deduplication before loading into Crelate's Contact/Company model. Missing or duplicate records between portals are flagged during our reconciliation phase and resolved with the customer's HR administrator before insert. This step can add one to three weeks for mid-sized workforces with high portal overlap.

  • Payroll, benefits, and PTO data have no native Crelate object

    Cavu HCM's structured HR data — payroll records, benefits enrollments, PTO balances, garnishment orders, and tax withholding configurations — has no direct equivalent in Crelate's ATS data model. Crelate is built for candidate tracking and recruiting workflows, not HR payroll management. We preserve this data as Crelate custom fields on the Person record, but it does not render as a native structured object and cannot trigger Crelate workflows. The customer's HR administrator reviews the custom field contents for completeness after migration; any payroll-specific compliance documents (garnishment orders, tax jurisdiction assignments) are inventoried separately for manual verification.

  • Crelate field mappings apply to custom forms, not cross-system migration

    Crelate's field mapping feature, documented in the Crelate Help Center, copies answers from custom form fields to columns within Contact, Company, or Opportunity records. This feature supports in-app form-to-record data flow after migration, not the cross-system field mapping performed during migration. Cavu custom fields for payroll, benefits, and PTO must be pre-created as Crelate custom fields (via Settings, Core Records) before migration data loads, not mapped through the form field mapping interface. Crelate supports text, numeric, monetary, picklist, and date custom field types, but the customer must define the schema first; we create these as part of the migration schema design step.

  • Crelate API rate limit of 60 RPM constrains batch load speed

    Crelate's API supports a documented rate limit of 60 requests per minute. For migrations with over 1,000 records across People, Organizations, Jobs, and Activities, we implement batch chunking with 1-second delays between individual API calls and exponential backoff on 429 responses. This keeps the load within Crelate's limits without triggering temporary IP blocks. While 60 RPM is sufficient for mid-sized recruiting databases, it extends the load phase for migrations with large historical Activity records.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Cavu HCM to Crelate data migration

  1. Discovery and portal audit

    We audit every Cavu HCM portal from which data must be extracted: the Employer on Demand employer portal, the employee self-service portal, the time supervisor portal, and the HR self-service portal. We inventory the record types available in each portal, estimate row counts for each data type (employees, payroll summaries, benefits enrollments, PTO balances, tax configurations, time entries, documents, applicant profiles, scheduled shifts), identify portal-specific export limitations and session timeout thresholds, and assess the deduplication complexity based on employee overlap across portals. The discovery output is a written migration scope, an export schedule for sequential portal sessions, and a deduplication strategy document.

  2. Crelate schema design and custom field creation

    We design the destination Crelate schema to accommodate Cavu HCM data that has no native Crelate equivalent. This includes creating custom fields on the Person record for payroll summaries, benefits enrollment elections, PTO accrual balances, tax withholding configurations, time entry summaries, and document folder references. We create custom fields on the Organization record for pay schedule configuration and GL mapping. We configure picklist values for benefits types (health, dental, vision, 401k), leave types (vacation, sick, personal), and tax jurisdiction types. Crelate's Logical Name field on each custom field is set during creation for API reference during the load phase. Schema is deployed into the customer's Crelate environment before any data load begins.

  3. Sequential portal extraction and deduplication

    We extract data from Cavu HCM portals in sequential sessions to stay within portal row-level download limits and session timeouts. Each portal export produces a CSV file for each data type. We run deduplication across portal exports using email address as the primary key and SSN as the secondary key for records with matching names but different portal IDs. Duplicates are merged with a full-field reconciliation rule that selects the most recently updated field value from any portal for each non-key field. Deduplication output is reviewed by the customer's HR administrator before transformation begins.

  4. Sandbox test migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Crelate test environment using production-like data volume. We validate that each Crelate Person record contains the correct Cavu employment data, that custom fields are populated with structured payroll, benefits, and PTO data, that document attachments are linked to the correct Person record, and that no records are dropped during deduplication. The customer's HR administrator spot-checks 25-50 random Person records against the Cavu source data and signs off the mapping before production migration begins. Any custom field type corrections or missing data flags happen in this step, not in production.

  5. Production migration with API batch loading

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Organizations (from Cavu employer and company records), Persons (with deduplication applied), Jobs (from Cavu applicant profiles), Activities (from Cavu onboarding tasks and shift records), and document attachments. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We load via Crelate's REST API at 60 RPM with batch chunking and exponential backoff on 429 rate-limit responses. Any records rejected by Crelate's validation rules are logged, corrected, and retried in the following batch. A delta migration captures any Cavu records modified during the production migration window before cutover.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze Cavu HCM writes during cutover, run a final delta migration, validate the loaded Crelate record counts against the Cavu export totals, and confirm with the customer's HR and recruiting administrators that Person records contain expected employment data. We deliver a written inventory of every Cavu HR workflow and payroll automation, mapped to recommended Crelate Workflow equivalents where applicable. We do not rebuild Cavu workflows as Crelate Workflows inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any record linkage issues or missing custom field data raised by the customer's team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Cavu HCM logo

Cavu HCM

Source

Strengths

  • Unified payroll, HR, talent, and workforce management in a single platform reduces context-switching for administrators.
  • Dedicated payroll guide model provides a named human contact for troubleshooting beyond chatbots or ticket queues.
  • Strong compliance coverage including ACA, garnishment administration, and labor law poster compliance for multi-state employers.
  • Earned wage access via ZayZoon integration and employment verification via The Work Number are included at no additional cost.
  • Mobile access for both employees and managers enables remote scheduling, time entry, and self-service tasks.

Weaknesses

  • No public API documented anywhere in the platform's external communications — all data movement requires manual export or custom integration work.
  • Limited third-party integration disclosures make pre-purchase compatibility assessment difficult for customers with existing ERP or HRIS stacks.
  • Acquisition by IRIS Software Group (2023) creates uncertainty about long-term product continuity and support structure for legacy Cavu customers.
  • Resource intensity reported by small-business reviewers — the platform's full feature set may be overkill for teams under 20 employees.
  • Pricing tiers shift from weekly billing (small businesses) to per-employee monthly billing at 50+ users, which can surprise customers as they scale.
Crelate logo

Crelate

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM in a single platform reduces data synchronization overhead for recruiting teams.
  • Fast setup with guided implementation reported as a significant time saver for small teams.
  • Transparent per-seat pricing without surprise fees at the base tier.
  • Flexible custom field configuration across core objects without developer dependency.
  • Export capability supports up to 15,000 records per operation for Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limit of 120 requests per minute restricts bulk migration throughput.
  • Custom field cap of 20 per entity requires field consolidation for complex recruiting schemas.
  • All advanced features (Activities, Activity Forms, Core Record Field customization) are tier-gated add-ons.
  • Customer service responsiveness receives consistent negative feedback in reviews.
  • Resume parsing quality trails competitors and generates support requests.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Cavu HCM and Crelate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Cavu HCM: Not applicable — portal-only access. Manual exports are subject to UI row limits and session timeouts..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Cavu HCM doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Cavu HCM to Crelate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Cavu HCM to Crelate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Cavu HCM to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Cavu HCM to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and six weeks for accounts with under 200 employees, straightforward portal exports, and a clean deduplication outcome. Migrations with 200-500 employees, significant portal-duplicate records, multi-state tax configurations, large document repositories, or complex PTO accrual rules move to eight to twelve weeks because of sequential portal-export iteration time, deduplication overhead, and Crelate custom-field schema creation.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Cavu HCM.
Land in Crelate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day