Project Management migration

Migrate from Taiga to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Taiga and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Taiga logo

Taiga

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Taiga and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Taiga to Trello is a structural flattening migration. Taiga's hierarchical object model (Projects > Milestones > Epics > User Stories > Tasks) collapses into Trello's flat board-and-card model where there is no native sprint or epic object. We resolve this by mapping Taiga Milestones to Trello Lists (or a dedicated Labels column for sprint labels), Epics to a managed Label vocabulary, and User Stories and Tasks to Cards on the appropriate board. Custom attributes per artifact type in Taiga become Trello Custom Fields on cards. We do not migrate Taiga's wiki pages as code, nor do we migrate Taiga workflows or custom taiga-ui CSS overrides; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Trello or via Butler. Taiga has no native bulk export API, so all extraction relies on paginated REST calls at 30 records per page — we handle this loop explicitly to prevent silent truncation of large projects.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Taiga logo

Taiga

What's pushing teams away

  • The lack of a mature marketplace or plugin ecosystem means teams needing time tracking, resource management, or advanced reporting often outgrow Taiga and migrate to Jira or Linear.
  • Performance degrades noticeably on self-hosted instances with large projects, and the cloud-hosted option lacks enterprise-grade SLA guarantees and dedicated support tiers.
  • The API documentation is sparse and the record pagination limit of 30 per request makes automated migrations and integrations brittle without custom workaround code.
  • Teams needing native integration with CI/CD pipelines, feature flags, or customer success tooling find Taiga's ecosystem insufficient compared to platforms like Shortcut or Linear.
  • The roadmap cadence and community contribution model mean that bug fixes and feature requests move slowly, frustrating teams used to faster release cycles.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Taiga objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Taiga object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Taiga

Project

maps to

Trello

Workspace / Board

1:1
Fully supported

Taiga Projects map directly to Trello Boards. In Trello's Workspace model, each Board sits inside a Workspace. We create one Trello Workspace per Taiga Project or consolidate multiple Taiga projects into a single Workspace depending on the customer's board strategy. Project settings (description, color, membership) map to Board description and Workspace member invites.

Taiga

Milestone / Sprint

maps to

Trello

List

lossy
Fully supported

Taiga Milestones have start_date, end_date, and name. Trello has no native sprint object. We map each Taiga Milestone to a Trello List on the destination board, naming it with the milestone name and optionally adding the date range in the list header. For teams needing sprint reporting, we pre-create Custom Fields on the board (Sprint Start, Sprint End) and populate them per card.

Taiga

Epic

maps to

Trello

Label

lossy
Fully supported

Taiga Epics are top-level backlog items with status, color, and description that can contain multiple User Stories. Trello has no Epic object. We map each Taiga Epic to a Trello Label with a naming convention (e.g., [Epic] Feature Name) and assign that Label to all Cards derived from User Stories within that Epic. We document the Epic-Label mapping so the customer can maintain it as Labels are managed per board.

Taiga

User Story

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Taiga User Stories carry subject, description, status, points, assignee, milestone reference, and custom attributes. We map story points to a Trello Custom Field (Number: Points), status to the appropriate List on the destination board, and the milestone reference to the List name. Assignee becomes a Trello member assignment on the Card. Description migrates as card description with Markdown preserved.

Taiga

Task

maps to

Trello

Card or Checklist Item

lossy
Fully supported

Taiga Tasks belong to User Stories and have their own status, assignee, custom attributes, and due date. For smaller projects, Tasks map directly to Trello Cards on the same board as their parent User Story. For larger projects, we map Tasks to Checklist items on the parent User Story Card (using the 'move tasks to checklist' strategy) to reduce board clutter and preserve the parent-child relationship that flat Trello Cards cannot natively express.

Taiga

Issue

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Taiga Issues are standalone work items with type (bug, question, enhancement), severity, priority, status, and custom fields. We map Issue type to a Trello Label (Bug, Question, Enhancement), Issue severity and priority to Custom Fields (Select: Low/Medium/High) on the Card, and status to the appropriate List. Archived issues in Taiga become Archived Cards in Trello.

Taiga

Custom Attributes

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Taiga supports per-project custom attributes on User Stories, Tasks, and Issues with types including text, number, date, url, and enum (dropdown). We pre-create Trello Custom Fields on the destination board matching the custom attribute definitions, then populate them on each migrated Card. Enum attributes become Trello Select Custom Fields with the same options. If the same custom attribute is defined across multiple projects, we create it once per board and flag any project-specific variations.

Taiga

Project Members / Roles

maps to

Trello

Workspace Members

1:1
Mapping required

Taiga roles (Admin, Member, Viewer) per project map to Trello Workspace member roles. We resolve each Taiga user by email and invite them to the destination Trello Workspace with the closest available role. Trello's permission model (Workspace Admin, Workspace Member, Board Observer) requires a mapping decision during scoping: Taiga Admins become Workspace Admins, Members become Workspace Members, Viewers become Board Observers if the Enterprise tier is purchased or as a restricted Board Member otherwise.

Taiga

Wiki Pages

maps to

Trello

Card Description / Power-Up Docs

1:1
Mapping required

Taiga Wiki Pages are Markdown documents stored per project. Trello has no native wiki. We export the wiki page tree and convert each page's Markdown content into the description field of a dedicated Card (titled with the wiki page name) on the destination board. For teams with extensive wiki content, we recommend Trello's Docs Power-Up as a replacement and map the wiki hierarchy to a Docs folder structure. Links between wiki pages do not automatically re-link in Trello and require manual review.

Taiga

Tags / Labels

maps to

Trello

Labels

1:1
Mapping required

Taiga free-form tags on User Stories, Tasks, and Issues map directly to Trello Labels. We extract all tag strings, deduplicate them, and create matching Labels on the destination board. Where Taiga tags serve dual purposes (e.g., some tags represent Epics, others represent priority), we recommend splitting them during scoping: Epic tags become the dedicated Epic Label set (mapped in object #3), and remaining tags become standard Trello Labels.

Taiga

Attachments

maps to

Trello

Card Attachments

1:1
Mapping required

Taiga stores file attachments as media URL references on User Stories, Tasks, and Issues. We retrieve files from Taiga's media storage URL (cloud or self-hosted instance URL) and re-upload them as Card Attachments in Trello via the Trello API. File size and type limits in Trello (10MB on Free, unlimited on Standard+) apply. We flag any attachments exceeding Trello's per-plan size limit for manual handoff.

Taiga

Kanban Swimlanes

maps to

Trello

Board Structure

lossy
Fully supported

Taiga's Kanban mode supports swimlanes (horizontal lanes splitting rows) for WIP limits or team ownership. Trello does not have native swimlanes. We map swimlane groups to a Trello Board strategy: either as a separate Board per swimlane (preferred for WIP-limit enforcement) or as a Label per swimlane on a single Board (preferred for visibility). The customer chooses during scoping, and we document the mapping decision in the migration spec.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Taiga logo

Taiga gotchas

High

REST API hard-codes 30 records per page

High

Import only accepts Trello, Jira, Asana, and GitHub

Medium

Docker self-hosted v5 to v6 migration can lose data silently

Medium

Taiga export is instance-specific JSON, not portable CSV

Low

Custom CSS / taiga-ui v3 to v4 style overrides break after migration

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Taiga has no bulk export API — pagination at 30 records per request

    Taiga's REST API hard-codes a 30-record page limit that cannot be overridden. Community posts confirm this limit applies to all endpoints including user story, task, and issue listings. We handle this by implementing explicit cursor-based pagination that loops through pages until the API returns an empty result set, accumulating all records. Without this loop, exports of large Taiga projects silently truncate to the first 30 User Stories, Tasks, or Issues. We validate record counts against Taiga's JSON project dump after extraction and before loading into Trello to confirm completeness.

  • Trello has no native sprint or epic object — Milestones and Epics require structural decisions

    Taiga Milestones carry sprint start and end dates; Epics are top-level containers for User Stories. Trello has no equivalent object. We map Milestones to Lists (with date Custom Fields) and Epics to Labels, but these are best-effort structural approximations, not semantic equivalents. Teams relying on Taiga's sprint burndown, Epic velocity, or milestone completion percentage in reporting find that Trello cannot replicate these views without a third-party reporting Power-Up. We flag this gap during scoping and recommend the customer evaluate the Trello Dashboard Power-Up or a dedicated reporting tool post-migration.

  • Custom attribute schemas vary per Taiga project — Trello Custom Fields must be pre-created per board

    Taiga's custom attribute system is defined at the project level, meaning the same attribute (e.g., 'Customer ID') may exist in some projects but not others with different types or options. Trello Custom Fields are board-level and must be created before cards are imported. We audit all Taiga project custom attribute definitions during discovery, deduplicate across projects, create matching Custom Fields per destination Trello board, and apply them to migrated cards. Attributes that exist in Taiga but have no Trello equivalent (e.g., Taiga enum types with more than 25 options exceeding Trello's Select limit) are flagged for manual mapping.

  • Taiga Docker self-hosted export is not accessible via API for offline instances

    Taiga's export endpoint is only available via the web UI session, not via a dedicated API endpoint. For self-hosted Taiga instances without external API access or where the instance is behind a firewall, the export must be performed manually through the web interface and the JSON file shared to FlitStack AI. Taiga's community documentation confirms this limitation. We flag the self-hosted export requirement at project kickoff and provide step-by-step instructions for the export procedure, including the data verification checklist, to ensure the exported JSON is complete before we begin loading.

  • Trello Butler automations and Trello Gold features do not migrate — they must be rebuilt

    Teams that have built Butler rules in Trello before migration or who rely on Trello Gold features (board backgrounds, stickers, custom emojis) will find these intact in the destination Trello workspace if migrating from an existing Trello instance. For Taiga users moving to Trello fresh, Butler automation is not part of the migration. We document every Taiga workflow pattern (status triggers, assignment rules, due date alerts) as a written inventory with Butler equivalents so the customer's admin can rebuild them in Trello after cutover. We do not write Butler rules as part of the migration scope.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Taiga to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and export prep

    We audit the source Taiga instance: project count, artifact counts per type (Epics, User Stories, Tasks, Issues), Milestone list with dates, custom attribute definitions per project, tag vocabulary, and member roster. For self-hosted Taiga, we provide the export procedure (web UI JSON dump per project) with a data completeness checklist. For Taiga Cloud, we connect via the REST API with explicit 30-record pagination loops for each endpoint. The discovery output is a written migration scope including board structure decisions (swimlane mapping, Epic-Label convention) and a Trello Workspace/Board plan.

  2. Trello Workspace and Board scaffolding

    We create the destination Trello Workspace and Boards before any data loads. For each Taiga Project, we create a corresponding Trello Board. We pre-create Custom Fields on each board matching the Taiga custom attribute definitions discovered during audit. We create Labels using the Epic-Label naming convention. We create Lists using the Milestone names and dates. Workspace members are invited in batch using the member roster from Taiga. This scaffolding is validated by the customer's admin before artifact migration begins.

  3. Epic split and Label assignment

    We extract all Taiga Epics with their associated User Stories and compute the Label assignment per Card. Each Epic becomes a Trello Label with the [Epic] prefix convention, and we tag all Cards derived from User Stories within that Epic. The Epic-Card relationship is documented in a separate CSV inventory for the customer. Where a User Story belongs to multiple Epics in Taiga, we assign multiple Labels to the corresponding Card.

  4. Artifact migration in dependency order

    We migrate artifacts in dependency order: (1) Members invited to Workspace, (2) Labels created per Epic, (3) Lists created per Milestone, (4) Cards created from User Stories with subject, description, points, milestone List assignment, and Custom Fields populated, (5) Cards created from Issues with Labels for type, severity, priority, and Custom Fields, (6) Tasks migrated as Checklist items or child Cards per the customer's chosen strategy, (7) Attachments re-uploaded via Trello API, (8) Tags applied as remaining Labels. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report.

  5. Validation and swimlane verification

    We validate record counts: Cards created in Trello vs. User Stories plus Issues in Taiga. We spot-check 25-50 Cards for correct Custom Field population, Label assignment, member assignment, and list placement. For projects using Taiga Kanban swimlanes, we verify the swimlane-to-Board (or swimlane-to-Label) mapping is reflected correctly. We also verify archived Cards in Taiga are archived in Trello. Any discrepancies are corrected before cutover.

  6. Cutover, wiki handoff, and automation inventory

    We freeze Taiga writes during cutover, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then mark Trello as the system of record. We deliver the wiki page inventory (mapped to Card descriptions or Docs Power-Up folders) and the Butler automation inventory (Taiga workflow patterns with recommended Butler equivalents) to the customer's admin for manual rebuild. We support a three-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not write Butler rules or rebuild Trello Docs as part of the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Taiga logo

Taiga

Source

Strengths

  • Free and open-source under AGPL-3.0 with no per-seat licensing constraints on self-hosted deployments.
  • Native dual-mode support for both Scrum and Kanban in a single project without requiring a plugin.
  • Clean, minimal UI that is faster to onboard non-technical stakeholders compared to Jira.
  • Active community forum and documentation covering self-hosted Docker deployment and upgrades.
  • Built-in import pipeline for Trello, Jira, Asana, and GitHub as source platforms.

Weaknesses

  • No native bulk export API — all data retrieval goes through paginated REST calls with a low default page size.
  • Sparse third-party integrations and no Zapier/Make connector, limiting automated workflow options.
  • Custom attribute system varies per project, requiring field-level mapping work in any migration to a structured target.
  • No native time-tracking module — teams needing billable hours must use third-party tools or the wiki as a workaround.
  • Support on the free cloud tier is community-only, which can delay resolution of data-loss incidents during migration.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Taiga and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Taiga: Not publicly documented in official docs.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Taiga doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Taiga to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Taiga to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Taiga to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Taiga to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts under 5 projects and 2,000 artifacts with no custom attributes or swimlane structure. Migrations with 10+ projects, large artifact volumes (over 10,000 tasks and user stories), per-project custom attribute schemas, or a requirement to reconstruct Epic-to-Story relationships as Trello Labels move to five to nine weeks because of custom field pre-creation per board, Epic split logic, and swimlane reconstruction work.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Taiga.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day