HRMS migration

Migrate from Infor HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Infor HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Infor HCM logo

Infor HCM

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

69%

9 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Infor HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Infor HCM to Bullhorn is an unusual but well-supported migration path, most common when staffing or recruitment-focused organizations that onboarded Infor HCM for internal HR now want to consolidate onto Bullhorn's ATS and CRM platform built specifically for placement work. Infor HCM stores employee records with effective-dated history rows across dozens of tables, exports data through file-based IDM tools and CSV/Excel extracts rather than a public REST API, and supports user-defined fields (M3) or configurable fields (HCM) that must be explicitly mapped before load. We sequence exports by effective date, extract the full org chart hierarchy through parent-child traversal, and load records into Bullhorn's Candidate, Contact, Client Corporation, and Placement objects. Bullhorn's custom object limits differ by edition (10 in Growth/Enterprise ATS, 2 in standard ATS), which constrains how many Infor user-defined fields can migrate natively; fields exceeding the limit are flagged for Bullhorn admin to add post-load. Workflows, payroll calculation rules, accrual logic, and IDM document version history do not migrate; we deliver written inventories for the customer's admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Infor HCM logo

Infor HCM

What's pushing teams away

  • Customers report that the user interface feels dated and that navigating between modules requires more clicks than modern SaaS alternatives, reducing day-to-day efficiency for HR teams.
  • Hidden post-signing costs in the form of setup fees, premium support tiers, and consulting charges surprise organizations that expected transparent per-user pricing.
  • The breadth of the platform creates significant complexity; organizations with simpler HR needs find they are paying for functionality they do not use, and the system is harder to configure than expected.
  • Performance degrades when working with large datasets in Infor LN and related modules, frustrating users who need to run reports or exports against substantial employee populations.
  • Organizations moving to cloud-native HCM platforms like Workday or Dayforce report that the migration itself is difficult due to Infor's non-standard data model and limited public API access.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Infor HCM objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Infor HCM object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Infor HCM

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Infor HCM Employee records map to Bullhorn Candidate. Core biographical fields (legal name, date of birth, address, contact details, employment status) migrate directly. Infor's effective-dated job-title and manager-assignment rows extract as a dated history; the latest active row drives the primary Candidate record, and prior rows load into a Bullhorn Custom Object (e.g., customObject1s) as a job history timeline to preserve the full record. Employee type (full-time, contractor, temporary) maps to Bullhorn employmentType with a custom source_hcm_employee_type__c field retained for audit.

Infor HCM

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientContact (internal employee)

1:1
Fully supported

Infor HCM employee records for the customer's own internal staff (not contractors being placed) map to Bullhorn ClientContact records representing the agency's internal employees using Bullhorn. This distinction is determined during scoping based on the customer's use case; the same Infor employee table may yield both Candidate and ClientContact records depending on whether the individual is a contractor being placed or an internal staffer.

Infor HCM

Organization / Department

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Category or ClientCorporation

lossy
Fully supported

Infor HCM org structures are hierarchical trees with cost center and location associations. Bullhorn does not have a native internal org chart object. We reconstruct the org tree by mapping each Infor org unit to a Bullhorn Category (for internal department classification) or a ClientCorporation record (if the org unit represents a client relationship). The parent-child hierarchy is preserved by storing the Infor parent_org_id as a custom field on each Category for post-migration admin reconstruction.

Infor HCM

Position

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:many
Fully supported

Infor HCM Positions define headcount slots with grade, department, and salary grade associations. When the customer uses Infor HCM to track open job reqs or req-linked positions, these map to Bullhorn JobOrder records representing open job orders to be filled. A single Infor Position can yield one JobOrder in Bullhorn. Position hierarchies (reporting lines encoded in position structures) are stored as custom fields on the JobOrder for admin to map to Bullhorn's reporting structure post-load.

Infor HCM

Compensation History

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Placement + customObject (compensation timeline)

1:many
Mapping required

Infor HCM compensation history (salary, bonus, equity entries with effective dates) extracts as a dated history table. We load the most recent compensation row as the primary pay rate on the Bullhorn Placement record (fields: payRate, billRate, OTMultiplier). Prior history rows load into a Bullhorn Custom Object (e.g., customObject2s) as a compensation timeline with effectiveDate, payType, and amount fields. Bullhorn's compensation timeline is flat per Placement rather than a full retroactive history table; the Custom Object preserves the audit trail within Bullhorn's limits.

Infor HCM

Benefits Enrollments

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

customObject

1:1
Mapping required

Infor HCM benefit plan enrollments and coverage tiers map to Bullhorn Custom Objects attached to the Candidate record. We extract plan name, enrollment date, coverage level (employee, employee-plus-spouse, family), and carrier. Bullhorn has no native benefits object, so plan identifiers and enrollment details live in the Custom Object. Benefit plan identifiers in Infor are customer-specific and must be mapped to the customer's post-migration benefits administration system by the admin.

Infor HCM

Time and Attendance / Accruals

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

customObject

1:1
Fully supported

Infor Workforce Management time entries, absence balances, and accrual calculations map to Bullhorn Custom Objects on the Candidate or ClientContact record. We extract current PTO/sick balances and leave histories as typed records (leaveType, balanceHours, asOfDate). Infor accrual calculation rules (accrual rates, carryover limits, vesting schedules) are calculation logic that does not migrate; we document the current rule set for the customer's HR admin to configure in their chosen benefits or payroll system post-migration.

Infor HCM

Performance Reviews / Goals

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

customObject

1:1
Mapping required

Infor Talent Management performance documents, goal alignments, and review ratings extract as flat records per completed review cycle. We map to Bullhorn Custom Objects (e.g., customObject3s) attached to the Candidate record with fields: reviewCycle, overallRating, competencyScores, goalStatus, and comments. Review template structures and competency framework definitions in Infor are configuration data that does not have a direct Bullhorn equivalent; we deliver a template inventory for the admin to rebuild in Bullhorn's goal-setting or a third-party performance tool.

Infor HCM

Talent Profiles / Skills / Certifications

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate (skills, certifications, credentials)

1:1
Fully supported

Infor Talent Science skills, certifications, and credential data link to employee records as tagged attributes. These migrate as Bullhorn Candidate skills, certifications, and credentials using Bullhorn's standard Candidate fields (skillIDs, certification, education). Infor skill taxonomy codes map to Bullhorn skill name strings with a source_taxonomy__c field retained for reference. Where the Infor taxonomy is more granular than Bullhorn's flat skill list allows, we map to the closest Bullhorn skill or store the original taxonomy code as a custom text field.

Infor HCM

User-Defined Fields (M3) / Configurable Fields (HCM)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

customObject fields

1:1
Fully supported

Infor M3 and HCM user-defined fields (alphanumeric, numeric, date, text) defined in CMS470 sessions are extracted as name-value pairs per record. Bullhorn editions limit Custom Objects to 10 (Growth/Enterprise ATS) or 2 (standard ATS), each with a maximum of 55 fields. During scoping, we inventory every Infor user-defined field per object, rank them by business criticality, and allocate high-priority fields to Bullhorn customObject slots. Fields exceeding the allocation are flagged in a written supplement for Bullhorn admin to add via Bullhorn Support tickets post-load. Fields are type-mapped: Infor date UDFs become Bullhorn date fields, numeric UDFs become Bullhorn float or integer fields, text UDFs become Bullhorn string fields.

Infor HCM

Documents (IDM)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ContentDocument (Bullhorn Files)

1:1
Fully supported

Infor Document Management (IDM) documents and SharePoint attachments (contracts, IDs, performance records) attached to employee records extract as binary files. We map them to Bullhorn's ContentDocument (Files) attached to the corresponding Candidate or ClientContact record via ContentDocumentLink. Bullhorn supports file upload via REST API, so documents attach to the correct parent record using the employee-to-candidate ID mapping. Document version history from IDM is excluded per Infor's standard export limitation; we flag this for compliance review.

Infor HCM

Payroll / GL Transactions (LN)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Placement (pay/bill rates) + external payroll system

lossy
Fully supported

Infor LN payroll journal entries and GL postings live in the financial module rather than HCM proper. We extract payroll register data (pay period, gross pay, deductions, net pay) via file export. Pay calculation rules, tax jurisdiction configurations, and GL account mappings are Infor LN configuration that does not migrate. We deliver a payroll register summary extract for the customer's new payroll administrator to set up in their chosen payroll system. Bullhorn does not include native payroll; the payroll system replacement is a separate evaluation.

Infor HCM

Worker (contractor / contingent worker)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate + Placement (active)

1:1
Fully supported

Infor HCM contractor and contingent worker records (if stored in the same employee table) map to Bullhorn Candidate records with the employmentType set to Contract. If the contractor has an active placement assignment in Infor HCM, that assignment maps to a Bullhorn Placement record with status, start date, end date, and bill/pay rates. Contractor skill classifications from Infor migrate as Candidate skills using the same taxonomy mapping as permanent employee skills.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Infor HCM logo

Infor HCM gotchas

Medium

IDM document export excludes version history

High

Non-public API requires file-based extraction

Medium

Hidden implementation and consulting costs inflate the real TCO

Medium

Effective-dated history requires sequenced loading

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Infor has no public API; file-based extraction requires sequencing and chunking

    Infor HCM does not expose a well-documented public REST or GraphQL API for bulk record extraction. Most data export relies on Infor's IDM tools, CSV/Excel exports from within the application UI, or direct database access in on-premise deployments. We schedule multiple targeted file exports, chunking large employee populations into separate export runs to avoid timeouts, and sequence files by effective date to preserve the history ordering that Bullhorn's Custom Object compensation timeline requires. On-premise LN customers may require database-level extracts under a read-only connection coordinated with the customer's IT team. This extraction overhead adds one to two weeks relative to API-first migrations and must be resolved before transformation begins.

  • Effective-dated history requires strict chronological loading or the timeline breaks

    Infor HCM stores employee changes (job title changes, compensation adjustments, manager reassignments) as effective-dated rows rather than overwriting the prior record, meaning a single employee can have dozens of historical rows. When loading into Bullhorn Custom Objects as a compensation or job-history timeline, we must extract the full history before any transformation and load in strict ascending effective-date order. Any out-of-order insert creates a misordered timeline in Bullhorn that misrepresents an employee's seniority. We validate the effective-date sequence during the transformation phase and reject any out-of-order rows before load.

  • Bullhorn's Custom Object limits constrain how many Infor UDFs migrate natively

    Infor M3 and HCM deployments routinely have dozens of user-defined fields per object (defined in CMS470 sessions). Bullhorn caps Custom Objects at 10 in Growth and Enterprise ATS editions and 2 in standard ATS, each with 55 field slots. A single Infor employee record with 40 user-defined fields may exceed what Bullhorn accommodates in native Custom Objects alone. We inventory every Infor UDF during scoping, rank by business criticality, allocate to Bullhorn Custom Objects within the edition limit, and flag the remainder in a written supplemental mapping that the customer's Bullhorn admin adds via Support tickets post-load. Fields not allocated to Custom Objects are lost without this explicit decision tree.

  • IDM document export excludes version history; compliance audit trails require supplemental extraction

    Infor Document Management's export tool exports only the current version of each document, not the full version history. Organizations relying on document audit trails for compliance will lose version history when using the standard IDM export. We flag this during scoping and recommend a supplemental document audit extraction if version history is a compliance requirement. For SharePoint-integrated environments, a separate limit of 5,000 documents per export run also applies. Bullhorn's file storage must be sized to accommodate the extracted documents, which we calculate during scoping.

  • Infor's org hierarchy does not map to a Bullhorn native object; admin rebuilds are required

    Infor HCM stores org structures as hierarchical trees with parent-child relationships, cost center associations, and location linkages. Bullhorn has no native internal organizational chart object; the org tree is reconstructed through Bullhorn Categories or ClientCorporation hierarchy with parent links stored in custom fields. We traverse the Infor org tree during extraction, reconstruct the parent-child relationships as custom fields on the destination records, and deliver an org chart map document for the customer's Bullhorn admin to configure in Bullhorn's taxonomy or entity structure. This is a structural gap between enterprise HR and recruitment-specific platforms that requires manual admin work post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Infor HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and extraction method determination

    We audit the Infor HCM deployment to identify the extraction method available: IDM tools, CSV/Excel exports from the application UI, or direct database access for on-premise LN deployments. We inventory employee record counts, effective-dated history row volumes, user-defined field counts per object, org chart depth, and any SharePoint document integration. We also identify the Bullhorn edition in use (standard ATS, Growth, or Enterprise) to determine Custom Object allocation headroom. The discovery output is a written extraction plan specifying file export schedules, chunking sizes, and the effective-date sequencing requirements for history tables.

  2. Custom Object allocation and schema design

    We design the Bullhorn destination schema based on the scoping inventory. This includes identifying which Bullhorn Custom Objects will carry compensation history (customObject1), benefits enrollments (customObject2), performance review data (customObject3), and remaining user-defined fields (customObject4+). We allocate fields within the 55-field limit per Custom Object, map Infor UDF data types to Bullhorn field types (date, float, string, integer), and reserve slots for any fields that exceed the allocation for post-load admin addition. Bullhorn Support tickets for Custom Object provisioning are submitted during this phase so the schema is ready before data loading begins.

  3. File-based extraction in effective-date sequence

    We coordinate the Infor file exports in strict effective-date order, scheduling chunked export runs for employee populations exceeding the per-run export limit. Each chunk is validated for completeness (record count, field coverage) before the next chunk is triggered. For on-premise LN deployments, we work with the customer's IT team to establish a read-only database connection for direct table extracts, which we run during off-peak hours to avoid impacting production system performance. Document extracts run in parallel with record extracts and are mapped to Bullhorn Candidate and ClientContact IDs after the primary record mapping is complete.

  4. Transformation and field mapping

    We transform Infor extracts into Bullhorn API-ready payloads. Employee records split into Candidate (for contractors and external candidates) and ClientContact (for internal staff) based on the employmentType determination made during scoping. Effective-dated history rows for each employee are sorted ascending by effective date and loaded as Custom Object records attached to the parent Candidate or ClientContact. Infor skill taxonomy codes are mapped to Bullhorn skill name strings. Org chart parent-child relationships are flattened into custom fields on Bullhorn Category or ClientCorporation records. User-defined fields are distributed across allocated Custom Objects per the schema design.

  5. Staged load with reconciliation

    We load records into Bullhorn in dependency order: Custom Object schema first (so destination fields exist), then Candidates and ClientContacts (the parent records), then Custom Object history rows attached to those parents, then Documents attached via Bullhorn's REST file upload. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report showing records loaded, records skipped (duplicates), and records rejected with error reasons. Bullhorn API rate limits are managed with exponential backoff and batch chunking. Owner resolution matches Infor employee managers to Bullhorn User records by email lookup; unmatched owners are flagged in a reconciliation queue for the Bullhorn admin to resolve before production cutover.

  6. Cutover, validation, and admin handoff

    We freeze Infor HCM writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of every Infor workflow, payroll calculation rule, accrual configuration, and document version history that does not migrate, with Bullhorn-replacement guidance for each item. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve data quality issues raised by the Bullhorn admin team. Workflow rebuild, payroll system selection, and accrual rule reconfiguration are outside standard migration scope and are flagged as separate engagement items.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Infor HCM logo

Infor HCM

Source

Strengths

  • Pre-built industry-specific compliance templates for manufacturing, healthcare, and hospitality reduce configuration work for vertical customers.
  • Multi-jurisdiction payroll engine handles statutory deductions and reporting requirements across many countries from a single platform.
  • Tight ERP integration with Infor LN means HR and financial data share the same database, reducing reconciliation friction for organizations already on Infor.
  • AI-powered tools for resume screening, candidate matching, and engagement analytics are built into the talent management suite.
  • Position management with headcount budgeting and hierarchical approval workflows support organizations with structured workforce planning needs.

Weaknesses

  • Non-transparent pricing with module-level, contract-length, and jurisdiction-based variables creates budget uncertainty during procurement.
  • File-based export approach limits migration automation and requires manual extraction, transformation, and sequencing work for large employee populations.
  • The user interface is frequently described as dated and slower than modern SaaS alternatives, impacting HR team productivity in day-to-day use.
  • Performance degrades when querying large datasets, particularly in Infor LN, which creates bottlenecks during data extraction for migration projects.
  • Limited public API documentation makes it difficult to build automated migration pipelines; most data movement relies on IDM tools and CSV/Excel exports.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Infor HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Infor HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Infor HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Infor HCM: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Infor HCM doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Infor HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Infor HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Infor HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Infor HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for organizations with fewer than 2,000 employees, moderate effective-dated history (under 50,000 history rows), and fewer than 15 Infor user-defined fields. Migrations with large employee populations, hundreds of thousands of effective-dated history rows, or dozens of user-defined fields that must be allocated across Bullhorn Custom Objects move to eight to twelve weeks. The file-based extraction method in Infor (which has no public API) is the primary variable that extends timeline relative to API-first migrations.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Infor HCM.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day