Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Work as Team and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.
Work as Team
Source
Microsoft Project
Destination
Compatibility
5 of 10
objects map 1:1 between Work as Team and Microsoft Project.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Work as Team to Microsoft Project is a structural migration that requires flattening Work as Team's List-based hierarchy into Microsoft Project's task-and-summary-row model. Work as Team organizes work as Projects containing Lists containing Tasks; Microsoft Project organizes work as Projects containing Tasks with optional Summary Tasks that mirror a WBS structure. We resolve this schema difference during scoping, map each List to a Microsoft Project Summary Task grouping, and preserve Milestones and Time entries with their original dates and resource assignments. Client-facing portal data and per-task billing rates do not migrate because Microsoft Project does not include a native client portal or billing module. We flag Custom Fields and Team Member permissions at scoping so they land as Project-level or Task-level custom fields in the destination.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Work as Team object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Work as Team
Project
Microsoft Project
Project
1:1Work as Team Projects map directly to Microsoft Project files (MPP) or Project Online Project entities. Project name, description, start date, and deadline migrate as project-level metadata. We resolve the project status (active vs archived) and carry archived projects as separate inactive MPP files or Project Online projects with an Archived flag custom field.
Work as Team
List
Microsoft Project
Summary Task
1:manyWork as Team Lists do not have a direct Microsoft Project equivalent because Lists are a Work as Team-specific organizational container. We map each List to a Microsoft Project Summary Task row with the List name as the task name and indent all tasks from that List beneath it. If a Work as Team project has multiple Lists, this produces multiple Summary Task groupings in the destination project. List-level permissions do not migrate because Microsoft Project does not have a native per-task-group permission model.
Work as Team
Task
Microsoft Project
Task
1:1Work as Team Tasks map to Microsoft Project Task rows. Task name, description, due date, start date, and assignment migrate. We handle the indent level based on the parent List mapping (tasks inherit the Summary Task grouping from their source List). Task status (open, resolved, completed) maps to Microsoft Project PercentComplete or Status fields. Subtasks within a List become child tasks under the Summary Task with appropriate outline level.
Work as Team
Milestone
Microsoft Project
Task (Milestone flag)
1:1Work as Team Milestones map to Microsoft Project Task rows with Duration = 0 and Milestone = Yes. Milestone name, deadline date, and any associated description migrate. We verify that the milestone date lands on a working day or adjust per the project calendar during migration.
Work as Team
Time Entry
Microsoft Project
Task Assignment + Assignment Work field
1:manyWork as Team time entries link a team member to a task with hours logged and a date. In Microsoft Project, we create or link a Resource record for the team member, then add an Assignment to the related Task with the Work field set to the logged hours. We preserve the original date as an Assignment Start and Finish date. If multiple time entries exist for the same task-resource pair, we aggregate them into a single assignment record. Per-hour billing rates stored in Work as Team do not migrate because Microsoft Project does not support a native billing rate field on task assignments.
Work as Team
Team Member
Microsoft Project
Resource
1:1Work as Team team members map to Microsoft Project Resources. The resource name, email, and role migrate. We classify each resource as Material (for agency staff with hourly rates) or Work (for full-time contributors) based on the Work as Team billing configuration. Resource rates from Work as Team are stored as a custom field because Microsoft Project does not have a native billing rate field for material resources.
Work as Team
Task Assignment
Microsoft Project
Task Assignment
1:1Work as Team task assignments (person assigned to a task) map to Microsoft Project Task Assignments with the assigned resource linked and the assignment percent set to 100 if a single person or divided if multiple. The Work as Team estimated hours vs actual hours distinction maps to Task field Assignment Units vs actual work logged.
Work as Team
Custom Field
Microsoft Project
Custom Field (Organizer)
lossyWork as Team custom fields on tasks and projects migrate to Microsoft Project Custom Fields created via the Project Organizer. Text, number, date, and flag field types map directly. Dropdown or multi-select custom fields in Work as Team require a lookup table in Microsoft Project. We pre-create the destination custom fields before migration and flag any custom fields with no direct Microsoft Project type for customer decision during scoping.
Work as Team
File Attachment
Microsoft Project
Hyperlink or SharePoint Document Library
lossyWork as Team file attachments linked to tasks do not migrate as embedded objects in Microsoft Project MPP files. We extract the file URLs or download attachments during extraction, upload them to a SharePoint Document Library (or OneDrive if no SharePoint exists), and add a Hyperlink on the related Microsoft Project Task pointing to the document location. File version history does not migrate.
Work as Team
Client Portal
Microsoft Project
Not migrated
lossyWork as Team client portal data (client-facing project updates, client comments, client-only tasks) has no Microsoft Project equivalent. We extract client portal content during extraction and deliver it as a written inventory with file attachments so the customer's admin can configure a SharePoint site or Microsoft Teams channel as a replacement client communication space. This is not a data migration; it is a content handoff for manual rebuild.
| Work as Team | Microsoft Project | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| List | Summary Task1:many | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Milestone | Task (Milestone flag)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Task Assignment + Assignment Work field1:many | Fully supported | |
| Team Member | Resource1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task Assignment | Task Assignment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field (Organizer)lossy | Fully supported | |
| File Attachment | Hyperlink or SharePoint Document Librarylossy | Fully supported | |
| Client Portal | Not migratedlossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Work as Team gotchas
Task Lists are Teamwork-specific groupings
Client portal user access requires careful mapping
Time entries are tied to tasks and billing
Profitability and resource management data is tier-gated
Microsoft Project gotchas
Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner
Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling
Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client
Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365
Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and migration path decision
We audit the Work as Team source workspace across all active projects, archived projects, Lists, Tasks, Milestones, time entries, custom fields, team members, and client portal content. We pair this with a migration path decision: Microsoft Project desktop (MPP files), Project Online, or Planner Premium as the destination. If Project Online is the destination, we verify that the tenant was provisioned before the April 2026 new-instance creation block. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing record counts per object type and a destination path recommendation.
List-to-Summary-Task mapping design
We design the List-to-Summary-Task mapping for each Work as Team project during the scoping phase. For each project, we document which Lists become Summary Tasks, which tasks indent under each Summary Task, and any cross-List dependency links that require inter-task predecessor resolution. We also map Work as Team custom fields to Microsoft Project Custom Fields via the Organizer, confirming field types match before migration. The mapping document is reviewed and signed off by the customer's project manager before extraction begins.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Microsoft Project desktop environment or Project Online sandbox using a representative sample of projects. The customer reconciles task hierarchies (List groupings), Milestone dates, time entry aggregation, and resource assignment accuracy against the Work as Team source. Any mapping corrections to Summary Task indentation, predecessor links, or custom field types happen here before production migration. Milestone dates are spot-checked against Work as Team deadlines for date accuracy.
Resource and team member provisioning
We extract every distinct team member from Work as Team and create corresponding Resource records in Microsoft Project. Resources are classified as Work or Material based on the Work as Team billing configuration. If a Work as Team team member has no email address (a common gap in older Work as Team accounts), we use the team member name as the resource name and flag it for the customer to verify. Resource rates from Work as Team are stored in a custom field on each resource.
Production migration in project order
We run production migration in dependency order: Resources first (validated by customer admin), then Projects (one MPP per source project or one Project Online project per source), then Summary Tasks (from List names), then Tasks (nested under their Summary Task), then Milestones (zero-duration tasks with Milestone flag), then Time entries (converted to task assignments), then custom field values, then predecessor links, then file hyperlinks (pointing to SharePoint or OneDrive location). Each project emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next project begins.
Cutover, client portal handoff, and hypercare
We freeze Work as Team writes during cutover and run a final delta migration for any tasks or time entries modified during the migration window. We deliver the client portal content extraction as a structured CSV with file attachments for manual SharePoint or Teams rebuild. We support a five-business-day hypercare window where we resolve any task hierarchy errors, missing predecessor links, or resource assignment gaps reported by the customer's project team. We do not rebuild automations, templates, or client portal infrastructure as these are outside migration scope.
Platform deep dives
Work as Team
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Microsoft Project
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Work as Team and Microsoft Project.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Work as Team: Per-project and per-account limits documented in Teamwork's API docs; typically generous for normal usage but throttled on bulk operations..
Data volume sensitivity
Work as Team exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Work as Team to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Work as Team to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Work as Team
Other ways to arrive at Microsoft Project
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.