Project Management migration

Migrate from Work as Team to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Work as Team and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Work as Team logo

Work as Team

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

50%

5 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Work as Team and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Work as Team to Microsoft Project is a structural migration that requires flattening Work as Team's List-based hierarchy into Microsoft Project's task-and-summary-row model. Work as Team organizes work as Projects containing Lists containing Tasks; Microsoft Project organizes work as Projects containing Tasks with optional Summary Tasks that mirror a WBS structure. We resolve this schema difference during scoping, map each List to a Microsoft Project Summary Task grouping, and preserve Milestones and Time entries with their original dates and resource assignments. Client-facing portal data and per-task billing rates do not migrate because Microsoft Project does not include a native client portal or billing module. We flag Custom Fields and Team Member permissions at scoping so they land as Project-level or Task-level custom fields in the destination.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Work as Team logo

Work as Team

What's pushing teams away

  • List structure is Teamwork-specific and doesn't map 1:1 to standard PM tools, complicating migration to Asana, ClickUp, Monday, or Jira.
  • Per-user pricing scales steeply for large teams — Scale tier at $69.99/user/month is enterprise-grade pricing.
  • Engineering-team workflows lag specialist tools like Linear or Jira on Git integration, sprint velocity, and code-review hooks.
  • Real-time collaborative document editing is limited compared to integrated document platforms like Notion or Confluence.
  • Catalog name 'Work as Team' is ambiguous — confirm with the firm that they actually use Teamwork.com (the platform at teamwork.com) versus a similarly-named tool.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Work as Team objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Work as Team object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Work as Team

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team Projects map directly to Microsoft Project files (MPP) or Project Online Project entities. Project name, description, start date, and deadline migrate as project-level metadata. We resolve the project status (active vs archived) and carry archived projects as separate inactive MPP files or Project Online projects with an Archived flag custom field.

Work as Team

List

maps to

Microsoft Project

Summary Task

1:many
Fully supported

Work as Team Lists do not have a direct Microsoft Project equivalent because Lists are a Work as Team-specific organizational container. We map each List to a Microsoft Project Summary Task row with the List name as the task name and indent all tasks from that List beneath it. If a Work as Team project has multiple Lists, this produces multiple Summary Task groupings in the destination project. List-level permissions do not migrate because Microsoft Project does not have a native per-task-group permission model.

Work as Team

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team Tasks map to Microsoft Project Task rows. Task name, description, due date, start date, and assignment migrate. We handle the indent level based on the parent List mapping (tasks inherit the Summary Task grouping from their source List). Task status (open, resolved, completed) maps to Microsoft Project PercentComplete or Status fields. Subtasks within a List become child tasks under the Summary Task with appropriate outline level.

Work as Team

Milestone

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task (Milestone flag)

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team Milestones map to Microsoft Project Task rows with Duration = 0 and Milestone = Yes. Milestone name, deadline date, and any associated description migrate. We verify that the milestone date lands on a working day or adjust per the project calendar during migration.

Work as Team

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Assignment + Assignment Work field

1:many
Fully supported

Work as Team time entries link a team member to a task with hours logged and a date. In Microsoft Project, we create or link a Resource record for the team member, then add an Assignment to the related Task with the Work field set to the logged hours. We preserve the original date as an Assignment Start and Finish date. If multiple time entries exist for the same task-resource pair, we aggregate them into a single assignment record. Per-hour billing rates stored in Work as Team do not migrate because Microsoft Project does not support a native billing rate field on task assignments.

Work as Team

Team Member

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team team members map to Microsoft Project Resources. The resource name, email, and role migrate. We classify each resource as Material (for agency staff with hourly rates) or Work (for full-time contributors) based on the Work as Team billing configuration. Resource rates from Work as Team are stored as a custom field because Microsoft Project does not have a native billing rate field for material resources.

Work as Team

Task Assignment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team task assignments (person assigned to a task) map to Microsoft Project Task Assignments with the assigned resource linked and the assignment percent set to 100 if a single person or divided if multiple. The Work as Team estimated hours vs actual hours distinction maps to Task field Assignment Units vs actual work logged.

Work as Team

Custom Field

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field (Organizer)

lossy
Fully supported

Work as Team custom fields on tasks and projects migrate to Microsoft Project Custom Fields created via the Project Organizer. Text, number, date, and flag field types map directly. Dropdown or multi-select custom fields in Work as Team require a lookup table in Microsoft Project. We pre-create the destination custom fields before migration and flag any custom fields with no direct Microsoft Project type for customer decision during scoping.

Work as Team

File Attachment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Hyperlink or SharePoint Document Library

lossy
Fully supported

Work as Team file attachments linked to tasks do not migrate as embedded objects in Microsoft Project MPP files. We extract the file URLs or download attachments during extraction, upload them to a SharePoint Document Library (or OneDrive if no SharePoint exists), and add a Hyperlink on the related Microsoft Project Task pointing to the document location. File version history does not migrate.

Work as Team

Client Portal

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not migrated

lossy
Fully supported

Work as Team client portal data (client-facing project updates, client comments, client-only tasks) has no Microsoft Project equivalent. We extract client portal content during extraction and deliver it as a written inventory with file attachments so the customer's admin can configure a SharePoint site or Microsoft Teams channel as a replacement client communication space. This is not a data migration; it is a content handoff for manual rebuild.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Work as Team logo

Work as Team gotchas

High

Task Lists are Teamwork-specific groupings

High

Client portal user access requires careful mapping

Medium

Time entries are tied to tasks and billing

Medium

Profitability and resource management data is tier-gated

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • List structure has no 1:1 Microsoft Project equivalent

    Work as Team organizes tasks inside Lists, which is a platform-specific organizational concept. Microsoft Project uses a flat task list with Summary Tasks that can simulate grouping but requires explicit indent/outdent configuration. We map each List to a Summary Task grouping during migration, but List-level permissions, List-level color coding, and List-level billing rates do not map to any Microsoft Project feature. We flag these during scoping and either skip them or store them in a custom field for the customer to resolve post-migration.

  • Client portal data does not migrate to Microsoft Project

    Work as Team's client-facing portal includes project updates, client comments, client-visible tasks, and document sharing that has no direct Microsoft Project equivalent. Microsoft Project does not include a native client portal. We extract all portal content during extraction and deliver it as a structured document inventory (CSV + attachments) for the customer's admin to rebuild inside SharePoint, Teams, or a project-specific website. This is an out-of-scope rebuild task, not a data migration gap.

  • Time entries with billing rates lose rate context

    Work as Team stores per-task billing rates on team members and logs time entries against tasks. Microsoft Project does not have a native billing rate field on task assignments. We migrate time entries as assignment work hours and resource names, but the per-hour billing rate is stored in a custom field at migration time. If the customer uses Work as Team for agency billing, they must reconcile hours against their billing system after migration rather than inside Microsoft Project.

  • Microsoft Project Online is retiring; desktop or Planner Premium may be the actual destination

    Microsoft Project Online retires in September 2026 and is already blocking new instance creation as of April 2026. If the customer selects Project Online as the destination, we migrate into a new Project Online tenant only if the tenant was provisioned before the April 2026 block date. If the destination is Microsoft Project desktop (MPP), we deliver an MPP file per source project. If the customer intends to move to Planner Premium as Microsoft's replacement, that is a separate migration scope with a different object model.

  • Task dependencies across Lists require inter-task predecessor resolution

    Work as Team allows task-to-task dependencies within a project, and we migrate these as Microsoft Project predecessor links (Finish-to-Start by default). However, if a Work as Team dependency references a task in a different List, we must resolve the destination Summary Task group before the predecessor link can be created in Microsoft Project. We run a pre-flight dependency map during extraction to flag cross-List dependencies for manual verification or automated resolution before migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Work as Team to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and migration path decision

    We audit the Work as Team source workspace across all active projects, archived projects, Lists, Tasks, Milestones, time entries, custom fields, team members, and client portal content. We pair this with a migration path decision: Microsoft Project desktop (MPP files), Project Online, or Planner Premium as the destination. If Project Online is the destination, we verify that the tenant was provisioned before the April 2026 new-instance creation block. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing record counts per object type and a destination path recommendation.

  2. List-to-Summary-Task mapping design

    We design the List-to-Summary-Task mapping for each Work as Team project during the scoping phase. For each project, we document which Lists become Summary Tasks, which tasks indent under each Summary Task, and any cross-List dependency links that require inter-task predecessor resolution. We also map Work as Team custom fields to Microsoft Project Custom Fields via the Organizer, confirming field types match before migration. The mapping document is reviewed and signed off by the customer's project manager before extraction begins.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Microsoft Project desktop environment or Project Online sandbox using a representative sample of projects. The customer reconciles task hierarchies (List groupings), Milestone dates, time entry aggregation, and resource assignment accuracy against the Work as Team source. Any mapping corrections to Summary Task indentation, predecessor links, or custom field types happen here before production migration. Milestone dates are spot-checked against Work as Team deadlines for date accuracy.

  4. Resource and team member provisioning

    We extract every distinct team member from Work as Team and create corresponding Resource records in Microsoft Project. Resources are classified as Work or Material based on the Work as Team billing configuration. If a Work as Team team member has no email address (a common gap in older Work as Team accounts), we use the team member name as the resource name and flag it for the customer to verify. Resource rates from Work as Team are stored in a custom field on each resource.

  5. Production migration in project order

    We run production migration in dependency order: Resources first (validated by customer admin), then Projects (one MPP per source project or one Project Online project per source), then Summary Tasks (from List names), then Tasks (nested under their Summary Task), then Milestones (zero-duration tasks with Milestone flag), then Time entries (converted to task assignments), then custom field values, then predecessor links, then file hyperlinks (pointing to SharePoint or OneDrive location). Each project emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next project begins.

  6. Cutover, client portal handoff, and hypercare

    We freeze Work as Team writes during cutover and run a final delta migration for any tasks or time entries modified during the migration window. We deliver the client portal content extraction as a structured CSV with file attachments for manual SharePoint or Teams rebuild. We support a five-business-day hypercare window where we resolve any task hierarchy errors, missing predecessor links, or resource assignment gaps reported by the customer's project team. We do not rebuild automations, templates, or client portal infrastructure as these are outside migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Work as Team logo

Work as Team

Source

Strengths

  • Native time tracking integrated with tasks and billing.
  • Unlimited client portal users on Deliver and higher tiers.
  • Multiple project views (Gantt, table, board, calendar).
  • Tiered pricing from Free to Enterprise.
  • Resource management and profitability tracking on Scale tier.

Weaknesses

  • Teamwork-specific Task List structure complicates migration.
  • Per-user pricing scales steeply at higher tiers.
  • Engineering workflow lags specialist tools on Git integration.
  • Limited real-time collaborative document editing.
  • Catalog name 'Work as Team' is ambiguous and needs confirmation.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Work as Team and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    C

    Work as Team: Per-project and per-account limits documented in Teamwork's API docs; typically generous for normal usage but throttled on bulk operations..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Work as Team exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Work as Team to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Work as Team to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Work as Team to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Work as Team to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 20 projects and 5,000 tasks with no time-entry history or cross-project dependencies. Migrations with large time-entry histories (over 50,000 records), custom field schemas requiring Organizer configuration, or archived project archives requiring separate MPP file generation move to seven to twelve weeks because of per-project file validation, Milestone date verification, and resource assignment reconciliation.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Work as Team.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day