Migrate your Work as Team data
Task-first project management platform with built-in time tracking and client-facing portals. Most popular with agencies, consultancies, and software teams managing multiple concurrent projects.
In its favor
Why people choose Work as Team
The signal that keeps Work as Team on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.
Time tracking is native and tightly integrated with tasks, billing, and client invoicing — agencies running time-and-materials engagements don't need a separate Harvest or Toggl integration.
Client-facing portals let external stakeholders see project progress without paying for full seats — Deliver and higher tiers include unlimited client users.
Multiple project views (Gantt, table, board, calendar) cover different team preferences in one tool.
Tiered pricing from Free (5 users / 5 projects) through Enterprise allows agencies to scale up without re-platforming.
Resource management and profitability tracking on Scale tier ($69.99/user/month) support agency operations beyond pure task management.
List structure is Teamwork-specific and doesn't map 1:1 to standard PM tools, complicating migration to Asana, ClickUp, Monday, or Jira.
Per-user pricing scales steeply for large teams — Scale tier at $69.99/user/month is enterprise-grade pricing.
Engineering-team workflows lag specialist tools like Linear or Jira on Git integration, sprint velocity, and code-review hooks.
Real-time collaborative document editing is limited compared to integrated document platforms like Notion or Confluence.
Catalog name 'Work as Team' is ambiguous — confirm with the firm that they actually use Teamwork.com (the platform at teamwork.com) versus a similarly-named tool.
Reasons to switch
Why people leave Work as Team
The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Work as Team. Presented as facts, not knocks.
Platform scorecard
Strengths, weaknesses, and where Work as Team fits
Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.
SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit
Strengths
Weaknesses
Where it works
Where it struggles
Pricing tiers
Work as Team pricing overview
Teamwork.com offers a Free plan (5 users / 5 projects) plus paid tiers: Deliver at $10.99/user/month, Grow at $19.99/user/month, Scale at $69.99/user/month, and Enterprise (custom). Higher tiers add active project count, file storage, automations, client portal capacity, resource management, and profitability tracking. Annual billing is required for the published per-user rates; monthly billing carries a premium.
Free
Tier 1 of 5
Free
What's included
Need help selecting your Project Management?
Book a free 30 minute consultationPricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Work as Team's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →
What gets migrated
Work as Team object support
Object-by-object support for Work as Team migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.
Projects
Fully supportedProjects are the top-level container with title, dates, status, custom fields, and member roster. We extract the full project set including archived projects.
Tasks
Fully supportedTasks live within Task Lists nested under Projects. We extract tasks with assignment, due dates, priority, status, and time-entry associations.
Subtasks
Fully supportedSubtasks roll up under parent tasks. We preserve parent-child relationships during extraction.
Assignees
Fully supportedUsers assigned to tasks come across with role data. Client users and guests have separate access scopes we preserve.
Comments
Fully supportedTask comments and project messages are extracted with author, timestamp, and threading where applicable.
Attachments
Mapping requiredFiles attached to tasks and projects come from the Files module. We extract via the Files API and re-upload to the destination's attachment store.
Custom Fields
Mapping requiredCustom fields exist per Project and Task. We enumerate and map each to the destination schema.
Dependencies
Fully supportedTask dependencies feed the Gantt view. We preserve dependency chains so the destination Gantt rebuilds correctly.
| Object | Support | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Projects | Fully supported | Projects are the top-level container with title, dates, status, custom fields, and member roster. We extract the full project set including archived projects. |
| Tasks | Fully supported | Tasks live within Task Lists nested under Projects. We extract tasks with assignment, due dates, priority, status, and time-entry associations. |
| Subtasks | Fully supported | Subtasks roll up under parent tasks. We preserve parent-child relationships during extraction. |
| Assignees | Fully supported | Users assigned to tasks come across with role data. Client users and guests have separate access scopes we preserve. |
| Comments | Fully supported | Task comments and project messages are extracted with author, timestamp, and threading where applicable. |
| Attachments | Mapping required | Files attached to tasks and projects come from the Files module. We extract via the Files API and re-upload to the destination's attachment store. |
| Custom Fields | Mapping required | Custom fields exist per Project and Task. We enumerate and map each to the destination schema. |
| Dependencies | Fully supported | Task dependencies feed the Gantt view. We preserve dependency chains so the destination Gantt rebuilds correctly. |
Gotchas
What to watch for in Work as Team migrations
Issues we've hit on past Work as Team migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.
Task Lists are Teamwork-specific groupings
Client portal user access requires careful mapping
Time entries are tied to tasks and billing
Profitability and resource management data is tier-gated
| Severity | Issue |
|---|---|
| High | Task Lists are Teamwork-specific groupings |
| High | Client portal user access requires careful mapping |
| Medium | Time entries are tied to tasks and billing |
| Medium | Profitability and resource management data is tier-gated |
Leaving Work as Team?
Where Work as Team customers move next
5 destinations Work as Team can migrate to.
How a Work as Team migration works
Four steps, Work as Team-specific
Connect
API key and OAuth 2.0 per Teamwork's developer documentation. into Work as Team. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.
Map
We translate Work as Team-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.
Sample
Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Work as Team quirks before production.
Migrate
Full migration with Work as Team rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.
FAQ
Work as Team migration FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Work as Team migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Can't find your answer?
Walk through your Work as Team migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationOther project management tools we support
Ready when you are
Migrate Work as Team.
Without the rebuild.
Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Work as Team setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.