HRMS migration

Migrate from Madison Resources to Recruit CRM & ATS

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Madison Resources and Recruit CRM & ATS. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Recruit CRM & ATS.

Madison Resources logo

Madison Resources

Source

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Compatibility

50%

5 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Madison Resources and Recruit CRM & ATS.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Madison Resources to Recruit CRM is a cross-category migration from a staffing-specific back-office and payroll-funding platform to a recruitment agency CRM. Madison operates as a financial services layer handling payroll processing, tax administration, and working capital for staffing firms; it has no public API, and all data extraction requires coordinated file exports through Madison support. Recruit CRM is a recruitment ATS and CRM built for agencies under 50 people, with AI resume parsing, a Kanban pipeline interface, and transparent per-seat pricing from $85 per user per month. We extract Workers, Assignments, Payroll history, and Invoice records from Madison, transform the placement-linked relationships into Recruit CRM's Candidate and Job/Placement data model, and flag the funding and compliance document layers that sit outside the migration boundary. Workflows, automations, and factor-fee schedules are not migrated; we deliver a written inventory for your admin to rebuild in Recruit CRM or document for your funding team to renegotiate with a new capital provider.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Madison Resources logo

Madison Resources

What's pushing teams away

  • Switching to in-house payroll or a competing BPO when the firm reaches sufficient scale to justify building its own back-office infrastructure and negotiating its own factor lines.
  • Moving to a staffing-specific ATS or ERP that offers direct payroll funding integrations, eliminating the need for a separate back-office layer if the platform supports both operations and financing.
  • Consolidating to a staffing CRM with built-in back-office connectors that some firms find reduces handoff friction compared to Madison's standalone service model.
  • Dissatisfaction with factor fees or advance rates over time, especially when the firm can secure cheaper working capital through a traditional bank line or alternative funder once the firm has scale and credit history.

Choosing

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Recruit CRM for its full customizability — pipelines, stages, and fields can be tailored to any recruitment workflow without developer involvement.
  • Small teams value the built-in CRM and ATS combined in one subscription, eliminating the need to purchase and sync separate systems.
  • The Chrome extension for one-click LinkedIn profile collection streamlines candidate sourcing and reduces manual data entry for recruiters.
  • Responsive customer support with fast issue resolution is consistently cited as a reason teams stick with the platform long-term.
  • Automation options including email sequences and workflow triggers allow recruitment agencies to reduce repetitive manual outreach tasks.

Object mapping

How Madison Resources objects map to Recruit CRM & ATS

Each row shows how a Madison Resources object lands in Recruit CRM & ATS, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Madison Resources

Worker

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Madison Workers (employee records with SSN, pay rate, tax withholding elections, direct deposit details) map to Recruit CRM Candidate records. We extract full name, contact information, employment eligibility status, and start/end dates from Madison's Worker file export. Historical pay rate and tax withholding elections are preserved as custom fields on the Candidate record for reference, since Recruit CRM does not have a native payroll tax layer.

Madison Resources

Assignment

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Job and Placement

1:many
Fully supported

Each Madison Assignment links a Worker to a client placement with a bill rate, pay rate, and assignment lifecycle (start, end, status changes). We split this into two Recruit CRM objects: the client-facing Job (the open requisition at the client company) and the Placement record that links the Candidate to the Job with bill/pay rate, start date, and end date. Assignment status transitions migrate as Placement status values in Recruit CRM.

Madison Resources

Payroll Run

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Placement Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Madison payroll runs contain earnings, deductions, taxes, and net pay linked to a Worker and Assignment. Recruit CRM's ATS model does not include per-pay-period payroll detail as a native object. We aggregate payroll run summaries (total gross, total net, total taxes paid per pay period) and attach them as read-only custom fields on the Placement record for audit and historical reference. Individual pay stub detail is flagged for the customer's payroll team to retain in Madison records or transfer to a dedicated payroll platform.

Madison Resources

Invoice

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Placement Billing Record

lossy
Fully supported

Madison Invoices include hours worked, bill rate, applicable markups, and status (draft, submitted, paid) linked to an Assignment. Recruit CRM tracks placement billing through custom fields or its built-in billing module depending on the customer's tier. We export invoice headers and line items preserving the Assignment linkage and map invoice status, amount, and hours to corresponding Recruit CRM placement billing fields. Customers using Recruit CRM's billing module should confirm feature availability at their selected tier before migration.

Madison Resources

Tax Record

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Madison handles federal, state, and local tax withholdings and filings across its multi-state coverage (48 states). We export quarterly and annual tax summary records. Per-pay-period tax detail is mapped to Candidate-level custom fields (federal withholding status, state tax jurisdiction) as of the export date. Tax filing history (W-2, 1099 artifacts) is preserved as document references rather than structured records; we include file path manifests for the customer's compliance team to relocate.

Madison Resources

SUTA Tracking Record

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate or Placement Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Madison provides SUTA limit reporting that flags workers approaching or exceeding state unemployment tax wage bases. These limits change annually and vary by state. We preserve the historical SUTA tracking data (current wage base position, applicable state rate, limit threshold) as custom fields on the Candidate or Placement record for post-migration reference. Current-year rate tables require manual entry into Recruit CRM's custom fields or a payroll platform post-migration.

Madison Resources

Compliance Document

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate Document Upload

1:1
Fully supported

Madison stores I-9s, signed tax forms (W-4, state equivalents), and worker agreements in a document management layer that may not be included in the standard data export. We request file-path manifests and coordinate with Madison support to include document bundles or URLs where available. Each document reference is linked to the corresponding Candidate record in Recruit CRM as a document attachment. Physical file transfer is a separate coordination step from the structured data migration.

Madison Resources

Client/Company

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Company

1:1
Fully supported

Madison Assignment records reference client company names and sometimes client contact information for billing purposes. We extract unique client company names from the Assignment file and create Company records in Recruit CRM. Contact names associated with invoicing or billing in Madison map to Recruit CRM Contact records linked to the Company. The Madison client data is typically billing-adjacent rather than a full CRM company record, so we flag any gaps in company details for the customer to complete in Recruit CRM.

Madison Resources

Factor Fee Schedule

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

None (flagged for separate renegotiation)

1:1
Fully supported

Madison's factoring arrangements, including advance rates, factoring fees, and recourse provisions, are stored in individual client contracts and are not part of Madison's operational data export. These financial terms are outside the migration boundary. We flag this clearly in the scope document and recommend the customer's finance team renegotiate funding terms separately with Madison or a new capital provider post-migration. Recruit CRM does not include payroll funding functionality.

Madison Resources

Payroll Funding Terms

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

None (outside migration scope)

1:1
Fully supported

Madison's payroll funding and advance arrangements are contract-specific and opaque. When migrating to Recruit CRM, the firm retains responsibility for establishing new payroll funding or factoring arrangements independently of the data migration. We extract any funding-related field values present in Madison's export (such as current advance balance or fee schedules stored as notes) as informational records, but these do not map to any Recruit CRM object and are provided for the customer's finance team to review during the funding renegotiation process.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Madison Resources logo

Madison Resources gotchas

High

No public API means export scoping requires Madison coordination

Medium

Payroll funding terms are contractual and not exported

Medium

Multi-state SUTA rates change annually and vary by state

Low

Document file exports require separate file-level coordination

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS gotchas

High

API rate limits are license-scaled and can throttle bulk migration

Medium

Custom field schemas vary per organization and require field-level mapping

Medium

Files and email attachments require separate extraction and re-upload

Low

Email sequences and automation logic do not transfer between platforms

Pair-specific challenges

  • No public API requires coordinated file exports from Madison

    Madison Resources does not expose a documented REST API for external data access. All data extraction must be requested through Madison's support or account management team, who generate file exports on a negotiated schedule. This adds 2-4 weeks to migration scoping compared to platforms with self-serve export tooling. We initiate the export request early in discovery and lock the data snapshot date before transformation begins to avoid partial-period gaps in payroll run archives.

  • Madison Worker records lack direct CRM contact details

    Madison's Worker records are back-office employee records optimized for payroll processing. They may not contain full candidate sourcing data (resume text, skills, source channel, communication history) that Recruit CRM expects in a Candidate record. We extract every addressable field from Madison's Worker file, but the candidate sourcing and engagement data that makes a Recruit CRM Candidate record actionable must be rebuilt or supplemented by the staffing firm's recruiters post-migration.

  • Recruit CRM data export requires an active subscription

    Recruit CRM's data export functionality requires an active, paid subscription at the time of the import phase. Madison's data export can be requested while still under contract, but Recruit CRM's side must be provisioned and active before we can test import batches. We coordinate subscription timing to avoid a gap between Madison data delivery and Recruit CRM provisioning. Some reviewers note this creates lock-in risk on the destination side as well.

  • Staffing firm data often contains duplicate candidate records

    Staffing firms frequently create separate Worker records for the same individual when an employee works multiple assignments, transitions between placements, or returns after a gap. Madison reflects this in its Worker file. We deduplicate at the Candidate level during transformation using name, SSN, and email match logic, but the staffing firm's recruiters should review the deduplication output in Recruit CRM's staging environment before production migration to confirm no legitimate separate placements were incorrectly merged.

  • Factor fee schedules and funding terms do not migrate

    Madison's advance rates, factoring fees, and recourse provisions are contractual and stored outside Madison's operational data export. When migrating to Recruit CRM, which has no payroll funding module, the firm must renegotiate funding terms separately with Madison or a new capital provider. We flag funding-related fields in the data scope but make clear that the financial arrangement itself is outside the migration boundary. The customer's finance team should initiate funding renegotiation during the migration planning phase to avoid delays at cutover.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Madison Resources to Recruit CRM & ATS data migration

  1. Discovery and Madison export coordination

    We initiate the Madison data export request through Madison support or the account management team, starting this step as early as possible given the 2-4 week coordination lead time. We audit the scope across all Worker records, Assignment histories, payroll run archives, Invoice records, Tax summaries, and SUTA tracking data. We simultaneously provision a Recruit CRM sandbox environment to use as a staging target and confirm the customer's Recruit CRM subscription tier includes the fields and modules required by the migration scope.

  2. Data extraction and file manifest review

    Madison delivers structured file exports (typically CSV or XLS) for Workers, Assignments, Payroll Runs, and Invoices. We receive the file manifest and validate that all expected record types are present, flag any missing date ranges or partial periods, and request supplemental exports for any gaps before transformation begins. SUTA tracking data and tax summaries are reviewed for multi-state coverage completeness. Compliance document file paths are catalogued for separate document-level coordination.

  3. Transformation and object mapping

    We transform Madison's flat Worker file into Recruit CRM Candidate records, map Assignment records into Recruit CRM Job and Placement objects with the bill rate and pay rate preserved, and aggregate payroll run summaries into Placement-level custom fields. Client company names from Madison's Assignment records become Recruit CRM Company records. We apply deduplication logic at the Candidate level, flagging any Worker records that appear to represent the same individual across multiple assignments. Factor fee schedules and funding terms are extracted as informational output only and excluded from the Recruit CRM import set.

  4. Staging import and reconciliation

    We import the transformed dataset into Recruit CRM's staging environment. The customer's staffing firm operations lead reconciles record counts (Workers in, Candidates created; Assignments in, Placements created; Payroll summaries attached), spot-checks 20-30 records across different states and assignment statuses against the Madison source file, and validates that SUTA tracking data populated correctly. Any mapping corrections are applied and the staging import is re-run before production migration is approved.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record dependency order: Companies first (as the parent of Contacts and Placements), then Candidates, then Jobs, then Placements with Candidate and Job lookups resolved. Payroll summaries and tax reference fields are attached to Placement records in a subsequent batch. Invoice billing records are imported after Placements are confirmed. Compliance document references are linked to the corresponding Candidate records. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and funding handoff

    We freeze Madison write activity during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration period, and enable Recruit CRM as the system of record for candidate and placement tracking. We deliver a written inventory of Madison payroll funding terms and factor fee schedules for the customer's finance team to use in renegotiating funding arrangements. We do not rebuild Madison workflows or automations in Recruit CRM; that is documented separately for the customer's admin team. We support a one-week post-go-live window for reconciliation issues.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Madison Resources logo

Madison Resources

Source

Strengths

  • Exclusive focus on staffing industry means familiarity with sector-specific billing, compliance, and workforce regulations.
  • Payroll funding and back-office operations under one roof reduces vendor coordination for cash-flow management.
  • Extensive multi-state and Canadian payroll tax coverage across 48 states.
  • Customized reporting for SUTA limits and margin analysis tailored to staffing economics.
  • Established relationships with over 300 staffing firms demonstrate proven operational track record.

Weaknesses

  • No public API documented for direct data extraction; all exports require coordination through Madison support, adding lead time to migration scoping.
  • Pricing is not published on their website; prospective clients must request a custom quote, making competitive evaluation difficult.
  • Primarily designed for staffing firms, so non-staffing businesses with similar back-office needs would have limited fit.
  • Factor-fee structures are contract-specific and opaque, making it hard to compare total cost of capital against alternative funders.
  • System capabilities and feature set are not well-documented publicly, increasing discovery effort during vendor evaluation.
Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Strengths

  • Fully customizable pipelines, stages, and fields without requiring developer involvement
  • Combines recruitment CRM and ATS in one subscription for staffing agencies and small teams
  • Built-in email sequences and automation reduce manual outreach work
  • Chrome extension enables one-click LinkedIn profile collection directly into the CRM
  • Responsive customer support cited across multiple reviews with fast resolution times

Weaknesses

  • Several features are gated as paid add-ons rather than included in the base subscription
  • Email functionality has been reported as unreliable by multiple users
  • Interface occasionally lags during high-activity periods in large pipelines
  • Pricing is considered higher than comparable recruitment CRMs by some customers
  • Limited native reporting — users request pre-made report exports rather than manual data pulls

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Madison Resources and Recruit CRM & ATS.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Madison Resources: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Madison Resources doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Madison Resources to Recruit CRM & ATS migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Madison Resources to Recruit CRM & ATS data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Madison Resources to Recruit CRM & ATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Madison Resources to Recruit CRM & ATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and eight weeks. The primary driver is Madison's export coordination timeline, which requires 2-4 weeks of lead time before we receive the data file. Once we have the export, straightforward migrations with clean Worker and Assignment files complete in 2-4 additional weeks. Migrations with large payroll run archives, multi-state tax record sets, or complex assignment linking across multiple client companies extend to eight to fourteen weeks. We initiate the Madison export request during the first week of discovery to overlap the coordination delay with scoping work.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Madison Resources.
Land in Recruit CRM & ATS, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day