HRMS migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Madison Resources and Zoho Recruit. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Zoho Recruit.
Madison Resources
Source
Zoho Recruit
Destination
Compatibility
7 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Madison Resources and Zoho Recruit.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Madison Resources to Zoho Recruit is a cross-category migration: Madison operates as a staffing back-office and payroll-funding layer; Zoho Recruit is a talent acquisition ATS. The core challenge is that Madison has no documented API — all data extraction requires coordinated file exports generated by Madison support on the customer's behalf. We map Madison Workers to Zoho Recruit Candidates (1:1), split Madison Assignments into Zoho Recruit Job Openings and Client records, and attach Payroll run history as Zoho Recruit activity records with pay-period metadata preserved in custom fields. SUTA tracking thresholds, multi-state tax summaries, and invoice histories map to custom fields and Notes. Madison's factoring arrangements (advance rates, recourse terms) are contractual and do not exist in the operational data; we flag them for the customer's finance team to renegotiate with a new funder. We do not migrate workflows, automations, or forms. Document files (I-9s, W-2s, signed agreements) do not move through the structured-data migration pipeline — we deliver a file-path manifest and recommend a post-migration document-upload plan.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Madison Resources object lands in Zoho Recruit, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Madison Resources
Worker
Zoho Recruit
Candidate
1:1Madison Worker records map 1:1 to Zoho Recruit Candidate. We extract full name, SSN (stored as encrypted custom field or omitted per data-handling agreement), pay rate, tax withholding elections, start and end dates, and direct deposit details. These map to Zoho Recruit's First Name, Last Name (mandatory — Madison workers without a Last Name are flagged and resolved before import), Email, Phone, Current Job Position, Current Company, and resume attachments. Date fields preserve the original format. The Zoho Recruit Candidate module becomes the primary candidate record; any Madison custom fields (e.g., drug screening status, certifications) map to Zoho Recruit custom fields with a max of 50 per module on Standard, 300 per module on Enterprise.
Madison Resources
Assignment
Zoho Recruit
Job Opening + Client
1:manyEach Madison Assignment links a Worker to a client placement with a bill rate, pay rate, and assignment lifecycle (start date, end date, status changes). In Zoho Recruit, the client company maps to a Client record, and the assignment itself becomes a Job Opening with the pay rate and bill rate stored as custom fields. The assignment status (active, on-hold, completed, terminated) maps to a custom picklist field since Zoho Recruit Job Opening stages are recruitment-stage-oriented rather than assignment-status-oriented. Client contact records from Madison (the staffing firm's point of contact at the client company) map to Zoho Recruit Contacts under the Client.
Madison Resources
Payroll Run
Zoho Recruit
Task (Activity)
1:manyMadison payroll runs — earnings, deductions, taxes, net pay, and pay period dates — are too structured for a standard Zoho Recruit Activity note. We create a Zoho Recruit Task record for each pay period per Worker with the pay period date range, gross earnings, net pay, and key deduction totals stored as custom fields. The original payroll run reference number from Madison is preserved in a custom field for audit traceability. This approach attaches the payroll history to the Candidate record without requiring a separate payroll module that Zoho Recruit does not natively provide.
Madison Resources
Invoice
Zoho Recruit
Client record + Note
1:1Madison Invoice records (hours worked, bill rate, markups, status: draft/submitted/paid) map to Notes attached to the corresponding Zoho Recruit Client record. Invoice line items and totals are stored in a custom field block. Status values (draft, submitted, paid, overdue) map to a custom picklist field on the Note. Firms requiring full invoicing capability after migration should configure Zoho Books integration separately; Zoho Recruit's native invoicing is limited and is not designed for staffing billing conventions.
Madison Resources
Tax Record
Zoho Recruit
Client record + Note or Custom Fields
1:1Madison quarterly and annual federal, state, and local tax withholding summaries map to Notes attached to the Client record (for client-specific tax context) or as a tax compliance Note on the Candidate if the tax record is employee-specific. Per-pay-period tax detail migrates as custom fields on the Candidate record if the candidate count is manageable; for larger volumes we preserve the quarterly summary and note the tax year. The destination Zoho Recruit admin should configure a fiscal year setting to align with the firm's tax reporting period.
Madison Resources
SUTA Tracking Record
Zoho Recruit
Custom Fields + Workflow Rule (configuration)
lossyMadison SUTA tracking records — state-specific unemployment wage bases and per-worker limits — map to custom fields on the Candidate record (one field per state of operation, or a structured text field with state, limit, and YTD wages). SUTA thresholds change annually by state; we preserve the values as of the export date. Post-migration, the Zoho Recruit admin should review state-level rate tables for the current year. We document the SUTA field mapping and recommend a custom Zoho Recruit Workflow Rule to flag candidates approaching their state wage base limit, but the workflow itself is documented only — not implemented as part of the migration scope.
Madison Resources
Compliance Documents
Zoho Recruit
File path manifest (out of scope for data migration)
1:1Madison stores I-9s, W-4 elections, state-specific tax forms, signed worker agreements, and background check results in a document management layer. These are not included in the standard structured-data export. We request a file-path manifest from Madison support covering document types, worker associations, and file URLs. We deliver this manifest as a written document to the customer's Zoho Recruit admin, who can then configure the Zoho Recruit Document Library and upload documents manually or via Zoho WorkDrive integration. Physical document file transfer is outside the structured-data migration scope.
Madison Resources
Factor Fee Schedule
Zoho Recruit
Out of scope (contractual)
1:1Madison's factoring arrangements — advance rates, factor fees, recourse provisions, and credit terms — are stored in individual client contracts managed outside Madison's operational data system. These do not appear in the structured data export and are not migratable. We flag the existence of funding-related fields in the data scope so the customer's finance team is aware that factor fee schedules and advance arrangements must be renegotiated separately with a new payroll funder or bank. Zoho Recruit does not include payroll funding capability; firms should arrange working capital through a separate factor, line of credit, or Zoho-approved lending partner post-migration.
Madison Resources
Worker Rate Configuration
Zoho Recruit
Custom Fields on Candidate
lossyMadison tracks pay rates, bill rates, and any rate differentials (overtime multipliers, shift differentials, per-diem allowances) per worker per assignment. We map these to Zoho Recruit Candidate custom fields: pay_rate__c, bill_rate__c, overtime_multiplier__c, shift_differential__c. These custom fields are created during the schema design phase and are available on all Zoho Recruit plan tiers.
Madison Resources
Client (from Assignment context)
Zoho Recruit
Client
1:1Madison's client records (the companies where workers are placed) are referenced within Assignment data. We extract distinct client names, addresses, and contacts from Assignment records and create corresponding Zoho Recruit Client records. Client records in Zoho Recruit support contacts, job openings, and invoicing, which makes them the natural home for the staffing firm's client relationship data.
Madison Resources
Owner (Madison User)
Zoho Recruit
Zoho Recruit User
1:1Madison does not expose a user management API; Owner records are inferred from Assignment and Payroll run assignments. We extract distinct owner names and email addresses from the source data and match them to existing Zoho Recruit User accounts by email. Owners without a matching Zoho Recruit User go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes.
Madison Resources
Worker Status / Employment Type
Zoho Recruit
Custom Picklist Field on Candidate
lossyMadison tracks employment type (W-2, 1099, IC) and worker status (active, on assignment, off assignment, terminated). These map to a custom picklist field on the Candidate record. We recommend separating employment type and assignment status into distinct custom fields for reporting clarity.
| Madison Resources | Zoho Recruit | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worker | Candidate1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Assignment | Job Opening + Client1:many | Fully supported | |
| Payroll Run | Task (Activity)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Invoice | Client record + Note1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tax Record | Client record + Note or Custom Fields1:1 | Fully supported | |
| SUTA Tracking Record | Custom Fields + Workflow Rule (configuration)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Compliance Documents | File path manifest (out of scope for data migration)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Factor Fee Schedule | Out of scope (contractual)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Worker Rate Configuration | Custom Fields on Candidatelossy | Fully supported | |
| Client (from Assignment context) | Client1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Owner (Madison User) | Zoho Recruit User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Worker Status / Employment Type | Custom Picklist Field on Candidatelossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Madison Resources gotchas
No public API means export scoping requires Madison coordination
Payroll funding terms are contractual and not exported
Multi-state SUTA rates change annually and vary by state
Document file exports require separate file-level coordination
Zoho Recruit gotchas
Daily API rate limits are tier-gated and per-user capped
User import hard cap of 2,000 records
Attachment folder hierarchy must be preserved exactly
Resume parsing quota varies by plan and resets daily
Custom fields unavailable in Free and Standard editions
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and Madison export coordination
We audit the full Madison data inventory: Worker count and custom fields, Assignment count and rate structures, payroll run history span and field schemas, invoice volume and line item detail, SUTA tracking records by state, tax record summaries, and compliance document path manifest. We open a coordination request with Madison Resources support to generate structured file exports on a defined schedule. We confirm the Zoho Recruit plan tier (Standard at $25/user/month covers most staffing firm migrations; Enterprise at $75/user/month is required for 300+ custom fields per module), confirm admin access, and lock the data snapshot date. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with a Madison export checklist and Zoho Recruit schema design draft.
Source data extraction and field mapping design
We work with Madison support to extract Workers as CSV with full name, SSN (handled per data-handling agreement), pay rate, tax elections, start/end dates, and direct deposit details. Assignment data extracts as a CSV linked to workers by a common ID field, with client name, bill rate, pay rate, and assignment status. Payroll run history extracts as a separate file set by pay period and worker. Invoice headers and line items extract with assignment linkage preserved. SUTA tracking records extract by state per worker. We request a file manifest for compliance documents. All extracts are staged in a secure environment for initial validation before transformation begins.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Zoho Recruit sandbox instance. Workers become Candidates, Assignments split into Job Openings and Client records, Payroll history attaches as Activity records with custom fields, Invoices attach as Notes to Client records, and SUTA data maps to Candidate custom fields. The customer's Zoho Recruit admin reviews record counts, spot-checks 25-50 records against the Madison source data, and validates that client and worker relationships are preserved. Schema corrections, custom field additions, and picklist value adjustments happen in the sandbox before production migration. Sign-off on the sandbox migration gates the production phase.
Production migration in dependency order
We run the production migration in record-dependency order: Client records first (from Assignment client data), then Candidate records (from Madison Workers) with Last Name mandatory-field checks applied before insert, Job Openings linked to Clients (from Madison Assignments), Activity records for payroll history per Candidate, Notes for invoice and tax data attached to Client records, SUTA custom fields on Candidates, and compliance document file-path manifest delivered separately. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We coordinate API rate limiting and batch sizing against Zoho Recruit's API limits.
Cutover, validation, and post-migration handoff
We freeze Madison data writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records created or modified in Madison during the migration period, enable Zoho Recruit as the system of record, and run a final reconciliation comparing record counts in Zoho Recruit against the Madison source totals. We deliver the SUTA field mapping document, the compliance document file-path manifest, the invoice and payroll note template, and the funding-term renegotiation checklist to the customer's team. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflows, automations, payroll funding arrangements, and compliance document file transfer are outside the migration scope and are delivered as written inventories and checklists for the customer's admin and finance team.
Payroll funding and PEO handoff (out of scope, documented)
Madison Resources' payroll funding capability does not have an equivalent in Zoho Recruit. We deliver a written handoff document that lists the firm's current advance rate, factor fee schedule, and recourse terms as extracted from the Madison data scope (if disclosed in the export), so the firm's finance team can present these terms to a new funder. We recommend three to four payroll funding alternatives — traditional bank line of credit, staffing-specific factor, or Zoho-approved lending partner — with a comparison framework. The payroll processing function (tax withholding, payroll runs, direct deposit) is also outside Zoho Recruit's capability and should be assigned to a PEO, ADP, Paychex, or similar payroll processor as a separate engagement.
Platform deep dives
Madison Resources
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Zoho Recruit
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Madison Resources and Zoho Recruit.
Object compatibility
1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Madison Resources: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Madison Resources doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Madison Resources to Zoho Recruit migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Madison Resources to Zoho Recruit migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Madison Resources
Other ways to arrive at Zoho Recruit
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.