Project Management migration

Migrate from Project Drive to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Project Drive and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Project Drive logo

Project Drive

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Project Drive and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Project Drive organizes work around hierarchical task structures inside Gantt views with budget and cost tracking fields, while Trello uses a Kanban board model with cards, lists, labels, and a checklist hierarchy that has no native subtask or Gantt concept. These structural differences define the migration shape: Projects map to Trello Boards, tasks to cards, subtasks to checklists, and milestones to milestone-labeled cards with due dates. Gantt dependencies do not have a Trello equivalent, so we encode each as a checklist item on the predecessor card referencing the successor card by name and URL, then deliver a dependency map for the team to rebuild natively if they license the Timeline Power-Up. Budget and cost fields have no native Trello schema; we flag each field during scoping and recommend a Google Sheet or custom number field strategy for the admin to implement post-migration. We do not migrate calendar events, workflows, or automations as these do not exist as API-migratable records in Project Drive.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Project Drive logo

Project Drive

What's pushing teams away

  • The first-timer experience is steep — reviewers consistently report needing dedicated time to become comfortable with the platform.
  • Pricing is described as on the higher side for the feature set, prompting teams to evaluate lower-cost alternatives.
  • Feature gaps in integrations mean teams using other tools must resort to manual handoffs or workarounds.
  • The platform is less user-friendly than competitors for onboarding, creating friction when adding new team members quickly.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Project Drive objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Project Drive object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Project Drive

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive Projects map to Trello Boards as the top-level container. Project name becomes the board name, project description migrates as the board description field, and project status (Active, Archived) maps to the board state. We use Trello's REST API to create the board and set visibility (Private, Workspace, Public) per the scoping decision. Projects with a Gantt view sequence get a default List structure of To Do / In Progress / Done unless a custom list structure is requested during scoping.

Project Drive

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive Tasks map to Trello Cards. Task name becomes the card title, task description maps to the card description as plain text, and assignee resolves to a Trello member via email lookup. Start date and due date migrate as Custom Fields on the card (requires Trello Premium). Task status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed) maps to the card's List position. We preserve the original creation timestamp in a custom field for audit; Trello does not show creation order on cards natively.

Project Drive

Subtask

maps to

Trello

Checklist item

1:many
Fully supported

Project Drive Subtasks map to Trello Checklist items on the parent card. The subtask hierarchy flattens into a flat checklist because Trello has no nested task concept. We encode the parent-subtask relationship in the checklist item title using a [Parent Task Name] > [Subtask Name] convention so the original relationship is recoverable from the card title. Checked/unchecked state migrates directly. Some destination tools with deeper hierarchy support can restore the nesting; we assess this during scoping.

Project Drive

Milestone

maps to

Trello

Card with milestone label

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive Milestones are date-flagged markers in the Gantt view. We map each to a Trello Card with a dedicated milestone label (created during schema setup) and the milestone date as the card due date. We recommend enabling the Trello Timeline Power-Up during scoping to display milestone cards chronologically across the board, which most closely approximates the Gantt milestone row. Milestones without a date are migrated as cards with the milestone label and no due date.

Project Drive

Task Dependency (Gantt)

maps to

Trello

Checklist item on predecessor card

lossy
Fully supported

Project Drive stores Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, and custom Gantt dependencies as explicit records. Trello has no native dependency model. We encode each dependency during migration as a checklist item on the predecessor card with the text [Dependency] Successor: [Successor Card Name] and the card URL. We deliver a separate dependency map document listing every encoded dependency with its type so the customer's admin can rebuild dependencies natively using the Timeline Power-Up or a third-party Power-Up post-migration. This is not a direct field map but a reconstruction strategy.

Project Drive

User and Assignee

maps to

Trello

Board Member

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive Users and task assignees map 1:1 to Trello Board Members. We resolve each Project Drive assignee by email against Trello User accounts and invite unresolved users during the migration script execution. Member role (Admin, Member, Observer) is set during board setup per the scoping decision. Assignee is recorded on each card via Trello's idMembers field at card creation time. If a Project Drive user has no corresponding Trello account, they are flagged in a user reconciliation report for the admin to provision before migration resumes.

Project Drive

Budget and Cost Fields

maps to

Trello

Custom Field (number) or external document

lossy
Mapping required

Project Drive budget and cost fields have no native Trello equivalent because Trello does not support financial tracking fields at the platform level. We flag each numeric budget field during scoping and propose one of three strategies: map as a Trello Premium Custom Field of type Number, document in a separate Google Sheet linked from the board, or preserve in a budget handoff document for the customer to implement as a separate finance workflow post-migration. Original field names and data types are preserved in the handoff document. Budget values do not migrate into Trello cards unless the customer explicitly selects a custom field strategy and has Trello Premium.

Project Drive

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive task and project attachments migrate as Trello Card Attachments. We extract the binary file, preserve the original filename and content type, and upload to the target card via the Trello REST API using the card's id. Attachment links to the destination are maintained by preserving the original filename and content type. If a Trello board has a configured Google Drive or Dropbox Power-Up, we document the original storage location for the admin to re-link files post-migration. Large attachments (over 10 MB per Trello's API limit) are flagged in the extraction report for manual handling.

Project Drive

Calendar Event

maps to

Trello

None

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive integrates with external calendars but does not expose calendar event objects in its export. Trello has no native calendar object either. We do not migrate calendar events. Teams re-sync their external calendars (Google Calendar, Outlook) to Trello post-migration using Trello's calendar Power-Up or third-party integrations. The calendar re-sync is documented as a post-migration step in the handoff guide.

Project Drive

Task Labels and Tags

maps to

Trello

Labels

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive task-level tags and category labels map to Trello Labels on the card. We create label names matching the source tag text and assign them to the migrated card. Label color is assigned sequentially from Trello's default palette unless the customer provides a color mapping during scoping. Tags stored as multi-value properties in Project Drive become multiple Trello labels on the same card, which is the equivalent semantic structure.

Project Drive

Project Comment

maps to

Trello

Card Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive task and project comments migrate as Trello Card Comments on the parent card. Comment author resolves to a Trello member by email; if no match exists, the comment is posted under the migration service account with the original author name in the comment body. Comment timestamp is preserved as the comment creation date. Comment attachments are handled via the Attachment mapping. Rich text formatting in Project Drive comments is converted to Trello's markdown subset where possible; unsupported formatting is stripped.

Project Drive

Custom Fields

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields (Premium)

1:1
Fully supported

Project Drive custom fields on tasks and projects map to Trello Premium Custom Fields. We match by field name and infer type: text fields map to Trello Text type, number fields to Number type, date fields to Date type (if due date and start date are not already mapped), and dropdown-like fields to List type. Custom field values are populated at card creation time. This mapping requires Trello Premium ($5/user/mo); if the customer is on Trello Standard, we flag custom fields in the handoff document for manual post-migration entry or a Power-Up-based workaround.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Project Drive logo

Project Drive gotchas

High

No public API documented for bulk data export

Medium

Budget and cost fields require schema mapping at destination

Medium

Gantt sequencing does not always preserve inter-task dependency details

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • No public API for Project Drive export

    Project Drive does not publish a developer-facing REST API for automated data extraction. All migration work requires navigating the application UI to export structured data manually or via CSV downloads. We handle this by scripting authenticated UI-based extraction sessions, but export volume and rate depend on the application's export functionality rather than a controlled API. On large accounts (over 10,000 tasks), this adds timeline risk that we flag during scoping. We recommend scheduling a discovery call to confirm export capacity before committing to a migration timeline.

  • Trello API rate limits constrain write throughput

    Trello's REST API enforces 300 requests per 10 seconds per API key and 100 requests per 10 seconds per token. Additionally, the /1/members/ endpoint is limited to 100 requests per 900 seconds. During migration of large task sets, we batch card creation into controlled request windows with exponential backoff on 429 responses. Trello also enforces board-level object limits (e.g., 500 open cards per board triggers a warning; 4,700 total cards is the hard cap). We validate board-level card counts before migration and split boards if necessary. The customer's admin should provision a dedicated Trello API key for migration to avoid throttling shared production keys.

  • Budget and cost fields have no Trello native equivalent

    Project Drive stores budget and cost data as native project and task fields, but Trello has no financial tracking schema. Numeric budget fields cannot map to a typed Trello field without Premium custom fields. We flag each budget field during scoping, propose a custom number field or Google Sheet strategy, and deliver a written budget handoff document for the customer to implement. Budget values are not silently dropped; they are explicitly reconciled and documented so the customer can decide on a post-migration financial tracking approach.

  • Gantt dependencies require manual reconstruction in Trello

    Project Drive stores explicit Gantt dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish) as first-class records. Trello has no native dependency model, so we encode dependencies as checklist items on predecessor cards referencing successor cards by name and URL. This preserves the dependency graph in a recoverable form but does not activate Trello's Timeline Power-Up dependency visualization. We deliver a separate dependency map document listing every dependency by type so the customer's admin can rebuild them natively if they license the Timeline Power-Up or a third-party dependency Power-Up post-migration.

  • Subtask hierarchy flattens into card checklists

    Project Drive subtasks nest under tasks with a parent-reference relationship. Trello has no nested task or subtask concept; the equivalent is a checklist on the card. We preserve the parent-subtask relationship by encoding it in the checklist item title ([Parent] > [Subtask]), but Trello does not render this as a hierarchical tree. Teams that rely on the Project Drive subtask nesting for WBS reporting need to plan a post-migration review of their task breakdown structure. We assess subtask depth during scoping and flag cases where flattening significantly alters the work breakdown semantics.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Project Drive to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit Project Drive to understand the project count, task volume, subtask density per task, attachment count and total size, milestone count, user count, and the number of budget and cost fields in use. We also assess the Gantt dependency graph complexity to estimate encoding effort. We use a combination of CSV exports and UI-based authenticated extraction to inventory the source data. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a preliminary board structure proposal, and an honest assessment of export risk given Project Drive's lack of a documented API.

  2. Trello schema design

    We design the Trello destination structure based on the discovery output. Each Project Drive Project becomes a Trello Board. We define the List structure per board (default: To Do / In Progress / Review / Done, customizable). We create labels for milestone tracking, task status categories, and any source tag mappings. If Trello Premium is in scope, we configure Custom Fields for start date, due date, and budget fields. We create the Timeline Power-Up recommendation document if milestones are present. The schema is validated in a Trello sandbox board before production migration begins.

  3. Source extraction and dependency encoding

    We extract Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Milestones, Attachments, Comments, and Custom Field data from Project Drive using authenticated bulk CSV exports and UI-based extraction scripts. We reconstruct the Gantt dependency graph from the exported visual layout data and encode each dependency as a checklist item on the predecessor card. Assignee emails are resolved against a pre-provisioned Trello user list. Budget and cost fields are extracted and flagged in a separate reconciliation sheet. Any Project Drive user without a corresponding Trello account is reported to the customer for provisioning before the load phase.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Trello sandbox workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project lead reviews the board structure, card content, checklist encoding, label assignment, milestone display, and attachment integrity. They spot-check 25-50 random cards against the Project Drive source records and sign off before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections, list structure changes, or label naming adjustments happen at this stage. We do not proceed to production until the sandbox sign-off is received.

  5. Production migration

    We migrate into the production Trello workspace in dependency order: Boards first (workspace structure), then Cards with List resolution, then Custom Fields, then Checklist items (including subtask and dependency encoding), then Card Comments, then Attachments. We respect Trello's rate limits (300 req/10s per API key, 100 req/10s per token) with controlled batching and exponential backoff on 429 responses. Board members are invited and assigned to cards at this stage. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. A delta migration captures any records modified during the production window.

  6. Cutover, handoff, and hypercare

    We freeze Project Drive writes during cutover and run a final delta sync. We enable Trello as the system of record and verify the production reconciliation report matches the sandbox sign-off. We deliver the dependency map document, the budget handoff document, the custom field setup guide, and the calendar re-sync instructions as separate PDF artifacts. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve any record reconciliation issues raised by the project team. We do not rebuild Butler automations as part of the standard migration scope; we deliver a written inventory of automation patterns in scope for the customer to rebuild in Butler or via a separate automation engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Project Drive logo

Project Drive

Source

Strengths

  • Native Gantt chart view gives visual project sequencing without a separate scheduling tool.
  • Structured task hierarchy with cross-functional team assignment reduces ownership ambiguity.
  • Built-in budget and cost fields align project management with financial oversight in one interface.
  • Calendar sync for scheduling meetings and task deadlines from within the platform.

Weaknesses

  • First-timer onboarding is not user-friendly; teams report a learning curve before becoming productive.
  • Pricing is considered high relative to competitors for the feature set offered.
  • Limited documented API access makes programmatic export and integration non-standard.
  • Fewer integrations compared to established PM platforms like Asana, Monday.com, or Smartsheet.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Project Drive and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Project Drive: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Project Drive doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Project Drive to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Project Drive to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Project Drive to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Project Drive to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 5,000 tasks with no budget remapping and low subtask density complete in three to five weeks. Migrations over 15,000 tasks, high subtask-to-task ratios, multiple budget fields requiring a Google Sheet handoff strategy, or complex Gantt dependency graphs encoding move to eight to twelve weeks. The UI-based extraction method for Project Drive (due to the absence of a documented API) is the primary timeline variable on the source side, while Trello's API rate limits control write throughput on the destination side.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Project Drive.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day