Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ITM Platform and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.
ITM Platform
Source
Jira
Destination
Compatibility
7 of 11
objects map 1:1 between ITM Platform and Jira.
Complexity
CModerate
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
ITM Platform and Jira serve different ends of the project management spectrum: ITM Platform is a portfolio-and-program management tool with strategic alignment dashboards and baseline tracking for mid-market IT and professional services teams, while Jira is an issue-tracking and Agile delivery platform with deep sprint planning, Git integration, and a 3,000-plus plugin ecosystem. Migrating between them requires flattening ITM Platform's three-tier hierarchy (Portfolio > Program > Project) into Jira's single Project container, mapping ITM Tasks to Jira Issue types (Story, Task, Bug, Subtask), and resolving the absence of a native Risk entity in standard Jira without an add-on. We export via ITM Platform's REST API with pagination-aware looping and automatic session re-authentication every 28 minutes, then load into Jira via the REST API with exponential backoff and batch chunking. We do not migrate Workflows, automations, or scheduled reports as code; we deliver a written inventory of every rule requiring rebuild in Jira Automation or ScriptRunner post-migration.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a ITM Platform object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
ITM Platform
Portfolio
Jira
Jira Project or Project Category
lossyITM Platform Portfolios are top-level containers grouping Programs and Projects. We map each Portfolio to a Jira Project Category for organizational grouping, or to a dedicated Jira Project with an Epic structure if the customer requires portfolio-level reporting in Jira Dashboards. The choice depends on how many Jira Projects the migration generates and whether Advanced Roadmaps is licensed.
ITM Platform
Program
Jira
Jira Project or Epic
lossyITM Platform Programs group related Projects under a Portfolio. We map Programs to Jira Projects where the Program has more than 20 child Projects and warrants its own Jira project, or to Epics within the parent Jira Project where the Program maps to a Portfolio Category. Strategic alignment tags from the Program migrate to Jira labels or a custom Program__c field.
ITM Platform
Project
Jira
Jira Project
1:1ITM Platform Projects map directly to Jira Projects. Each Jira Project is created with the appropriate project type (Team-managed or Company-managed) based on the customer's chosen Jira governance model. Project dates, status, budget, and owner migrate to Jira Project properties or custom fields. ITM Project methodology (Agile or Waterfall) determines the initial Jira Board configuration.
ITM Platform
Task
Jira
Story, Task, or Bug
1:1ITM Platform Tasks map to Jira Issue types. We map based on the ITM Platform task type and the customer's configuration: standard work tasks become Jira Task, deliverables with acceptance criteria become Jira Story, and defects found during execution become Jira Bug. The mapping is configurable during scoping based on the customer's existing Jira issue type scheme.
ITM Platform
Subtask
Jira
Subtask
1:1ITM Platform Subtasks map to Jira Subtask issues, linked to the parent Jira issue via the Parent Link field. Where the destination Jira project uses a Team-managed project without Subtask enabled, we flatten Subtasks into a structured checklist field or as separate Jira Tasks with a parent relationship label. Task dates, status, assignee, and estimated hours migrate directly.
ITM Platform
Milestone
Jira
Fix Version or Due Date
lossyITM Platform Milestones are date-driven markers belonging to Projects or Tasks. We map milestone dates to Jira Fix Version (Releases) where milestones represent deliverable checkpoints, or to the Issue Due Date where a milestone maps to a specific task. The migration is configurable per milestone during scoping, and we preserve the milestone name as the Fix Version name or as a custom milestone__c field on the issue.
ITM Platform
Baseline
Jira
Structured Dataset (custom field)
1:1ITM Platform Baselines capture schedule, cost, and revenue snapshots per project. Jira has no native baseline comparison feature outside of Advanced Roadmaps. We extract all baseline records as a structured JSON or CSV dataset and attach it to the Jira Project as a custom Baselines__c field or as a Confluence page linked from the Jira Project. The customer reconciles baselines post-migration using Advanced Roadmaps or a third-party plugin.
ITM Platform
Risk
Jira
Issue (custom type) or custom fields
lossyITM Platform Risks are a distinct entity with probability, impact, owner, and mitigation plan. Jira Software does not have a native Risk object. We map Risks to Jira Issues using a custom Risk Issue type (if the customer's Jira scheme includes one) or to standard Jira Issues with custom fields: Probability__c, Impact__c, Mitigation__c, and Risk_Status__c. The customer configures the Risk issue type scheme during scoping.
ITM Platform
Custom Fields
Jira
Jira Custom Fields
1:1ITM Platform entity-scoped custom fields (project, task, purchase, risk) map to Jira custom fields of equivalent data type. We extract the custom field definition (key, type, options) and create Jira custom fields with matching names in the destination Jira instance. Text, number, date, and select fields map directly. Multi-select and checkbox fields map to Jira multi-select or label fields. Custom field configuration (screens, default value, search template) is deployed via Jira REST API after schema validation.
ITM Platform
Time Entries
Jira
Worklog
1:1ITM Platform time entries track hours logged against Tasks or Projects. We map these to Jira Worklog records linked to the corresponding Jira Issue. Each worklog preserves date, hours, user (resolved via email match), and description. Jira requires the user making the worklog API call to match the worklog author; we handle this by using the ITM Platform user email to resolve the Jira accountId before inserting each worklog record.
ITM Platform
User
Jira
Jira User
1:1ITM Platform Users are referenced across Tasks, Risks, Assignments, and Time Entries. We extract the full user list (name, email, role) and match by email against the Jira destination site's user directory. Any ITM Platform user without a matching Jira accountId goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import proceeds. We do not create Jira accounts via API without explicit admin authorization.
| ITM Platform | Jira | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | Jira Project or Project Categorylossy | Fully supported | |
| Program | Jira Project or Epiclossy | Fully supported | |
| Project | Jira Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Story, Task, or Bug1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Subtask | Subtask1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Milestone | Fix Version or Due Datelossy | Fully supported | |
| Baseline | Structured Dataset (custom field)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Risk | Issue (custom type) or custom fieldslossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields | Jira Custom Fields1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Time Entries | Worklog1:1 | Mapping required | |
| User | Jira User1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
ITM Platform gotchas
API session token expires 30 minutes after last call
v1 and v2 API endpoints coexist with no clear upgrade path
No documented bulk or batch API endpoint
Jira gotchas
Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration
Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms
Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin
Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption
Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Source audit and Jira schema design
We audit the ITM Platform tenant across Projects, Programs, Portfolios, Tasks, Subtasks, Baselines, Milestones, Risks, Purchases, Custom Fields, Time Entries, and Users. We probe both v1 and v2 API endpoints to confirm which version serves each entity type. We design the Jira destination schema: Jira Projects (Team-managed or Company-managed per the customer's governance choice), Issue Type scheme (Story, Task, Bug, Subtask, Risk), Fix Version structure, Custom Fields with types, and a user reconciliation map. The output is a written scope document and Jira schema design for the customer's admin to review before we proceed.
Risk and baseline handling decision
We confirm the customer's chosen approach for Risks (native Issues with custom fields vs. add-on) and Baselines (structured dataset vs. Confluence page). These are the two objects without a direct Jira equivalent and require a configuration decision before migration. We pre-create the custom fields in Jira via REST API and validate that they appear in the correct Screens and Issue Type schemes. If the customer has purchased Advanced Roadmaps, we confirm baseline mapping into its data model.
User reconciliation and Jira account provisioning
We extract every distinct ITM Platform user referenced on Tasks, Risks, Assignments, and Time Entries and match by email against the destination Jira site's user directory. Users without a matching Jira accountId go to a reconciliation spreadsheet for the customer's admin to provision. Migration cannot insert Time Entries or issue assignments without a resolved Jira accountId. We do not create Jira users programmatically unless explicitly authorized and supplied with the required provisioning parameters.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox or a dedicated test Jira Cloud site using production-like data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (Projects, Issues, Subtasks, Risks, Time Entries), spot-checks 25-50 records against the ITM Platform source, and confirms that custom field values, assignee mappings, and worklogs landed correctly. Any mapping corrections are made before production migration begins. Jira Cloud Migration Assistant is not used for this migration because JCMA is designed for Jira Server-to-Jira Cloud moves, not cross-platform migrations.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects (created first), Issues (Tasks, Stories, Bugs with Subtasks), Risks (with custom fields resolved), Time Entries (as Jira Worklogs via REST API with accountId lookup), and Baselines (as structured datasets attached to the Jira Project). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. ITM Platform writes are not frozen during migration; we run delta passes to capture records modified during the migration window before cutover.
Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff
We run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then deliver the production reconciliation report to the customer's project manager. We deliver a written inventory of every ITM Platform workflow rule, scheduled report, and automation requiring rebuild in Jira Automation or ScriptRunner. We do not rebuild automations as code inside the migration scope. We support a one-week post-cutover window for reconciliation issues. Jira dashboard and report rebuilding is outside the standard migration scope and can be scoped as a separate engagement.
Platform deep dives
ITM Platform
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Jira
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Overall complexity
Moderate migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ITM Platform and Jira.
Object compatibility
1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
ITM Platform: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
ITM Platform doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ITM Platform to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your ITM Platform to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave ITM Platform
Other ways to arrive at Jira
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.