Project Management migration

Migrate from TeamGantt to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TeamGantt and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

62%

8 of 13

objects map 1:1 between TeamGantt and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from TeamGantt to Trello is a paradigm migration: TeamGantt is a Gantt-first scheduling tool where timelines, dependencies, and resource workloads define the data model, while Trello is a Kanban board tool where Cards flow through Lists define the workflow. We map the structural differences during scoping — Projects become Boards, Tasks become Cards, Milestones become Cards with zero-duration due dates, and Subtask Groups become Lists. Dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, lag time) have no native Trello equivalent, so we deliver a written dependency graph as a handoff artifact for the admin to rebuild using Butler or a Power-Up. We migrate time-tracking entries as card descriptions or checklist items, flag the Workloads report as manual reconstruction, and preserve all Labels, Comments, and Custom Field values. Trello's API rate limit of 300 requests per 10 seconds per key governs our write batching throughout. We do not migrate TeamGantt Baselines, Workload reports, or automation rules as code; these require manual rebuild in Trello or a third-party Power-Up.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

What's pushing teams away

  • Teams report that resource management is limited—workload views are paywalled behind Pro and the capacity planning features are basic compared to dedicated resource management tools.
  • The lack of a native macOS desktop app frustrates users who want a full-screen experience; the iPad/iPhone app is described as small and insufficient for complex project management.
  • Integration ecosystem is narrow—Zapier is the primary no-code integration path, and teams needing native bi-directional sync with tools like Salesforce or QuickBooks find themselves building custom API workarounds.
  • Some teams find collaboration features lacking—particularly threaded discussions, @mentions, and shared document editing that modern PM tools bundle in.
  • As teams scale beyond 5–10 concurrent projects, the per-project pricing model becomes expensive and teams report looking for unlimited-project plans or portfolio-level views that TeamGantt Basic and Standard do not offer.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How TeamGantt objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a TeamGantt object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TeamGantt

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Projects map to Trello Boards. Each Project's start date is inferred from its earliest task start date in TeamGantt (there is no explicit project start/end field), so we use that earliest task date as the Board creation context. Projects with multiple milestone groups can be mapped to separate Lists within a single Board or to separate Boards entirely; the customer chooses the board structure during scoping. Custom project-level fields migrate to Trello Custom Fields on the Board.

TeamGantt

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Tasks map to Trello Cards. We preserve: task name, description (notes), start date, due date, duration, percent complete, and assignee. Percent complete from TeamGantt maps to Trello's Card cover color or a checklist item completion ratio depending on customer preference. Cards are created in the target List (mapped from the TeamGantt Group/Subtask structure) before moving to the next phase.

TeamGantt

Group (Subtask hierarchy)

maps to

Trello

List

1:many
Fully supported

TeamGantt Groups represent the subtask hierarchy within a Project. Each Group maps to a Trello List, and Tasks within the Group become Cards in that List. Nested sub-groups are flattened to one level of List; deeply nested subgroups are mapped as Cards with the full path name preserved in the Card title for manual reorganization post-migration. The mapping spec documents the nesting depth for the customer's admin to evaluate against their Trello board structure.

TeamGantt

Milestone

maps to

Trello

Card (zero-duration marker)

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Milestones (zero-duration date markers) map to Trello Cards with the milestone name and the target date set as the Card due date. We flag milestones in the Card name prefix (e.g., '[MILESTONE]') so they are visually identifiable. The milestone association to parent Project is preserved in the Board name. There is no native milestone type in Trello; if the customer requires a calendar or timeline view of milestones, we recommend the Planyway or Placker Power-Up post-migration.

TeamGantt

Dependency (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, lag)

maps to

Trello

Dependency Inventory (no native target)

lossy
Fully supported

Task dependencies define predecessor/successor chains in TeamGantt. Trello has no native dependency model. We export the full dependency graph (predecessor_id, successor_id, type, lag_days) as a written dependency map and include a ranked list of Cards requiring manual link setup. If the customer licenses a dependency Power-Up (Placker, GoodGantt, Planyway), we provide the data in the format required by that Power-Up's import tool. Dependencies are not migrated programmatically because no stable Trello native API supports them.

TeamGantt

Checklist

maps to

Trello

Checklist

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Checklist items on Tasks map to Trello Card Checklists. We preserve checklist item names and completion status. Checklist item order is preserved. Trello supports multiple checklists per Card; we maintain the original checklist structure grouping within each Card. Checklist-level completion percentages map to the same percent-complete logic used for Card cover or summary.

TeamGantt

Label

maps to

Trello

Label

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Labels map directly to Trello Board Labels. Label names and colors transfer. Label assignments across all Tasks are preserved as Card Label assignments. If the TeamGantt account uses more labels than the target Trello Board supports (10 label colors per Board by default), we map excess labels to label name prefixes and group by color family.

TeamGantt

Discussion (Comments)

maps to

Trello

Card Comments

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Discussion threads on Tasks map to Trello Card Comments. We preserve full comment text, author name, author email, and timestamp. Comment ordering is maintained chronologically. Trello does not support threaded replies natively; flat comment chains map directly. If the source comments contain @mentions, we note them as plain-text mentions in the comment body since Trello @mentions are a different mention system.

TeamGantt

Custom Field (Project and Task level)

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt custom fields exist at both project and task levels. We discover all custom field definitions via the TeamGantt API (field type, label, options for picklist fields) and create equivalent Trello Custom Fields on the target Board before data import. Text, number, date, and checkbox types map directly. Picklist fields map to Trello Dropdown Custom Fields with the original option values. Custom fields with no equivalent Trello type are flagged for the customer to choose a representation (text, label, or checklist).

TeamGantt

User

maps to

Trello

Board Member

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Users (task assignees and project collaborators) map to Trello Board Members. We resolve by email match. Guest users in TeamGantt who have limited project access map to Trello Members added to the relevant Boards only. Trello Free tier supports unlimited Members per Board, so no member-count constraint applies. Users without a Trello account are held in the reconciliation queue for the customer to provision accounts before card assignment migration proceeds.

TeamGantt

Time Entry

maps to

Trello

Card Description / Checklist Item

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt time entries (tracked hours per task) have no native Trello equivalent. We append time entry data to the Card description in a structured format (date, user, hours, notes) and optionally create a 'Time Log' checklist item per Card for manual tracking. If the customer licenses a Trello time-tracking Power-Up post-migration, we provide the time entry data in the format required for that Power-Up's import.

TeamGantt

Baseline

maps to

Trello

Baseline Inventory (no native target)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt Baselines capture a snapshot of the original planned schedule for comparison against actual progress. Trello has no baseline or planned-vs-actual comparison feature. We export all saved baselines as a structured CSV (task name, planned start, planned end, actual start, actual end, variance days) and deliver it as a written handoff artifact. The customer's admin uses this to manually recreate baseline data in a spreadsheet or a third-party reporting tool. We do not migrate baselines programmatically because no Trello API or Power-Up supports this data model.

TeamGantt

Workloads Report

maps to

Trello

Member Card Summary

lossy
Fully supported

The TeamGantt Workloads report (available on Pro and Unlimited plans) shows per-user task assignments and hour allocations. Trello has no native workload view. We export the Workloads report as a CSV (user, task, hours assigned, hours logged) and deliver it as a written artifact. For teams using a Trello Power-Up with workload features (Planyway, Placker), we provide the data in the format required for that Power-Up's import. If the source account is on Basic or Standard, workload data is sourced from the CSV export fallback.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt gotchas

High

Project billing model charges per project on Basic tier

Medium

Workloads report requires Pro or Unlimited plan

Medium

Free plan exports are limited to CSV with no API access

Low

Project start date is inferred, not set explicitly

Low

Time zone and language handling for non-Latin characters

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Task dependencies do not migrate to Trello natively

    TeamGantt dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, and lag time) have no native Trello equivalent. Trello does not have an API endpoint or Power-Up that supports dependency import in bulk. We export the full dependency graph as a structured CSV (predecessor_id, successor_id, type, lag_days) and deliver it as a written dependency map for the customer's admin to rebuild manually using Butler or a licensed dependency Power-Up. Migrations that assume dependencies carry over automatically will find gaps in scheduling logic post-migration.

  • Baselines and Workloads reports have no Trello target

    TeamGantt Baselines capture planned vs. actual progress snapshots and the Workloads report shows per-user task allocations. Trello has no equivalent native objects. We export both as structured CSV handoff artifacts, but they do not migrate programmatically and require manual rebuild in Trello or a third-party reporting tool. If the source account is on Basic or Standard, the Workloads report is not accessible via the TeamGantt UI and must be sourced from the CSV export fallback.

  • Trello API rate limits constrain write throughput

    Trello enforces 300 requests per 10 seconds per API key and 100 requests per 10 seconds per token. Exceeding these limits returns a 429 error. We batch all card and comment writes into chunks of 50 records with 500ms inter-request delays and exponential backoff on 429 responses. For migrations exceeding 2,000 cards, we add a member-based parallelism strategy that routes writes by Board Member to distribute token-level quota across multiple tokens. Response-size limits (large card action queries) are handled by paginating requests and avoiding single large response fetches.

  • TeamGantt free plan lacks API access for migration

    The TeamGantt free tier includes unlimited tasks and projects but does not include API access. Migration from a free TeamGantt account relies entirely on CSV export (Menu > Export CSV), which omits discussion comments, baselines, and some custom field values. We advise customers on the free plan to upgrade to a paid plan for a 14-day migration window before migration begins. We flag which objects are available from CSV vs. API during scoping so the customer understands the data completeness scope before signing off.

  • Subtask hierarchy flattens to one List level in Trello

    TeamGantt supports nested Groups of tasks (subtask hierarchy with parent-child date propagation). Trello Lists are a single organizational level within a Board. We map each TeamGantt Group to a Trello List and nest deeper subtask Groups as Cards with the full group path in the Card name. We document the nesting depth in the mapping spec so the customer's admin can evaluate whether the flattened structure meets their workflow needs or requires post-migration reorganization into additional Boards.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TeamGantt to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and plan comparison

    We audit the source TeamGantt account across tier (Free/Basic/Standard/Pro/Unlimited), project count, task count, group nesting depth, dependency graph size, label taxonomy, comment volume, custom field definitions, and baseline count. We identify which objects are accessible via API vs. CSV export and flag the free-plan API gap. We pair this with a Trello workspace audit: existing Boards, List structure, Power-Up inventory, and member count. The discovery output is a written migration scope listing every object that migrates, every object that requires manual rebuild, and the recommended Board structure mapping from TeamGantt Projects.

  2. Board and List structure design

    We design the Trello destination structure before any data moves. Each TeamGantt Project maps to one or more Trello Boards; we document the rationale (one Board per project vs. consolidating related projects into one Board). We design the List structure by mapping each TeamGantt Group to a List and documenting how nested subtask groups are handled. We pre-create all Trello Custom Fields on each Board and pre-populate label colors to match the TeamGantt label taxonomy. Custom field type mapping (text to text, date to date, picklist to dropdown) is validated in a staging pass before production migration.

  3. CSV and API data extraction

    We extract data from TeamGantt using the REST API for paid-tier accounts (to capture discussions, baselines, and full custom field types) and fall back to CSV export for free-tier accounts or fields not exposed via API. The extraction run captures: Projects, Tasks (with start/end/duration/percent_complete), Groups (hierarchy depth), Milestones, Dependencies (predecessor/successor/type/lag), Labels and assignments, Comments (with author and timestamp), Checklists and items, Custom field values, Time entries, and Workloads report (Pro/Unlimited). We reconcile extracted row counts against the TeamGantt UI counts before proceeding.

  4. Dependency and baseline artifact export

    We run a dedicated export of the dependency graph and all saved baselines as structured CSVs. The dependency CSV lists every successor task, its predecessor, the dependency type (FS, SS, lag), and the calculated slack. The baseline CSV lists every task with its planned start/end dates per saved baseline snapshot. Both artifacts are delivered as written handoff documents alongside the migrated data. We do not write these to Trello since no native target object exists; the customer's admin uses them to rebuild in Butler or a dependency Power-Up.

  5. Production migration with rate-limit-aware batching

    We run production migration in dependency order: Board creation, List creation, then Cards in Group order. Cards are created in batches of 50 with 500ms inter-request delays, exponential backoff on 429 responses, and chunking for large boards. After card creation, we write Checklist items, Label assignments, Comment history (with timestamps and author attribution), Custom Field values, and Member assignments. We reconcile row counts after each batch phase before proceeding. Trello API rate limits (300/key/10s, 100/token/10s) govern write pacing throughout.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze TeamGantt writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified since the initial extraction, then mark Trello as the system of record. We deliver the dependency graph CSV, baseline CSV, and workload report CSV as written artifacts. We do not rebuild TeamGantt automation rules in Trello Butler as part of the migration scope. We provide a Butler command reference for common automation patterns (auto-move Cards on due date, auto-assign on List entry) mapped from TeamGantt Workflow equivalents, and the customer's admin implements these post-migration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

Source

Strengths

  • Drag-and-drop Gantt chart scheduling with automatic dependency propagation and rescheduling notifications.
  • Generous free tier with unlimited tasks and projects, no time cap, making it accessible for freelancers and small teams.
  • Task-level time tracking with hourly estimation and a dedicated Workloads report on higher plans.
  • Baseline comparison that lets teams see planned vs. actual progress over time.
  • Clean CSV and PDF export for sharing project data outside the platform.

Weaknesses

  • No native macOS desktop app; the iOS app is a scaled mobile interface, not a full desktop client.
  • Per-project pricing on lower tiers becomes costly for teams managing many concurrent projects.
  • Resource management is limited—workload views are gated behind Pro/Unlimited, and advanced capacity planning features are absent.
  • Collaboration features are basic; no native document co-editing or rich @mention notification system within tasks.
  • Limited integrations beyond Zapier; no native bi-directional sync with major CRMs or accounting tools.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TeamGantt and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TeamGantt: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    TeamGantt doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your TeamGantt to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TeamGantt to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TeamGantt to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TeamGantt to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 500 tasks, 5 projects, and no complex group nesting complete in two to four weeks. Migrations with 500+ tasks, multi-level subtask groups, large comment histories, or multiple projects mapping to separate Trello boards move to five to nine weeks. The rate-limit write pacing and the dependency/baseline artifact preparation are the primary timeline drivers; the actual card migration typically runs within a single weekend window for most account sizes.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TeamGantt.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day