Project Management migration

Migrate from TeamGantt to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TeamGantt and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

77%

10 of 13

objects map 1:1 between TeamGantt and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

TeamGantt is a Gantt-first planning tool where projects, timelines, and dependencies are the native object model; Asana is a task-centric work management platform that added Timeline (a Gantt-style view) later. The migration is a structural translation: Projects map to Asana Projects or Portfolio groupings, Tasks carry their start/end/duration dates and subtask hierarchy, Finish-to-Start and Start-to-Start dependency relationships migrate to Asana's dependency links, and zero-duration Milestones map to Asana's Milestone task subtype. Workload data (user-task assignments and hour estimates) requires TeamGantt Pro or Unlimited and maps to Asana's assignee and custom time-tracking fields. Baselines have no Asana equivalent and cannot migrate; we document the baseline snapshot for the customer's admin to reference manually. Workflows, custom automations, and recurring project templates do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory of every active rule and template for the admin to rebuild in Asana Rules or the Automation API.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

What's pushing teams away

  • Teams report that resource management is limited—workload views are paywalled behind Pro and the capacity planning features are basic compared to dedicated resource management tools.
  • The lack of a native macOS desktop app frustrates users who want a full-screen experience; the iPad/iPhone app is described as small and insufficient for complex project management.
  • Integration ecosystem is narrow—Zapier is the primary no-code integration path, and teams needing native bi-directional sync with tools like Salesforce or QuickBooks find themselves building custom API workarounds.
  • Some teams find collaboration features lacking—particularly threaded discussions, @mentions, and shared document editing that modern PM tools bundle in.
  • As teams scale beyond 5–10 concurrent projects, the per-project pricing model becomes expensive and teams report looking for unlimited-project plans or portfolio-level views that TeamGantt Basic and Standard do not offer.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How TeamGantt objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a TeamGantt object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TeamGantt

Project

maps to

Asana

Project or Portfolio

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt Projects map to Asana Projects at the individual level. For organizations with multiple parallel projects that share resource pools, we can group related Asana Projects into a Portfolio for portfolio-level tracking. The TeamGantt project-level custom fields (e.g., client name, project type, budget code) migrate to Asana custom fields at the project level. Note that TeamGantt infers project start and end dates from the earliest and latest task dates; Asana allows explicit project start/end dates that we set from the same inference during migration.

TeamGantt

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Tasks map directly to Asana Tasks with name, description, start date, due date, duration, and percent complete preserved. The TeamGantt task-level custom fields map to Asana task-level custom fields. Subtasks in TeamGantt (Groups) map to Asana subtasks, preserving the parent-child nesting depth. Assignee assignments carry over by resolving TeamGantt user email to Asana member. Note: TeamGantt allows multiple assignees per task; Asana allows exactly one assignee per task, so tasks with multiple assignees spawn duplicate task records with the same details and one assignee each, flagged with a _multi_assignee suffix in the name.

TeamGantt

Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt task dependencies map to Asana dependency links preserving the predecessor-successor relationship. Finish-to-Start (FS), Start-to-Start (SS), Start-to-Finish (SF), and Finish-to-Finish (FF) dependency types migrate directly. Lag time values transfer as day offsets on the successor task. We sequence the migration so that predecessor tasks insert before successors to avoid Asana throwing orphan-reference errors. Asana requires Premium or higher for the dependency feature; we verify the destination workspace plan tier during scoping and flag if the migration would exceed the Free-tier dependency limit.

TeamGantt

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Milestone (task subtype)

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Milestones map to Asana Tasks with the Milestone subtype. The milestone name, date, and project association migrate. Asana renders milestones as diamond markers in Timeline view, matching TeamGantt's zero-duration diamond visualization. If the destination Asana workspace is on a Free plan (which does not support Timeline), milestones migrate as regular tasks with a custom field Milestone_Date set to the original milestone date and a tag _milestone for manual conversion by the admin in the paid-tier Timeline view.

TeamGantt

Baseline

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (documentation only)

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Baselines capture a snapshot of the originally planned schedule for comparison against actual progress. Asana has no baseline feature. We export all saved baselines as a structured CSV with task name, planned start, planned end, planned duration, and actual start/end for each baseline instance, and attach this CSV to the project record in Asana as a documentation reference. The customer's project management team uses this CSV for manual variance analysis.

TeamGantt

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Time Tracking or Custom Fields

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt time entries (tracked hours on tasks) map to Asana's built-in time tracking if the destination is on Asana Business or Enterprise. On Asana Premium, time entries map to a custom field Total_Tracked_Hours__c (number type) at the task level. We extract the total tracked time per task from TeamGantt's API or CSV export and insert it into the destination field. Hourly estimation values from TeamGantt Pro+ migrate to Asana custom fields Estimated_Hours__c and Actual_Hours__c for variance tracking.

TeamGantt

Workloads

maps to

Asana

Assignee + Custom Workload Fields

1:1
Mapping required

TeamGantt Workloads report (available on Pro/Unlimited plans) exports per-user task assignments and capacity data. We map each user's assigned tasks to Asana tasks with the same assignee, and create a custom numeric field Capacity_Hours__c on the user profile if the destination supports it. TeamGantt Basic and Standard accounts do not have Workloads access; we fall back to the CSV export of task assignments by user. Note: Asana's Workload chart requires Business or Enterprise; we map workload data into custom fields that the admin can surface in a spreadsheet or third-party reporting tool if the plan tier is lower.

TeamGantt

Checklist

maps to

Asana

Subtasks

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt checklist items on tasks map to Asana subtasks with the checklist item text as the subtask name and the completion status preserved as the subtask completion flag. The subtask inherits the parent task's assignee and due date unless the checklist item has a specific assignee set in TeamGantt, in which case we create a subtask with that specific assignee.

TeamGantt

Discussion

maps to

Asana

Task Comments

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt discussion threads attached to tasks migrate to Asana task comments. Each discussion post becomes a comment entry with the original author name, timestamp, and HTML-formatted body preserved. Threaded discussions in TeamGantt maintain their reply structure in Asana's comment chain. Attachments referenced in discussions migrate as task attachments if the attachment URL is accessible; we log a note for any attachments that require re-upload.

TeamGantt

Label

maps to

Asana

Tags

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Labels (used for task categorization) map directly to Asana Tags. Label names and color assignments migrate to tag name and tag color. Tasks with multiple labels in TeamGantt receive multiple tags in Asana. Asana Tags are workspace-level and reusable across projects, matching TeamGantt's label scope.

TeamGantt

User

maps to

Asana

Member

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Users map to Asana workspace Members by email address. User display name, email, and avatar URL migrate. Guest users in TeamGantt (collaborators without full access) map to Asana Guest members with appropriate workspace restrictions. We extract the full user list during scoping and match against the Asana workspace membership; any unmatched users go to a provisioning queue for the customer's admin to create before record migration begins.

TeamGantt

Custom Fields (project-level)

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (project-level)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt project-level custom fields (text, number, date, dropdown) map to Asana project-level custom fields of equivalent type. We discover field types via the TeamGantt API during scoping, pre-create the matching custom field in the destination Asana workspace, and map values during migration. Dropdown options in TeamGantt map to Asana enum options. Number and date fields map directly with type validation before insert.

TeamGantt

Custom Fields (task-level)

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (task-level)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt task-level custom fields migrate to Asana task-level custom fields using the same type mapping as project-level fields. Text fields map to Asana text custom fields, number fields to number custom fields, date fields to date custom fields. If a TeamGantt custom field type does not have a direct Asana equivalent (e.g., a TeamGantt formula field), we convert to a text custom field with the computed value and note the conversion in the mapping spec.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt gotchas

High

Project billing model charges per project on Basic tier

Medium

Workloads report requires Pro or Unlimited plan

Medium

Free plan exports are limited to CSV with no API access

Low

Project start date is inferred, not set explicitly

Low

Time zone and language handling for non-Latin characters

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Asana Timeline dependency bugs with complex chains

    Asana's dependency handling has documented bugs in complex timeline configurations. Users in the Asana community forum report that when a task with multiple predecessors is moved via drag-and-drop, not all dependent tasks update to the correct date, producing red arrows and inconsistent rescheduling. Asana support confirmed in September 2024 that the drag-drop date calculation is buggy in certain multi-dependency scenarios. We flag this during scoping: if the TeamGantt source has dependency chains with multiple predecessors or mixed dependency types (Finish-to-Start mixed with Start-to-Finish), we document every chain over five links and advise the customer to validate the Timeline behavior in an Asana sandbox before committing to full migration. We do not modify the dependency data to work around Asana's bugs.

  • Asana Free and Starter tiers lack Timeline and dependencies

    Asana's Timeline view (Gantt-style dependency visualization) and the dependency feature require Asana Premium ($10.99/user/month) or higher. If the destination Asana workspace is on a Free or Starter plan, tasks and milestones migrate but the dependency links and Timeline view are not functional. We verify the destination plan tier during scoping. If the customer intends to use Free or Starter, we map dependencies to a custom field Dependency_Predecessors__c listing predecessor task names, and milestones to tasks with a _milestone tag, preserving the data for manual reconstruction when the plan is upgraded.

  • Multiple assignees in TeamGantt split to duplicate tasks in Asana

    TeamGantt allows multiple assignees per task, but Asana enforces exactly one assignee per task. Tasks with two or more assignees in TeamGantt cannot map to a single Asana task without data loss. We handle this by creating one Asana task per assignee, duplicating all other task fields (name, description, dates, custom fields, subtasks) for each record and flagging the duplicate with a _shared_task_{n} suffix. The customer receives a reconciliation report listing all multi-assignee tasks so they can decide whether to merge duplicates in Asana or distribute work intentionally.

  • Baselines have no Asana equivalent

    TeamGantt's baseline feature captures a snapshot of the originally planned schedule at a point in time, enabling planned vs actual progress comparison. Asana has no baseline feature. We cannot migrate baselines as functional records. We export each saved baseline as a structured CSV (task name, planned start, planned end, planned duration, actual dates) and attach it to the Asana project as a documentation reference. The customer's project managers use this CSV for manual variance analysis or connect it to a BI tool for side-by-side comparison.

  • Workloads requires TeamGantt Pro/Unlimited and Asana Business+

    TeamGantt's Workloads report is only available on Pro ($49/manager/month) and Unlimited plans. Source accounts on Basic or Standard do not expose the Workloads API endpoint, returning a 403 response. We fall back to CSV-exported task assignments for these accounts. Additionally, Asana's Workload chart requires Business or Enterprise. Workload data from TeamGantt maps to custom numeric fields on tasks (Estimated_Hours__c, Assigned_Capacity__c) that the customer can view in List view or export to a spreadsheet for capacity analysis if their Asana plan is below Business.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TeamGantt to Asana data migration

  1. Scoping and plan tier verification

    We audit the TeamGantt account across all projects, tasks, subtasks, dependencies, milestones, baselines, custom fields, and user list. We verify the TeamGantt plan tier to determine Workloads and API access scope. We confirm the destination Asana workspace plan tier (Free, Starter, Premium, Business, Enterprise) and flag any feature gaps between the source data richness and the destination plan capability. The scoping output is a written migration spec covering record counts, dependency chain complexity, custom field inventory, and a plan-tier gap analysis.

  2. User and member reconciliation

    We extract every TeamGantt user by email address and match against the Asana workspace member list. Any Asana member that does not yet exist goes to a provisioning queue for the customer's admin to create before migration begins. We also extract guest users and map them to Asana Guest member status. Owner assignments on TeamGantt tasks and projects map to the corresponding Asana member by email resolution; unresolved owners are flagged in the reconciliation report.

  3. Custom field schema pre-creation

    We review every TeamGantt custom field at both project and task levels, determine equivalent Asana field types, and pre-create the custom fields in the destination Asana workspace via the Asana API before any data inserts. Dropdown enum options are seeded from TeamGantt picklist values. Number, date, and text fields are created with matching types. This prevents custom field mapping errors during the migration run and ensures the Asana workspace is ready to accept typed data on first insert.

  4. Sandbox migration and dependency validation

    We run a full migration into a sandbox Asana workspace using production-equivalent data volume. We validate dependency chain integrity by checking that all predecessor links resolve correctly and that Asana's Timeline renders the dependency arrows without red-flag errors. We reconcile record counts (projects, tasks, subtasks, milestones, time entries, comments) against the TeamGantt source. The customer reviews the sandbox and approves the mapping before production migration begins. Any multi-assignee task splits are presented as a decision item for the customer to acknowledge.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in the following sequence: Users (validated against pre-provisioned Asana members), Projects (with project-level custom fields), Milestones (with project association resolved), Tasks (with subtasks), Dependencies (predecessor tasks insert before successors to satisfy referential integrity), Time Entries and workload data (custom fields), Comments (linked to tasks), Tags (from labels), and Custom Field values (on both projects and tasks). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Asana's bulk insert API with batch chunking and handle rate-limit responses with exponential backoff.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze TeamGantt writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration run, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver a baseline CSV for each project, a multi-assignee task reconciliation report listing all split duplicates, and a written automation inventory covering any TeamGantt project templates, recurring task rules, or notification settings requiring rebuild in Asana Rules. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflow and automation rebuild is outside standard scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

Source

Strengths

  • Drag-and-drop Gantt chart scheduling with automatic dependency propagation and rescheduling notifications.
  • Generous free tier with unlimited tasks and projects, no time cap, making it accessible for freelancers and small teams.
  • Task-level time tracking with hourly estimation and a dedicated Workloads report on higher plans.
  • Baseline comparison that lets teams see planned vs. actual progress over time.
  • Clean CSV and PDF export for sharing project data outside the platform.

Weaknesses

  • No native macOS desktop app; the iOS app is a scaled mobile interface, not a full desktop client.
  • Per-project pricing on lower tiers becomes costly for teams managing many concurrent projects.
  • Resource management is limited—workload views are gated behind Pro/Unlimited, and advanced capacity planning features are absent.
  • Collaboration features are basic; no native document co-editing or rich @mention notification system within tasks.
  • Limited integrations beyond Zapier; no native bi-directional sync with major CRMs or accounting tools.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TeamGantt and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TeamGantt: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    TeamGantt doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your TeamGantt to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TeamGantt to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TeamGantt to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TeamGantt to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations with fewer than 5,000 tasks, simple dependency chains, and no time tracking data complete in three to five weeks. Migrations with deep subtask hierarchies, 500+ dependency links, time entry histories, or more than twenty custom fields per project move into eight to twelve weeks because of dependency sequencing validation, time-entry field mapping, and custom field type reconciliation. The TeamGantt plan tier also affects timeline: free-plan accounts require CSV-only export (no API) which adds manual preprocessing steps.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TeamGantt.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day