Project Management migration

Migrate from Smartsheet to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Smartsheet and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Smartsheet logo

Smartsheet

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

64%

9 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Smartsheet and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from Smartsheet to Asana is a structural conversion, not a record transfer. Smartsheet organizes work in Sheets containing Rows across Columns within a Workspace and Folder hierarchy; Asana organizes work in Projects containing Tasks within Teams. Row indent structure becomes parent-child subtask hierarchy, Column types (Date, Contact, Dropdown, Dependency, Baseline) map to Asana Custom Fields, and predecessor relationships become Asana Dependencies linked in Timeline. We cannot export Smartsheet Automations via API, so we capture the automation configuration during discovery and deliver a written rebuild guide for your admin. Attachments migrate as files re-uploaded to Asana tasks. The API access requirement means migrations must come from Business or Enterprise Smartsheet accounts; Pro-plan accounts cannot generate API tokens and may require CSV-based extraction with manual field mapping. Dashboards, Reports, and Baselines are documented separately for manual reconstruction in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Smartsheet logo

Smartsheet

What's pushing teams away

  • Per-user pricing increases significantly when scaling data-entry contributors across the organization, particularly after Smartsheet's 2025 licensing change requiring paid seats for all editors.
  • Large sheets with high row counts or complex formulas suffer noticeable performance degradation, frustrating users managing enterprise-scale portfolios.
  • Mobile app functionality is limited compared to the desktop experience, making real-time field updates difficult for distributed teams.
  • Lack of native sprint planning and backlog management makes it unsuitable for agile software development teams, driving Jira migrations.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Smartsheet objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Smartsheet object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Smartsheet

Workspace

maps to

Asana

Organization (or Team)

1:many
Fully supported

Smartsheet Workspaces are top-level containers that may hold Folders and nested Sheets. We map each Workspace to an Asana Organization, with the option to further split large Workspaces into multiple Asana Teams based on the customer's desired organizational structure. During scoping, we review whether the Workspace hierarchy should become a flat Team structure or a nested Team-within-Organization model. Folders within Workspaces do not have a direct Asana equivalent; we map Folder groupings to Asana Projects or to Sections within Projects, and the customer selects the preferred granularity during scoping.

Smartsheet

Folder

maps to

Asana

Project or Section

1:many
Fully supported

Smartsheet Folders group related Sheets. We map Folders to Asana Projects (preferred) or to Sections within a parent Project (if the customer prefers a flat structure). The choice depends on whether the customer wants Folder contents to appear as a single unified project or as multiple separate projects. During scoping we review the Folder count, Sheet count per Folder, and any cross-Folder Report dependencies that would constrain the structure.

Smartsheet

Sheet

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Each Smartsheet Sheet is the primary project container and maps to a single Asana Project. We preserve the Sheet name as the Project name, the sheet-level summary data as Project description, and any sharing settings as Project-level member permissions. Sheet configuration (grid view defaults, column ordering, conditional formatting rules) is captured in discovery and the equivalent is documented for the admin to configure in Asana. Sheets with more than 500,000 cells are chunked into multiple destination Projects, which the customer approves during scoping.

Smartsheet

Row

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet Rows map to Asana Tasks. Parent-child indent hierarchy in Smartsheet becomes subtask nesting in Asana, with the top-level row becoming a parent Task and indented child rows becoming subtasks. Row order within the sheet is preserved as task ordering. Row-level formulas and computed values migrate as static values unless the customer specifies that the formula logic should be carried forward as a custom numeric field.

Smartsheet

Standard Column (Text, Number, Date, Dropdown)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (Text, Number, Date, Enum)

1:1
Fully supported

Standard Smartsheet column types (Text, Number, Date, Contact List, Dropdown, Checkbox) map to corresponding Asana Custom Field types. Dropdown columns with defined option lists become Asana enum custom fields with the same option values. We use column headers as the custom field name, removing special characters to match Asana's naming constraints. If two source columns have the same header name in different Sheets, we deduplicate by scoping the custom field to the relevant project rather than the workspace.

Smartsheet

Dependency Column (Predecessors)

maps to

Asana

Dependency (Task Link)

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet predecessor relationships (finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, start-to-finish) map to Asana Dependency links in Timeline view. We extract the predecessor row references from Smartsheet, resolve them to the corresponding task GIDs in the destination project, and create Asana dependency records using the Asana Tasks API dependency endpoint. Note: Asana dependencies sometimes do not cascade date adjustments correctly when a predecessor task is manually moved, a known Asana community-reported behavior; we document this for the customer's project managers and recommend using Timeline drag for dependency updates post-migration.

Smartsheet

Baseline Column

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (manual rebuild)

lossy
Fully supported

Smartsheet Baseline columns (snapshot dates and values taken at a project baseline) have no direct Asana equivalent. We capture the baseline data as static Date and Number custom fields named Original Start Date and Original End Date on the task, preserving the historical baseline values. The baseline visualization (overlay of baseline Gantt bars) requires manual rebuild in Asana Timeline as a separate tracking exercise.

Smartsheet

Contact List Column

maps to

Asana

Assignee (Person Custom Field)

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet Contact List columns hold one or more user references per row. Asana supports a single assignee per task natively, with the option to add additional assignees via a multi-person custom field. We map the primary contact from the Contact List column to the native Asana assignee field, and any additional contacts to a multi-person custom field. All contacts are resolved by email match against the Asana Organization's member list.

Smartsheet

Formula Column

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (static value)

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet formula columns (cross-sheet references, aggregations, conditional logic) cannot be preserved as live formulas in Asana because Asana does not support cross-task or cross-project formula evaluation. We evaluate formula columns at migration time and write the resulting static values into Asana custom fields. For simple row-level formulas (arithmetic, date arithmetic), we document the original formula syntax so the customer's admin can optionally rebuild them in Asana's reporting layer.

Smartsheet

Automation Rule

maps to

Asana

Rules for Asana (manual rebuild)

lossy
Fully supported

Smartsheet Automations (triggers, conditions, and actions) cannot be exported via API or UI. We run a discovery audit of every active automation rule, capture its trigger event, conditional criteria, and action sequence in a structured spreadsheet, and deliver it as a rebuild guide. The customer's admin uses Asana's Rules for Asana builder (available at Advanced tier) or a workflow automation tool to reconstruct equivalent logic. This is manual rebuild scope outside the data migration.

Smartsheet

Discussion / Comment

maps to

Asana

Comments

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet Row-level and Sheet-level Discussions migrate to Asana Task comments and Project comments respectively. We preserve the comment body, the author name, and the timestamp. Threading structure (replies to comments) may flatten in Asana depending on whether the destination project uses a flat comment model; we sort by timestamp to preserve chronological order. Mentions (@user) in comments are captured as text references and optionally converted to Asana @mentions if the mentioned user exists in the destination Organization.

Smartsheet

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment (File)

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet row-level and sheet-level file attachments are downloaded from Smartsheet's attachment endpoints and re-uploaded to the corresponding Asana Task. We cannot preserve Smartsheet-hosted attachment URLs because Smartsheet does not export attachment files via standard sheet export. Customers must confirm they have access to the original source files before migration. We validate file size against Asana's 100 MB per-file limit and flag any attachments exceeding this threshold.

Smartsheet

Report

maps to

Asana

Portfolio / Dashboard (manual rebuild)

lossy
Fully supported

Smartsheet Reports aggregate data from one or more source Sheets and are capped at 50,000 rows. We migrate the report's underlying data into Asana as a project with tasks, preserving the filter criteria as named static custom fields. The report's layout, grouping, and visualization do not migrate; we deliver a report reconstruction guide documenting the source report's data sources, filters, and column configuration so the customer's admin can rebuild it in Asana Portfolios or the Asana Dashboard.

Smartsheet

User / License

maps to

Asana

Member

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet user accounts with their assigned roles (Owner, Admin, Editor, Viewer) are mapped to Asana Organization members. We resolve by email match. Any Smartsheet user whose email does not correspond to an existing Asana Organization member is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import. Role mapping: Smartsheet Owner and Admin map to Asana Admin; Editor maps to Member; Viewer maps to Guest (if the destination org uses Guest access) or Member.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Smartsheet logo

Smartsheet gotchas

High

500,000-cell sheet limit constrains large-scale migrations

High

Automations are not exported via API or UI

High

API access requires Business or Enterprise plan

Medium

Attachments are not included in standard sheet exports

Medium

Report row limits cap data exports at 50,000 rows

Low

Rate limit of 300 requests per minute can slow bulk migration

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Smartsheet API access requires Business or Enterprise plan

    The Smartsheet REST API is gated behind the Business ($24/user/mo) and Enterprise tiers. Pro-plan accounts cannot generate API tokens, which means migration tooling cannot pull data programmatically. We confirm the source account's plan tier during scoping. If the account is on Pro, we either request a temporary Business trial upgrade, extract data via CSV export using Data Shuttle, or the customer upgrades before migration begins. API access must be active at the start of the migration engagement.

  • Automations are not exportable and require manual rebuild

    Smartsheet automation rules (triggers, conditions, and actions) cannot be retrieved via API or any native export function. We document every active automation during discovery but cannot deliver them as transferable code. The customer receives a written automation inventory with trigger type, condition logic, action sequence, and recommended Asana Rules equivalent. Rebuilding in Asana Rules (Advanced tier) or a third-party workflow tool is a separate task for the customer's admin. This is a fundamental platform limitation, not a migration tooling gap.

  • Dependency cascade behavior differs between platforms

    Asana's Timeline dependency system sometimes fails to cascade date adjustments correctly when a predecessor task is manually moved, producing red arrows in the Timeline and leaving dependent tasks at incorrect dates. This is a documented Asana community issue (Asana Forum threads from 2024-2025). We re-establish all Smartsheet predecessor relationships as Asana dependencies during migration, but the customer's project managers should be aware of this behavior and use Timeline drag to trigger re-calculation rather than direct date edits when adjusting schedules. We flag this in the project kickoff and post-migration handoff documentation.

  • Baseline visualization requires manual rebuild in Asana Timeline

    Smartsheet Baselines capture a point-in-time snapshot of task dates, duration, and completion status. We preserve baseline values as static custom fields on tasks, but Asana does not natively render a baseline Gantt overlay. Teams that rely on Smartsheet's baseline comparison view to track schedule variance need to rebuild this visualization manually in Asana using a third-party reporting tool or by setting up a separate baseline-tracking project structure.

  • CSV import to Asana flattens sheet structure without API-level migration

    Manual CSV import from Smartsheet to Asana (via Asana's CSV Importer) brings in task names, dates, and assignees but loses the full column structure, custom field definitions, dependencies, row hierarchy, discussions, and attachments. Reviewers on the Smartsheet Community forum describe this as requiring 'a lot of work trying to set up the project similar to the way Asana had it set up.' We use the Asana API directly to create tasks, set custom field values, link dependencies, and attach files, preserving the full structure. Manual CSV-only import is not sufficient for complex Smartsheet sheets and is not our approach.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Smartsheet to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and plan confirmation

    We audit the source Smartsheet account across plan tier (confirming Business or Enterprise for API access), Workspace and Folder count, Sheet inventory with cell counts, active automation rules, custom column types, dependency complexity, attachment volume, and user roster. We confirm that all users have Asana Organization accounts provisioned before migration begins. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing every Sheet-to-Project mapping, a custom column type translation table, and the automation rebuild inventory.

  2. Schema design and custom field provisioning

    We design the Asana destination schema before any data moves. This includes creating Projects in the target Teams, provisioning Custom Fields (with enum option lists mapped from Smartsheet dropdown columns), configuring Timeline dependencies as the first project setting, and setting up Asana member roles matching the Smartsheet role model. For large Workspace hierarchies, we present the customer with two structure options — flat (Folder = Project) or nested (Folder = Section within a parent Project) — and confirm the preferred approach before provisioning.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a staging Asana environment (or the destination Organization if a sandbox is not available) using production data volume. The customer's project manager reconciles record counts (Tasks created, Custom Fields set, Dependencies linked, Attachments uploaded), spot-checks 25-50 random tasks against the source Sheet, and validates that row hierarchy, dates, assignees, and status values are correct. Any mapping corrections are documented and applied to the production migration plan before cutover.

  4. User and owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct user referenced in Smartsheet Contact List columns and match them by email against the Asana destination Organization's member list. Any Smartsheet user without a matching Asana account is added to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions missing Asana accounts (active or inactive depending on whether the Smartsheet user is still active). Migration cannot proceed past task creation until all assignees are resolved because Asana requires a valid assignee reference on every task.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Projects are created first, then Custom Field definitions are applied per project, then Tasks are created with parent-child hierarchy resolved, then Custom Field values are set per task, then Dependencies are linked using the Asana Tasks dependency endpoint, then Discussions are migrated as comments, and finally Attachments are uploaded to tasks. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Large Sheets (approaching 500,000 cells) are chunked into multiple destination Projects during this step with the customer's approval.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze Smartsheet writes during cutover, run a delta migration of any tasks modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the automation rebuild inventory document, the dashboard and report reconstruction guide, and the baseline re-implementation guide to the customer's admin. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any data integrity issues raised by the team. We do not rebuild Smartsheet Automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that work is documented and handed off for the customer's admin to execute.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Smartsheet logo

Smartsheet

Source

Strengths

  • Spreadsheet-familiar UI reduces training time for non-technical users transitioning from Excel or Google Sheets.
  • Deep automation engine with conditional triggers scales business processes without developer involvement.
  • Robust Gantt chart and dependency tracking support traditional waterfall and hybrid project methodologies.
  • Strong governance and admin controls (Admin Center, role management, audit logs) satisfy enterprise IT requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Performance degrades on sheets approaching Smartsheet's 500,000-cell limit, causing lag for large portfolios.
  • Automations and complex formulas are not natively exportable, requiring manual rebuilds at the destination.
  • Per-user pricing model can become expensive as organizations scale editor seats across the enterprise.
  • Mobile experience is significantly limited compared to the web interface, reducing field usability.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Smartsheet and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Smartsheet: 300 requests per minute per access token.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Smartsheet exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Smartsheet to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Smartsheet to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Smartsheet to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Smartsheet to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts with fewer than 20 Sheets and 3,000 rows. Migrations with 50 or more sheets, complex multi-level dependency chains across large portfolios, or multiple Workspace-to-Team hierarchies move to eight to twelve weeks because of row hierarchy reconstruction, dependency re-linking, and custom column type mapping. The main variables are the number of Sheets, row count, and whether the customer requires the automation rebuild inventory to be delivered alongside data migration.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Smartsheet.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day