Project Management migration

Migrate from awork to monday Work Management

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between awork and monday Work Management. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in monday Work Management.

awork logo

awork

Source

monday Work Management

Destination

monday Work Management logo

Compatibility

83%

10 of 12

objects map 1:1 between awork and monday Work Management.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from awork to monday.com is a schema translation migration. awork organizes work under Projects and Tasks within workspace-scoped structures; monday.com uses Boards and Items with a flat group-and-column model. We map Projects to Boards, Tasks to Items, and Time Entries to Items with separate time-tracking columns since monday.com has no native time-tracking module. awork's per-project custom field activation model means we must check every custom field's project assignment during scoping; fields not activated for a given project do not appear in export and must be flagged before migration begins. awork's per-workspace status definitions require a value map at every destination Board since monday.com's status column options are set per-board. We do not migrate automations, workflows, or project templates as code; we deliver written inventories for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration. monday.com's free tier supports up to two boards with three columns, which constrains the migration scope for accounts without an active paid plan.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

awork logo

awork

What's pushing teams away

  • Time tracking cannot be logged directly against a Client record, only against Projects and Tasks, forcing teams that bill by client to create wrapper projects or lose billing granularity.
  • Small, ad-hoc tasks require a full Project to be created before they can be tracked, pushing teams toward either over-engineering their project structure or skipping time logging entirely.
  • Sortable priority tags are absent from the task interface, leaving teams without a native way to sequence or filter work by urgency across the project board.
  • A November 2025 review noted that despite being described as the best on the market, the platform fell short on core feature expectations and felt limiting for growing teams.

Choosing

monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management

What's pulling them in

  • Lowest onboarding friction of any mid-market PM tool — drag-and-drop boards and colorful UI mean non-technical team members contribute from day one without training.
  • Highly customizable board structure lets teams model their actual workflow rather than forcing a predefined template onto their process.
  • Generous free forever plan with two seats lets small teams or solo users validate the platform before committing budget or migrating data from elsewhere.
  • Integrations with Slack, Zoom, Google Drive, and CRM tools keep monday.com as a coordination hub rather than requiring teams to switch context constantly.
  • Multiple view modes — Kanban, Calendar, Gantt, Map, Chart — give different team members the visualization they prefer without switching tools.

Object mapping

How awork objects map to monday Work Management

Each row shows how a awork object lands in monday Work Management, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

awork

Project

maps to

monday Work Management

Board

1:1
Fully supported

awork Projects map directly to monday.com Boards. Each awork project becomes a board with the project name as the board title. The project description, start date, and end date migrate to the board's name and optional description field. Project status (a per-workspace value) maps to the monday.com board's status column options, which we configure before migration. Budget data from awork has no native monday.com equivalent and migrates as a custom number column.

awork

Task

maps to

monday Work Management

Item

1:1
Fully supported

awork Tasks map to monday.com Items within the target Board. Task name becomes the item title, description migrates as the item's text column, due date maps to the date column, and priority migrates to a label or number column. Assignee resolves by matching awork user email to monday.com user email. Task status from awork (a per-workspace value) maps to a monday.com status column configured per-board with a value map collected during discovery.

awork

Subtask

maps to

monday Work Management

Sub-item

1:1
Fully supported

awork Subtasks map to monday.com Sub-items. Sub-items are available on monday.com Standard, Pro, and Enterprise plans. We flag any board migration that includes subtasks if the destination monday.com account is on the Basic plan, as sub-items are not available at that tier. The parent-child relationship is preserved by linking sub-items to their parent item in monday.com. We flag subtask ordering if the destination account uses a view where ordering is not natively preserved.

awork

Time Entry

maps to

monday Work Management

Item (dedicated time-tracking board) or Item columns

1:1
Fully supported

awork Time Entries have no native monday.com equivalent. We create a dedicated time-tracking board or add time-tracking columns to each project board. Each time entry becomes an item with columns for user (linked to the monday.com user), start time, end time, duration (calculated), billable flag (yes/no label column), and task reference (text or link column). The billable flag from awork preserves billing categorization. Time entries with no task association in awork become items in the dedicated time-tracking board with a project reference column.

awork

User

maps to

monday Work Management

User

1:1
Fully supported

awork workspace members map to monday.com User accounts by email address. We extract all distinct awork users referenced on tasks, projects, and time entries and match by email to the monday.com user list. Any awork user without a matching monday.com account is flagged for admin provisioning before migration. User roles and workspace permissions in awork have no direct monday.com equivalent and are documented for the admin to configure post-migration.

awork

Custom Field

maps to

monday Work Management

Column

1:1
Fully supported

awork Custom Fields map to monday.com columns. The critical constraint is that awork custom fields must be activated per-project before they appear at the task level. We audit every custom field's project-level activation status during scoping and flag any field that is not active for a given project. These fields will not appear in export for tasks in that project. The customer either activates the missing fields before export or accepts that those fields will not migrate. We do not infer or fabricate values for inactive fields.

awork

Project Status

maps to

monday Work Management

Status Column Options

lossy
Fully supported

awork Project Statuses are defined per-workspace with custom names, colors, and ordering. There is no global status vocabulary. We collect the complete status schema during discovery and create matching monday.com status column options per-board with corresponding colors and ordering. If awork workspaces have conflicting status names (same concept with different labels), we build a normalization table during scoping.

awork

Tag

maps to

monday Work Management

Tag Column or Text Column

1:1
Fully supported

awork Tags are key-value labels applied to tasks for categorization. We map tag names 1:1 to monday.com tag column values. If the destination board uses the new monday.com column types, tags appear as label options within the tag column. We flag any tag normalization required if the destination board has existing tag labels that conflict with awork tag names.

awork

Project Template

maps to

monday Work Management

Board Template (via duplicate)

1:1
Fully supported

awork Project Templates define reusable project structures including default tasks, statuses, and custom field configurations. monday.com does not have a native project template import. We document the template structure (task names, default assignees, default due dates, custom field values, and status definitions) in a written template inventory. The customer uses monday.com's duplicate board feature or manually creates boards from the inventory. This is not a direct data migration.

awork

Client

maps to

monday Work Management

Board or Column

1:many
Fully supported

awork Clients are top-level records that cannot have time entries logged directly against them. Teams migrating to monday.com frequently restructure by creating a Board per client. We map awork Client records to monday.com Boards and link project-boards as sub-boards or group them by client name. The customer decides during scoping whether clients become top-level boards or a client tag column on existing boards.

awork

Engagement: Note

maps to

monday Work Management

Item Update or Workdoc

1:1
Fully supported

awork Notes attached to tasks map to monday.com Item Updates. We preserve the note body, author (matched by email to monday.com user), and creation timestamp. If the note contains structured content, the author and timestamp migrate with the note body as plain text. Notes with attachments migrate the attachment references separately if they are accessible URLs; binary file attachments have no direct monday.com equivalent and are flagged for manual re-upload.

awork

Workflow Automation

maps to

monday Work Management

Automation (rebuild required)

1:1
Fully supported

awork Workflow Automations have no direct monday.com equivalent. We audit every active awork workflow (trigger type, conditions, actions) and document it in a written automation inventory with recommended monday.com automation equivalents. The customer's admin rebuilds automations in monday.com's Automation Builder. This inventory is a deliverable, not a migrated artifact.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

awork logo

awork gotchas

Medium

Custom fields must be activated per project

Medium

Project statuses are per-workspace, not global

Low

Timeline export is an image, not structured data

monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management gotchas

High

Subitems have no bulk export endpoint

High

API complexity budget constrains query depth

Medium

Daily call limits vary sharply across plan tiers

Medium

Automation and integration rules do not export via API

Low

Saved views are not exposed via API

Pair-specific challenges

  • awork custom fields must be activated per-project before export

    awork custom fields are created at the workspace level but require explicit per-project activation before they appear in any task view or export. If a project does not have a given custom field activated, that field is absent from the export for every task in that project. We audit every custom field's project-level activation status during scoping and produce a gap report listing which fields are missing from which projects. The customer either activates the missing fields in awork before we run the export or accepts that those field values will not migrate. We do not fabricate or infer values for fields that were never activated in the source.

  • monday.com has no native time-tracking module

    awork includes a native time-tracking module with billable/non-billable flags, start/end timestamps, and user attribution. monday.com has no built-in time-tracking feature. We handle this by creating a dedicated time-tracking board or by adding time-tracking columns (user, start time, end time, duration, billable flag) to each project board. However, this is a column configuration that the customer's admin should review post-migration to ensure the time data structure matches their billing workflow. Some teams use a monday.com marketplace app for time tracking; we do not install or configure third-party apps as part of standard migration scope.

  • Sub-items require a paid monday.com plan

    awork supports native subtasks as a structured child object of tasks. monday.com Sub-items are available only on Standard, Pro, and Enterprise plans, not on Basic. We flag subtask migrations when the destination account plan is Basic. If the account is on Basic and subtasks must migrate, we create items in a separate board with a parent-reference column as a workaround, or the customer upgrades the plan. We do not upgrade the account as part of migration scope.

  • Automations and workflows do not migrate

    awork workflow automations (triggers, conditions, and actions) have no direct equivalent in monday.com's Automation Builder. We do not migrate automations as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active awork workflow with its trigger type, conditions, and actions mapped to a recommended monday.com automation equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds these manually in monday.com's Automation Builder post-migration. This is a known limitation of any awork-to-monday.com migration and is addressed in the automation handoff document.

  • Timeline export from awork is an image, not structured data

    awork's timeline export feature produces a PNG or SVG image file suitable for presentations and client-facing visuals, not a structured data file. We do not use the timeline image as a migration source. All task data intended for migration comes from the list view or board view export. This does not prevent migration but means that any work planned exclusively in awork's timeline view must be reconstructed in monday.com's Gantt or timeline view using the migrated item data.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful awork to monday Work Management data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the awork workspace across projects, tasks, subtasks, time entries, custom fields, tags, users, and active workflows. We check every custom field's project-level activation status and produce a gap report. We collect the per-workspace status schema and identify any conflicting status definitions across workspaces. We document project templates and note any automation logic that will require manual rebuild. The discovery output is a written migration scope that includes the activation gap report, status value map, user reconciliation list, and automation inventory.

  2. Schema design and board structure planning

    We design the monday.com destination schema. Each awork Project becomes a Board with a status column configured using the collected status value map. We pre-create all custom columns per board matching the awork custom field definitions. For time tracking, we design a time-tracking column structure (user, start, end, duration, billable flag) either as a dedicated board or as columns on each project board, based on the customer's preference confirmed during scoping. We configure sub-item support on boards where subtasks exist, confirming the destination plan includes this feature.

  3. Test migration in sandbox

    We run a full migration into a monday.com sandbox or a temporary workspace. We validate board structure, item count, column mapping, status value assignment, time entry structure, and user attribution. The customer's project manager spot-checks 20-30 records against the awork source for accuracy and signs off on the mapping before production migration begins. Any corrections to the status value map, column type, or user reconciliation happen here.

  4. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order. User accounts are validated first (confirmed against the monday.com user list). Boards are created from awork Projects. Items are created within boards from awork Tasks. Sub-items are linked to parent items. Time entries are created using the time-tracking column structure. Custom field columns are populated using the activation-confirmed subset. Tags are mapped to tag column values. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  5. Cutover and automation handoff

    We freeze awork write access during cutover and run a final delta migration for any records modified during the migration window. We enable monday.com as the system of record and deliver the automation inventory and project template documentation to the customer's admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild awork automations as monday.com automations; that work is documented for the customer's admin to complete.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

awork logo

awork

Source

Strengths

  • Built-in time tracking keeps billable data linked directly to tasks without a separate tool.
  • Clean, accessible interface reduces onboarding time for non-technical team members.
  • Workflow customization requires far less configuration overhead than comparable tools like Jira.
  • Automation capabilities and Lexoffice integration support end-to-end agency billing workflows.
  • GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance with European-hosted data addresses regulatory requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Time cannot be logged against a Client record directly, only against Projects or Tasks.
  • Small, ad-hoc work items still require a full project to be created before they can be tracked.
  • Native sortable priority tagging is absent from the task interface.
  • No publicly documented API with confirmed authentication or rate limit specifications.
  • The feature set is optimized for agencies and may be limiting for non-agency project teams.
monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management

Destination

Strengths

  • Drag-and-drop board UI with near-zero learning curve for non-technical users entering project data for the first time.
  • 20+ column types and unlimited custom columns let teams model arbitrarily complex data structures without developer help.
  • Multi-view support — Kanban, Gantt, Calendar, Timeline, Chart, Map — satisfies different team members without forcing a single layout.
  • Automations cover common trigger-action patterns for teams without dedicated developers to write custom scripts.
  • Free plan for 2 seats and a 14-day trial on all paid tiers make evaluation risk-free before committing to migration scope.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing with no enterprise flat-rate option means costs scale linearly with headcount, making it expensive at 50+ seats.
  • Subitems lack bulk API access, making them problematic for CRM-style use cases where contact records live as subitems under a company board.
  • Automations and advanced views are gated behind Pro and Enterprise tiers, creating feature deserts on entry-level plans.
  • Dependency column is visually limited — no critical path, no auto-rescheduling, and cross-board dependencies require manual link management.
  • No native document management; docs, wikis, and knowledge bases require a separate integration or third-party workaround.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across awork and monday Work Management.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    awork: Rate-limited per client; 429 Too Many Requests response includes RateLimit-Reset header indicating seconds until reset.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    awork exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your awork to monday Work Management migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about awork to monday Work Management data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during awork to monday Work Management migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your awork to monday Work Management migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts under 30 boards and 5,000 tasks with straightforward custom fields and no per-project activation gaps to resolve. Migrations with large time entry histories (over 10,000 entries), extensive per-project custom field activation gaps, or complex tag normalization move to five to nine weeks because of the scoping time required to audit activation status and configure the time-tracking column structure in monday.com.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from awork.
Land in monday Work Management, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day