Project Management

Migrate your awork data

Agency-focused project management platform with built-in time tracking, workflow automation, and a clean interface. Positioned as a simpler Jira alternative for teams managing client projects.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
awork logo

In its favor

Why people choose awork

The signal that keeps awork on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Users consistently cite built-in time tracking as the primary reason for choosing awork, because it eliminates the need for separate time-logging tools and keeps billing data tightly coupled to tasks in one platform.

The interface is described as intuitive and immediately clear, making it accessible to team members of varying technical skill levels without requiring formal training or documentation.

Workflow customization is praised as significantly simpler than Jira, with fewer settings to configure and a more focused feature set that maps directly to agency processes.

The Lexoffice integration is highlighted as a differentiator for German-speaking agencies, connecting project time data directly into accounting workflows with minimal manual intervention.

Teams switching from Notion, Trello, or Microsoft To Do cite awork's structured project hierarchy and dedicated client-project setup as the key improvements to how they organize work.

Time tracking cannot be logged directly against a Client record, only against Projects and Tasks, forcing teams that bill by client to create wrapper projects or lose billing granularity.

Small, ad-hoc tasks require a full Project to be created before they can be tracked, pushing teams toward either over-engineering their project structure or skipping time logging entirely.

Sortable priority tags are absent from the task interface, leaving teams without a native way to sequence or filter work by urgency across the project board.

A November 2025 review noted that despite being described as the best on the market, the platform fell short on core feature expectations and felt limiting for growing teams.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave awork

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing awork. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where awork fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Built-in time tracking keeps billable data linked directly to tasks without a separate tool.Clean, accessible interface reduces onboarding time for non-technical team members.Workflow customization requires far less configuration overhead than comparable tools like Jira.Automation capabilities and Lexoffice integration support end-to-end agency billing workflows.GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance with European-hosted data addresses regulatory requirements.

Weaknesses

Time cannot be logged against a Client record directly, only against Projects or Tasks.Small, ad-hoc work items still require a full project to be created before they can be tracked.Native sortable priority tagging is absent from the task interface.No publicly documented API with confirmed authentication or rate limit specifications.The feature set is optimized for agencies and may be limiting for non-agency project teams.

Where it works

Small to mid-sized agencies (5–100 users) that need structured client-project hierarchies with integrated time tracking in a single platform, particularly in German-speaking markets where Lexoffice accounting integration reduces billing overhead.Teams migrating from unstructured tools like Notion, Trello, or Microsoft To Do that require clearer project organization, task hierarchies, and accountability without the configuration complexity of Jira.Agencies with recurring client work where project templates, reusable workflows, and automated status progressions reduce setup time across similar engagements.Teams requiring GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance with European-hosted infrastructure, particularly in consulting and professional services firms subject to data residency requirements.Project-based teams that bill by the hour and need billable flags, user attribution, and start/end timestamps tightly coupled to tasks without maintaining a separate time-tracking tool.

Where it struggles

Teams that bill or report at the client level rather than the project level, since time cannot be logged directly against a Client record and requires workarounds like wrapper projects.Growing teams that begin to outgrow the agency-optimized feature set, particularly when core feature expectations (per a November 2025 review) are not met for scaling operations.Environments with frequent ad-hoc tasks or quick captures where creating a full project feels over-engineered, leading to either bloated project structures or skipped time logging.Non-agency organizations—such as product teams, internal IT departments, or engineering squads—where client-project hierarchies are irrelevant and the feature set feels misaligned with actual workflows.Teams requiring native, sortable priority tagging across the task board, since this capability is absent from the standard task interface without custom field workarounds.

Pricing tiers

awork pricing overview

a work publishes tier names (Starter, Professional, Enterprise) with recommended team sizes but does not publicly disclose per-seat or flat pricing. Professional is recommended for teams of 5–100 users; Enterprise targets teams of 20–200 users. Pricing is custom and typically negotiated, which means migration scoping must account for potential feature gating if a source account is on a lower tier.

Starter

Tier 1 of 3

Not publicly documented

What's included

Core project and task managementUp to a small team sizeStandard support

Need help selecting your Project Management?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on awork's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

awork object support

Object-by-object support for awork migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Projects

Fully supported

a work's primary container for client work. Projects have statuses, assigned users, budgets, and deadlines. We migrate Projects 1:1 and preserve the project name, description, start/end dates, budget fields, and owner assignment. Status values require mapping to the destination system.

Tasks

Fully supported

Tasks are the core work unit within Projects. awork exposes tasks in list, board, and timeline views. We export all task fields including assignee, due date, priority, status, and description. Custom field values are migrated at the task level. The task's status field maps from awork's per-workspace status scheme.

Subtasks

Mapping required

Subtasks exist as a structured child object of tasks. The exact nesting depth and display behavior vary by view. We preserve the parent-child relationship but flag subtask ordering if the destination system has ordering limitations. Some PM tools collapse subtasks into checklist fields, which we handle during field mapping.

Users (Team Members)

Fully supported

Users are workspace-scoped members with roles. awork stores user profiles with names, email addresses, and avatars. We migrate user records and preserve assignments on Projects and Tasks. If the destination system uses a different user schema, we map by email as the unique identifier.

Project Statuses

Mapping required

Statuses are user-defined at the workspace level, not global. Each project can have a custom set of statuses with distinct names and colors. We collect the full status schema during scoping and build a value map so migrated records land in the correct state at the destination.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields are created at the workspace level, then activated per-project before they appear at the task level. awork supports text, number, date, and other field types. We flag any custom field that is not activated for a target project, as it will not surface at import time. Task-level custom fields export to Excel and API in all views.

Time Entries

Fully supported

a work stores tracked time with start and end timestamps, user attribution, billable/non-billable flags, and task association. Time entries export in Excel format. We migrate all time entry fields and note that billing rates stored inside awork may need separate mapping if the destination uses a different rate schema.

Project Templates

Mapping required

Project Templates in awork define reusable project structures including default tasks, statuses, and custom field configurations. We preserve template definitions as a distinct object and migrate them as Projects or templates at the destination depending on the target platform's template model.

Tags

Fully supported

Tags are key-value labels applied to tasks to categorize work across projects. Tags export with task data. We map tag names 1:1 and flag any tag normalization needed if the destination system enforces lower-case or uniqueness constraints.

Gotchas

What to watch for in awork migrations

Issues we've hit on past awork migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

Medium

Custom fields must be activated per project

Medium

Project statuses are per-workspace, not global

Low

Timeline export is an image, not structured data

How a awork migration works

Four steps, awork-specific

Connect

OAuth 2.0 (recommended OAuth 2.1 with PKCE / Authorization Code Flow) and personal API keys into awork. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate awork-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate awork quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with awork rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

awork migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during awork migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your awork migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most awork migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate awork.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your awork setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported