Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Tability and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Tability
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
10 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Tability and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Tability to Asana is a migration from a purpose-built OKR platform into a broader work-management suite that layers Goals on top of project tracking. Tability's Objectives and Key Results map into Asana's Goals and custom-field-augmented Projects, but the structural relationship differs: Tability embeds progress measurement directly in OKR records, while Asana stores progress on Goals as a separate rollup requiring manual or rule-driven updates. We sequence migration by exporting Objectives first, then Key Results, then Tasks linked to those OKRs, and merge in the check-in history as task comments or Goal notes. We do not migrate Tability's AI-generated goal drafts, Strategy Map dependency graphs (which have no export format), or the weekly reminder automations, which are rebuilt as Asana Rules or manually on the Advanced tier.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Tability object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Tability
Objective
Asana
Goal
1:1Tability Objectives map to Asana Goals. We preserve the objective title, description, owner (mapped by email to Asana User), start/end dates, and current status (At Risk, On Track, Completed). Parent-child objective hierarchies in Tability map to Asana's hierarchical Goals with a parent_goal_gid reference. Progress percentage migrates as a manual value in Asana's progress field since Asana Goals do not auto-rollup from sub-items without an integration.
Tability
Key Result
Asana
Goal (via custom fields)
1:manyTability Key Results are sub-objects attached to Objectives with a metric type (number, percentage, currency, binary), current value, target value, and unit label. Asana has no native Key Result sub-object; we model Key Results as custom fields on the linked Asana Project or as numbered Tasks under a Key Results grouping section. For numeric Key Results, we create Asana custom number fields; for percentage Key Results, we create percentage fields; for binary (yes/no) Key Results, we create a checkbox custom field. The Objective-Key Result relationship is preserved by linking each KR Task or field group to the parent Goal.
Tability
Check-in
Asana
Task Comment or Goal Note
1:1Tability check-in history (date, author, note, updated progress value) does not export in the standard CSV. We extract it from the activity log separately and merge it by Objective and Key Result ID. Check-ins attach to the corresponding Asana Goal as Notes (for objective-level check-ins) or to the parent Project Task (for Key Result-level check-ins). The original author and timestamp are preserved. If the activity log is inaccessible on the customer's tier, we flag the gap before migration.
Tability
Task
Asana
Task
1:1Tability Tasks connected to Objectives carry assignees, due dates, and completion status. We map them to Asana Tasks, preserving the objective linkage as an Asana Tag (named with the parent objective title) so that task-to-OKR alignment is visible via tag filtering. Due dates, assignees, and completion status transfer directly. Subtasks in Tability map to Asana Subtasks under the parent Task.
Tability
User / Owner
Asana
User
1:1Tability user records carry name, email, and role. We match by email to the destination Asana organization's User directory. Owners without a matching Asana User are flagged as ghost owners and held in a reconciliation queue; the customer provisions matching Asana users before record import resumes.
Tability
Custom Property
Asana
Custom Field
lossyTability allows custom fields on Objectives and Key Results. We export them as name-value pairs and map them to Asana custom fields by type: text to Asana text fields, numbers to number fields, dates to date fields, and dropdowns to enum fields. Asana does not allow custom field type changes after creation; we create new fields with the correct type before import and flag any type mismatches for customer resolution.
Tability
Tag / Label
Asana
Tag
1:1Tags applied to Tability Objectives and Key Results export as a string array. We map them to Asana Tags with identical labels. Asana Tags are org-wide and can be applied across projects; this preserves cross-project tagging that Tability supports.
Tability
Strategy Map
Asana
Dependency Linkage (manual rebuild)
1:1Tability's Strategy Map visualizes cross-team objective alignment and dependencies as a UI-level graph with no structured export format. We extract a best-effort adjacency list by querying each Objective's linked dependencies from the Tability UI. On Asana, dependencies are task-level constructs (not goal-level), so we document the dependency pairs and deliver a written relinking guide for the customer's admin to rebuild using Asana's dependency linking on the migrated Projects. Organizations with more than 20 cross-linked objectives should plan for a manual review session post-migration.
Tability
Dashboard
Asana
Portfolio / Project Dashboard (manual rebuild)
1:1Tability dashboards are saved view configurations with chart layouts and filter states. These are UI-level constructs without semantic data. We do not migrate dashboard layouts. The customer rebuilds visibility using Asana Portfolios (Advanced tier) or project-level reporting views. We document the key metrics and objectives visible on each Tability dashboard so the customer can configure equivalent Asana views.
Tability
Standup
Asana
None
1:1Tability Standups are async daily updates scoped to individuals. They are transient, conversation-level data with no structural equivalent in Asana. We do not migrate standups. If the customer uses standups for OKR-adjacent progress tracking, we recommend Asana's My Tasks view or a daily standup section within a project as the replacement.
Tability
AI Goal Recommendations
Asana
None
1:1Tability's AI-generated goal drafts and suggestions exist within the platform's AI layer and are not stored as exportable database records. They cannot be migrated to any destination platform. Asana does not offer an equivalent AI goal recommendation feature at this time. We document this boundary upfront so customers do not expect their AI-generated draft library to carry over.
Tability
Integration Configuration
Asana
Integration Reconfiguration (documented)
1:1Tability integration settings (Jira, Slack, Teams, Asana connectors) are destination-side configurations that do not export. We document which tools were connected to Tability and deliver a reconfiguration checklist for each so the customer can re-establish the connections in their Asana workspace. The Asana integration settings in particular (Tability's bidirectional Asana sync) are replaced by using Asana Goals natively.
| Tability | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Objective | Goal1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Key Result | Goal (via custom fields)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Check-in | Task Comment or Goal Note1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User / Owner | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Property | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Tag / Label | Tag1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Strategy Map | Dependency Linkage (manual rebuild)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Dashboard | Portfolio / Project Dashboard (manual rebuild)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Standup | None1:1 | Fully supported | |
| AI Goal Recommendations | None1:1 | Not supported | |
| Integration Configuration | Integration Reconfiguration (documented)1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Tability gotchas
No documented public API for bulk exports
Check-in history is not exported in standard CSV
AI-generated goal drafts are not structural data
Per-seat pricing with no published rate card
Strategy Map dependency graph has no export format
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and data audit
We audit the Tability workspace across account tier, workspace count, objective hierarchy depth, Key Result volume, check-in frequency, task linkage count, and custom field configurations. We request a pre-export data audit from Tability support for workspaces exceeding CSV row limits. We also verify the customer's current Asana tier and confirm whether the Goals module is accessible (requires Advanced). The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts per object type, a list of any inaccessible data (activity log, AI drafts, Strategy Map), and an Asana tier recommendation.
CSV batch export and activity log extraction
We guide the customer through Tability's multi-batch CSV export process, grouping by workspace or date range to stay within column and row limits. We extract the activity log separately for check-in history reconstruction. Each batch is validated for row count, column completeness, and referential integrity (Objective IDs on Key Results, Owner IDs on all records) before the next batch is exported. Any records that exceed export limits are flagged and pulled manually with Tability support assistance.
Schema design in Asana
We configure the Asana destination workspace before migration. This includes creating custom fields on the target Projects (matching Tability's Key Result metric types: number, percentage, currency, checkbox), creating Tags that mirror Tability's tag labels, setting up a Goals hierarchy structure that reflects Tability's parent-child Objective relationships, and establishing a naming convention that preserves Tability's workspace separation within Asana Projects or Portfolios. Custom fields are created in Asana before any data import to avoid type-mismatch issues since Asana does not allow field type changes after creation.
User reconciliation and owner mapping
We extract every distinct Tability Owner referenced on Objectives, Key Results, and Tasks and match by email against the Asana destination organization's User table. Owners without a matching Asana User go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. Migration cannot proceed past this step because assignee and owner lookups must be satisfied at import time. We also verify that the customer has Asana Advanced licensing for all owners who need Goal creation access.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Asana Goals first (from Tability Objectives), then Projects with custom fields (from Tability Key Results), then Tasks (linked to parent Objectives via Tags), then check-in history (merged as Goal Notes and Task Comments), then tags. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Strategy Map dependencies are documented as a structured adjacency list and delivered as a manual relinking guide rather than imported.
Cutover, validation, and automations handoff
We freeze Tability writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the Automation Rebuild Checklist for Asana Rules (weekly reminder automations equivalent to Tability's check-in reminders) and the Strategy Map relinking guide for the customer's admin. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Tability's weekly reminder automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope.
Platform deep dives
Tability
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Tability and Asana.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Tability: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Tability doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Tability to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Tability to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Tability
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.