Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Tability and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
Tability
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
11 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Tability and Trello.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from Tability to Trello is a migration from a dedicated OKR platform to a Kanban-style task and project management tool. There is no native semantic equivalent in Trello for Objectives, Key Results, progress percentages, or automated check-in reminders—these require a structured mapping strategy rather than a direct object-for-object transfer. We map Tability's Objectives to Trello Boards, Key Results to Lists within those Boards, and Tasks to Cards with checklist items. We preserve owner assignments as Board members and reconstruct check-in history as card Comments because Trello has no timestamped progress-update log. The Tability Strategy Map's cross-objective dependency graph has no export format and is flagged for manual re-linkage. We do not migrate AI-generated goal recommendations, Standups, Dashboards, or integration configurations. Trello automations (Butler rules and Power-Up automations) are documented as a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Tability object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Tability
Objective
Trello
Board
1:1Tability Objectives map to Trello Boards. Each Objective's title, description, owner, start date, and end date transfer to the Board name, description, and membership. The Board is created first so that its ID is available for all child Key Result and Task records. Parent-child Objective hierarchies in Tability map to Board Collections or Workspace-level board grouping if the customer uses multiple Workspaces.
Tability
Key Result
Trello
List or Card
lossyKey Results map to Trello Lists within the parent Objective Board, or to Card records with the metric configuration documented in the Card description. Numeric Key Results (number, percentage, currency) are stored as Custom Fields in the Key Results list if the customer is on Trello Standard or above. The current value, target value, and unit label migrate as structured data. Progress percentage is not natively tracked in Trello; we use checklist completion percentage as a proxy or document the last-known progress value in the Card description for manual reference.
Tability
Task
Trello
Card
1:1Tability Tasks connected to Objectives map to Trello Cards on the corresponding Board. We preserve the assignee (mapped to Board member), due date, description, and completion status. Tability's task-to-objective linkage is recorded in the Card description as a structured note (e.g., 'Linked to Objective: [name]') since Trello has no native many-to-one task-to-objective relationship. Subtasks in Tability migrate as Card checklists with individual checklist items.
Tability
Check-in
Trello
Card Comment
1:1Tability check-in history (date, author, note, updated progress value) is reconstructed as Trello Card Comments. We export the activity log separately from the main CSV, parse each check-in by Objective or Key Result ID, and insert a dated Comment on the corresponding Card. The comment format preserves the author and the updated progress value. This is the closest Trello equivalent to Tability's timestamped progress-update log; there is no native check-in object or progress history in Trello.
Tability
Strategy Map
Trello
Card Links
1:1Tability's cross-team dependency graph (Strategy Map) has no structured export format and is a UI-level construct. We attempt to export the dependency adjacency list by querying each Objective's linked dependencies manually from the Tability interface. On Trello, we reconstruct dependencies as Card Links (using Trello's Attachments > Linked Cards feature) and document the full adjacency list in a delivered CSV so the customer can re-establish links manually. For organizations with more than 20 cross-linked Objectives, we flag the graph for manual re-linkage planning.
Tability
User / Owner
Trello
Board Member
1:1Tability Users and Objective owners are matched by email to Trello members on the target Workspace. We add each matched user as a member of the relevant Board(s). Users without a matching Trello account are flagged as ghost owners and held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before Board membership migration completes.
Tability
Custom Properties
Trello
Custom Fields or Card Description
1:1Tability custom fields on Objectives and Key Results are exported as name-value pairs. On Trello Standard and above, we create Custom Fields of the appropriate type (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox) within each Board. On Trello Free, custom field values are stored as structured text in the Card description. Type coercion is applied where possible; mismatched types are flagged in the pre-migration audit.
Tability
Tag / Label
Trello
Label
1:1Tability tags on Objectives and Key Results map to Trello Labels on Cards. We export the tag array per record and create Label records on the destination Board with matching colors where the customer has defined a color scheme. Unmapped tags (where no corresponding Label exists) are created as new Labels in a neutral color.
Tability
Standups
Trello
none
1:1Tability Standups are async daily updates scoped to individuals and are transient conversation-level data with no structural equivalent in Trello. We do not migrate standup records. We document their existence and approximate volume in the pre-migration audit so the customer understands what will not appear in Trello.
Tability
Dashboards
Trello
none
1:1Tability Dashboards are saved view configurations with chart layout and filter state. These are UI-level constructs with no semantic data. We do not migrate dashboard layouts. The customer rebuilds dashboard views in Trello using Board Filters, Dashboard views (Premium), or Power-Up reporting tools.
Tability
AI Goal Recommendations
Trello
none
1:1Tability AI-generated goal drafts and suggestions live in the platform's AI feature layer and are not stored as exportable database records. They cannot be migrated to Trello or any other destination platform. We document this boundary upfront so customers do not expect their AI-generated draft library to carry over. Trello's own AI features (quick-capture on Standard and above) regenerate recommendations post-migration.
Tability
Integrations
Trello
none
1:1Tability integration configurations (Slack, Teams, Jira, Asana connectors, Zapier) are destination-side settings that do not carry over. We document which tools were connected in Tability so the customer can re-configure them within Trello using Power-Ups, Butler rules, or Trello's native integrations (Slack, Google Drive, etc.) on the destination side.
| Tability | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Objective | Board1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Key Result | List or Cardlossy | Fully supported | |
| Task | Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Check-in | Card Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Strategy Map | Card Links1:1 | Mapping required | |
| User / Owner | Board Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Properties | Custom Fields or Card Description1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Tag / Label | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Standups | none1:1 | Not supported | |
| Dashboards | none1:1 | Not supported | |
| AI Goal Recommendations | none1:1 | Not supported | |
| Integrations | none1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Tability gotchas
No documented public API for bulk exports
Check-in history is not exported in standard CSV
AI-generated goal drafts are not structural data
Per-seat pricing with no published rate card
Strategy Map dependency graph has no export format
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and export audit
We audit the source Tability workspace across workspaces, Objectives, Key Results, Tasks, check-in volume, custom fields, tags, and Strategy Map complexity. We request a pre-export data audit from Tability to confirm all data fits within CSV column and row limits. We also document the activity log availability for check-in history reconstruction. On the Trello side, we audit the destination Workspace, Board structure, existing Labels, Custom Fields already in use, and active Butler automation rules that may conflict with migrated data. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object and any data-fit gaps identified.
CSV export batching and activity log extraction
Tability has no public API. We export Objectives, Key Results, and Tasks via the built-in CSV export, batching by workspace if the export exceeds row limits. We extract the activity log separately to reconstruct check-in history. For Strategy Map dependencies, we run a manual adjacency query per Objective in the Tability UI and compile the results into a dependency CSV. If the activity log is inaccessible (on certain tiers), we flag the gap and advise the customer to screenshot key check-in periods. We do not export Standups, Dashboards, or AI-generated goal recommendations.
Trello destination schema preparation
We pre-create Boards in Trello corresponding to each Tability Objective, pre-creating Lists for Key Results and Label definitions matching Tability tags. On Trello Standard and above, we create Custom Fields on each Board to carry Key Result metric configuration (current value, target value, unit label). We do not create automations during this phase; we document the desired Butler rule configurations for the customer's admin to implement post-migration.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Trello Workspace (using a test Board as a sandbox equivalent) to validate Board, List, Card, Label, and Custom Field creation. The customer reconciles a sample of migrated records against the Tability source, spot-checking objective linkage, Key Result metric values, task assignments, owner-to-member mapping, and check-in comment reconstruction. Any mapping corrections occur here before production migration begins.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Board Members (validated), Boards (from Objectives), Lists (from Key Results), Cards with Custom Fields (from Tasks and Key Results with metric data), Labels (matched to Tability tags), Card Comments (from reconstructed check-in history), Card Links (from Strategy Map adjacency list). Check-in history is the highest-risk phase due to the activity log reconstruction; we run this last to minimize the window where Tability continues receiving updates during migration.
Cutover, validation, and automation handoff
We freeze Tability writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Trello as the active system of record for the migrated scope. We deliver the Butler automation inventory (documented from pre-migration discovery) to the customer's admin for rebuild. We support a three-day hypercare window to resolve reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Tability's automated check-in reminders as Butler rules; that configuration is scoped separately based on the customer's desired cadence.
Platform deep dives
Tability
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Tability and Trello.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Tability: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Tability doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Tability to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Tability to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Tability
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.