Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Tability and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.
Tability
Source
Microsoft Project
Destination
Compatibility
6 of 10
objects map 1:1 between Tability and Microsoft Project.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Tability to Microsoft Project is a paradigm shift from outcome-focused goal tracking to output-focused project scheduling. Tability organizes work around Objectives and Key Results that measure progress toward strategic outcomes; Microsoft Project organizes work around tasks, dependencies, and Gantt schedules that track delivery execution. We bridge this gap by mapping each Tability Objective to a Microsoft Project project or summary task, each Key Result to a task with progress tracked via percent-complete fields, and each Task to a child task. Check-in history is reconstructed from Tability's activity log export and attached as task notes with timestamps, preserving the progress narrative even though Microsoft Project has no native weekly check-in concept. The lack of a Tability public API means all export relies on CSV batch processing with row and column limits; we work around this by exporting in multiple batches and reconciling the full dataset before import. We do not migrate AI-generated goal drafts, dashboards, or standup data.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Tability object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Tability
Objective
Microsoft Project
Project or Summary Task
1:1Tability Objectives map to Microsoft Project projects if the organization manages objectives as standalone initiatives, or to summary tasks within a master project if multiple objectives roll up to a single program. The Objective title becomes the Project name or summary task name. Start and end dates migrate as Project Start and Finish or as the summary task's start and finish dates. Owner assignment maps to a Microsoft Project Resource record created during the owner-to-resource reconciliation phase.
Tability
Key Result
Microsoft Project
Task with Progress Fields
1:1Tability Key Results map to Microsoft Project tasks. The metric type (number, percentage, currency, binary) and target value are stored in custom task fields (Text1 for metric type, Number1 for target) since Microsoft Project has no native Key Result data model. Current progress value is mapped to PercentComplete on the task. The unit label migrates to a Text2 custom field. We do not attempt to replicate Tability's automatic progress calculation because Microsoft Project calculates task progress based on actual work or percent-complete entries rather than from an external metric.
Tability
Task
Microsoft Project
Subtask or Task
1:1Tability Tasks connected to Objectives and Key Results map to Microsoft Project tasks or subtasks. The Objective linkage is preserved by nesting the task under the corresponding summary task (representing the Key Result) that is itself nested under the Objective summary task. Assignee, due date, and completion status migrate as Resource Assignment, Finish date, and PercentComplete=100 respectively.
Tability
Check-in
Microsoft Project
Task Note with Timestamp
1:manyCheck-in history is not included in Tability's standard CSV export. We extract the activity log separately and reconstruct check-in records by Objective and Key Result ID, merging them with the CSV export. Each check-in becomes a Microsoft Project task note appended with the check-in date, author name, and progress note. Where Microsoft Project does not support task-level notes at scale, we attach check-in history as a project-level document or SharePoint-linked note. Large check-in histories (over 50 entries per Key Result) may require manual triage to keep the task note field readable.
Tability
Strategy Map
Microsoft Project
Task Dependencies (Finish-to-Start)
lossyTability's Strategy Map visualizes cross-team objective dependencies as a UI-level graph with no structured export format. We export a best-effort adjacency list by querying each Objective's linked dependencies from the Tability UI. Dependencies are then reconstructed in Microsoft Project as Finish-to-Start task dependencies. Dependency graphs exceeding 20 cross-linked objectives are flagged for manual re-linkage planning on the destination because automated dependency reconstruction from the adjacency list is fragile for complex graphs.
Tability
User / Owner
Microsoft Project
Resource
1:1Tability Users and Objective owners are matched by email to Microsoft Project resource records. We extract distinct owner emails from the CSV export and create a corresponding Resource record for each unique owner. Unmatched owners (users in Tability without a corresponding identity in the destination) are flagged as ghost owners and require manual assignment to the correct Resource before task import resumes. Inactive Tability owners map to Resources with the 'Inactive' flag in Microsoft Project.
Tability
Custom Properties
Microsoft Project
Custom Fields
lossyTability custom fields on Objectives and Key Results are exported as name-value pairs in the CSV. We map them to Microsoft Project custom enterprise fields (Text, Number, Cost, Flag, or Date types chosen during scoping to match the custom field data type). Type coercion is applied where Tability's untyped custom fields contain values that fit a specific Microsoft Project field type. Mismatched types are flagged and stored as Text fields to avoid data loss.
Tability
Tag / Label
Microsoft Project
Text Custom Field or Outline Code
lossyTags from Tability Objectives and Key Results are exported as string arrays. They are mapped to a Microsoft Project custom Text field (e.g., Text3) as a comma-separated list, or to an Outline Code field if the destination org uses Outline Codes for categorization. The customer selects the tagging strategy during scoping.
Tability
Dashboard
Microsoft Project
Not Migrated
1:1Tability dashboards are saved view configurations with chart layout and filter state that do not carry semantic data. We do not migrate dashboard layouts. Users rebuild their reporting views in Microsoft Project using built-in views, SharePoint project site dashboards, or Power BI project templates post-migration.
Tability
AI Goal Recommendations
Microsoft Project
Not Migrated
1:1Tability AI-generated goal drafts and suggestions exist within the platform's AI feature layer and are not stored as structured data objects. They cannot be exported or migrated to any destination platform. We document this boundary upfront so customers do not expect their AI-generated draft library to carry over. The destination platform's own AI capabilities (Microsoft Copilot in Project for the web or Planner Premium) regenerate recommendations post-migration.
| Tability | Microsoft Project | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Objective | Project or Summary Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Key Result | Task with Progress Fields1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Subtask or Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Check-in | Task Note with Timestamp1:many | Fully supported | |
| Strategy Map | Task Dependencies (Finish-to-Start)lossy | Mapping required | |
| User / Owner | Resource1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Properties | Custom Fieldslossy | Mapping required | |
| Tag / Label | Text Custom Field or Outline Codelossy | Fully supported | |
| Dashboard | Not Migrated1:1 | Fully supported | |
| AI Goal Recommendations | Not Migrated1:1 | Not supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Tability gotchas
No documented public API for bulk exports
Check-in history is not exported in standard CSV
AI-generated goal drafts are not structural data
Per-seat pricing with no published rate card
Strategy Map dependency graph has no export format
Microsoft Project gotchas
Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner
Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling
Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client
Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365
Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Pre-export data audit and batch planning
We request access to the customer's Tability workspace and conduct a pre-export audit: total Objectives, total Key Results, total Tasks, total custom fields, check-in history volume, dependency graph size, and user count. We identify which workspaces or goal programs fit within CSV export limits and which require multiple batch exports. We confirm whether the activity log is accessible for check-in history reconstruction. The output is a written export plan with batch groupings and a data gap report identifying any Objectives, Key Results, or check-in periods that require manual extraction.
CSV export and activity log extraction
We guide the customer through the CSV export from Tability in batches (grouped by workspace or program to stay within export limits). Simultaneously, we extract the activity log for check-in history reconstruction. If the activity log is not accessible on the customer's tier, we flag this and advise the customer to capture key screenshots before cutover. We validate the export completeness against the audit counts before proceeding to transform.
Transform: check-in reconstruction and Objective-Key Result linking
We reconstruct the check-in history by merging the activity log with the CSV export by Objective and Key Result ID. Each check-in is tagged with date, author, and note text. We then build the Objective-Key Result-Task hierarchy in a staging table, resolving parent-child links and dependency adjacency lists. Custom fields and tags are normalized to key-value pairs. Owner emails are extracted for resource reconciliation.
Resource and owner reconciliation
We extract every distinct owner email from the Tability export and match against the destination Microsoft Project resource list. For Project Plan 3/5 desktop or Project Online PWA, we create Resource records for each unique owner. Ghost owners (Tability owners without a corresponding destination identity) are placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to resolve before task import. We do not import tasks with unresolved resource assignments.
Microsoft Project import in hierarchy order
We import in dependency order: Resources first (validated), then Summary Tasks for each Objective (or separate Project files if the customer prefers), then tasks for each Key Result, then child tasks for connected Tability Tasks. Key Result metric type, target value, and current progress are stored in custom fields. Check-in history is appended to task notes. Dependencies are created as Finish-to-Start links from the adjacency list. We use the Microsoft Project MPP or MPXJ library for programmatic import when the destination is Project desktop, or the Project Online REST API for cloud PWA destinations.
Cutover, validation, and OKR rebuild handoff
We freeze Tability writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and validate record counts against the pre-export audit. We deliver a written OKR rebuild inventory documenting which objectives and key results were migrated, their mapped task and resource assignments, and which items (dashboards, AI recommendations, standups) could not be migrated and require manual rebuild. We do not rebuild Tability OKR cadences as Microsoft Project schedule templates inside the migration scope.
Platform deep dives
Tability
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Microsoft Project
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Tability and Microsoft Project.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Tability: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Tability doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Tability to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Tability to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Tability
Other ways to arrive at Microsoft Project
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.