Project Management migration

Migrate from Tability to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Tability and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Tability logo

Tability

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

60%

6 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Tability and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Tability to Microsoft Project is a paradigm shift from outcome-focused goal tracking to output-focused project scheduling. Tability organizes work around Objectives and Key Results that measure progress toward strategic outcomes; Microsoft Project organizes work around tasks, dependencies, and Gantt schedules that track delivery execution. We bridge this gap by mapping each Tability Objective to a Microsoft Project project or summary task, each Key Result to a task with progress tracked via percent-complete fields, and each Task to a child task. Check-in history is reconstructed from Tability's activity log export and attached as task notes with timestamps, preserving the progress narrative even though Microsoft Project has no native weekly check-in concept. The lack of a Tability public API means all export relies on CSV batch processing with row and column limits; we work around this by exporting in multiple batches and reconciling the full dataset before import. We do not migrate AI-generated goal drafts, dashboards, or standup data.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Tability logo

Tability

What's pushing teams away

  • Teams outgrow the platform as OKR programs scale across departments, citing insufficient cross-team visibility and reporting depth for organizations beyond 50-100 users
  • Layout and navigation UX frustrates power users who need fast access to objectives and quick-check workflows, with multiple reviews flagging unnecessary complexity in the interface
  • The platform skews toward simple weekly check-ins rather than strategic planning, leading teams who want roadmapping and portfolio-level goal management to seek more capable alternatives
  • Limited API and automation capabilities push technically-oriented teams toward platforms with better programmatic access and custom workflow support
  • Pricing becomes less competitive at scale, especially when teams require advanced analytics, SSO, and audit capabilities available only on higher tiers

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Tability objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Tability object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Tability

Objective

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project or Summary Task

1:1
Fully supported

Tability Objectives map to Microsoft Project projects if the organization manages objectives as standalone initiatives, or to summary tasks within a master project if multiple objectives roll up to a single program. The Objective title becomes the Project name or summary task name. Start and end dates migrate as Project Start and Finish or as the summary task's start and finish dates. Owner assignment maps to a Microsoft Project Resource record created during the owner-to-resource reconciliation phase.

Tability

Key Result

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task with Progress Fields

1:1
Fully supported

Tability Key Results map to Microsoft Project tasks. The metric type (number, percentage, currency, binary) and target value are stored in custom task fields (Text1 for metric type, Number1 for target) since Microsoft Project has no native Key Result data model. Current progress value is mapped to PercentComplete on the task. The unit label migrates to a Text2 custom field. We do not attempt to replicate Tability's automatic progress calculation because Microsoft Project calculates task progress based on actual work or percent-complete entries rather than from an external metric.

Tability

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Subtask or Task

1:1
Fully supported

Tability Tasks connected to Objectives and Key Results map to Microsoft Project tasks or subtasks. The Objective linkage is preserved by nesting the task under the corresponding summary task (representing the Key Result) that is itself nested under the Objective summary task. Assignee, due date, and completion status migrate as Resource Assignment, Finish date, and PercentComplete=100 respectively.

Tability

Check-in

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Note with Timestamp

1:many
Fully supported

Check-in history is not included in Tability's standard CSV export. We extract the activity log separately and reconstruct check-in records by Objective and Key Result ID, merging them with the CSV export. Each check-in becomes a Microsoft Project task note appended with the check-in date, author name, and progress note. Where Microsoft Project does not support task-level notes at scale, we attach check-in history as a project-level document or SharePoint-linked note. Large check-in histories (over 50 entries per Key Result) may require manual triage to keep the task note field readable.

Tability

Strategy Map

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Dependencies (Finish-to-Start)

lossy
Mapping required

Tability's Strategy Map visualizes cross-team objective dependencies as a UI-level graph with no structured export format. We export a best-effort adjacency list by querying each Objective's linked dependencies from the Tability UI. Dependencies are then reconstructed in Microsoft Project as Finish-to-Start task dependencies. Dependency graphs exceeding 20 cross-linked objectives are flagged for manual re-linkage planning on the destination because automated dependency reconstruction from the adjacency list is fragile for complex graphs.

Tability

User / Owner

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

Tability Users and Objective owners are matched by email to Microsoft Project resource records. We extract distinct owner emails from the CSV export and create a corresponding Resource record for each unique owner. Unmatched owners (users in Tability without a corresponding identity in the destination) are flagged as ghost owners and require manual assignment to the correct Resource before task import resumes. Inactive Tability owners map to Resources with the 'Inactive' flag in Microsoft Project.

Tability

Custom Properties

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Tability custom fields on Objectives and Key Results are exported as name-value pairs in the CSV. We map them to Microsoft Project custom enterprise fields (Text, Number, Cost, Flag, or Date types chosen during scoping to match the custom field data type). Type coercion is applied where Tability's untyped custom fields contain values that fit a specific Microsoft Project field type. Mismatched types are flagged and stored as Text fields to avoid data loss.

Tability

Tag / Label

maps to

Microsoft Project

Text Custom Field or Outline Code

lossy
Fully supported

Tags from Tability Objectives and Key Results are exported as string arrays. They are mapped to a Microsoft Project custom Text field (e.g., Text3) as a comma-separated list, or to an Outline Code field if the destination org uses Outline Codes for categorization. The customer selects the tagging strategy during scoping.

Tability

Dashboard

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not Migrated

1:1
Fully supported

Tability dashboards are saved view configurations with chart layout and filter state that do not carry semantic data. We do not migrate dashboard layouts. Users rebuild their reporting views in Microsoft Project using built-in views, SharePoint project site dashboards, or Power BI project templates post-migration.

Tability

AI Goal Recommendations

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not Migrated

1:1
Not supported

Tability AI-generated goal drafts and suggestions exist within the platform's AI feature layer and are not stored as structured data objects. They cannot be exported or migrated to any destination platform. We document this boundary upfront so customers do not expect their AI-generated draft library to carry over. The destination platform's own AI capabilities (Microsoft Copilot in Project for the web or Planner Premium) regenerate recommendations post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Tability logo

Tability gotchas

High

No documented public API for bulk exports

High

Check-in history is not exported in standard CSV

Medium

AI-generated goal drafts are not structural data

Medium

Per-seat pricing with no published rate card

Low

Strategy Map dependency graph has no export format

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Tability has no public API; CSV export has structural limits

    Tability does not publish a documented public REST API with bulk data endpoints. All migration relies on the built-in CSV export, which has column and row limits that may truncate large workspaces or workspaces with many custom fields. We work around this by exporting in multiple batches grouped by workspace or date range, then reconstructing the full dataset during the transform phase. Customers should request a pre-export data audit to confirm all Objectives and Key Results fit within export limits before the migration engagement begins. Any workspace exceeding export limits is flagged for manual data extraction from the UI.

  • Check-in history is absent from standard CSV export

    Tability's CSV export captures current progress values and status but drops the check-in log—the dated trail of progress updates with author notes. We reconstruct check-in history by exporting the activity log separately and merging it with the CSV export by Objective and Key Result ID. If the activity log is not accessible on the customer's Tability tier, we flag the gap and advise the customer to screenshot key periods before cutover. Microsoft Project has no native weekly check-in equivalent; check-in history is stored as task notes, which has a practical readability limit of approximately 50 entries per task.

  • Microsoft Project Online retires September 30, 2026

    Microsoft has announced the retirement of Project Online (the cloud/PWA variant) on September 30, 2026, with new sales ending October 1, 2025. Organizations migrating to Microsoft Project as a destination should confirm whether they are licensing Project Plan 3, Project Plan 5 (standalone), or Project Online (cloud). Project Plan 3 and Plan 5 desktop and cloud access continue. Migrating from Tability to a platform with a known retirement date within 12-18 months requires careful licensing planning; Microsoft is pushing users toward Planner Premium for lightweight work management or Project Server Subscription Edition for enterprise PMO needs.

  • OKR progress does not map directly to project task status

    Tability Key Results track progress toward a measurable outcome (e.g., 'Increase NPS from 42 to 60') using a current-value and target-value model. Microsoft Project tasks track work completion based on actual work hours or percent-complete entries. There is no automatic way to translate a Tability Key Result's numeric progress (e.g., 'NPS at 51, target 60, 85% toward goal') into a meaningful Microsoft Project PercentComplete value without manual interpretation. We store the original Tability progress metric in a custom field but do not auto-calculate task percent-complete from it.

  • Strategy Map dependency graph has no export format

    The cross-team alignment visualization in Tability's Strategy Map is a UI-level construct with no structured data export. We export a best-effort adjacency list by querying each Objective's linked dependencies manually from the UI, but this is fragile for organizations with more than 20 cross-linked objectives. We flag large dependency graphs (exceeding 20 cross-linked objectives) for manual re-linkage planning on the destination before the Microsoft Project dependency import phase begins.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Tability to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Pre-export data audit and batch planning

    We request access to the customer's Tability workspace and conduct a pre-export audit: total Objectives, total Key Results, total Tasks, total custom fields, check-in history volume, dependency graph size, and user count. We identify which workspaces or goal programs fit within CSV export limits and which require multiple batch exports. We confirm whether the activity log is accessible for check-in history reconstruction. The output is a written export plan with batch groupings and a data gap report identifying any Objectives, Key Results, or check-in periods that require manual extraction.

  2. CSV export and activity log extraction

    We guide the customer through the CSV export from Tability in batches (grouped by workspace or program to stay within export limits). Simultaneously, we extract the activity log for check-in history reconstruction. If the activity log is not accessible on the customer's tier, we flag this and advise the customer to capture key screenshots before cutover. We validate the export completeness against the audit counts before proceeding to transform.

  3. Transform: check-in reconstruction and Objective-Key Result linking

    We reconstruct the check-in history by merging the activity log with the CSV export by Objective and Key Result ID. Each check-in is tagged with date, author, and note text. We then build the Objective-Key Result-Task hierarchy in a staging table, resolving parent-child links and dependency adjacency lists. Custom fields and tags are normalized to key-value pairs. Owner emails are extracted for resource reconciliation.

  4. Resource and owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct owner email from the Tability export and match against the destination Microsoft Project resource list. For Project Plan 3/5 desktop or Project Online PWA, we create Resource records for each unique owner. Ghost owners (Tability owners without a corresponding destination identity) are placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to resolve before task import. We do not import tasks with unresolved resource assignments.

  5. Microsoft Project import in hierarchy order

    We import in dependency order: Resources first (validated), then Summary Tasks for each Objective (or separate Project files if the customer prefers), then tasks for each Key Result, then child tasks for connected Tability Tasks. Key Result metric type, target value, and current progress are stored in custom fields. Check-in history is appended to task notes. Dependencies are created as Finish-to-Start links from the adjacency list. We use the Microsoft Project MPP or MPXJ library for programmatic import when the destination is Project desktop, or the Project Online REST API for cloud PWA destinations.

  6. Cutover, validation, and OKR rebuild handoff

    We freeze Tability writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and validate record counts against the pre-export audit. We deliver a written OKR rebuild inventory documenting which objectives and key results were migrated, their mapped task and resource assignments, and which items (dashboards, AI recommendations, standups) could not be migrated and require manual rebuild. We do not rebuild Tability OKR cadences as Microsoft Project schedule templates inside the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Tability logo

Tability

Source

Strengths

  • Weekly automated check-in reminders reduce manager overhead and keep OKR conversations flowing without dedicated follow-up
  • AI goal generation speeds up the goal-writing process for teams new to OKR methodology
  • Multiple view modes (list, Kanban, dashboard, Strategy Map) accommodate different roles from contributor to executive
  • Native Microsoft Teams integration makes Tability accessible within the Microsoft 365 environment where many enterprise teams already live
  • Strategy Map provides visual cross-team alignment without requiring complex manual linking of objectives

Weaknesses

  • Limited API surface means programmatic migration and automation require workarounds or manual export/import steps
  • Reporting and dashboard capabilities are basic compared to enterprise OKR platforms, with users reporting insufficient visibility at scale
  • Layout and navigation UX receives consistent criticism in user reviews, particularly for power users who interact with the tool frequently
  • No native time-tracking or resource-planning features, making it unsuitable for teams that want OKRs embedded within broader project delivery
  • Custom field and object extensibility is minimal, constraining organizations that need to model domain-specific Key Result types
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Tability and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Tability: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Tability doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Tability to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Tability to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Tability to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Tability to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 200 Objectives and 1,000 Key Results with clean CSV exports and accessible activity logs. Migrations with fragmented check-in history requiring activity log reconstruction, large dependency graphs exceeding 20 cross-linked objectives, or multiple workspaces requiring separate project imports move to six to ten weeks. The pre-export data audit typically takes one to two days before the engagement formally begins.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Tability.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day