Project Management migration

Migrate from ProjeQtOr to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ProjeQtOr and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

ProjeQtOr logo

ProjeQtOr

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

77%

10 of 13

objects map 1:1 between ProjeQtOr and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from ProjeQtOr to Trello is a capability trade-down migration. ProjeQtOr bundles Gantt charts, resource calendars, expense tracking, risk registers, and bug tracking in a single application; Trello is a Kanban board platform with no native resource management, financial fields, or Gantt view. We extract data from ProjeQtOr's MySQL or PostgreSQL database using direct SQL queries since no commercial API exists, then load records through Trello's REST API with batch chunking and rate-limit handling. Projects map to Boards, Tasks to Cards, Milestones to labeled Cards or Lists, and Resource Allocations to Card Members with checklist items for hours. We flag the absence of native equivalents for expense records, risk registers, issue workflows, budget tracking, and versions early so the customer understands what will not arrive in Trello before migration begins.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ProjeQtOr logo

ProjeQtOr

What's pushing teams away

  • The web interface lacks the polish and UX consistency of modern SaaS PM tools—users report that navigating between modules and locating specific services feels unintuitive and dated.
  • Performance degrades noticeably with large portfolios—projects with hundreds of tasks and many concurrent users can experience slow load times and sluggish form submissions.
  • No native mobile app exists; teams requiring iOS or Android access must use a browser, which produces a suboptimal experience for field workers or traveling project managers.
  • Limited third-party integrations compared to platforms like Jira or Asana mean teams that rely on Slack notifications, Confluence documentation, or Salesforce CRM sync find ProjeQtOr falls short without custom development.
  • Self-hosted deployment demands internal IT resources for server maintenance, backups, PHP version updates, and database administration—ongoing operational overhead that managed SaaS tools eliminate.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How ProjeQtOr objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a ProjeQtOr object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ProjeQtOr

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Projects map directly to Trello Boards. We extract project name, description, status, start date, and end date from the ProjeQtOr Project table and create a Trello Board per Project. The ProjeQtOr project status (template, planned, in-progress, finished, closed) maps to Board visibility and archived state in Trello. We set the Board description from ProjeQtOr's project description field. Multi-project portfolios in ProjeQtOr become multiple Trello Boards, which is the standard Trello organization pattern.

ProjeQtOr

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Tasks map to Trello Cards. We preserve task name, description, status, priority, planned work hours, and actual work from the ProjeQtOr Task table. Parent-child task hierarchies (WBS numbering) map to Trello Card hierarchy via a naming convention (e.g., parent card name with indented child names in the description) since Trello does not support native parent-card relationships. We also create checklist items for child tasks within the parent Card to preserve the WBS structure in a readable format.

ProjeQtOr

Milestone

maps to

Trello

Card (labeled)

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Milestones map to Trello Cards on a dedicated Milestones List or Board. We set the Card name from the milestone name, the due date from the milestone target date, and apply a specific milestone label (created in Trello during migration) to distinguish milestone cards from regular task cards. Completed milestones get archived or moved to a Completed Milestones list. Standalone milestones without a parent task become Cards with the milestone label and no parent card association.

ProjeQtOr

Resource

maps to

Trello

Member

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Resources (team members with calendar availability and cost rates) map to Trello Board Members. We extract resource name, email, and capacity settings from the ProjeQtOr Resource table and invite each as a Trello member. ProjeQtOr skill profiles and cost-rate fields have no Trello equivalent; we document these in a separate Skills and Rates inventory file delivered alongside the migration for the customer admin to reference outside Trello.

ProjeQtOr

Allocation

maps to

Trello

Card Member + Checklist

1:many
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Resource Allocations bind a Resource to a Task with a start date, end date, and daily assignment percentage. We assign the corresponding Trello Card Member (the Resource) and create a checklist item with the allocation period and percentage. Planned hours from the allocation map to a planned-hours custom field on the Card (Standard plan and above). Multiple resources assigned to a single task produce multiple Card Members, matching Trello's multi-assignee model. We flag any resource allocations exceeding 100 percent in the same ProjeQtOr task as a conflict in the migration reconciliation report.

ProjeQtOr

Expense

maps to

Trello

Card (no native equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Expense records have no native Trello equivalent. Trello has no financial fields, cost amounts, VAT, or budget tracking. We create a Card per expense in a dedicated Expenses Board or list, storing expense category, amount, date, and project association in the Card description and custom fields. The customer should evaluate whether a dedicated expense-tracking Power-Up or a separate financial tool is required for ongoing expense management post-migration. This is a documented capability gap, not a data loss gap.

ProjeQtOr

Risk

maps to

Trello

Card (labeled)

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Risks include probability, impact, mitigation plan, and owner. Trello has no structured risk fields. We create Cards with a Risk label, storing probability as a number custom field, impact as a dropdown custom field, mitigation plan in the Card description, and owner as a Card Member. This is a mapping to the closest Trello primitive, not a structural equivalent. The customer should review whether a dedicated risk register Power-Up is needed for ongoing risk management.

ProjeQtOr

Issue / Incident

maps to

Trello

Card (labeled)

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Issues (bugs, incidents, change requests) map to Trello Cards with an Issue label. We extract issue type, priority, status, and description and create a Card per issue in a dedicated Issues list or board. Priority maps to Trello Card priority labels (e.g., P1, P2, P3). The customer should evaluate whether a dedicated bug-tracking Power-Up is required for software development teams managing issue workflows beyond simple labeled cards.

ProjeQtOr

Document

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr document records reference files stored on the application server filesystem. We locate each file in the ProjeQtOr document storage directory and upload it as an attachment to the corresponding migrated Trello Card using Trello's REST API. We preserve the original folder hierarchy as a reference in the Card description. File uploads use Trello's attachment endpoint with the file binary included in the request body. Cards with no matching file on disk are flagged in the reconciliation report with the file path reference for manual resolution.

ProjeQtOr

Budget

maps to

Trello

Card (no native equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Budget records track planned versus actual spending per project. Trello has no native financial or budget fields. We create a Budget Board with Cards representing budget line items, storing planned amount, actual amount, variance, and category in Card custom fields. The customer should evaluate a dedicated budget-tracking Power-Up or external financial tool for ongoing budget management. We deliver a written budget data inventory as a structured CSV so the customer's finance team can import into their preferred financial system.

ProjeQtOr

Version / Release

maps to

Trello

Card (labeled)

1:1
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr Versions track product releases linked to a project with version name, number, status, and target date. We map these to Trello Cards with a Release label, storing version number, status, and target date in Card custom fields. If the customer uses a Trello Power-Up for release management, we document the recommended configuration and the version data inventory for manual migration into the Power-Up's data model.

ProjeQtOr

Custom Fields (EAV)

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields (Power-Up)

lossy
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr stores custom fields in an EAV (Entity-Attribute-Value) table structure with object-type and ID references. We enumerate all custom field associations per object during discovery, flatten them into the destination custom field structure, and create the corresponding Trello Custom Fields (Standard plan and above) before importing Cards. ProjeQtOr custom fields that have no matching Trello custom field type (e.g., multi-select from a large value list) are merged into the Card description field and flagged in the custom field inventory delivered to the customer. Trello Custom Fields support checkboxes, dates, dropdowns, numbers, and text.

ProjeQtOr

Workflow / Status

maps to

Trello

List

lossy
Fully supported

ProjeQtOr custom status workflows per object type define which statuses are available per project or object class. We read the ProjeQtOr workflow definition table during discovery and create a Trello List per status value on the target Board. Status ordering from ProjeQtOr maps to List ordering in Trello from left to right. We document any ProjeQtOr statuses that have no natural Trello equivalent (e.g., status values tied to approval workflows) as items requiring a manual rebuild decision post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ProjeQtOr logo

ProjeQtOr gotchas

High

No API means migrations rely on database exports or UI exports

Medium

PHP and database version dependencies constrain self-hosted upgrades

Medium

Custom fields stored as EAV rows require careful mapping

Medium

File attachments and documents are server-filesystem references

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • ProjeQtOr has no API; database access requires coordination

    ProjeQtOr exposes no REST, GraphQL, or bulk data export endpoint. All migration work requires direct SELECT queries against the MySQL or PostgreSQL database or CSV/XML exports from the application UI. Direct database access requires read credentials with sufficient privileges to run queries across all tables without locking production data. We request a replica database connection or a read-only dump for migration scoping and map PHP application field names to underlying database column names using the schema documentation generated during discovery. If the source instance uses an older PHP version (7.x with MySQL 5.7), we include a compatibility check in the migration readiness assessment and recommend a staged migration environment if PHP cannot be upgraded without affecting other applications on the same server.

  • EAV custom fields require explicit enumeration queries

    ProjeQtOr custom fields are stored in a separate EAV table with object-type and ID references, not as direct columns on the main record tables. A simple column-list export will omit all custom field values unless the migration queries explicitly join the custom field tables by object type and record ID. We write migration queries that enumerate the custom field associations for each ProjeQtOr object type, flatten them into the destination custom field structure, and flag any ProjeQtOr custom fields that exceed Trello's supported types (checkboxes, dates, dropdowns, numbers, text) so the customer can decide whether to merge them into the Card description or drop them entirely.

  • Resource calendars, expense records, and risk registers have no Trello native equivalent

    ProjeQtOr bundles resource management, expense tracking, and risk registers as core objects. Trello has no resource calendars, no financial fields, and no structured risk fields at any pricing tier. We map these ProjeQtOr objects to Trello Cards with labels and custom fields as the closest available primitive, but the customer should understand that this is a structural compromise, not a direct equivalent. We deliver a written inventory of all expense records, risk registers, and resource calendar data during migration scoping so the customer admin can evaluate whether a dedicated Power-Up or external tool is required for ongoing management of these workstreams.

  • Document file attachments require parallel filesystem transfer

    ProjeQtOr document attachments are stored as files on the application server filesystem with database references. Migrating only the database records will produce broken attachment links in Trello. We identify all ProjeQtOr document records, locate the corresponding files in the ProjeQtOr file storage directory, and run a parallel file upload to Trello's attachment storage using the REST API. We then update the attachment references in the migrated Cards to point to the new Trello-hosted file URLs. Large attachment sets (over 500 files) are chunked and sequenced to avoid rate-limit exhaustion on Trello's API.

  • Trello archived cards are not included in standard JSON export

    Trello's own export tool does not include archived Cards by default, which creates a reconciliation gap when migrating archived ProjeQtOr tasks into Trello. We handle this by explicitly targeting both active and archived Card records in the Trello import payload using the Card archive state flag. For the ProjeQtOr source, we include closed or finished Tasks in the extraction query. This bidirectional archived-record inclusion prevents silent data loss on both sides of the migration. We validate record counts across active and archived states during reconciliation before customer sign-off.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ProjeQtOr to Trello data migration

  1. Migration readiness assessment and database scoping

    We request read-only database credentials (or a replica connection) for the ProjeQtOr MySQL or PostgreSQL instance and run a schema discovery pass to enumerate all tables, column names, custom field EAV associations, and foreign-key relationships. We identify the ProjeQtOr version and PHP/database stack to confirm compatibility with our extraction tooling. We produce a written Migration Readiness Report listing all ProjeQtOr objects in scope, estimated record counts per object, any objects flagged as out-of-scope because they have no Trello equivalent, and a preliminary field-level mapping table for the customer admin to review and approve before extraction begins.

  2. Data extraction and transformation

    We run direct SQL queries against the ProjeQtOr database to extract Projects, Tasks, Milestones, Resources, Allocations, Expenses, Risks, Issues, Documents, and Custom Field values. For each object type we join the EAV custom field tables by record ID and object type to ensure no custom field data is omitted. We transform PHP application field names to destination schema field names using the mapping table approved during scoping. We generate a transformation manifest documenting every field that was dropped, merged, or flagged so the customer has a complete record of what was extracted and how it was mapped.

  3. Trello board and schema creation

    We create a Trello Board per ProjeQtOr Project, a List per ProjeQtOr workflow status, and Custom Fields (where supported by the customer's Trello plan) for all mapped ProjeQtOr custom fields. We configure Card labels for Milestone, Risk, Issue, and Release categories before any Card import begins. If the customer is on Trello Free (limited to 10 boards), we flag this during scoping and recommend a Standard plan upgrade or a board consolidation strategy before migration begins.

  4. File attachment parallel transfer

    We identify all ProjeQtOr document records with filesystem references, locate each file in the ProjeQtOr storage directory, and upload files to Trello as Card attachments in parallel with the Card import. We maintain a file-path-to-Trello-attachment-URL mapping and update Card attachment references accordingly. Files are uploaded in batches of 50 with retry logic to handle transient network errors. Large file sets (over 500 files) are chunked across multiple upload windows to avoid exhausting Trello's API rate limits.

  5. Card import with dependency ordering and reconciliation

    We import Cards in dependency order: parent Tasks first (to establish checklist hierarchy), then child Tasks as checklist items within parent Cards, then Milestone Cards, Risk Cards, and Issue Cards. Card Members are resolved by matching ProjeQtOr Resource email addresses to Trello member accounts. Each import phase emits a row-count reconciliation report (records in source vs records created in Trello) and a random-sample audit of 25 Cards against the source ProjeQtOr records. Reconciliation must reach 98 percent match before the next phase begins. The customer admin reviews and signs off the reconciliation report before production cutover.

  6. Cutover, delta migration, and module inventory handoff

    We freeze ProjeQtOr writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and switch the team to Trello as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of ProjeQtOr modules with no Trello native equivalent (resource calendars, expense records, risk registers, budget tracking, versions, workflows) specifying the ProjeQtOr field values and record counts for each so the customer's admin can evaluate Power-Up alternatives or external tool replacements. We do not rebuild ProjeQtOr workflows, status automations, or email notifications inside Trello as part of the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ProjeQtOr logo

ProjeQtOr

Source

Strengths

  • Completely free and open source under AGPLv3+ with no artificial user, project, or feature caps.
  • Wide functional scope covering tasks, resources, risks, expenses, documents, budgets, and bug tracking in a single application.
  • Supports MySQL and PostgreSQL, giving teams flexibility in their database infrastructure and hosting environment.
  • Active community and documented MS-Project import/export via a dedicated plugin for organizations migrating from or to other PM platforms.
  • Multi-platform deployment on Windows, Linux, macOS and web-based access from any modern browser.

Weaknesses

  • No documented REST, GraphQL, or bulk API—migrations require direct database queries or XML/CSV export from the application UI, which is error-prone for large datasets.
  • Self-hosted model places all server maintenance, backups, and security hardening on the customer's IT team.
  • No native mobile applications; mobile access depends entirely on the responsive web interface which users describe as functional but not polished.
  • Limited integration ecosystem compared to commercial alternatives—no native Zapier, Microsoft Teams, or Google Workspace connectors.
  • User interface complexity and dated visual design create a steeper onboarding curve than modern SaaS project management tools.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ProjeQtOr and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ProjeQtOr: Not applicable—no API exposed.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ProjeQtOr doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ProjeQtOr to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ProjeQtOr to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ProjeQtOr to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ProjeQtOr to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations covering Projects, Tasks, Milestones, and Resource Allocations under 15,000 Cards land between three and five weeks. Migrations that include expense records, risk registers, document attachments (especially large file sets), and EAV custom field complexity extend to seven to twelve weeks. The primary driver of timeline variance is the number of ProjeQtOr modules in active use and the volume of document attachments requiring parallel filesystem transfer to Trello.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ProjeQtOr.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day