Project Management migration

Migrate from Wrike to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Wrike and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Wrike logo

Wrike

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

60%

9 of 15

objects map 1:1 between Wrike and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Wrike to Trello is a structural simplification, not a direct record copy. Wrike organizes work in a deep hierarchy — Spaces containing Folders containing Projects containing Tasks and Subtasks — with custom workflows, calculated fields, time logs, and cross-project dependencies. Trello operates on a flat Board-List-Card model where the deepest nesting is Cards with checklists. We map Wrike Projects to Trello Boards, Tasks to Cards, and Subtasks to Card checklists, preserving the original parent-child hierarchy explicitly in the migration log. Calculated Custom Fields carry their last-known value, not the formula. Dependencies migrate using the Card Dependencies Power-Up where available, or are preserved in the written handoff inventory. Wrike Automations and Custom Workflows do not migrate; we deliver a written map of every active automation and status set for the customer's admin to rebuild in Trello Butler or via Power-Up. Teams moving to Trello typically cite simpler tooling needs, Atlassian ecosystem integration, or eliminating Wrike's per-seat minimum enforcement as the primary drivers.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Wrike logo

Wrike

What's pushing teams away

  • Pricing rigidity punishes small teams—a user needing 2 Business-plan seats must purchase 5, adding ~$900/year in phantom costs that drive churn.
  • Minimum seat enforcement and annual-only billing create forced commitments that feel high-risk for teams unsure of long-term fit.
  • Steep learning curve for non-technical users and growing complexity as workspaces scale—many reviewers cite onboarding time as a barrier to adoption.
  • Interface clutter from accumulated projects, automations, and custom fields degrades performance and usability at scale.
  • Customer support quality is inconsistent, with some mid-market users reporting slow response times and unhelpful troubleshooting.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Wrike objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Wrike object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Wrike

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Projects map 1:1 to Trello Boards using the Project title as the Board name, start and due dates preserved in the Board description. If the Wrike Project contains multiple custom statuses (workflow states), we note the original status set in the migration inventory for the customer to recreate as Lists in Trello. Large projects with over 50 tasks may be split into multiple Boards if the customer requests flat list structures; we flag this decision during scoping.

Wrike

Folder

maps to

Trello

Board or Workspace

1:many
Fully supported

Wrike Folders sitting between a Space and a Project have no direct Trello equivalent. We evaluate the folder count and nesting depth during scoping. Folders with fewer than 10 Projects may be merged into a single Board with Lists representing each Project;Folders with extensive task volumes are mapped to separate Boards under a shared Trello Workspace. The original folder-to-project hierarchy is preserved in the migration log.

Wrike

Space

maps to

Trello

Workspace

1:1
Mapping required

Wrike Spaces map to Trello Workspaces (previously called Teams). Space-level permissions require manual review post-migration since Trello's Workspace permission model (Workspace admins, members, observers) differs from Wrike's Space membership roles. We export the Space member list and present it as a Trello Workspace invite list for the customer's admin to provision.

Wrike

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Tasks map 1:1 to Trello Cards within the target Board and List. Task title becomes Card name, description migrates as Card description (Markdown supported), start date and due date migrate as Card due date, and assignee resolves to Trello member by email match. Custom fields that exist in the destination Trello workspace (Premium or Enterprise) migrate as Card custom fields; custom fields on Free/Standard plans are flagged as a Tier Gap requiring either a Power-Up or manual column creation.

Wrike

Subtask

maps to

Trello

Checklist Item or Child Card

1:many
Fully supported

Wrike Subtasks inherit the parent's context and can have independent assignees and dates. For flat structures, we map Subtasks to Checklist items on the parent Card, preserving the subtask title. For complex Subtask hierarchies with independent dates and assignees exceeding three levels, we convert them to child Cards on the same Board to preserve the richer attribute set. The parent-child relationship is preserved in the migration log for audit.

Wrike

Custom Field

maps to

Trello

Custom Field (Premium/Enterprise) or Power-Up Field

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike supports 14+ Custom Field types (DropDown, Numeric, Date, Currency, Percentage, Contacts, Checkbox, Calculated). We map these to Trello Custom Fields on Premium+ plans using the equivalent type. CalculatedNumeric and CalculatedDate fields carry their last computed value as a static value; Trello does not support live formula recalculation. DropDown fields with large option sets exceeding Trello's 100-option limit are flagged and split into multiple fields. On Free/Standard Trello plans, all custom field data is preserved in the Card description with a structured prefix for manual extraction.

Wrike

Dependency

maps to

Trello

Card Dependencies Power-Up

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike's Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, and Start-to-Finish dependency types map to the Atlassian Card Dependencies Power-Up where available on the destination Trello workspace. The Power-Up must be installed and enabled before migration; we confirm this during pre-migration setup. Dependencies that cannot be mapped due to Power-Up unavailability are listed in the migration inventory with source and target Card names for manual relinking.

Wrike

User

maps to

Trello

Member

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike user accounts (name, email, role) are exported via the API and matched to Trello members by email address. Deactivated Wrike users without a Trello invitation are held in a reconciliation queue. Active Wrike users are invited to the target Trello Workspace before task import begins to satisfy Card assignment requirements.

Wrike

Comment

maps to

Trello

Card Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Comments on Wrike Tasks and Projects migrate as Card comments, preserving author, timestamp, and text content. Trello supports @-mentions in comments, which we attempt to map to Trello member usernames where a match exists; unmatched @-mentions are converted to plain text references. Comment threading from Wrike is not preserved as nested replies in Trello (Trello does not support nested comment threads); all comments land as top-level Card activity.

Wrike

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

File attachments are preserved as Trello Card attachments where file size is under Trello's limit (10MB on Free, 250MB on paid plans). Files exceeding the Free-tier limit require either a Trello Enterprise upgrade or a link reference (URL) in the Card instead of an inline attachment. We flag files exceeding the destination tier's attachment limit during the pre-migration storage audit. Large image attachments and PDFs migrate directly within the limit; files requiring re-upload are noted with source download links.

Wrike

Time Entry

maps to

Trello

Checklist Item (manual) or Power-Up

lossy
Fully supported

Wrike time logs against tasks (hours, dates, billing categories) have no native Trello equivalent. We export the time entries in full and note them in the migration inventory. On Trello Premium/Enterprise, the Time Tracking Power-Up can be installed post-migration to recreate time logs manually. Duration-based entries are converted to checklist items with the original hours noted; billing category is preserved in the Card description.

Wrike

Tag

maps to

Trello

Label

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Tags map directly to Trello Labels by name. Label color is assigned systematically (alphabetical order, cycling through Trello's 10 label colors) unless the customer specifies a color mapping during scoping. Tags with no corresponding Label color assignment default to gray. Wrike tags applied to multiple object types (Folders, Projects, Tasks) are preserved as separate Label entries on each migrated Card.

Wrike

Dashboard

maps to

Trello

(Written inventory only)

lossy
Fully supported

Wrike Dashboards aggregate widgets showing project health, workload, and custom metrics. Trello has no native dashboard or reporting view for cross-board analytics on Free, Standard, or Premium tiers. We export dashboard widget definitions and layout configurations in the migration inventory document. The customer can recreate key dashboards using Trello Enterprise's Custom Fields reporting or a third-party BI tool connected to the Trello API.

Wrike

Workflow

maps to

Trello

(Written inventory only)

lossy
Fully supported

Wrike Workflows define custom status sets and transition rules per project or globally. These do not migrate because Trello uses a List-based status model (each List represents a status column) rather than a defined status schema with transition rules. We deliver a written Workflow inventory listing every custom Wrike status, its allowed transitions, and the recommended Trello List configuration for the customer's admin to implement manually.

Wrike

Automation

maps to

Trello

(Written inventory only)

lossy
Fully supported

Wrike automations (rule-based triggers, conditional actions, time-based triggers) do not migrate to Trello Butler because the automation models are structurally different. Wrike's automations operate on a hierarchical event-triggered model with cross-project scope; Trello Butler operates on board-level command menus and button triggers. We deliver a written automation inventory with each Wrike Rule's trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Butler equivalent for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Wrike logo

Wrike gotchas

High

Minimum seat enforcement forces over-purchase

Medium

Calculated Custom Fields carry values, not formulas

Medium

2GB Free tier storage cap causes export truncation

Medium

400 req/s API rate limit throttles large migrations

Low

Annual billing lock-in limits mid-migration flexibility

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Custom Fields require Premium or Enterprise Trello

    Wrike's 14+ custom field types are available across Team ($10/user) and Business ($25/user) plans. Trello only supports Custom Fields on Premium ($10/user/month) and Enterprise tiers. Migrations from Wrike Team or Business accounts to Trello Free or Standard will lose all custom field data unless a compatible Power-Up is installed or the data is manually embedded in Card descriptions. We run a pre-migration tier audit and alert the customer if their destination Trello plan cannot support the source custom field count. We do not add paid Power-Ups on the customer's behalf; this is a separate procurement decision.

  • Wrike hierarchy flattens into Trello boards

    Wrike's Spaces-Folders-Projects structure cannot map 1:1 to Trello's Board-List-Card model. Spaces become Workspaces, Folders require a scoping decision (merged Board or split Boards), Projects become Boards, and Tasks become Cards. Subtasks become either checklist items or child Cards depending on their independent attribute depth. We document every hierarchy decision in the migration schema and preserve the original Wrike folder tree in the migration log for reference. Teams should review the Board structure post-migration to confirm the flattened model reflects their current workflow.

  • Dependency chains need Card Dependencies Power-Up

    Wrike supports four dependency types (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish) natively between any two tasks. Trello has no native dependency model. The Atlassian-built Card Dependencies Power-Up provides dependency tracking but is only available on Trello Premium and Enterprise. We confirm the Power-Up is installed and enabled before migration and map Wrike dependencies to blocking and relates-to links. If the Power-Up is unavailable, dependencies are preserved as a written inventory with Card names and dependency type for manual relinking.

  • Wrike calculated fields carry values, not formulas

    Wrike's CalculatedNumeric and CalculatedDate fields store a computed value at the moment of export, not a live formula. Trello has no equivalent calculated field type. We flag every Calculated field during the data audit, export the last-known numeric or date value, and append it to the corresponding Trello Card's description with a 'Calculated value at migration time:' prefix. The destination will not recompute these values. We recommend either converting to a static value with periodic manual refresh or using a third-party Power-Up that supports computed fields if the customer requires live calculation.

  • Trello API lacks bulk card creation endpoints

    Trello's REST API creates Cards one at a time with no native bulk insert endpoint, which throttles large migrations significantly compared to Wrike's ~400 req/s API. For workspaces with over 2,000 Cards to migrate, we implement parallel request batching with rate-limit awareness and coordinate migration windows to avoid saturating the API during business hours. The absence of a bulk endpoint does not cause data loss but extends migration duration for high-volume accounts.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Wrike to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and tier alignment

    We audit the source Wrike workspace across tier (Free/Team/Business/Enterprise), active user count, project and task volumes, custom field count and types, automation rule count, dependency chain volume, attachment sizes, and time entry totals. We pair this with a Trello destination tier assessment: Free covers unlimited users but no custom fields; Standard ($5/user) adds butler and 250MB attachments; Premium ($10/user) adds Custom Fields, Card Dependencies, and admin controls; Enterprise is custom-quoted. The discovery output is a written migration scope with a Trello tier recommendation if the source data requires features unavailable on the Free plan.

  2. Hierarchy mapping and Board structure design

    We design the Trello Board structure before any data moves. This includes mapping each Wrike Project to a Board or List, resolving Folder-level containers (merged or split based on project count), deciding whether Subtasks become checklist items or child Cards, and selecting the List names that replace Wrike's custom workflow statuses. We also install the Card Dependencies Power-Up at this stage if the destination is Premium or Enterprise. The Board structure is validated against the customer's workflow owner before migration scripts are written.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Trello Workspace set up specifically for validation using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager or team leads reconcile Board counts, Card counts, label mappings, custom field presence, comment preservation, and dependency linkage against the Wrike source. We correct any mapping errors identified during reconciliation before the production migration window opens.

  4. Owner provisioning and member setup

    We extract every Wrike user referenced on tasks and subtasks (as assignee or responsible user) and match them to Trello members by email. Active Wrike users are invited to the target Trello Workspace before task import begins. Any Wrike user without a matching Trello account is flagged for manual provisioning. Trello Workspace admins configure member permissions (admin, normal, observer) at this stage.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in this order: Workspace and Boards (structure), Lists (status columns), Members (invitations confirmed), Cards (tasks mapped from Projects), Custom Fields (where destination tier supports them), Labels (from tags), Comments, Attachments (with file size validation), and Dependencies (via Power-Up). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Wrike Automations and Workflows are not migrated; they appear in the written inventory delivered at cutover.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff inventory

    We freeze Wrike task writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration for any records modified during the migration, then mark Trello as the system of record. We deliver the Automation and Workflow inventory document to the customer's admin team for rebuild in Trello Butler. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild Wrike Automations as Butler rules inside the migration scope; that work requires a separate scoping engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Wrike logo

Wrike

Source

Strengths

  • Multi-methodology support with Gantt, Kanban, Table, Calendar, and workload views in a single workspace
  • 400+ native integrations plus Wrike Integrate for custom two-way sync and API-based connections
  • Built-in proofing and approval workflows for creative asset review without a separate DAM tool
  • AI Essentials bundled across plans including comment summarization, board AI, and mobile prioritization
  • Resource management and workload balancing with real-time capacity insights on Business tier and above

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing with hard user-range boundaries creates sudden cost spikes when teams grow slightly past tier limits
  • Free tier limited to 2GB storage per account—small teams exhaust this quickly with attachments and exports
  • Annual billing mandatory for most plans; monthly options are not generally available to non-enterprise customers
  • Standard deployment timelines run 75-150 days with significant internal resource commitment required
  • Interface complexity grows with workspace scale, leading to performance lag and governance challenges
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Wrike and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Wrike: ~400 requests per second (estimated per-second basis).

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Wrike exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Wrike to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Wrike to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Wrike to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Wrike to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 5,000 active tasks with straightforward Project-to-Board mapping and no complex dependency chains. Migrations with deep folder nesting, Calculated Custom Fields requiring value-mapping, dependency chains exceeding 500 records, or large attachment volumes requiring manual re-upload extend to six to ten weeks because of Trello API rate-limiting and the hierarchy restructuring work required during Board design.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Wrike.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day