Project Management migration

Migrate from Workfront to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Workfront and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Workfront logo

Workfront

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Workfront and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

1-2 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Adobe Workfront to Trello is a structural simplification. Workfront organizes work through Portfolios, Programs, Projects, and Tasks in a deep hierarchical model with role-based assignments, custom fields, approval workflows, and financial records. Trello uses a flat Board-List-Card model with no native Portfolio or Program equivalent, limited custom field support, and no concept of approval workflows as records. We resolve the hierarchy gap by mapping each Workfront Project to a Trello Board and each Task to a Card, collapsing Programs and Subtasks into lists, checklist items, or descriptive blocks. We extract Workfront custom field schemas via the API and map them to Trello labels or Power-Up custom fields before migration. We preserve all locked Billing Records as a separate financial export. Workfront approval workflows, Automated Workflow templates, and Proofing templates do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Trello Power-Ups or Butler rules.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Workfront logo

Workfront

What's pushing teams away

  • Licensing cost escalations frustrate teams, especially when the tier model requires more paid seats for light contributors or when AI capabilities are gated behind higher tiers at additional cost.
  • Performance degrades for large teams and projects with many concurrent users, with reviewers noting slow load times and sluggish interactions on complex project dashboards.
  • The Boards feature—positioned as an agile alternative to Jira—has underwhelmed customers: integration with core Projects is poor, performance is inconsistent, and teams migrating from Jira find it insufficient as a replacement.
  • Initial setup and configuration carry a steep learning curve; reviewers describe the first few weeks as time-consuming and note that removing fields from templates can corrupt older projects.
  • Adobe's mandatory Admin Console migration forces organizations to change how users authenticate (moving to Adobe Identity), and some teams find this transition disruptive enough to reconsider their toolset.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Workfront objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Workfront object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Workfront

Portfolio

maps to

Trello

Workspace

lossy
Mapping required

Workfront Portfolios have no direct Trello equivalent. We map each Workfront Portfolio to a Trello Workspace as a top-level grouping container. Workspace names and descriptions migrate. Workfront financial rollup data (planned revenue, budget) has no Trello destination and is included in the financial extract alongside Billing Records.

Workfront

Program

maps to

Trello

Board (grouped)

lossy
Fully supported

Workfront Programs group related Projects. Trello has no native Program object. We map each Program to a Trello Board, with a naming convention prefix (ProgramName-BoardName) to preserve hierarchy visibility. Programs without Projects are preserved as empty boards for the customer to populate.

Workfront

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Workfront Projects map 1:1 to Trello Boards. Project name becomes Board name, Project description migrates as the board description, and Project status (Current, On Hold, Complete, Dead) maps to a board label. Active projects become open boards; completed projects become archived boards. We extract project dates (planned start, projected completion) as card due dates on the first card of each board.

Workfront

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Workfront Tasks map to Trello Cards. Task name becomes Card title, task description becomes Card description, and task status maps to Card list position (To Do, Doing, Done). Assignments to Workfront Users map to Trello Board Members via email resolution. Priority in Workfront maps to Trello label color (red for high, orange for medium, green for low).

Workfront

Subtask

maps to

Trello

Checklist Item

1:many
Fully supported

Workfront Subtasks inherit the parent Task schema and are stored as separate rows with a parentID reference. We flatten Subtasks into Checklist items on the parent Card, preserving the subtask name, assignee, and due date. If a Subtask itself has subtasks, we create a nested checklist within the checklist item using Trello's checklist-in-checklist structure via the API.

Workfront

User

maps to

Trello

Member

1:1
Fully supported

Workfront Users (active licensed users) map to Trello Members by email address. We extract user name, email, and primary Job Role as a Trello label on any cards assigned to that user. Inactive Workfront users are not migrated unless their historical task assignments are needed for data completeness; in that case they appear as card members without Trello login access.

Workfront

Custom Field (Project and Task level)

maps to

Trello

Label or Power-Up Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Workfront custom fields (text, number, date, dropdown) are discovered via the Workfront API before migration. If the destination Trello workspace is on Standard or Premium, we map Workfront picklist custom fields to Trello Labels (creating label names from picklist values). For Standard/Premium workspaces with Power-Up custom fields enabled, we map typed fields (date, number, dropdown) to Trello Power-Up custom fields. Free-tier workspaces cannot use Power-Up custom fields; all custom field data becomes card descriptions or labels only.

Workfront

Document

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Workfront Documents attach to Projects or Tasks and support versioning. We extract document metadata (file name, version, upload date, linked proof approval status) and download the file via the Workfront API. Each document becomes a card attachment in Trello. File content is uploaded directly to the Trello Card via the Trello API. Proof approval status is written into the card description as a text block since Trello has no native proofing layer.

Workfront

Notes (Updates)

maps to

Trello

Card Comments

1:1
Mapping required

Workfront Notes are conversation threads attached to Projects, Tasks, or other objects. Each Note (author, timestamp, rich text body) migrates as a Trello Card comment. We preserve the original author name and timestamp. Rich text converts to plain text with basic formatting preserved where Trello comment markdown allows.

Workfront

Issue / Request

maps to

Trello

Card (with label)

1:1
Fully supported

Workfront Issues track blockers or change requests logged against a Project or Task. We map Issues to Trello Cards on the board that corresponds to the parent Project. Workfront Issue status (Open, Closed, On Hold) maps to list position. We add a label named 'Issue' to distinguish these cards from standard tasks. Request Queue intake data becomes card description text.

Workfront

Approval

maps to

Trello

Card Label + Financial Extract

1:1
Fully supported

Workfront Approvals define a workflow of stages and approvers attached to Tasks, Projects, Documents, or Timesheets. Trello has no approval workflow record type. We extract approval status (Approved, Rejected, Pending) and associate it with the Card as a label (Approved, Rejected, Pending). The full approval history including approver, stage, and timestamp is written to a separate CSV export delivered alongside the migration.

Workfront

Billing Record

maps to

Trello

Financial Extract (CSV)

1:1
Fully supported

Workfront Billing Records capture billable revenue against a Project. Once a Billing Record is marked Billed, Workfront permanently locks it and no edits are possible. We extract all Billing Records (including locked Billed records) before migration as a CSV financial extract with project name, billing record ID, amount, status, and date. This extract is delivered as a standalone file. Trello has no financial record type, so no Billing Record data migrates into Trello cards; the extract preserves it for the customer's finance team.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Workfront logo

Workfront gotchas

High

Adobe Admin Console user migration is mandatory and non-negotiable

Medium

UI export limit of 2,000 rows requires API-based extraction

High

Billing Records lock permanently once marked as Billed

Medium

Workfront Planning record limits vary by subscription tier

Low

Proofing Automated Workflows and template settings are instance-specific

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Trello Free tier does not support custom fields

    Trello's Power-Up custom fields (date, number, dropdown) are only available on Standard ($6/user/mo), Premium ($10/user/mo), and Enterprise ($17.50/user/mo) plans. The Free tier supports labels only. If the migrating team is on the Free plan, Workfront custom fields that are not picklist values cannot be represented in Trello without upgrading. We discover the Workfront custom field schema during scoping, check the destination workspace plan tier, and flag any required upgrades before migration begins. Skipping this check means custom field data is dropped or flattened into card descriptions, which reviewers report causes significant data loss.

  • Workfront Portfolios and Programs have no Trello equivalent

    Workfront's Portfolio-Program-Project hierarchy provides top-down financial and progress reporting for enterprise teams. Trello has no Portfolio or Program object; the closest grouping is a Trello Workspace containing multiple Boards, with no financial rollup. We map Portfolios to Workspaces and Programs to Boards (with a naming prefix), but portfolio-level revenue totals, program-level resource allocation, and cross-project reporting have no Trello destination. We flag these gaps during scoping so the customer can decide whether to maintain financial reporting in a separate spreadsheet or BI tool.

  • Approval workflows and Automated Workflow templates do not migrate

    Workfront Approvals attached to Tasks, Projects, Documents, or Timesheets define reviewer stages, proof roles, and notification settings via Automated Workflow templates. Trello has no native approval record type; review workflows require a Power-Up (such as Pluralsight's Approvals or a custom Butler rule) to replicate. We extract approval status and write it to Trello labels, but the workflow itself must be rebuilt. We deliver a written inventory of every Workfront approval and Automated Workflow template with its stages, conditions, and approvers for the customer's admin to configure in Trello post-migration.

  • Trello API rate limit of 3,600 requests per minute requires batched ingestion

    The Trello API enforces approximately 3,600 requests per minute across most endpoints, with additional per-board rate limits that vary by workspace plan. We use Trello's Bulk API endpoints where available and implement exponential backoff on 429 responses. For migrations with over 50 boards and 10,000 cards, we chunk card creation into batches of 50 per request and throttle list and board creation to avoid triggering Trello's abuse detection. This extends migration timelines but ensures data completeness without partial writes.

  • Workfront locked Billing Records are preserved but not migrated into Trello

    Workfront permanently locks any Billing Record once its status is set to Billed. This is a product-level restriction. The revenue data in those records is immutable in Workfront and must be preserved before migration cutover. We extract all Billing Records as a standalone CSV with project name, record ID, amount, currency, status, and date. Trello has no financial record type, so Billing Records do not enter Trello. The financial extract is delivered to the customer alongside the migration. Skipping this extraction means Billed records are lost because they cannot be read or edited after cutover.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Workfront to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and custom field schema extraction

    We audit the source Workfront environment via the API: current plan tier, active Projects, Task and Subtask counts, custom field definitions (names, types, picklist values), document count and storage usage, Approval templates, and Billing Records by status. We check the destination Trello workspace plan tier to determine Power-Up custom field availability. The discovery output is a written migration scope including record counts, custom field mapping plan, and a flag if the Free Trello plan cannot accommodate the source custom field schema.

  2. Board and Workspace structure design

    We design the Trello destination structure: one Workspace per Workfront Portfolio, one Board per Workfront Program or Project (depending on whether Programs are in use), and one List per Workfront task status value. We define the label color scheme mapping from Workfront task priority and approval status. If the workspace is Standard or Premium with Power-Up custom fields enabled, we configure the custom field types in Trello to match Workfront field types before any card migration begins.

  3. User mapping and member provisioning

    We extract every Workfront User referenced in task assignments and map them by email to Trello Members. Any Workfront user without a matching Trello account is flagged for the customer's admin to provision before record migration. We apply Workfront Job Role as a Trello label on cards assigned to that user so that role-based assignment intent is preserved even without a direct role concept in Trello.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a staging Trello workspace using representative data volume. The customer reviews board structure, card completeness, label assignment, checklist nesting, and attachment presence. We reconcile card counts per board, attachment counts, and comment counts against the Workfront source. Any mapping corrections (label naming, list structure, custom field misplacements) are resolved in the sandbox before production migration begins.

  5. Billing Record extraction

    Before production migration, we extract all Workfront Billing Records (including locked Billed records) via the Workfront API into a CSV financial extract. This extract includes project name, billing record ID, amount, currency, status, and billing date. We deliver this file to the customer as a standalone export. This step must complete before cutover because Billed records cannot be accessed or modified after the Workfront write freeze.

  6. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in order: Workspace and Board creation first (parent structure), then Card creation with checklist items (Subtasks) nested, then label and member assignment, then document attachments uploaded via Trello API, then card comments (Workfront Notes) posted. We use Trello Bulk API endpoints for card creation and implement 429-aware throttling. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We freeze Workfront writes during cutover and run a final delta migration for any records created or modified during the window.

  7. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    After migration, we run a final reconciliation comparing Trello card counts, attachment counts, and member assignments against the Workfront source totals. We deliver the Approval and Automated Workflow template inventory to the customer's admin for Trello Power-Up rebuild. We support a one-week hypercare window for data reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Workfront approval workflows, Automated Workflow templates, or document proofing cycles as part of the standard migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Workfront logo

Workfront

Source

Strengths

  • Deep Adobe ecosystem integration connecting project work to Creative Cloud assets and Experience Manager DAM.
  • Scalable hierarchical structure from Portfolio down to Task that maps well to enterprise marketing and creative operations.
  • Open API with full object access and Workfront Fusion for low-code cross-system workflow automation.
  • Proofing and Automated Workflow templates that handle multi-stage document review without a separate tool.
  • Enterprise-grade user management with role-based access control and audit trails for regulated industries.

Weaknesses

  • Enterprise pricing model with no public per-seat cost makes budgeting and vendor comparison difficult for prospects.
  • Boards (kanban) feature lacks the depth and platform integration to serve agile teams migrating from Jira, leaving a gap in the product for that use case.
  • Mandatory Adobe Admin Console migration introduces identity management changes that some organizations find disruptive, especially those with complex SSO configurations.
  • Known issues include sync delays between Workfront and Snowflake, occasional automatic approval locking, and document thumbnail failures—none of which are resolved by the customer.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Workfront and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Workfront: 200 requests per minute (Workfront Planning); other modules use undocumented per-org limits.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Workfront exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Workfront to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Workfront to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Workfront to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Workfront to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between one and two weeks for accounts with fewer than 10,000 tasks across up to 15 boards and no complex custom field schemas. Migrations with 25,000+ tasks, 50+ boards, multi-level subtask nesting, or Power-Up custom field configuration extend to four to eight weeks because of Trello API throttling on large batch operations and custom field mapping complexity. We confirm the timeline during scoping after counting Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, custom fields, and attachments.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Workfront.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day