Project Management migration

Migrate from Workamajig to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Workamajig and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Workamajig logo

Workamajig

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Workamajig and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Workamajig to Microsoft Project is a scope-reduction migration. Workamajig bundles project management, time tracking, billing, and CRM under one subscription; Microsoft Project focuses on scheduling, resource management, and portfolio oversight. We preserve Projects, Tasks, Dependencies, Resources, and Time Entries from Workamajig, map Campaign rollup relationships into project-level groupings or separate project plans, and extract Time Entries as Notes or Assignment Notes since Microsoft Project has no native time-tracking module. Deliverables, approval workflows, invoices, purchase orders, and the CRM module have no Microsoft Project equivalent and are exported as CSV or documented for manual rebuild. Workamajig's beta1 API rate limits (20 req/min on Projects) govern export pacing, and we sequence the migration in dependency order to resolve parent-record lookups before child records insert.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Workamajig logo

Workamajig

What's pushing teams away

  • A majority of negative reviews cite the interface as clunky and unintuitive, with excessive clicking required to navigate between common forms and reports.
  • Many users report that the platform is complex and difficult to learn, leading to extended onboarding periods and reliance on support for routine tasks.
  • Lack of batch-mode operations for repetitive actions across multiple projects frustrates power users managing large portfolios simultaneously.
  • Performance issues and technical bugs are cited as ongoing pain points, with engineering prioritization not always aligning with customer-reported issues.
  • Teams migrate toward simpler, more modern interfaces like Productive, Monday.com, or Asana seeking a better user experience without sacrificing project management depth.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Workamajig objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Workamajig object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Workamajig

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Workamajig Projects map directly to Microsoft Project Project objects. We extract Project Name, Project Number, Project Status (Active, On Hold, Completed), Start Date, Due Date, estimated hours, and all project-level custom field values. Workamajig's Project API is rate-limited at 20 req/min, so we paginate in staggered 20-record batches with backoff delays to avoid 429 errors. Projects with linked Campaign parents are flagged with a custom field for downstream campaign rollup grouping.

Workamajig

Campaign

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project (grouping configuration)

1:many
Fully supported

Workamajig Campaigns roll up multiple Projects for aggregated billing, budget tracking, and reporting. Microsoft Project has no Campaign object. We handle this in one of two ways during scoping: Option A maps each Campaign to a parent Project whose tasks represent phase-level rollup (all linked Project task summaries roll up to the parent); Option B creates a Campaign Register CSV that the customer uses to group related Project MPP or Project for the web plans in SharePoint folders or a Project Online Enterprise Resource Pool view. The choice depends on the customer's reporting cadence and whether they use Project Online cloud or Project Server Subscription Edition.

Workamajig

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Workamajig Tasks nested under Projects map to Microsoft Project Tasks. We export the full task hierarchy including WBS sequence, predecessor links (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, and lag time), date ranges, hourly allocations, percent complete, and task-level custom fields. Task dependencies expressed as cross-project links in Workamajig are flagged and resolved: Microsoft Project Online supports cross-project dependencies while Project Desktop Standard does not. We note which tasks have external predecessors before migration so the customer knows which environment type to target.

Workamajig

Task (predecessor chain)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task dependency

lossy
Fully supported

Workamajig stores task predecessors as linked records; Microsoft Project stores predecessors as Task Predecessorcessorcessorcessorcessors on each Task row with dependency type codes (FS, SS, FF, SF) and lag. We transform the predecessor chain into MS Project predecessor format during the export phase, mapping Workamajig's dependency types to standard MS Project dependency codes. Recurring task dependencies and conditional predecessors are flagged as requires-manual-review items since these do not always transfer reliably across systems.

Workamajig

Resource

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

Workamajig Employees and Team Members map to Microsoft Project Resources. We export resource name, email, role type (Work, Material, Cost), hourly rate (from Workamajig Role rates), and max units. Resources with no assigned tasks are included with zero assignments. Workamajig's generic Resources (non-user allocation pools) map to MS Project Material Resources or Cost Resources depending on how the Workamajig role was configured. Rate precision is preserved to two decimal places.

Workamajig

Task Assignment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

Workamajig task-to-resource assignments map to MS Project Assignments (TaskResourceAssignments). Each assignment carries the Work field (hours), Units (percentage or decimal), and Assignment Owner. For assignments with billable hours in Workamajig, we store the billable amount in an Assignment Notes field since MS Project has no native billing module. Workamajig's Anyone-to-Charge-Time flag is preserved as an assignment property.

Workamajig

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Note or Assignment Note

lossy
Fully supported

Workamajig Time Entries (linked to Project, Task, and Employee with billable/non-billable flags and hourly rates) have no direct Microsoft Project equivalent. MS Project has no native time-tracking module. We export all Time Entries as Task-level Notes with a structured format: Date | Employee | Hours | Billable (Y/N) | Rate | Amount. For Project Online environments, we can alternatively attach time-entry CSVs as SharePoint document library files linked to the project. The billable/non-billable flag and hourly rates are preserved in the note text; the customer should evaluate whether to use a third-party time-tracking integration (Harvest, Tempo, or Project Online timesheets) post-migration.

Workamajig

Custom Field

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Workamajig custom fields on Projects, Campaigns, Tasks, and other objects are extracted with full schema metadata (field type, required flag, choice options) and mapped to equivalent Microsoft Project Enterprise Custom Fields or SharePoint columns depending on the target environment (Project Online vs Project Desktop). Picklist and multi-select custom fields from Workamajig map to MS Project lookup tables. We flag any Workamajig custom field type without a direct MS Project equivalent (for example, complex multi-tiered picklists) for customer review before mapping.

Workamajig

Deliverable

maps to

Microsoft Project

CSV export (no native equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Workamajig Deliverables with approval workflows, reviewer assignments, and status tracking have no native Microsoft Project object. We export Deliverable records as a CSV including Project association, deliverable name, description, due date, assigned reviewers, approval status, and approval date. The CSV is delivered alongside the project plan so the customer can rebuild deliverable tracking in a separate tool (SharePoint, Teams, or a dedicated approval system). Digital proofing file links are exported as URLs in the CSV; the files themselves are not migrated.

Workamajig

Company

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource custom list or SharePoint list

lossy
Fully supported

Workamajig Companies and their Contact associations have no native Microsoft Project object. We export Companies as a CSV (Company Name, Domain, Address, Industry) and Contacts as a separate CSV (First Name, Last Name, Email, Company, Role). For Project Online environments, these can be stored in a SharePoint list linked to the project site or used to build an enterprise Resource Pool in Project Server. For Project Desktop, we recommend a separate CRM or SharePoint-based client register maintained outside the MPP file.

Workamajig

Invoice

maps to

Microsoft Project

CSV export (no native equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Workamajig Invoices and their line items have no Microsoft Project equivalent. We export Invoice headers (Invoice Number, Client, Project/Campaign association, date, total amount, payment status) and line items (description, quantity, rate, amount, tax) as a CSV. This CSV is suitable for import into the customer's accounting system (QuickBooks, NetSuite, Dynamics 365 Business Central) post-migration. We do not migrate invoice PDFs as part of the standard scope; file migration is a separate engagement.

Workamajig

Purchase Order

maps to

Microsoft Project

CSV export (no native equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Workamajig Purchase Orders tracking vendor expenses against Projects have no native Microsoft Project equivalent. We export PO headers (PO Number, Vendor, Project association, date, total) and line items as a CSV. The customer should evaluate whether the destination accounting system (or a planned Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central integration) will handle vendor expense tracking post-migration. PO-to-Project linkage is preserved in the CSV as a reference field.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Workamajig logo

Workamajig gotchas

High

Projects API rate limit of 20 req/min throttles large migrations

Medium

API is beta1 with no backward-compatibility guarantees

Medium

Server migrations change IP addresses and break IP-whitelisted integrations

Low

Report definitions do not export, only report data

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Workamajig API is beta1 with no backward-compatibility guarantees

    Workamajig's current API version is beta1 and they notify customers a few months before deprecation. Schema changes between scoping and execution can occur, and module-level rate limits (Projects capped at 20 req/min) slow bulk extraction for large project portfolios. We lock the API version at scoping time, document the schema snapshot, and re-validate field availability before running the migration. If a required field is deprecated, we fall back to the report export module or CSV extraction for that object class.

  • Task import via Copy Tasks from Project Number has no MS Project equivalent

    Workamajig's task import recommends using a template-copy column (Copy Tasks from Project Number) rather than importing individual task rows, which preserves workflow and header fields from the source template. Microsoft Project has no template-copy import mechanism; all tasks must be explicitly listed with their fields. We flatten Workamajig task hierarchies into explicit task rows before MS Project import and resolve predecessor links as MS Project-compatible dependency codes (FS, SS, FF, SF) rather than relying on template inheritance.

  • Campaign rollup and multi-project grouping requires post-migration configuration

    Workamajig's Campaign object aggregates multiple Projects for billing and budget reporting. Microsoft Project has no Campaign equivalent. We handle the campaign-to-project linkage as a CSV overlay and advise the customer upfront whether to use Option A (parent project task rollup) or Option B (SharePoint folder grouping). Neither approach is automatic; both require a decision during scoping and manual configuration in the destination environment before projects are published.

  • Deliverables, approval workflows, and billing records do not exist in Microsoft Project

    Workamajig's digital proofing, deliverable approval workflows, invoices, and purchase orders are not translatable to Microsoft Project objects. We export these records as structured CSVs and note the linkage to source projects, but the customer must plan a rebuild strategy: approval workflows typically move to Power Automate, Teams approval cards, or a dedicated approval tool; billing records migrate to an accounting system. We do not migrate these as code or records inside the project plan.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Workamajig to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the Workamajig environment: project count and status distribution, campaign-to-project linkage count, task hierarchy depth and dependency complexity, resource and role count, time-entry volume with billable/non-billable split, and custom field inventory across all object types. We also identify CRM records (Companies, Contacts, Activities), deliverable count, invoice and PO volume, and any active report definitions requiring manual rebuild inventory. This audit produces a written scoping document with object-level record counts and a recommendation on campaign-to-project grouping strategy.

  2. Schema design and calendar mapping

    We design the Microsoft Project destination schema in coordination with the customer. This includes determining whether the destination is Project Online, Project Server Subscription Edition, or Project Desktop, because the schema options differ. We define the Enterprise Custom Field structure mapped to Workamajig custom fields, configure the calendar system (Workamajig skips weekends and holidays by default; we verify whether the Workamajig company calendar holidays match the destination MS Project calendar and note any discrepancy), and confirm the campaign rollup grouping approach. Schema is validated in a staging environment before production migration begins.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a staging or sandbox Microsoft Project environment using production-like data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (Projects in, Tasks in, Resources in, Assignments in), spot-checks 20-30 random projects against Workamajig source records, validates custom field values, and confirms the campaign grouping configuration. Any mapping corrections, dependency resolution failures, or calendar issues are resolved here. Sign-off on the sandbox reconciliation gates the production migration start date.

  4. Production migration — Projects, Resources, and Tasks

    We run production migration in dependency order: Resources first (so Assignment records can reference them), then Projects (with Campaign linkage recorded as a custom field), then Tasks with predecessor chains resolved in a single pass. Task import is done via MS Project-compatible CSV or the Project Online REST API with batch chunking. Workamajig's 20 req/min rate limit on Projects is managed by pacing exports across staggered batches; large portfolios (500+ projects) may require multiple export sessions over consecutive days.

  5. Production migration — Supporting records and time entries

    We export Time Entries as structured Task Notes and deliver them as a companion CSV. Custom Fields are imported as Enterprise Custom Field values on Projects and Tasks. Companies and Contacts are delivered as CSVs for SharePoint list or Resource Pool population. Deliverables, Invoices, and Purchase Orders are exported as CSVs with project linkage preserved. Activities (read-only via Workamajig API) are exported as a Contact-engagement log CSV if the customer uses the CRM data in a downstream system.

  6. Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze Workamajig writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Microsoft Project as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of every item that requires manual rebuild: report definitions, deliverable approval workflows, invoice and PO records (with CSV), and activity log instructions. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve any data discrepancies. We do not rebuild approval workflows in Power Automate, migrate invoice files, or configure the CRM SharePoint list as part of the migration scope; these are documented for the customer's admin team or a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Workamajig logo

Workamajig

Source

Strengths

  • Comprehensive ERP features including GL, invoicing, payables, and receivables bundled with project management at one price.
  • Unlimited client and vendor portal logins at every tier without per-contact billing surprises.
  • Deep reporting at client, project, and campaign granularity with profitability and utilization breakdowns.
  • Campaign object allows multi-project rollup for billing and budget tracking across an entire client engagement.
  • Digital proofing and deliverable approval workflows are natively integrated, not bolted on via third-party plugin.

Weaknesses

  • Interface is widely described as complex and unintuitive with excessive navigation steps for common tasks.
  • API is in beta1 with module-level rate limits (Projects capped at 20 req/min) that slow bulk data extraction.
  • Several modules expose only GET access (diary, team, reports), limiting migration completeness for workflow and configuration data.
  • Ongoing performance issues and technical bugs are cited in reviews without consistent engineering response.
  • No native free tier; minimum 10-user commitment makes it difficult to trial at scale.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Workamajig and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Workamajig: 50 req/min for most modules (activities, companies, contacts, diary, opportunities, task, team, todos); 20 req/min for projects module; reports rate limit is documented separately.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Workamajig doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Workamajig to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Workamajig to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Workamajig to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Workamajig to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Typical migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts with under 500 projects, clean task hierarchies, and no complex cross-project dependency chains. Migrations with large project portfolios (500+), complex campaign-to-project rollup structures, high time-entry volume, or CRM record exports requiring SharePoint configuration move into eight to twelve weeks. The planning and sandbox validation phase adds an additional one to two weeks before migration begins, so the full end-to-end timeline is four to fourteen weeks.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Workamajig.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day