HRMS migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Ceipal ATS and Recruit CRM & ATS. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Recruit CRM & ATS.
Ceipal ATS
Source
Recruit CRM & ATS
Destination
Compatibility
7 of 11
objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Recruit CRM & ATS.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
4-6 weeks
Overview
Moving from Ceipal ATS to Recruit CRM is a schema translation that requires resolving Ceipal's flat relational model (Applicant → Submission → Job → Client → Placement) against Recruit CRM's Candidate/Job/Deal/Company structure. Ceipal uses encrypted object IDs across all API endpoints, which means we must build ID-mapping tables in the staging layer before any foreign-key relationships can be resolved in Recruit CRM. Resume files must transfer via API to trigger Recruit CRM's parsing pipeline; CSV-only imports leave candidates searchable only by raw text rather than structured fields, which is the most common migration failure for this pair. We do not migrate Workflows, VMS integrations, or Ceipal WorkForce module records as standard scope; these require a separate enumeration and rebuild plan. Recruit CRM's API enforces 60 requests per minute on accounts with 6 or fewer licenses and 10 per minute per license beyond that, which we throttle with exponential backoff during bulk migration batches.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Ceipal ATS object lands in Recruit CRM & ATS, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Ceipal ATS
Applicant (Candidate)
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate
1:1Ceipal Applicant records map to Recruit CRM Candidate. We extract applicant profiles, structured contact details, skills, and work history via Ceipal's API (not CSV) to preserve parsed fields. Candidate email addresses are validated during staging against the Dice-portal-email corruption pattern—if a Ceipal candidate's primary email matches a third-party portal domain, we flag it for manual review and optionally preserve the corrected email in a secondary custom field in Recruit CRM. Resume files transfer as binary attachments via Recruit CRM's file upload endpoint so parsing triggers on the destination side.
Ceipal ATS
Job Posting (Requisition)
Recruit CRM & ATS
Job
1:1Ceipal Job records map to Recruit CRM Job. We map title, description, location, requirements, and pipeline stages to Recruit CRM job fields. Ceipal job stages translate to Recruit CRM pipeline stages during migration; if the customer has custom stage names, we create matching stages in Recruit CRM before import. Active job status preserves; archived jobs migrate as inactive unless the customer specifies a different cutoff.
Ceipal ATS
Submission
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate-Job association (Submission record or deal-linked submission)
1:1Ceipal Submissions link an Applicant to a Job with submission status, submittal date, and recruiter assignment. Recruit CRM does not have a native Submission object equivalent; we represent the submission chain as a Candidate record linked to a Job with a custom Submission Status field and the submission date preserved. The recruiter assignment resolves via owner email mapping against Recruit CRM User records. Ceipal's encrypted submission IDs are held in the staging ID-mapping table so the full chain remains traceable post-import.
Ceipal ATS
Client
Recruit CRM & ATS
Company
1:1Ceipal Client records (company name, contact info, billing details) map directly to Recruit CRM Company. We preserve address data, client status, and any associated contacts as Recruit CRM Contact records linked to the Company. Client status from Ceipal maps to a Company custom field if the customer's workflow relies on client lifecycle stages.
Ceipal ATS
Lead
Recruit CRM & ATS
Contact or Company lead flag
many:1Ceipal Leads are distinct from Clients with different status fields and source attribution. Recruit CRM uses Company as the account-level record and Contact as the person-level record without a separate Lead object. We map Ceipal Leads to Recruit CRM Contacts or Companies depending on whether the Lead has person-level detail (name, email, phone) or company-level detail only. The original lead status and source attribution migrate as custom fields on the destination record for reporting continuity.
Ceipal ATS
Placement
Recruit CRM & ATS
Deal
1:1Ceipal Placements (final hiring outcome tying Applicant to Job under Client) map to Recruit CRM Deal. Placement start date, compensation, and billing details migrate to Deal fields. The Deal is linked to the candidate (as the primary Contact) and the Company (client) in Recruit CRM, and the original placement record is preserved as a custom field set for audit. Ceipal's encrypted Placement ID is logged in the staging ID-mapping table.
Ceipal ATS
Employee Records (WorkForce module)
Recruit CRM & ATS
Not migrated (separate engagement)
lossyCeipal WorkForce module records (employee profiles, compensation, department, location) are outside Recruit CRM's data model scope because Recruit CRM does not include an HR/employee management module. If the customer uses WorkForce alongside the ATS, we scope the WorkForce migration as a separate engagement. If the customer only needs placement history and candidate records in Recruit CRM, we exclude WorkForce records from the standard migration scope and note this in the written scope document.
Ceipal ATS
Timesheets (WorkForce module)
Recruit CRM & ATS
Not migrated (separate engagement)
lossyTimesheet records in Ceipal WorkForce track hours per employee per period. Recruit CRM does not have a native timesheet object; time-tracking is not a standard feature. We do not migrate timesheets as part of the ATS migration. If the customer requires timesheet data in Recruit CRM, it would need to be represented as custom line items or notes on a Deal, which we document as a configuration option rather than a standard mapping.
Ceipal ATS
Custom Fields (Columns/Rows)
Recruit CRM & ATS
Custom Fields
lossyCeipal allows admins to add custom columns to grids and custom properties on Applicants, Jobs, and Placements. These are organization-specific with no published schema. During discovery, we enumerate all custom fields by querying the Ceipal API's field metadata endpoints and manually reviewing the admin UI with the customer's access. Each custom field is then created in Recruit CRM with the matching type (text, number, date, picklist, checkbox) before any data import, because Recruit CRM requires custom fields to exist before values can be written to them via API.
Ceipal ATS
Documents (resumes, offer letters, contracts)
Recruit CRM & ATS
Files (attached to Candidate, Job, Deal, or Company)
1:1Ceipal stores documents against applicants, jobs, and placements (resumes, offer letters, contracts). We transfer documents as binary blobs via Recruit CRM's file upload API. Resume files attach to the corresponding Candidate record and trigger re-parsing. Offer letters and contracts attach to the associated Deal or Company record. Ceipal's encrypted document IDs are logged in the staging ID-mapping table so attachment associations are preserved across the migration.
Ceipal ATS
Owner (Ceipal user)
Recruit CRM & ATS
User
1:1Ceipal Owner records (the recruiter or staff member assigned to a candidate, job, or submission) map to Recruit CRM User. We resolve owners by email match. Any Ceipal Owner without a matching Recruit CRM User goes to a reconciliation queue where the customer's admin provisions the User before record import resumes, because OwnerId references are required on most standard object inserts in Recruit CRM.
| Ceipal ATS | Recruit CRM & ATS | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant (Candidate) | Candidate1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Job Posting (Requisition) | Job1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Submission | Candidate-Job association (Submission record or deal-linked submission)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Client | Company1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Lead | Contact or Company lead flagmany:1 | Fully supported | |
| Placement | Deal1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Employee Records (WorkForce module) | Not migrated (separate engagement)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Timesheets (WorkForce module) | Not migrated (separate engagement)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields (Columns/Rows) | Custom Fieldslossy | Mapping required | |
| Documents (resumes, offer letters, contracts) | Files (attached to Candidate, Job, Deal, or Company)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Owner (Ceipal user) | User1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Ceipal ATS gotchas
Resume email fields get overwritten on Dice-to-Ceipal migration
CSV imports bypass Ceipal's resume parsing engine
Encrypted object IDs require ID-mapping tables in staging
Rate limit errors return inconsistent HTTP codes
Free migration support is guided but scoped to Ceipal's own import tools
Recruit CRM & ATS gotchas
API rate limits are license-scaled and can throttle bulk migration
Custom field schemas vary per organization and require field-level mapping
Files and email attachments require separate extraction and re-upload
Email sequences and automation logic do not transfer between platforms
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and object enumeration
We audit the source Ceipal environment across modules (TalentHire vs. WorkForce), custom field inventory per object, encrypted ID usage across API endpoints, active submission and placement volumes, and engagement history. We enumerate custom fields by querying Ceipal's admin UI with the customer's credentials and cross-referencing API field metadata. We identify WorkForce module usage to determine whether it falls within standard ATS migration scope or requires a separate engagement. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts per object, a custom field mapping table, and a WorkForce boundary determination.
Staging layer and ID-mapping table construction
We build the staging layer in our migration environment with ID-mapping tables that hold Ceipal's encrypted IDs alongside the corresponding destination Recruit CRM record IDs as they are created. This resolves Submission → Applicant and Placement → Client associations at migration time rather than in a post-import repair pass. We also flag portal-domain email addresses (Dice, Monster, CareerBuilder patterns) and surface them to the customer for a manual correction pass before the delta migration runs.
Recruit CRM schema pre-creation
We create all required custom fields in Recruit CRM before any data import begins, because the API rejects records with field values for fields that do not yet exist. This includes custom fields for original Ceipal IDs, lead source attribution, placement compensation details, and the portal-email flag for corrected contact records. Recruit CRM requires Business Plan API access; we verify the customer's plan tier during scoping. Custom fields are created via the Recruit CRM API POST to /custom-fields with the correct field type (text, number, date, picklist, checkbox).
Owner reconciliation and User provisioning
We extract every distinct Ceipal Owner (recruiter or staff member) referenced on Candidate, Job, Submission, and Placement records and match by email against Recruit CRM's User table. Owners without a matching User go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Recruit CRM admin provisions any missing Users before record import resumes. OwnerId references must be satisfied at insert time in Recruit CRM; unresolved owners block the candidate and job import phases.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (validated against Recruit CRM), Companies (from Ceipal Clients), Candidates with resume file attachments via API (to trigger parsing), Jobs (with pipeline stages mapped), Submissions (with Applicant and Job lookups resolved via ID-mapping table), Deals (Placements linked to Candidate and Company), and Documents attached to the correct parent record. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We throttle Ceipal API reads using per-user token limits and use exponential backoff on both 400 and 429 responses. We throttle Recruit CRM API writes at 60 req/min for accounts with 6 or fewer licenses or 10 req/min per license beyond that, using the X-RateLimit-Remaining header to adjust batch sizes dynamically.
Delta migration, cutover, and workflow handoff
We freeze Ceipal writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records created or modified during the migration period, then enable Recruit CRM as the system of record. Candidate search functionality is spot-checked to confirm parsing triggered correctly on API-imported records. We deliver a written inventory of Ceipal Workflows, VMS portal configurations, and WorkForce module records (if applicable) for the customer's admin to rebuild or reconfigure. We do not rebuild automations or VMS integrations as part of the migration scope.
Platform deep dives
Ceipal ATS
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Recruit CRM & ATS
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Ceipal ATS and Recruit CRM & ATS.
Object compatibility
1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Ceipal ATS: Not publicly documented; varies per user token; 429 returned on ATS API, 400 reported on Healthcare ATS API.
Data volume sensitivity
Ceipal ATS doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Ceipal ATS to Recruit CRM & ATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Ceipal ATS to Recruit CRM & ATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Ceipal ATS
Other ways to arrive at Recruit CRM & ATS
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.