HRMS migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Ceipal ATS and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.
Ceipal ATS
Source
Crelate
Destination
Compatibility
8 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Crelate.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Ceipal ATS to Crelate is a structural migration for staffing firms and recruiting agencies that have outgrown Ceipal's pricing tier, encountered resume data quality degradation during import, or need a cleaner ATS experience aligned with permanent placement workflows rather than Ceipal's contract and VMS-heavy model. Ceipal stores its core data as a flat relational chain: Applicant linked to one or more Submissions, each Submission tied to a Job and a Client, culminating in a Placement. Crelate normalizes this into separate People, Job, and Pipeline objects with distinct Activity logs for each entity. We resolve that schema gap during staging, build ID-mapping tables to handle Ceipal's encrypted object IDs, and push applicant records through Crelate's parsing pipeline so migrated candidates remain searchable by structured criteria rather than raw resume text. Custom fields, WorkForce module data, and historical placement records are scoped and enumerated before any data moves. We do not migrate workflows, automations, or job board posting configurations; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Crelate.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Ceipal ATS object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Ceipal ATS
Applicant
Crelate
Person
1:1Ceipal Applicants map to Crelate People records. The Ceipal applicant record carries structured contact fields (name, email, phone, address), skills, work history, and education parsed from the resume. We preserve parsed fields via API transfer with resume files pushed through Crelate's parsing pipeline, avoiding the CSV bypass issue that leaves Ceipal candidates un-indexed. Ceipal's encrypted applicant_id is recorded in a migration_reference__c field in Crelate for downstream lookup during submission and placement mapping.
Ceipal ATS
Submission
Crelate
Activity (on Person or Job)
1:manyCeipal Submissions link an Applicant to a Job with submission status, submission date, and recruiter assignment. Crelate does not have a dedicated Submission object; instead, submissions are represented as Activity records linked to both the Person and the Job. We resolve the Person and Job foreign keys at migration time via ID-mapping tables, then create Activity records of type Submission linked to both parents. The submission status and date migrate as Activity properties.
Ceipal ATS
Job Posting
Crelate
Job
1:1Ceipal Job Postings (requisitions) map directly to Crelate Jobs. The Job record carries title, description, location, requirements, and pipeline stages. We map Ceipal job stages to Crelate pipeline stages during migration, with the pipeline stages pre-provisioned in Crelate's settings before data load begins. Ceipal's encrypted job_id is stored in migration_reference__c on the Crelate Job for lookup during submission and placement resolution.
Ceipal ATS
Client
Crelate
Organization
1:1Ceipal Client records (company name, contact info, billing details) map to Crelate Organization records. Organization is created before Person import so that the lookup relationship is satisfied at the moment of Person insert. Address data, industry, and client status migrate as Organization properties. Ceipal's encrypted client_id is preserved in migration_reference__c on the Organization.
Ceipal ATS
Lead
Crelate
Organization or Person (merged)
many:1Ceipal Leads are distinct from Clients and carry different status fields and source attribution. Crelate does not have a separate Lead object; leads are represented as Organizations or Persons depending on the customer's workflow. We preserve lead status in a custom field ceipal_lead_status__c on the destination record and source attribution in ceipal_lead_source__c for segmentation and reporting in Crelate.
Ceipal ATS
Placement
Crelate
Activity (on Job, linked to Person and Organization)
1:1Ceipal Placements tie an Applicant to a Job under a Client, carrying start date, compensation, and billing information. In Crelate, the placement outcome is recorded as an Activity of a designated Placement type linked to the Job, with the Person and Organization referenced through the ID-mapping tables built during scoping. Compensation and start date migrate as Activity custom properties.
Ceipal ATS
Employee Records (WorkForce)
Crelate
Person (HR profile)
lossyCeipal WorkForce module stores employee profiles, compensation, department, and location as a separate data model from the ATS applicant records. WorkForce is a separate paid tier in Ceipal. If WorkForce data is in scope, we provision a Crelate People profile with HR-specific fields (department, manager, hire date, compensation) mapped from Ceipal WorkForce employee records. The customer chooses whether to create separate ATS (recruiting) and HR (workforce) profiles in Crelate during scoping.
Ceipal ATS
Timesheets
Crelate
Activity (Time Tracking)
1:1Ceipal WorkForce timesheet records track hours per employee per period with period, hours, and approver metadata. Crelate represents timesheet data as Activity records with time-tracking properties. We map period, hours, and approver to Crelate Activity properties during migration. This object is only in scope if the WorkForce module is active in Ceipal and the customer uses Crelate's time-tracking feature.
Ceipal ATS
Expenses
Crelate
Activity (Expense)
1:1Expense tracking in Ceipal WorkForce captures amount, category, employee, and submission date. We migrate expense records with full line-item detail as Activity records of type Expense in Crelate, mapping categories to Crelate's expense category equivalents. This object is only in scope if the WorkForce module is active and the customer uses Crelate's expense feature.
Ceipal ATS
Documents (Resumes, Offer Letters, Contracts)
Crelate
Document Attachments
1:1Ceipal stores documents against applicants, jobs, and placements (resumes, offer letters, contracts). We transfer documents as binary blobs via API where supported, falling back to URL-based document references in the Crelate record. Resume files are re-uploaded to trigger Crelate's parsing pipeline for searchable structured data. Other document types attach as linked files to the relevant Person, Job, or Organization record.
Ceipal ATS
Custom Fields (Columns/Rows)
Crelate
Custom Properties
lossyCeipal allows admins to add custom columns to grids and custom properties on Applicants, Jobs, and Placements. These are organization-specific and must be enumerated during discovery. We map each custom field to an equivalent Crelate custom property, preserving the field type (text, number, date, picklist) and any applicable picklist values. Ceipal's per-module custom fields (TalentHire vs. WorkForce) are kept in separate scoping buckets and mapped independently.
Ceipal ATS
Owner
Crelate
User
1:1Ceipal Owners (recruiters, team leads) map to Crelate User records. We resolve owners by email match against Crelate's user directory. Any Ceipal Owner without a matching Crelate User is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before Person import resumes. Ceipal's encrypted owner_id is preserved in migration_reference__c on the User for audit.
| Ceipal ATS | Crelate | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant | Person1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Submission | Activity (on Person or Job)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Job Posting | Job1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Client | Organization1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Lead | Organization or Person (merged)many:1 | Fully supported | |
| Placement | Activity (on Job, linked to Person and Organization)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Employee Records (WorkForce) | Person (HR profile)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Timesheets | Activity (Time Tracking)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Expenses | Activity (Expense)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Documents (Resumes, Offer Letters, Contracts) | Document Attachments1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields (Columns/Rows) | Custom Propertieslossy | Mapping required | |
| Owner | User1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Ceipal ATS gotchas
Resume email fields get overwritten on Dice-to-Ceipal migration
CSV imports bypass Ceipal's resume parsing engine
Encrypted object IDs require ID-mapping tables in staging
Rate limit errors return inconsistent HTTP codes
Free migration support is guided but scoped to Ceipal's own import tools
Crelate gotchas
120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations
20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions
15,000-record export ceiling on single operations
Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate
API key is a querystring parameter, not a header
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and scoping
We audit the source Ceipal instance across modules (TalentHire, WorkForce, or both), enumerating all object types, custom fields, and pipeline stages in scope. We pull a preliminary data export to profile record counts, identify data quality issues (missing emails, duplicate records, encrypted IDs), and determine whether WorkForce data is active and in scope. We pair this with Crelate's API schema enumeration to confirm which objects are available in the customer's target Crelate environment. The discovery output is a written migration scope, an object-level mapping draft, and a list of Ceipal custom fields requiring manual enumeration before migration begins.
Staging environment and ID-mapping table construction
We set up a staging environment with the Ceipal export loaded and ID-mapping tables constructed. Each Ceipal encrypted ID (applicant, job, client, submission, placement, owner) is mapped to its plain-text Crelate equivalent or flagged as requiring new record creation. We also flag records with corrupted email fields (Dice portal overwrites) and present the customer with a remediation decision before migration. Custom field mappings are built against the enumerated Ceipal schema and validated against Crelate's property types.
Crelate schema provisioning
Before any data inserts, we provision the Crelate destination schema: pipeline stages (mapped from Ceipal job stages), custom properties (mapped from Ceipal custom fields), and any WorkForce-specific HR profile fields if the WorkForce module is in scope. Crelate's pipeline and custom property configuration is deployed via Crelate's API or admin UI before migration load begins. This ensures that all incoming records map to typed fields rather than falling into generic catch-all properties.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Crelate test environment using production-like data volume. The customer's recruiting operations lead spot-checks 25-50 random Person records (checking name, email, phone, parsed skills), Job records (checking title, description, stages), and Activity records (checking submission and placement links) against the Ceipal source. The customer signs off the schema and mapping before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections happen here, not in production.
Owner reconciliation and User provisioning
We extract every distinct Ceipal Owner referenced on Applicant, Submission, and Placement records and match by email against Crelate's user directory. Owners without a matching Crelate User go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing Crelate Users (active or inactive depending on whether the original Ceipal user is still active). Migration cannot proceed past this step because User lookups are required on Person and Activity records.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Organizations (from Ceipal Clients), People (from Ceipal Applicants with resume files re-parsed in Crelate), Jobs (from Ceipal Job Postings with pipeline stages resolved), Activities (Submissions and Placements linked to People and Jobs via ID-mapping tables), Documents (resumes attached to People, offer letters attached to Placements), WorkForce data (employee profiles, timesheets, expenses if in scope). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.
Cutover, validation, and handoff
We freeze Ceipal writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Crelate as the system of record. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues raised by the customer's recruiting team. We deliver a written inventory of Ceipal workflows, job board posting configurations, and automation rules that require rebuild in Crelate. We do not rebuild these as part of the migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's admin or a Crelate implementation partner.
Platform deep dives
Ceipal ATS
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Crelate
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Ceipal ATS and Crelate.
Object compatibility
1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Ceipal ATS: Not publicly documented; varies per user token; 429 returned on ATS API, 400 reported on Healthcare ATS API.
Data volume sensitivity
Ceipal ATS doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Ceipal ATS to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Ceipal ATS to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Ceipal ATS
Other ways to arrive at Crelate
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.