HRMS migration

Migrate from Ceipal ATS to Crelate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Ceipal ATS and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.

Ceipal ATS logo

Ceipal ATS

Source

Crelate

Destination

Crelate logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Crelate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Ceipal ATS to Crelate is a structural migration for staffing firms and recruiting agencies that have outgrown Ceipal's pricing tier, encountered resume data quality degradation during import, or need a cleaner ATS experience aligned with permanent placement workflows rather than Ceipal's contract and VMS-heavy model. Ceipal stores its core data as a flat relational chain: Applicant linked to one or more Submissions, each Submission tied to a Job and a Client, culminating in a Placement. Crelate normalizes this into separate People, Job, and Pipeline objects with distinct Activity logs for each entity. We resolve that schema gap during staging, build ID-mapping tables to handle Ceipal's encrypted object IDs, and push applicant records through Crelate's parsing pipeline so migrated candidates remain searchable by structured criteria rather than raw resume text. Custom fields, WorkForce module data, and historical placement records are scoped and enumerated before any data moves. We do not migrate workflows, automations, or job board posting configurations; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Crelate.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Ceipal ATS logo

Ceipal ATS

What's pushing teams away

  • Resume data quality degrades during import—G2 reviewers report that candidate email addresses and phone numbers are frequently missing or replaced with third-party portal emails (e.g., Dice email instead of personal contact), forcing recruiters to skip otherwise qualified candidates.
  • The platform requires more customization options to match complex staffing workflows; users cite frustration with the out-of-box field structure not aligning with their internal processes for healthcare credentialing or executive search.
  • Ceipal's parsing engine can leave imported resumes un-indexed in search if the import path bypasses the parsing pipeline, creating a candidate database that looks full but is functionally empty for sourcing purposes.
  • Some users report that UI improvements are needed to keep pace with modern UX expectations, particularly in the candidate profile and job board search interfaces compared to newer ATS competitors.

Choosing

Crelate logo

Crelate

What's pulling them in

  • Affordable per-seat pricing with transparent tiers makes Crelate accessible for small-to-mid staffing firms evaluating ATS platforms for the first time.
  • Fast implementation reported by customers—some describe getting live in a matter of minutes with support team assistance.
  • Unified ATS + CRM in a single product eliminates the need to buy and synchronize separate recruiting and sales tools.
  • Flexible custom fields across Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities allow recruiting teams to capture firm-specific data without developer involvement.
  • Positive reviews highlight the product's intuitive interface and functional breadth for teams that need recruiting workflows without enterprise overhead.

Object mapping

How Ceipal ATS objects map to Crelate

Each row shows how a Ceipal ATS object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Ceipal ATS

Applicant

maps to

Crelate

Person

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Applicants map to Crelate People records. The Ceipal applicant record carries structured contact fields (name, email, phone, address), skills, work history, and education parsed from the resume. We preserve parsed fields via API transfer with resume files pushed through Crelate's parsing pipeline, avoiding the CSV bypass issue that leaves Ceipal candidates un-indexed. Ceipal's encrypted applicant_id is recorded in a migration_reference__c field in Crelate for downstream lookup during submission and placement mapping.

Ceipal ATS

Submission

maps to

Crelate

Activity (on Person or Job)

1:many
Fully supported

Ceipal Submissions link an Applicant to a Job with submission status, submission date, and recruiter assignment. Crelate does not have a dedicated Submission object; instead, submissions are represented as Activity records linked to both the Person and the Job. We resolve the Person and Job foreign keys at migration time via ID-mapping tables, then create Activity records of type Submission linked to both parents. The submission status and date migrate as Activity properties.

Ceipal ATS

Job Posting

maps to

Crelate

Job

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Job Postings (requisitions) map directly to Crelate Jobs. The Job record carries title, description, location, requirements, and pipeline stages. We map Ceipal job stages to Crelate pipeline stages during migration, with the pipeline stages pre-provisioned in Crelate's settings before data load begins. Ceipal's encrypted job_id is stored in migration_reference__c on the Crelate Job for lookup during submission and placement resolution.

Ceipal ATS

Client

maps to

Crelate

Organization

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Client records (company name, contact info, billing details) map to Crelate Organization records. Organization is created before Person import so that the lookup relationship is satisfied at the moment of Person insert. Address data, industry, and client status migrate as Organization properties. Ceipal's encrypted client_id is preserved in migration_reference__c on the Organization.

Ceipal ATS

Lead

maps to

Crelate

Organization or Person (merged)

many:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Leads are distinct from Clients and carry different status fields and source attribution. Crelate does not have a separate Lead object; leads are represented as Organizations or Persons depending on the customer's workflow. We preserve lead status in a custom field ceipal_lead_status__c on the destination record and source attribution in ceipal_lead_source__c for segmentation and reporting in Crelate.

Ceipal ATS

Placement

maps to

Crelate

Activity (on Job, linked to Person and Organization)

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Placements tie an Applicant to a Job under a Client, carrying start date, compensation, and billing information. In Crelate, the placement outcome is recorded as an Activity of a designated Placement type linked to the Job, with the Person and Organization referenced through the ID-mapping tables built during scoping. Compensation and start date migrate as Activity custom properties.

Ceipal ATS

Employee Records (WorkForce)

maps to

Crelate

Person (HR profile)

lossy
Fully supported

Ceipal WorkForce module stores employee profiles, compensation, department, and location as a separate data model from the ATS applicant records. WorkForce is a separate paid tier in Ceipal. If WorkForce data is in scope, we provision a Crelate People profile with HR-specific fields (department, manager, hire date, compensation) mapped from Ceipal WorkForce employee records. The customer chooses whether to create separate ATS (recruiting) and HR (workforce) profiles in Crelate during scoping.

Ceipal ATS

Timesheets

maps to

Crelate

Activity (Time Tracking)

1:1
Mapping required

Ceipal WorkForce timesheet records track hours per employee per period with period, hours, and approver metadata. Crelate represents timesheet data as Activity records with time-tracking properties. We map period, hours, and approver to Crelate Activity properties during migration. This object is only in scope if the WorkForce module is active in Ceipal and the customer uses Crelate's time-tracking feature.

Ceipal ATS

Expenses

maps to

Crelate

Activity (Expense)

1:1
Mapping required

Expense tracking in Ceipal WorkForce captures amount, category, employee, and submission date. We migrate expense records with full line-item detail as Activity records of type Expense in Crelate, mapping categories to Crelate's expense category equivalents. This object is only in scope if the WorkForce module is active and the customer uses Crelate's expense feature.

Ceipal ATS

Documents (Resumes, Offer Letters, Contracts)

maps to

Crelate

Document Attachments

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal stores documents against applicants, jobs, and placements (resumes, offer letters, contracts). We transfer documents as binary blobs via API where supported, falling back to URL-based document references in the Crelate record. Resume files are re-uploaded to trigger Crelate's parsing pipeline for searchable structured data. Other document types attach as linked files to the relevant Person, Job, or Organization record.

Ceipal ATS

Custom Fields (Columns/Rows)

maps to

Crelate

Custom Properties

lossy
Mapping required

Ceipal allows admins to add custom columns to grids and custom properties on Applicants, Jobs, and Placements. These are organization-specific and must be enumerated during discovery. We map each custom field to an equivalent Crelate custom property, preserving the field type (text, number, date, picklist) and any applicable picklist values. Ceipal's per-module custom fields (TalentHire vs. WorkForce) are kept in separate scoping buckets and mapped independently.

Ceipal ATS

Owner

maps to

Crelate

User

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Owners (recruiters, team leads) map to Crelate User records. We resolve owners by email match against Crelate's user directory. Any Ceipal Owner without a matching Crelate User is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before Person import resumes. Ceipal's encrypted owner_id is preserved in migration_reference__c on the User for audit.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Ceipal ATS logo

Ceipal ATS gotchas

High

Resume email fields get overwritten on Dice-to-Ceipal migration

High

CSV imports bypass Ceipal's resume parsing engine

Medium

Encrypted object IDs require ID-mapping tables in staging

Medium

Rate limit errors return inconsistent HTTP codes

Low

Free migration support is guided but scoped to Ceipal's own import tools

Crelate logo

Crelate gotchas

High

120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations

High

20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions

Medium

15,000-record export ceiling on single operations

Medium

Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate

Low

API key is a querystring parameter, not a header

Pair-specific challenges

  • Ceipal encrypted IDs require ID-mapping tables in the staging layer

    Ceipal introduced encrypted IDs across all ATS endpoints in a recent release to enhance data security. All API references between objects (Submission → Applicant, Submission → Job, Placement → Client) use these encrypted IDs. Crelate's standard IDs do not have an encryption layer. During migration, we build ID-mapping tables in the staging layer so that foreign-key relationships in Crelate are resolved correctly rather than pointing to null or mismatched records. This adds a discovery step to enumerate which encrypted ID types exist in the Ceipal export and build the corresponding mapping before any data inserts into Crelate.

  • CSV imports bypass Ceipal's resume parsing engine, breaking candidate search

    Ceipal's parsing engine runs during the UI-based candidate creation workflow. When candidate records are bulk-imported via CSV, the raw text is stored but parsed fields (structured skills, work history, education) are not populated. This leaves imported candidates searchable only by resume text rather than structured criteria, fundamentally breaking AI matching and advanced search filters. We route all applicant imports through Ceipal's API with resume files attached to trigger the parsing pipeline, or where direct API access is restricted, we pre-parse resumes into structured JSON and submit via the bulk endpoint.

  • Resume email fields are overwritten during Dice-to-Ceipal migrations

    Multiple G2 reviews confirm that when candidates are migrated from Dice into Ceipal, the primary email field is often replaced with the Dice portal email rather than the candidate's personal or professional address. If the source Ceipal instance contains records migrated from Dice, the email fields may already be corrupted. We detect this condition during pre-migration data profiling, flag affected records, and either preserve the source email in a secondary field or alert the customer to a manual correction pass post-import.

  • Rate limit errors return inconsistent HTTP codes on Ceipal

    The Ceipal ATS API documentation states that rate-limited requests return a 429 Too Many Requests error, but the Healthcare ATS API documentation page explicitly states that rate-limited requests return a 400 error code. We handle both code patterns in our migration connector and implement exponential backoff with jitter to avoid silent failures that could leave migration batches incomplete. Crelate's API has more consistent rate limit response headers that we monitor directly.

  • WorkForce module uses a separate pricing tier and custom schema

    Ceipal WorkForce module (HR, timesheets, expenses) uses a separate pricing tier ($81-$85/user/month) and may have custom fields per organization that differ from the ATS schema. WorkForce data cannot be migrated using the same object mapping as the ATS records. We scope WorkForce as a separate migration bucket, enumerate its schema during discovery, and map employee records, timesheet entries, and expense records to equivalent Crelate People profile properties and Activity types. This adds a discovery and provisioning step not present in TalentHire-only migrations.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Ceipal ATS to Crelate data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the source Ceipal instance across modules (TalentHire, WorkForce, or both), enumerating all object types, custom fields, and pipeline stages in scope. We pull a preliminary data export to profile record counts, identify data quality issues (missing emails, duplicate records, encrypted IDs), and determine whether WorkForce data is active and in scope. We pair this with Crelate's API schema enumeration to confirm which objects are available in the customer's target Crelate environment. The discovery output is a written migration scope, an object-level mapping draft, and a list of Ceipal custom fields requiring manual enumeration before migration begins.

  2. Staging environment and ID-mapping table construction

    We set up a staging environment with the Ceipal export loaded and ID-mapping tables constructed. Each Ceipal encrypted ID (applicant, job, client, submission, placement, owner) is mapped to its plain-text Crelate equivalent or flagged as requiring new record creation. We also flag records with corrupted email fields (Dice portal overwrites) and present the customer with a remediation decision before migration. Custom field mappings are built against the enumerated Ceipal schema and validated against Crelate's property types.

  3. Crelate schema provisioning

    Before any data inserts, we provision the Crelate destination schema: pipeline stages (mapped from Ceipal job stages), custom properties (mapped from Ceipal custom fields), and any WorkForce-specific HR profile fields if the WorkForce module is in scope. Crelate's pipeline and custom property configuration is deployed via Crelate's API or admin UI before migration load begins. This ensures that all incoming records map to typed fields rather than falling into generic catch-all properties.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Crelate test environment using production-like data volume. The customer's recruiting operations lead spot-checks 25-50 random Person records (checking name, email, phone, parsed skills), Job records (checking title, description, stages), and Activity records (checking submission and placement links) against the Ceipal source. The customer signs off the schema and mapping before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections happen here, not in production.

  5. Owner reconciliation and User provisioning

    We extract every distinct Ceipal Owner referenced on Applicant, Submission, and Placement records and match by email against Crelate's user directory. Owners without a matching Crelate User go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing Crelate Users (active or inactive depending on whether the original Ceipal user is still active). Migration cannot proceed past this step because User lookups are required on Person and Activity records.

  6. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Organizations (from Ceipal Clients), People (from Ceipal Applicants with resume files re-parsed in Crelate), Jobs (from Ceipal Job Postings with pipeline stages resolved), Activities (Submissions and Placements linked to People and Jobs via ID-mapping tables), Documents (resumes attached to People, offer letters attached to Placements), WorkForce data (employee profiles, timesheets, expenses if in scope). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  7. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze Ceipal writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Crelate as the system of record. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues raised by the customer's recruiting team. We deliver a written inventory of Ceipal workflows, job board posting configurations, and automation rules that require rebuild in Crelate. We do not rebuild these as part of the migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's admin or a Crelate implementation partner.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Ceipal ATS logo

Ceipal ATS

Source

Strengths

  • AI-driven candidate matching and ranking that auto-scores candidates against job requirements and surfaces top matches.
  • Centralized recruiting platform combining ATS, VMS, and workforce management under one billing relationship.
  • Free data migration and 4-week guided onboarding that reduces switching friction for staffing firms moving from incumbent platforms.
  • Multi-board job distribution to 25+ VMS portals and job boards with a single publish action and automated candidate harvesting during off-hours.
  • Built-in BI with role-specific dashboards for executive, team lead, and recruiter views without requiring external BI tools.

Weaknesses

  • Resume parsing quality degrades when candidate contact details are missing from the source document, creating records that look complete but lack actionable contact information.
  • API documentation is limited to authenticated endpoint references; public-facing rate limit values and bulk export endpoints are not clearly documented, complicating migration planning.
  • Custom field and column additions are per-organization, requiring manual enumeration during migration scoping rather than a published schema to cross-reference against.
  • Ceipal offers no public pricing calculator—quotes are obtained through sales calls, making cost-of-switching estimates difficult without direct contact.
  • The platform's per-user token rate limiting means large data migrations must be throttled per-seat, extending migration timelines for high-record-volume customers.
Crelate logo

Crelate

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM in a single platform reduces data synchronization overhead for recruiting teams.
  • Fast setup with guided implementation reported as a significant time saver for small teams.
  • Transparent per-seat pricing without surprise fees at the base tier.
  • Flexible custom field configuration across core objects without developer dependency.
  • Export capability supports up to 15,000 records per operation for Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limit of 120 requests per minute restricts bulk migration throughput.
  • Custom field cap of 20 per entity requires field consolidation for complex recruiting schemas.
  • All advanced features (Activities, Activity Forms, Core Record Field customization) are tier-gated add-ons.
  • Customer service responsiveness receives consistent negative feedback in reviews.
  • Resume parsing quality trails competitors and generates support requests.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Ceipal ATS and Crelate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Ceipal ATS: Not publicly documented; varies per user token; 429 returned on ATS API, 400 reported on Healthcare ATS API.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Ceipal ATS doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Ceipal ATS to Crelate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Ceipal ATS to Crelate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Ceipal ATS to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Ceipal ATS to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 15,000 applicants, 2,000 jobs, and 500 placements with no WorkForce module data. Migrations that include WorkForce data (employee records, timesheets, expenses), large historical placement volumes, or extensive custom field sets move to six to ten weeks because each WorkForce module requires separate schema enumeration, API endpoint routing, and destination object provisioning.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Ceipal ATS.
Land in Crelate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day