HRMS migration

Migrate from Screenloop to Recruit CRM & ATS

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Screenloop and Recruit CRM & ATS. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Recruit CRM & ATS.

Screenloop logo

Screenloop

Source

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Compatibility

90%

9 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Screenloop and Recruit CRM & ATS.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Screenloop to Recruit CRM is a migration shaped by Screenloop's status as a growing-stage ATS with no publicly documented API and a proprietary Interview Intelligence layer that stores audio recordings and AI-generated notes outside standard record export. We handle this by coordinating bulk CSV exports through Screenloop's admin interface, mapping each export to Recruit CRM's Candidates, Jobs, Interviews, and Custom Objects schemas, and resolving owner-to-user lookups before record import. Stage history is preserved as a pipeline event log attached to each candidate. Interview transcripts and AI-generated scorecard notes transfer as structured text; raw audio cannot be pulled programmatically and is flagged for direct retrieval from Screenloop support. We do not migrate Screenloop Workflows, Background Check reports, Training Modules content, or Reference survey data as code or media — we deliver written inventories of these for the customer's admin to recreate in Recruit CRM.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Screenloop logo

Screenloop

What's pushing teams away

  • Users want granular control over Slack notification routing, reporting that current Slack integration lacks the depth to filter which alerts reach which channels.
  • Smaller teams report occasional difficulty navigating advanced analytics and reporting features that feel more suited to mid-market users.
  • Early-stage platform maturity means some enterprise-grade controls like audit logging, role-based field restrictions, and org-wide data retention policies are limited or undocumented.

Choosing

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Recruit CRM for its full customizability — pipelines, stages, and fields can be tailored to any recruitment workflow without developer involvement.
  • Small teams value the built-in CRM and ATS combined in one subscription, eliminating the need to purchase and sync separate systems.
  • The Chrome extension for one-click LinkedIn profile collection streamlines candidate sourcing and reduces manual data entry for recruiters.
  • Responsive customer support with fast issue resolution is consistently cited as a reason teams stick with the platform long-term.
  • Automation options including email sequences and workflow triggers allow recruitment agencies to reduce repetitive manual outreach tasks.

Object mapping

How Screenloop objects map to Recruit CRM & ATS

Each row shows how a Screenloop object lands in Recruit CRM & ATS, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Screenloop

Candidates

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Screenloop Candidate records transfer to Recruit CRM Candidate with standard fields (name, email, phone, location, application date, source). Stage history is exported as a timestamped pipeline event log and attached as a custom notes block or structured activity entries per candidate so the hiring timeline is preserved. We flag any candidates attached to inactive or archived Jobs as requiring a destination Job to be created or re-associated before import.

Screenloop

Jobs

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Job

1:1
Fully supported

Screenloop Job postings transfer to Recruit CRM Job records with title, department, location, employment type, and description. Active versus closed status is preserved. Job-specific custom fields are extracted with their data types during the audit phase and mapped to Recruit CRM custom fields on Job. We flag any job-level scorecard templates associated with each Job so the customer can configure evaluation forms in Recruit CRM before candidate import.

Screenloop

Pipeline Stages

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Pipeline Stage

lossy
Fully supported

Screenloop's configurable stage names and ordering (e.g., Applied, Screening, Interview, Offer) map to Recruit CRM pipeline stages on the Candidate record. Stage transition timestamps are preserved as date fields on the candidate's activity timeline. We extract the full stage configuration per Job during the audit and provide a mapping spreadsheet so the customer can align stage names between platforms before import.

Screenloop

Scorecards

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Interview Evaluation

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop scorecard structured ratings and free-text feedback transfer to Recruit CRM interview evaluation fields. The rating criteria and weightings are Screenloop-native and must be manually recreated in Recruit CRM's evaluation form builder per Job or per team; we extract the full scorecard schema during the audit and provide a field-level mapping document so the customer aligns criteria before final import. AI-generated scorecard notes from the Interview Intelligence layer transfer as free-text fields.

Screenloop

Interview Records

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Interview

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop interview records (scheduled date, interviewer assignment, interview type, duration, outcome) transfer to Recruit CRM Interview records linked to the candidate and Job. The Interview Intelligence transcript text migrates as a structured text field. Raw audio files cannot be programmatically pulled from Screenloop; we flag this and advise customers to request audio exports directly from Screenloop support if required for compliance or legal purposes.

Screenloop

References

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (Reference Notes)

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop Reference survey responses (referee name, relationship, submission date, soft-skill feedback) transfer as structured text notes on the Recruit CRM Candidate record. The automated survey delivery and referee-facing flow is Screenloop-native and does not migrate; we document the Reference structure in the inventory so the customer can configure a replacement process in Recruit CRM or a linked survey tool.

Screenloop

Background Checks

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (Background Check Status)

1:1
Mapping required

Background check records including check type, provider, status, and outcome summary transfer to Recruit CRM Candidate as structured custom fields and a status indicator. Raw PDF reports from third-party providers cannot be exported through Screenloop's interface; we flag this and advise the customer to retrieve provider reports directly or store them outside Recruit CRM.

Screenloop

Training Modules

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (Training Completion)

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop Interviewer Training module completion records per user transfer to Recruit CRM as a structured notes block on the relevant User or Candidate record indicating module name, completion date, and score. The actual training video content and assessment files are Screenloop-hosted and do not migrate; we provide an inventory of completed modules so the customer can reassign or recreate training in Recruit CRM's context.

Screenloop

Users

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

User

1:1
Fully supported

Screenloop User accounts transfer to Recruit CRM Users with name, email, and role (Admin, Hiring Manager, Recruiter, Interviewer). Owner-to-candidate associations are preserved so interview attribution and assignment history remain intact. We resolve Screenloop owner references to Recruit CRM User records by email match; any Screenloop owner without a matching Recruit CRM User is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before import continues.

Screenloop

Custom Fields

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Custom Fields (on all standard objects)

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop custom fields on Candidates, Jobs, and Interviews are exported with their data types (text, number, date, single-select, multi-select) and current values. We apply a field-level mapping step to align each custom field to the equivalent Recruit CRM custom field on the corresponding object. Multi-select values from Screenloop map to Recruit CRM multi-select picklists; single-select maps to a dropdown. The customer validates the destination custom field schema during the sandbox migration phase.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Screenloop logo

Screenloop gotchas

High

No documented public API complicates automated migration

High

Interview Intelligence recordings and AI notes require special handling

Medium

Scorecard templates are Screenloop-native and need remapping at destination

Medium

No documented bulk export endpoint for historical transactions

Low

Platform maturity and audit trail gaps for compliance migrations

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS gotchas

High

API rate limits are license-scaled and can throttle bulk migration

Medium

Custom field schemas vary per organization and require field-level mapping

Medium

Files and email attachments require separate extraction and re-upload

Low

Email sequences and automation logic do not transfer between platforms

Pair-specific challenges

  • No documented public API requires manual export coordination

    Screenloop does not publish a public API endpoint, authentication method, or rate limits on a developer portal. Bulk data extraction relies on CSV generation through the admin interface, which must be coordinated with the customer's Screenloop account holder. This extends the discovery and extraction phases compared to API-driven migrations and means large accounts (5,000+ candidates) may require multiple staged export batches. We flag any export access issues in the scoping report and advise customers to ensure their Screenloop account is on an active subscription before export begins.

  • Interview audio and AI-generated notes cannot be programmatically pulled

    Interview recordings are stored in Screenloop's proprietary Interview Intelligence layer and do not expose a direct download URL via any documented endpoint. AI-generated transcripts and auto-populated scorecard notes transfer as text fields, but raw audio files require direct retrieval from Screenloop support and cannot be included in the standard migration export. We flag this at scoping and advise customers with legal or compliance requirements to contact Screenloop support for audio export before cutover.

  • Scorecard templates are Screenloop-native and need manual recreation

    Screenloop scorecard structures (rating criteria, weightings, free-text fields) are configured per job or per team. These templates do not automatically transfer to Recruit CRM's evaluation form builder. We extract the complete scorecard schema during the audit phase and deliver a mapping spreadsheet listing each Screenloop scorecard criterion and its recommended Recruit CRM evaluation field equivalent so the customer's admin aligns the criteria before candidate import.

  • Historical pipeline transaction logs have no bulk export path

    Screenloop's pipeline event history (stage changes, interview outcomes, note additions) accumulates as candidate-level activity. There is no documented bulk-export endpoint for historical transaction logs. We reconstruct stage history from individual candidate record queries where accessible, but very large accounts (10,000+ candidates) may experience incomplete event timelines. We document any gaps in the audit report and recommend the customer request historical export assistance from Screenloop support if complete pipeline history is required for compliance.

  • SSO and advanced access controls are undocumented on Screenloop

    Screenloop's Enterprise tier includes SSO and advanced role-based access controls but documentation is limited compared to established ATS platforms. During migration scoping we assess the customer's current Screenloop user roles and permissions to identify any access-control configurations that lack an equivalent in Recruit CRM. We flag mismatches in the scoping report and recommend the customer review Recruit CRM's role configuration during sandbox testing to ensure the destination permissions model covers the required use cases.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Screenloop to Recruit CRM & ATS data migration

  1. Export coordination and scoping discovery

    We schedule a scoping call with the customer's Screenloop account holder to walk through the data export process. Screenloop does not expose a bulk export API, so we coordinate CSV generation through the admin interface for Candidates, Jobs, Users, Interview Records, Scorecards, and any Reference and Background Check data. We assess candidate volume, job count, interview transcript volume, scorecard template count, and any active Training Module records. The output is a written migration scope and a data export checklist sent to the customer's Screenloop admin with instructions for generating each export file.

  2. Sandbox staging and schema design in Recruit CRM

    We create a sandbox or trial environment in Recruit CRM and load the exported CSV files to validate record structure, field mapping, and dependency order. During this phase we design the destination schema: Recruit CRM custom fields are created to match extracted Screenloop custom fields; pipeline stages are configured to match the source stage names and ordering; evaluation forms are drafted per scorecard template schema extracted during audit. The customer reviews and signs off on the sandbox state before production migration begins.

  3. Scorecard template mapping and evaluation form setup

    We extract every unique scorecard template from Screenloop during the audit phase, document the rating criteria and weightings for each job or team, and deliver a field mapping spreadsheet. The customer configures equivalent evaluation forms in Recruit CRM per scorecard template before candidate import. We resolve the mapping between Screenloop criteria and Recruit CRM evaluation fields so that historical scorecard data lands in the correct structured fields rather than falling into unstructured notes.

  4. Owner reconciliation and user provisioning

    We extract every distinct Screenloop Owner referenced on candidate, interview, and scorecard records and match by email against Recruit CRM User accounts. Owners without a matching Recruit CRM User are placed in a reconciliation queue; the customer's admin provisions the missing users before record import resumes. This step is required because Recruit CRM requires an OwnerId on candidate and job records and any unresolved reference causes the import phase to stall.

  5. Production migration in record-dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users first (validated against the reconciliation queue), then Jobs, then Candidates with stage history attached, then Interview records with transcript text and interviewer assignments, then Scorecard evaluations, then Reference and Background Check status fields. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Screenloop's absence of an API means CSV-based import via Recruit CRM's bulk upload or REST import endpoint is the primary ingestion path; we chunk large files to avoid timeout and validate field counts against the mapping schema before each upload.

  6. Cutover, validation, and written inventory delivery

    We freeze Screenloop writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then mark Recruit CRM as the system of record. We deliver the written inventory of unreconstructed objects: Screenloop Workflows (cannot migrate to Recruit CRM's automation builder), Reference survey delivery configurations, Training Module content, Background Check PDF reports, and Interview audio files. The customer's admin uses the inventory to plan manual rebuild and retrieval. We support a one-week post-cutover window for reconciliation queries raised by the hiring team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Screenloop logo

Screenloop

Source

Strengths

  • AI Notetaker auto-populates interview scorecards from recorded sessions, eliminating manual note-taking for hiring teams.
  • All-in-one Talent Operations Platform replaces multiple standalone tools with a single subscription and unified data model.
  • Automated interview scheduling with calendar sync and candidate reminders reduces coordination overhead across hiring teams.
  • Interview Intelligence records, transcribes, and analyzes interviews to surface soft-skill insights and candidate fit signals.
  • Strong customer-reported outcomes: 50% faster hiring, 74% time-to-hire reduction, 26% improvement in candidate NPS.

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented API — bulk data export and programmatic migration require custom integration work or CSV-based extraction.
  • Platform originated as a hiring-intelligence tool and has expanded into a full ATS, meaning some enterprise-grade controls are still maturing.
  • Interview recordings and AI-generated transcripts are stored in Screenloop's proprietary Interview Intelligence layer and may not be directly portable.
  • Slack integration lacks granular notification routing controls, frustrating users who want fine-grained alert filtering.
  • Small review sample size on G2 (41 reviews) makes it difficult to assess consistency of experience across different team sizes.
Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Strengths

  • Fully customizable pipelines, stages, and fields without requiring developer involvement
  • Combines recruitment CRM and ATS in one subscription for staffing agencies and small teams
  • Built-in email sequences and automation reduce manual outreach work
  • Chrome extension enables one-click LinkedIn profile collection directly into the CRM
  • Responsive customer support cited across multiple reviews with fast resolution times

Weaknesses

  • Several features are gated as paid add-ons rather than included in the base subscription
  • Email functionality has been reported as unreliable by multiple users
  • Interface occasionally lags during high-activity periods in large pipelines
  • Pricing is considered higher than comparable recruitment CRMs by some customers
  • Limited native reporting — users request pre-made report exports rather than manual data pulls

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Screenloop and Recruit CRM & ATS.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Screenloop: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Screenloop doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Screenloop to Recruit CRM & ATS migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Screenloop to Recruit CRM & ATS data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Screenloop to Recruit CRM & ATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Screenloop to Recruit CRM & ATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts with up to 2,000 candidates, 500 jobs, and no complex Interview Intelligence assets. Accounts with large interview transcript volumes, multiple scorecard templates, or Reference survey history requiring custom field remapping extend to five to eight weeks. The primary timeline variable is how quickly the customer can generate and deliver CSV exports through Screenloop's admin interface, since there is no API to automate extraction.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Screenloop.
Land in Recruit CRM & ATS, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day