HRMS migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.
Ceipal ATS
Source
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Destination
Compatibility
12 of 14
objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
4-6 weeks
Overview
Moving from Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn is a data-model translation between two fundamentally different schemas. Ceipal organizes its data around a flat relational model where every Applicant can have one or more Submissions tied to a Job and a Client, culminating in a Placement. Bullhorn stores the same recruiting lifecycle across a deeply relational schema—Candidate, ClientCorporation, ClientContact, JobOrder, JobSubmission, Placement—connected through foreign keys and junction objects like Application V2. We resolve the architectural mismatch at every object boundary: Ceipal's encrypted object IDs require ID-mapping tables in staging so that Submission-to-Applicant and Placement-to-Client relationships are preserved in Bullhorn. Bullhorn's 1,500 requests-per-minute API rate limit and Ceipal's hourly token expiry require throttle and refresh logic built into the extraction pipeline from day one. Workflows, sequences, and the Ceipal Recruiter Assistant AI do not migrate; we deliver a written automation inventory for the customer's Bullhorn admin to rebuild in Bullhorn Workflow or a Bullhorn-partner automation tool.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Ceipal ATS object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Ceipal ATS
Applicant
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Candidate
1:1Ceipal Applicants map directly to Bullhorn Candidate records. The Ceipal applicant record carries contact details, skills, education, work history, and resume file—all of which transfer to Bullhorn Candidate. We extract the resume binary alongside structured fields so Bullhorn's parsing engine runs on intake rather than storing raw text. Ceipal's encrypted applicantId requires an ID-mapping table in staging so that Submission and Placement lookups resolve correctly in Bullhorn.
Ceipal ATS
Job Posting
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
JobOrder
1:1Ceipal Job Postings map to Bullhorn JobOrder records. The job title, description, location, requirements, and pipeline stages transfer directly. Ceipal job stages map to Bullhorn JobOrder status values (Open, Interview, Offer, etc.). We preserve the job owner (recruiter assignment) via User lookup by email match against Bullhorn User records.
Ceipal ATS
Submission
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
JobSubmission
1:1Ceipal Submissions link an Applicant to a Job with submission status, submittal date, and recruiter assignment. This maps to Bullhorn JobSubmission, which is a junction object connecting Candidate to JobOrder. We resolve both the Candidate foreign key and the JobOrder foreign key via the ID-mapping tables built during the discovery phase. CSV-only migrations break this chain—we use the API to preserve the Applicant-to-Submission-to-Job relationship in Bullhorn.
Ceipal ATS
Client
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
ClientCorporation
1:1Ceipal Client records (company name, contact info, billing details) map to Bullhorn ClientCorporation. Address data, client status, and industry classification transfer to Bullhorn's corresponding fields. ClientCorporation is created before any Candidate or JobOrder import so that all foreign-key lookups are satisfied at the moment of insert.
Ceipal ATS
Lead
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Lead
1:1Ceipal Leads are distinct from Clients and carry different status fields and source attribution. They map to Bullhorn Lead records, which exist separately from ClientCorporation in Bullhorn's schema. Lead status, source, and any custom lead-routing fields migrate to Bullhorn Lead with the original Ceipal lead status preserved in a custom field for reporting continuity.
Ceipal ATS
Placement
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Placement
1:1Ceipal Placements (final hiring outcome tying Applicant to Job under Client) map to Bullhorn Placement. Start date, compensation, billing rate, and placement status transfer directly. We resolve the Candidate foreign key, the JobOrder foreign key, and the ClientCorporation foreign key via ID-mapping tables. Bullhorn Placement also requires a ClientContact reference—we either map from Ceipal's Client contact record or create a placeholder ClientContact during ClientCorporation migration.
Ceipal ATS
Submission Status / Submittal Date
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
JobSubmission Status + Application V2
lossyCeipal tracks submission status and submittal date as fields on the Submission record. Bullhorn splits this across JobSubmission status and Application V2 history. We map the current status directly and preserve the full submission timeline in Application V2 Note fields. If the customer uses Ceipal's submission stage tracking for audit, we replicate this in Bullhorn via a custom field on JobSubmission.
Ceipal ATS
WorkForce Employee Record
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Employee / Custom Object
1:1Ceipal WorkForce module stores employee profiles, compensation, department, and location under a separate pricing tier. Bullhorn does not have a native HCM/HRMS module; workforce data typically maps to Bullhorn Custom Objects (available from Bullhorn ATS tier with 2 Custom Objects or Bullhorn Front Office Growth/Enterprise with up to 10 Custom Objects with 55 fields each). We scope WorkForce migration separately and pre-create the destination Custom Object schema before any employee records load.
Ceipal ATS
WorkForce Timesheet
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Timesheet Custom Object
1:1Timesheet records in Ceipal WorkForce (hours per employee per period, approver metadata) map to Bullhorn Custom Object records on the Employee Custom Object. Period, hours worked, and approval status transfer to custom fields. If the customer uses Bullhorn Workforce Management (a separate product line), we scope this as a parallel migration with its own schema design.
Ceipal ATS
WorkForce Expense
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Expense Custom Object
1:1Expense records in Ceipal WorkForce (amount, category, employee reference, submission date) map to Bullhorn Custom Object records linked to the Employee Custom Object. Category mappings are defined during discovery against Bullhorn's picklist options. Full line-item detail migrates to custom fields on the Expense Custom Object.
Ceipal ATS
Custom Fields (Columns/Rows)
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Custom Object Fields
lossyCeipal allows admins to add custom columns to grids on Applicants, Jobs, and Placements. These are organization-specific with no public schema reference. We enumerate every custom field during discovery by querying Ceipal's API for entity metadata, then map them to Bullhorn Custom Object fields (if the data is entity-level) or to Bullhorn Custom Fields on standard entities (Candidate, JobOrder, Placement). Edition constraints apply: Bullhorn ATS supports 2 Custom Objects, ATS Growth supports none, and Front Office Growth/Enterprise supports up to 10 Custom Objects with 55 fields each.
Ceipal ATS
Document (Resume, Offer Letter, Contract)
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
ContentDocument / Attachment
1:1Ceipal stores documents against Applicants, Jobs, and Placements—resumes, offer letters, contracts. We transfer documents as binary blobs via Bullhorn's REST API using the file upload endpoint, linking them to the parent record (Candidate, JobOrder, Placement) via ContentDocumentLink. Resume files trigger Bullhorn's parsing pipeline on upload to populate structured Candidate fields. Non-resume documents (offer letters, contracts) attach as ContentDocuments with the appropriate ContentDocumentLink visibility setting.
Ceipal ATS
Owner (Recruiter Assignment)
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
User
1:1Ceipal Owner records on Applicants, Jobs, Submissions, and Placements map to Bullhorn User records. We resolve by email match against Bullhorn User. Any Ceipal Owner without a matching Bullhorn User enters a reconciliation queue for the customer's Bullhorn admin to provision before record import resumes. OwnerId references are required on most standard Bullhorn entities, so this step gates the entire migration.
Ceipal ATS
TalentBench Resume Database
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Candidate + Skills Custom Object
1:1Ceipal TalentBench is a searchable resume repository with parsed fields (structured skills, work history, education) alongside raw resume text. We migrate parsed resume data as structured fields on Bullhorn Candidate records and preserve the raw resume as a ContentDocument attachment so Bullhorn's own parsing engine runs on intake. Skills migrate to Bullhorn Candidate skills fields; if the customer's skill taxonomy is complex, we map to a Skills Custom Object linked to Candidate.
| Ceipal ATS | Bullhorn ATS & CRM | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant | Candidate1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Job Posting | JobOrder1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Submission | JobSubmission1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Client | ClientCorporation1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Lead | Lead1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Placement | Placement1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Submission Status / Submittal Date | JobSubmission Status + Application V2lossy | Fully supported | |
| WorkForce Employee Record | Employee / Custom Object1:1 | Fully supported | |
| WorkForce Timesheet | Timesheet Custom Object1:1 | Fully supported | |
| WorkForce Expense | Expense Custom Object1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields (Columns/Rows) | Custom Object Fieldslossy | Mapping required | |
| Document (Resume, Offer Letter, Contract) | ContentDocument / Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Owner (Recruiter Assignment) | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| TalentBench Resume Database | Candidate + Skills Custom Object1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Ceipal ATS gotchas
Resume email fields get overwritten on Dice-to-Ceipal migration
CSV imports bypass Ceipal's resume parsing engine
Encrypted object IDs require ID-mapping tables in staging
Rate limit errors return inconsistent HTTP codes
Free migration support is guided but scoped to Ceipal's own import tools
Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas
ATS Growth edition has no API access
Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports
Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition
Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific
Resume parse quality varies by document format
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and scope definition
We audit the source Ceipal portal across modules in scope (TalentHire ATS only, or TalentHire plus WorkForce), custom column enumeration on Applicants, Jobs, Placements, and any WorkForce modules, encrypted ID type discovery, active submission and placement volumes, and document attachment counts. We pair this with a Bullhorn edition assessment: Bullhorn ATS ($99/user) covers most recruiting-only migrations; Bullhorn Front Office Growth/Enterprise ($149-$199/user) is required if WorkForce data or more than 2 Custom Objects are in scope. Discovery output is a written migration scope, encrypted ID type inventory, and Bullhorn edition recommendation.
Schema design and encrypted ID-mapping strategy
We design the destination Bullhorn schema. This includes provisioning Custom Objects for any WorkForce data or Ceipal custom fields that exceed Bullhorn ATS limits, custom fields on standard Bullhorn entities (Candidate, JobOrder, Placement, ClientCorporation, Lead), Record Types if the customer requires separate job or placement pipelines per business unit, and the ID-mapping table strategy that resolves every Ceipal encrypted ID to its Bullhorn integer primary key. Schema deploys to a Bullhorn Sandbox first for validation before production migration begins.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into Bullhorn Sandbox using production-like data volume. The customer's Bullhorn admin reconciles record counts (Candidates in, JobOrders in, JobSubmissions in, Placements in, Custom Object records in), spot-checks 25-50 random records against the Ceipal source, and validates that Submission-to-Candidate and Placement-to-ClientCorporation lookups resolve correctly. Any mapping corrections or encrypted ID resolution gaps surface here, not in production.
User provisioning and Owner reconciliation
We extract every distinct Ceipal Owner referenced on Applicant, Job, Submission, and Placement records and match by email against the Bullhorn User table. Any Ceipal Owner without a matching Bullhorn User enters a reconciliation queue. The customer's Bullhorn admin provisions missing Users before record import resumes. OwnerId references are required on most standard Bullhorn entities, so this step gates the entire migration pipeline.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (manual provisioning, validated), ClientCorporation and ClientContact (from Ceipal Clients), JobOrder (from Ceipal Job Postings), Candidate (with resume binaries to trigger Bullhorn parsing), Lead (from Ceipal Lead object), JobSubmission (with CandidateId and JobOrderId resolved via ID-mapping tables), Placement (with CandidateId, JobOrderId, and ClientCorporationId resolved), WorkForce data (Employee Custom Objects, Timesheet Custom Objects, Expense Custom Objects if in scope), Documents (ContentDocuments attached to the relevant parent records), Custom Object fields for any Ceipal custom columns. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.
Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff
We freeze Ceipal writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver the automation inventory document listing every Ceipal Workflow and the Recruiter Assistant configuration to the customer's Bullhorn admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Ceipal Workflows or Recruiter Assistant automations as Bullhorn Workflow or Bullhorn-partner automation tool configurations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.
Platform deep dives
Ceipal ATS
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.
Object compatibility
All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Ceipal ATS: Not publicly documented; varies per user token; 429 returned on ATS API, 400 reported on Healthcare ATS API.
Data volume sensitivity
Ceipal ATS doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Ceipal ATS
Other ways to arrive at Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.