HRMS migration

Migrate from Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Ceipal ATS logo

Ceipal ATS

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

86%

12 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn is a data-model translation between two fundamentally different schemas. Ceipal organizes its data around a flat relational model where every Applicant can have one or more Submissions tied to a Job and a Client, culminating in a Placement. Bullhorn stores the same recruiting lifecycle across a deeply relational schema—Candidate, ClientCorporation, ClientContact, JobOrder, JobSubmission, Placement—connected through foreign keys and junction objects like Application V2. We resolve the architectural mismatch at every object boundary: Ceipal's encrypted object IDs require ID-mapping tables in staging so that Submission-to-Applicant and Placement-to-Client relationships are preserved in Bullhorn. Bullhorn's 1,500 requests-per-minute API rate limit and Ceipal's hourly token expiry require throttle and refresh logic built into the extraction pipeline from day one. Workflows, sequences, and the Ceipal Recruiter Assistant AI do not migrate; we deliver a written automation inventory for the customer's Bullhorn admin to rebuild in Bullhorn Workflow or a Bullhorn-partner automation tool.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Ceipal ATS logo

Ceipal ATS

What's pushing teams away

  • Resume data quality degrades during import—G2 reviewers report that candidate email addresses and phone numbers are frequently missing or replaced with third-party portal emails (e.g., Dice email instead of personal contact), forcing recruiters to skip otherwise qualified candidates.
  • The platform requires more customization options to match complex staffing workflows; users cite frustration with the out-of-box field structure not aligning with their internal processes for healthcare credentialing or executive search.
  • Ceipal's parsing engine can leave imported resumes un-indexed in search if the import path bypasses the parsing pipeline, creating a candidate database that looks full but is functionally empty for sourcing purposes.
  • Some users report that UI improvements are needed to keep pace with modern UX expectations, particularly in the candidate profile and job board search interfaces compared to newer ATS competitors.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Ceipal ATS objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Ceipal ATS object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Ceipal ATS

Applicant

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Applicants map directly to Bullhorn Candidate records. The Ceipal applicant record carries contact details, skills, education, work history, and resume file—all of which transfer to Bullhorn Candidate. We extract the resume binary alongside structured fields so Bullhorn's parsing engine runs on intake rather than storing raw text. Ceipal's encrypted applicantId requires an ID-mapping table in staging so that Submission and Placement lookups resolve correctly in Bullhorn.

Ceipal ATS

Job Posting

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Job Postings map to Bullhorn JobOrder records. The job title, description, location, requirements, and pipeline stages transfer directly. Ceipal job stages map to Bullhorn JobOrder status values (Open, Interview, Offer, etc.). We preserve the job owner (recruiter assignment) via User lookup by email match against Bullhorn User records.

Ceipal ATS

Submission

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobSubmission

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Submissions link an Applicant to a Job with submission status, submittal date, and recruiter assignment. This maps to Bullhorn JobSubmission, which is a junction object connecting Candidate to JobOrder. We resolve both the Candidate foreign key and the JobOrder foreign key via the ID-mapping tables built during the discovery phase. CSV-only migrations break this chain—we use the API to preserve the Applicant-to-Submission-to-Job relationship in Bullhorn.

Ceipal ATS

Client

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Client records (company name, contact info, billing details) map to Bullhorn ClientCorporation. Address data, client status, and industry classification transfer to Bullhorn's corresponding fields. ClientCorporation is created before any Candidate or JobOrder import so that all foreign-key lookups are satisfied at the moment of insert.

Ceipal ATS

Lead

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Lead

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Leads are distinct from Clients and carry different status fields and source attribution. They map to Bullhorn Lead records, which exist separately from ClientCorporation in Bullhorn's schema. Lead status, source, and any custom lead-routing fields migrate to Bullhorn Lead with the original Ceipal lead status preserved in a custom field for reporting continuity.

Ceipal ATS

Placement

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Placement

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Placements (final hiring outcome tying Applicant to Job under Client) map to Bullhorn Placement. Start date, compensation, billing rate, and placement status transfer directly. We resolve the Candidate foreign key, the JobOrder foreign key, and the ClientCorporation foreign key via ID-mapping tables. Bullhorn Placement also requires a ClientContact reference—we either map from Ceipal's Client contact record or create a placeholder ClientContact during ClientCorporation migration.

Ceipal ATS

Submission Status / Submittal Date

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobSubmission Status + Application V2

lossy
Fully supported

Ceipal tracks submission status and submittal date as fields on the Submission record. Bullhorn splits this across JobSubmission status and Application V2 history. We map the current status directly and preserve the full submission timeline in Application V2 Note fields. If the customer uses Ceipal's submission stage tracking for audit, we replicate this in Bullhorn via a custom field on JobSubmission.

Ceipal ATS

WorkForce Employee Record

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Employee / Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal WorkForce module stores employee profiles, compensation, department, and location under a separate pricing tier. Bullhorn does not have a native HCM/HRMS module; workforce data typically maps to Bullhorn Custom Objects (available from Bullhorn ATS tier with 2 Custom Objects or Bullhorn Front Office Growth/Enterprise with up to 10 Custom Objects with 55 fields each). We scope WorkForce migration separately and pre-create the destination Custom Object schema before any employee records load.

Ceipal ATS

WorkForce Timesheet

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Timesheet Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

Timesheet records in Ceipal WorkForce (hours per employee per period, approver metadata) map to Bullhorn Custom Object records on the Employee Custom Object. Period, hours worked, and approval status transfer to custom fields. If the customer uses Bullhorn Workforce Management (a separate product line), we scope this as a parallel migration with its own schema design.

Ceipal ATS

WorkForce Expense

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Expense Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

Expense records in Ceipal WorkForce (amount, category, employee reference, submission date) map to Bullhorn Custom Object records linked to the Employee Custom Object. Category mappings are defined during discovery against Bullhorn's picklist options. Full line-item detail migrates to custom fields on the Expense Custom Object.

Ceipal ATS

Custom Fields (Columns/Rows)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Ceipal allows admins to add custom columns to grids on Applicants, Jobs, and Placements. These are organization-specific with no public schema reference. We enumerate every custom field during discovery by querying Ceipal's API for entity metadata, then map them to Bullhorn Custom Object fields (if the data is entity-level) or to Bullhorn Custom Fields on standard entities (Candidate, JobOrder, Placement). Edition constraints apply: Bullhorn ATS supports 2 Custom Objects, ATS Growth supports none, and Front Office Growth/Enterprise supports up to 10 Custom Objects with 55 fields each.

Ceipal ATS

Document (Resume, Offer Letter, Contract)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ContentDocument / Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal stores documents against Applicants, Jobs, and Placements—resumes, offer letters, contracts. We transfer documents as binary blobs via Bullhorn's REST API using the file upload endpoint, linking them to the parent record (Candidate, JobOrder, Placement) via ContentDocumentLink. Resume files trigger Bullhorn's parsing pipeline on upload to populate structured Candidate fields. Non-resume documents (offer letters, contracts) attach as ContentDocuments with the appropriate ContentDocumentLink visibility setting.

Ceipal ATS

Owner (Recruiter Assignment)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal Owner records on Applicants, Jobs, Submissions, and Placements map to Bullhorn User records. We resolve by email match against Bullhorn User. Any Ceipal Owner without a matching Bullhorn User enters a reconciliation queue for the customer's Bullhorn admin to provision before record import resumes. OwnerId references are required on most standard Bullhorn entities, so this step gates the entire migration.

Ceipal ATS

TalentBench Resume Database

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate + Skills Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

Ceipal TalentBench is a searchable resume repository with parsed fields (structured skills, work history, education) alongside raw resume text. We migrate parsed resume data as structured fields on Bullhorn Candidate records and preserve the raw resume as a ContentDocument attachment so Bullhorn's own parsing engine runs on intake. Skills migrate to Bullhorn Candidate skills fields; if the customer's skill taxonomy is complex, we map to a Skills Custom Object linked to Candidate.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Ceipal ATS logo

Ceipal ATS gotchas

High

Resume email fields get overwritten on Dice-to-Ceipal migration

High

CSV imports bypass Ceipal's resume parsing engine

Medium

Encrypted object IDs require ID-mapping tables in staging

Medium

Rate limit errors return inconsistent HTTP codes

Low

Free migration support is guided but scoped to Ceipal's own import tools

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Encrypted Ceipal object IDs require ID-mapping tables in staging

    Ceipal introduced encrypted IDs across ATS endpoints in a recent release. All API references between objects—Submission to Applicant, Submission to Job, Placement to Client—use these encrypted IDs. Bullhorn, by contrast, uses integer primary keys and standard foreign-key lookups. During migration we build ID-mapping tables in the staging layer so that foreign-key relationships in Bullhorn are resolved correctly rather than pointing to null or wrong records. This discovery step adds a day to scoping but prevents silent relationship breaks that are expensive to correct post-migration.

  • Ceipal CSV imports bypass the resume parsing engine

    Ceipal's parsing engine runs during UI-based candidate creation. Bulk CSV imports store raw text but leave parsed fields (structured skills, work history, education) unpopulated, breaking AI matching and advanced search filters. We route all candidate imports through Ceipal's API with resume binaries so Bullhorn's own parsing pipeline runs on intake. We do not use Ceipal CSV exports as the migration source for candidate records.

  • Bullhorn's Application V2 has no Ceipal equivalent

    Bullhorn's Application V2 and Application History objects track the full stage-change timeline for a candidate's journey through a job pipeline. Ceipal's Submission record does not carry equivalent stage-history metadata. We preserve what stage information exists in Ceipal as Bullhorn Application V2 records and store the rest in a custom field on JobSubmission. Customers with heavy stage-history audit requirements may need a post-migration data cleanup pass or a custom Bullhorn reporting view built by their admin.

  • Bullhorn rate limit of 1,500 requests per minute gates extraction throughput

    Bullhorn's REST API caps at 1,500 requests per minute globally across the org (kb.bullhorn.com). Ceipal's auth tokens expire every hour, requiring refresh logic built into the extraction pipeline. We implement pagination, exponential backoff, and token refresh in the migration connector. For high-volume Ceipal customers (millions of submission records), the Bullhorn rate limit extends the extraction timeline significantly compared to lower-volume migrations.

  • WorkForce module requires Bullhorn Custom Object schema pre-creation

    Ceipal WorkForce (employee records, timesheets, expenses) is priced separately and uses a different schema from the ATS module. Bullhorn does not have a native HCM/HRMS module; workforce data maps to Bullhorn Custom Objects with edition-dependent limits. We scope WorkForce migrations separately and pre-create the destination Custom Object schema—including all employee, timesheet, and expense custom fields—before any data load. If the customer is on Bullhorn ATS (2 Custom Objects max), we prioritize which WorkForce objects map to standard Bullhorn fields versus Custom Objects during scoping.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and scope definition

    We audit the source Ceipal portal across modules in scope (TalentHire ATS only, or TalentHire plus WorkForce), custom column enumeration on Applicants, Jobs, Placements, and any WorkForce modules, encrypted ID type discovery, active submission and placement volumes, and document attachment counts. We pair this with a Bullhorn edition assessment: Bullhorn ATS ($99/user) covers most recruiting-only migrations; Bullhorn Front Office Growth/Enterprise ($149-$199/user) is required if WorkForce data or more than 2 Custom Objects are in scope. Discovery output is a written migration scope, encrypted ID type inventory, and Bullhorn edition recommendation.

  2. Schema design and encrypted ID-mapping strategy

    We design the destination Bullhorn schema. This includes provisioning Custom Objects for any WorkForce data or Ceipal custom fields that exceed Bullhorn ATS limits, custom fields on standard Bullhorn entities (Candidate, JobOrder, Placement, ClientCorporation, Lead), Record Types if the customer requires separate job or placement pipelines per business unit, and the ID-mapping table strategy that resolves every Ceipal encrypted ID to its Bullhorn integer primary key. Schema deploys to a Bullhorn Sandbox first for validation before production migration begins.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into Bullhorn Sandbox using production-like data volume. The customer's Bullhorn admin reconciles record counts (Candidates in, JobOrders in, JobSubmissions in, Placements in, Custom Object records in), spot-checks 25-50 random records against the Ceipal source, and validates that Submission-to-Candidate and Placement-to-ClientCorporation lookups resolve correctly. Any mapping corrections or encrypted ID resolution gaps surface here, not in production.

  4. User provisioning and Owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Ceipal Owner referenced on Applicant, Job, Submission, and Placement records and match by email against the Bullhorn User table. Any Ceipal Owner without a matching Bullhorn User enters a reconciliation queue. The customer's Bullhorn admin provisions missing Users before record import resumes. OwnerId references are required on most standard Bullhorn entities, so this step gates the entire migration pipeline.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (manual provisioning, validated), ClientCorporation and ClientContact (from Ceipal Clients), JobOrder (from Ceipal Job Postings), Candidate (with resume binaries to trigger Bullhorn parsing), Lead (from Ceipal Lead object), JobSubmission (with CandidateId and JobOrderId resolved via ID-mapping tables), Placement (with CandidateId, JobOrderId, and ClientCorporationId resolved), WorkForce data (Employee Custom Objects, Timesheet Custom Objects, Expense Custom Objects if in scope), Documents (ContentDocuments attached to the relevant parent records), Custom Object fields for any Ceipal custom columns. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze Ceipal writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver the automation inventory document listing every Ceipal Workflow and the Recruiter Assistant configuration to the customer's Bullhorn admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Ceipal Workflows or Recruiter Assistant automations as Bullhorn Workflow or Bullhorn-partner automation tool configurations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Ceipal ATS logo

Ceipal ATS

Source

Strengths

  • AI-driven candidate matching and ranking that auto-scores candidates against job requirements and surfaces top matches.
  • Centralized recruiting platform combining ATS, VMS, and workforce management under one billing relationship.
  • Free data migration and 4-week guided onboarding that reduces switching friction for staffing firms moving from incumbent platforms.
  • Multi-board job distribution to 25+ VMS portals and job boards with a single publish action and automated candidate harvesting during off-hours.
  • Built-in BI with role-specific dashboards for executive, team lead, and recruiter views without requiring external BI tools.

Weaknesses

  • Resume parsing quality degrades when candidate contact details are missing from the source document, creating records that look complete but lack actionable contact information.
  • API documentation is limited to authenticated endpoint references; public-facing rate limit values and bulk export endpoints are not clearly documented, complicating migration planning.
  • Custom field and column additions are per-organization, requiring manual enumeration during migration scoping rather than a published schema to cross-reference against.
  • Ceipal offers no public pricing calculator—quotes are obtained through sales calls, making cost-of-switching estimates difficult without direct contact.
  • The platform's per-user token rate limiting means large data migrations must be throttled per-seat, extending migration timelines for high-record-volume customers.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Ceipal ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Ceipal ATS: Not publicly documented; varies per user token; 429 returned on ATS API, 400 reported on Healthcare ATS API.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Ceipal ATS doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Ceipal ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for accounts under 20,000 Applicants, 3,000 Jobs, and 5,000 Placements with no WorkForce module. Migrations with Ceipal WorkForce employee records, large submission histories (over 500,000 submission records), or Ceipal custom columns requiring Bullhorn Custom Object schema creation extend to ten to fourteen weeks because of the WorkForce scope, encrypted ID resolution, and custom field mapping. Bullhorn's data extraction process can take two to three weeks depending on the volume of historical data and Bullhorn support queue availability.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Ceipal ATS.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day