CRM migration

Migrate from Case.one to HubSpot

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Case.one and HubSpot. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in HubSpot.

Case.one logo

Case.one

Source

HubSpot

Destination

HubSpot logo

Compatibility

100%

12 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Case.one and HubSpot.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

48–72 hours

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Case.one organizes around matters and parties within each case, while HubSpot organizes around contacts and companies with deals as the revenue-tracking construct. The migration requires mapping Case.one's matter-centric hierarchy (cases → parties → time entries → invoices) into HubSpot's contact-company-deal model, with Case.one case types becoming deal pipelines and party roles becoming either contact properties or custom pick-list values. HubSpot has no native time-tracking or legal billing module, so Case.one time entries and invoice histories migrate as custom properties on the deal record or as a custom object linked by case reference. We preserve all original create dates, matter open dates, and billing timestamps as custom datetime fields so historical reporting continuity is maintained. Case.one workflows (matter-stage automations, conflict checks, document generation triggers) do not migrate and must be rebuilt in HubSpot using HubSpot's workflows or a legal-specific integration layer. Our migration engine uses Case.one's API to extract full matter histories, transforms the data model during load, and runs a delta-pickup window at cutover to capture any matter updates during the switch.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Case.one logo

Case.one

What's pushing teams away

  • Workflow automation limitations frustrate firms with complex multi-step processes that require more flexibility than the native rules engine provides.
  • Performance degradation reported when managing large document repositories within individual matters.
  • Customer support response times are a common complaint in negative reviews, particularly for billing or technical issues.
  • Mobile application lacks feature parity with the desktop version, limiting remote access to full case details.
  • Integration ecosystem is narrower than competitors, making connectivity with niche legal tools and custom software challenging.

Choosing

HubSpot logo

HubSpot

What's pulling them in

  • Lowest barrier to entry of any major CRM — the free tier with unlimited contacts lets teams validate fit before committing to a paid plan, according to G2 and Capterra reviewers.
  • Native integration between the CRM and sales engagement tools (sequences, email tracking, dialer) means no separate sync configuration, a theme across G2 Sales Hub reviews.
  • Pipeline visualization, deal tracking, and automated workflows are consistently praised as intuitive and easy to set up without developer involvement.
  • Strong onboarding for new team members — reviewers on Capterra and G2 highlight how quickly new reps become productive without formal training.
  • The HubSpot platform ecosystem (Marketing, Sales, Service, CMS hubs) allows growing companies to consolidate tools without building new integrations.

Object mapping

How Case.one objects map to HubSpot

Each row shows how a Case.one object lands in HubSpot, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Case.one

Matter / Case

maps to

HubSpot

Deal + Custom Object (Matter_Reference__c)

1:1
Fully supported

Case.one matters map to HubSpot Deals because both represent revenue-trackable entities with stages, amounts, and close dates. The matter number and case type become custom text properties. Matter open date and close date migrate as custom datetime fields for historical continuity. If the firm tracks retainer balances, those become custom currency fields on the deal.

Case.one

Party (Contact within Matter)

maps to

HubSpot

Contact

1:1
Fully supported

Named parties from Case.one (plaintiff, defendant, opposing counsel, expert) map to HubSpot Contacts. The party role within the matter becomes a custom pick-list property (Party_Role__c) on the contact, optionally linked to the deal via a custom junction object if the same person appears in multiple roles across matters. Primary attorney assignments become the contact's OwnerId.

Case.one

Party Organization

maps to

HubSpot

Company

1:1
Fully supported

Organizations named in Case.one matters (law firms, corporate clients, opposing parties) map to HubSpot Companies. Company domain, address, and industry are carried over directly. Multi-party organizations within a single matter collapse to the primary Company record with the contact linked via primary association.

Case.one

Time Entry

maps to

HubSpot

Custom Object (Time_Entry__c) linked to Deal

1:1
Fully supported

HubSpot has no native time-tracking object. Case.one time entries (date, duration, attorney, billing rate, description) become a custom object linked to the Deal via a lookup field. This preserves the full time-entry history per matter without cluttering the contact record. Billing rate and amount calculate from the migrated rate fields.

Case.one

Invoice / LEDES Bill

maps to

HubSpot

Custom Object (Invoice__c) linked to Deal

1:1
Fully supported

Case.one invoices and LEDES-formatted bills have no HubSpot equivalent. We create a custom Invoice object linked to the Deal, storing invoice number, date, amount, status (sent/paid/overdue), and the original LEDES billing code as a text field. Line items migrate as a long-text custom field for reference.

Case.one

Task / To-Do

maps to

HubSpot

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Case.one tasks within a matter map directly to HubSpot Tasks. Original due dates, assignees, and matter linkage (via custom property) are preserved. Completed status and completion timestamps carry over. Court-deadline tasks get a custom pick-list flag (Court_Deadline__c) for prioritization.

Case.one

Note

maps to

HubSpot

Note

1:1
Fully supported

Case.one notes on matters migrate as HubSpot Notes attached to the corresponding Deal. Rich-text formatting is preserved where possible. Original author and create date are stored in HubSpot's native note metadata. Notes from specific case milestones (deposition, settlement conference) get a custom property for categorization.

Case.one

Document / File Attachment

maps to

HubSpot

File (attached to Deal)

1:1
Fully supported

Documents attached to Case.one matters re-upload to HubSpot Files linked to the corresponding Deal. File size limits (25MB per file in HubSpot) apply; large document sets are batched. Document names and matter context are preserved in the file description field. Version history from Case.one is not replicated in HubSpot.

Case.one

Calendar Event / Court Date

maps to

HubSpot

Event + Custom Property (Court_Date__c)

1:1
Fully supported

Case.one calendar events map to HubSpot Events with original start/end times preserved. Court dates get a custom checkbox (Is_Court_Date__c) and court jurisdiction stored in a custom text field. Events are linked to the Deal representing that matter. Recurring court appearances require manual recreation in HubSpot's event recurrence settings.

Case.one

Custom Matter Properties (Court Jurisdiction, Billing Arrangement, Refferer Source)

maps to

HubSpot

Custom Properties on Deal

1:1
Fully supported

Case.one custom fields per matter — such as court jurisdiction, billing arrangement (hourly/flat/contingency), referring source, and case subtype — migrate as HubSpot custom properties on the Deal. Pick-list values are mapped one-by-one to HubSpot pick-list options. Cross-field dependencies (e.g., court jurisdiction gating billing arrangement options) cannot be enforced in HubSpot without workflow rebuilding.

Case.one

User / Attorney

maps to

HubSpot

User

1:1
Fully supported

Case.one users (attorneys, paralegals, admins) resolve to HubSpot Users by email match. If Case.one users have no email in the system, they are flagged for admin assignment. Inactive Case.one users become inactive HubSpot users to preserve historical attribution on time entries and notes.

Case.one

Billing Arrangement / Fee Structure

maps to

HubSpot

Custom Pick-list Property on Deal (Billing_Arrangement__c)

1:1
Fully supported

Case.one billing arrangements (hourly, flat fee, contingency, pro bono) map to a HubSpot custom pick-list. Each value migrates one-to-one. If Case.one uses custom billing arrangement names, we create matching HubSpot pick-list options. Retainer balance amounts migrate as a custom currency field on the deal.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Case.one logo

Case.one gotchas

High

Trust account balance migration requires financial reconciliation

Low

Per-active-case pricing means closed matters do not count toward billing

Medium

Custom field schemas are firm-specific and require enumeration

Medium

Large document repositories may require chunked export with integrity verification

HubSpot logo

HubSpot gotchas

High

Marketing Contacts billing model is migration-critical

High

Feature tier gating is not visible until onboarding

Medium

Mandatory onboarding fees inflate year-one cost

Medium

HubSpot CSV importer cannot migrate engagements or attachments

Medium

Custom objects require Enterprise and a pre-existing schema

Pair-specific challenges

  • Matter hierarchy flattening creates N:1 party-to-deal relationships

    Case.one models parties within a matter context — the same person can be 'opposing counsel' in one matter and 'expert witness' in another. HubSpot contacts have no per-matter role concept natively. We resolve this by creating a custom pick-list property (Party_Role__c) on the contact and optionally a junction object linking the contact to the deal with a role label. If the firm needs role-aware reporting per matter, the junction object approach is required and must be designed before migration — it changes how contact-deal associations query in HubSpot Reports.

  • Time entries and invoices become disconnected custom objects without native linking

    HubSpot has no billing module and no time-tracking object. Time entries and invoices migrate as custom objects (Time_Entry__c and Invoice__c) linked to the deal via lookup fields. However, HubSpot's native reporting does not aggregate custom object data into deal-level revenue views without a linked custom object setup and manual dashboard configuration. Firms relying on Case.one's billing dashboard for attorney compensation or matter profitability reports need to rebuild those views in HubSpot using custom report types — a manual step that is out of scope for data migration.

  • Case.one workflow triggers do not transfer and require HubSpot workflow rebuilding

    Case.one matter-stage automations — such as conflict-check triggers at intake, document-generation workflows at specific case milestones, court-date reminder sequences, and LEDES invoice auto-generation rules — have no HubSpot equivalent. These must be rebuilt in HubSpot using HubSpot workflows (available in Pro and above) or via a legal-specific integration layer. We export Case.one workflow definitions as a reference document for the firm's HubSpot admin to use during the rebuild phase. The gap is disclosed upfront so firms budget admin time post-migration.

  • Marketing contact distinction has no Case.one analogue

    HubSpot's marketing-contact billing flag distinguishes contacts who have consented to marketing emails — a legal firm rarely uses this since attorney-client communications are not marketing. All Case.one parties land as non-marketing contacts in HubSpot by default. If the firm later enables HubSpot marketing emails for newsletters or seminar invitations, contacts must be manually opted in. This is a configuration step, not a migration gap, but firms should be aware that HubSpot's contact count does not immediately trigger marketing-billing charges.

  • Document version history and file size limits create retention gaps

    Case.one retains full document version history (draft → revised → final) per matter. HubSpot Files track the current version only. Documents exceeding HubSpot's 25MB per-file limit must be chunked or stored externally with a link stored in HubSpot. Firms with large case exhibits, discovery productions, or multimedia evidence (video depositions) should identify these before migration so a document management strategy is in place at cutover. FlitStack can surface file size outliers during the pre-migration audit.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Case.one to HubSpot data migration

  1. Audit Case.one data model and surface custom fields, billing arrangements, and document volumes

    We connect to Case.one via API to enumerate all matter types, custom fields, party role structures, time-entry schemas, and invoice formats. A pre-migration audit report identifies LEDES-formatted invoices, multi-party matters with role conflicts, oversized documents, and inactive users. This report drives the HubSpot schema design: pipeline count, custom property definitions, and whether time-entry/invoice custom objects are needed. We deliver this audit before any data moves.

  2. Design HubSpot schema: pipelines, custom properties, custom objects, and user mapping

    Based on the audit, we design HubSpot pipelines (one per Case.one case type), custom properties for court jurisdiction, billing arrangement, retainer balance, and party role. If time-entry or invoice history is material, we create the Time_Entry__c and Invoice__c custom objects with lookup fields to the Deal. User resolution mapping is established by email — inactive Case.one users flagged for admin assignment. We deliver a schema design document for HubSpot admin approval before creating the schema.

  3. Run sample migration with field-level diff across a representative matter slice

    We migrate a sample set of 10–25 matters spanning different case types, party counts, and billing arrangements. The sample includes time entries, invoices, tasks, and documents. We generate a field-level diff comparing source values to destination values for every mapped field, showing nulls, truncation, and value-mapping results. You review the diff and approve field mappings before the full run commits. Unresolved party roles and document size issues surface here.

  4. Execute full migration with delta-pickup window at cutover

    The full migration runs in sequenced batches: matters first (for deal creation), then parties and companies (with owner resolution), then time entries and invoices as linked custom objects, then tasks, notes, and files. During cutover, a 24–48 hour delta-pickup window captures any Case.one records modified while the migration was running. All operations are logged in the audit trail. One-click rollback is available if reconciliation reveals data integrity issues. Documents exceeding HubSpot file limits are flagged for external storage with HubSpot links.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Case.one logo

Case.one

Source

Strengths

  • Per-active-case pricing aligns cost with actual caseload rather than seat count.
  • Consolidated platform reduces switching between separate billing, document, and case tools.
  • Collaborative litigation workspace built natively into the case management flow.
  • Integrated trust accounting handles client fund tracking within the same system.
  • Free tier available for very small firms or evaluation purposes.

Weaknesses

  • Narrower third-party integration ecosystem compared to established legal CRM competitors.
  • Mobile application feature set lags behind the full desktop experience.
  • Workflow automation is less flexible than platforms with programmable rule engines.
  • Limited public documentation on API endpoints and capabilities.
  • Smaller market share means fewer third-party migration resources and community templates.
HubSpot logo

HubSpot

Destination

Strengths

  • Genuinely useful free CRM tier with no seat limit on contact records.
  • All-in-one sales engagement layer (sequences, email tracking, calling, dialer) embedded natively in the CRM, eliminating a separate integration.
  • Intuitive interface and fast onboarding for individual reps, per G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Workflow automation triggers across contacts, deals, and tickets with a visual builder.
  • API coverage for all standard objects including custom objects at Enterprise tier.

Weaknesses

  • Pricing model is contact-based at the marketing layer — importing all records as marketing contacts can multiply the monthly bill by 4×.
  • Feature tier cliffs are frequent surprises: sequences, calling, advanced reporting, and quoting are all gated, often requiring plan upgrades mid-implementation.
  • Mandatory onboarding fees at Professional ($1,500) and Enterprise ($3,500) are not prominently disclosed on the pricing page.
  • API rate limits are restrictive for bulk migration — burst limits of 100-200 req/10sec and search endpoint limits of 4 req/sec require careful job queuing.
  • Custom objects, additional pipelines, and advanced forecasting are Enterprise-only, making cost projections difficult for growing teams.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard CRM migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Case.one and HubSpot.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Case.one: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Case.one doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Case.one to HubSpot migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Case.one to HubSpot data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Case.one to HubSpot migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Case.one to HubSpot migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Case.one-to-HubSpot migrations complete in 48–72 hours for under 25,000 records. Configurations with heavy time-entry histories, LEDES invoices, or multiple case types requiring separate HubSpot pipelines extend to 7–10 days. The longest planning step is designing the matter-to-deal schema mapping and deciding whether time-entry and invoice custom objects are needed — that decision drives field-level validation complexity.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Case.one.
Land in HubSpot, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day