HRMS migration

Migrate from Checkwriters to Crelate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Checkwriters and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.

Checkwriters logo

Checkwriters

Source

Crelate

Destination

Crelate logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Checkwriters and Crelate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Checkwriters and Crelate are different platform types within the HR software landscape. Checkwriters is a full HRMS centered on payroll, compliance, and employee self-service, with a recruiting module available as an upgrade on HR Premier and above. Crelate is a dedicated ATS and recruiting CRM that organizes data around People (candidates), Organizations (companies), and Opportunities (job orders). The natural migration surface between them is the Checkwriters recruiting module: job postings, candidate profiles, applications, and hiring notes. We use Checkwriters Report Writer exports and admin-assisted data pulls to extract recruiting records, map them into Crelate's schema, and validate in a Crelate sandbox before production cutover. Checkwriters has no public API for bulk data extraction, which constrains migration to CSV exports coordinated directly with the customer's HR Admin. Payroll, accruals, deductions, benefits, and performance reviews do not migrate to Crelate because they fall outside an ATS data model. We document these items and flag parallel system requirements during discovery.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Checkwriters logo

Checkwriters

What's pushing teams away

  • The UI is described as clumsy for repetitive tasks — entering hours day-by-day with mandatory save steps is a recurring frustration for payroll managers
  • Limited configurability for complex compensation scenarios — multi-tier pay structures, spot bonuses, and off-cycle adjustments require manual intervention
  • Reporting capabilities feel constrained compared to dedicated BI tools — custom Report Writer builds are possible but require HR Admin access and significant setup
  • Some customers report the platform feels dated compared to newer HRMS options, particularly around mobile experience and modern UX patterns
  • Billing model lacks transparency — pricing is not publicly published and negotiations happen on a per-customer basis, which creates uncertainty for buyers evaluating the platform

Choosing

Crelate logo

Crelate

What's pulling them in

  • Affordable per-seat pricing with transparent tiers makes Crelate accessible for small-to-mid staffing firms evaluating ATS platforms for the first time.
  • Fast implementation reported by customers—some describe getting live in a matter of minutes with support team assistance.
  • Unified ATS + CRM in a single product eliminates the need to buy and synchronize separate recruiting and sales tools.
  • Flexible custom fields across Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities allow recruiting teams to capture firm-specific data without developer involvement.
  • Positive reviews highlight the product's intuitive interface and functional breadth for teams that need recruiting workflows without enterprise overhead.

Object mapping

How Checkwriters objects map to Crelate

Each row shows how a Checkwriters object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Checkwriters

Job Postings (Recruiting module)

maps to

Crelate

Job Post

1:1
Fully supported

Checkwriters job postings map to Crelate Job Post records. The job title, description, location, employment type, and department fields transfer directly. Job board distribution settings do not carry forward because Crelate manages its own job distribution integrations. We extract the posting date and close date from Checkwriters Report Writer exports and set the Crelate Job Post status accordingly. Any active job postings in-flight at cutover are prioritized in the first migration batch.

Checkwriters

Candidates (Recruiting module)

maps to

Crelate

Person

1:1
Fully supported

Checkwriters candidate profiles map to Crelate Person records. Core fields including name, email address, phone number, current employer, and current title transfer directly. Application status history stored in Checkwriters as a series of status-change events is collapsed into the most recent status and stored as a custom field on the Crelate Person record for audit. Source attribution (where the candidate originated) migrates to a Crelate custom field.

Checkwriters

Applications (Recruiting module)

maps to

Crelate

Application

1:1
Fully supported

Checkwriters applications link a candidate to a specific job posting and track status through the hiring pipeline (Applied, Screening, Interview, Offer, Hired, Rejected). We map these status values to Crelate's Application status taxonomy. Application date and last-modified date transfer as Crelate creation and modification timestamps. Notes attached to an application in Checkwriters migrate as Crelate Activity Notes linked to the Application record.

Checkwriters

Interview Notes

maps to

Crelate

Note (linked to Person or Application)

1:1
Fully supported

Interview notes, interviewer feedback, and scoring records stored in Checkwriters migrate as Crelate Note records. We resolve the note's parent record by matching the interview's candidate and job references from the Checkwriters export. Interviewer attribution (name, role, date) maps to Crelate's note metadata fields. Score values and rating fields migrate to custom fields on the Crelate Note or Application record depending on the customer's review structure.

Checkwriters

Custom Fields (Recruiting module)

maps to

Crelate

Custom Fields on Person, Organization, Opportunity

lossy
Fully supported

Checkwriters custom fields on employee and candidate profiles require HR Admin-level permissions to enumerate in full. We request admin-level access to the Checkwriters tenant during scoping to extract the complete custom field registry before designing the Crelate destination schema. Each Checkwriters custom field type (text, date, dropdown, numeric) maps to the equivalent Crelate custom field type on the matching core record. Dropdown values from Checkwriters become Crelate picklist options, and we validate that all values in the migrating dataset are represented in the destination picklist before import.

Checkwriters

Documents and Attachments (Recruiting module)

maps to

Crelate

File Attachments on Person

1:1
Fully supported

Resume files, cover letters, portfolio attachments, and signed forms stored in the Checkwriters Document Center and attached to candidate records migrate as Crelate File Attachments linked to the corresponding Person record. We extract file references and the original file name and restore them in Crelate. Visibility restrictions on documents in Checkwriters are not enforceable in Crelate's permission model and are flagged to the customer's admin during the permissions handoff.

Checkwriters

Employee Records (HRMS core)

maps to

Crelate

Not Migrated (ATS scope boundary)

lossy
Fully supported

Employee records (demographics, job title, department, hire date, employment status, salary, pay frequency) are Checkwriters HRMS core data. Crelate is an ATS and recruiting CRM that does not have a payroll, benefits, or employee relations data model. We do not migrate employee HRMS data into Crelate. The customer maintains Checkwriters or a dedicated HRMS for all employee records and uses Crelate for recruiting only. We document this boundary explicitly in the scoping report and confirm the customer's parallel-system strategy before migration begins.

Checkwriters

Payroll, Accruals, Deductions, Benefits

maps to

Crelate

Not Migrated (ATS scope boundary)

lossy
Fully supported

Payroll items, time-off accruals, benefit elections, deduction histories, and pay stub records are Checkwriters HRMS data with no equivalent object in Crelate's recruiting schema. These records cannot be migrated into Crelate and must remain in Checkwriters or a replacement HRMS. We flag this boundary clearly in the discovery report and recommend the customer retains Checkwriters access for payroll history and compliance records or selects a parallel HRMS before cutover.

Checkwriters

Onboarding Workflows and Documents

maps to

Crelate

Not Migrated (not reconstructable)

1:1
Fully supported

Checkwriters onboarding task records and completed document signatures do not export through any documented path. Completed onboarding tasks in Checkwriters cannot be reconstructed as structured records in Crelate. We flag this to customers during discovery and recommend a parallel manual onboarding setup in Crelate using their onboarding templates. Checkwriters onboarding document files can be extracted and attached to the corresponding Crelate Person record as part of the document migration, but the step-completion workflow history does not carry forward.

Checkwriters

Performance Reviews

maps to

Crelate

Not Migrated (no export path)

1:1
Not supported

Performance review templates, writing-assist content, and completed review records are stored in a proprietary Checkwriters format with no documented export API. We do not attempt an automated migration of performance review content because it produces incomplete or corrupted records. We flag this to customers with the Performance Reviews upgrade and recommend a parallel review cycle setup in their destination HRMS or performance management tool post-migration.

Checkwriters

Time-Off Requests and Balances

maps to

Crelate

Not Migrated (ATS scope boundary)

1:1
Fully supported

Time-off request history and accrual balances are HRMS records managed through Checkwriters. Crelate does not have a time-off tracking or accrual management data model. These records remain in Checkwriters or a replacement HRMS. Request records with pending or in-progress status at cutover are flagged as requiring admin resolution before the Checkwriters access is adjusted.

Checkwriters

Report Writer Definitions

maps to

Crelate

Discovery Reference

1:1
Fully supported

The Report Writer report definitions built by the customer's HR Admin serve as our extraction blueprint during migration. We capture the full list of Report Writer exports the customer has built for recruiting data and use them to reproduce the data pull in Crelate's reporting environment post-migration. The report definitions themselves do not transfer because Crelate's reporting engine uses a different data model and field structure.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Checkwriters logo

Checkwriters gotchas

Medium

Payroll item effective dates use check-date ranges, not calendar dates

Medium

Custom fields require permission-level access to discover

High

Payroll cannot be submitted while errors exist, only warnings are bypassable

High

Performance review content is not exportable via documented API

Medium

Historical payroll data must be pulled via Report Writer, not API

Crelate logo

Crelate gotchas

High

120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations

High

20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions

Medium

15,000-record export ceiling on single operations

Medium

Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate

Low

API key is a querystring parameter, not a header

Pair-specific challenges

  • No public API means migration depends on Report Writer coordination

    Checkwriters exposes no public REST API for bulk data extraction of recruiting records. All candidate, application, and document data requires HR Admin access to the Report Writer module, where the customer or our team must build and export reports manually per data type. This adds a coordination step that is absent in most ATS-to-ATS migrations. We request HR Admin access to the Checkwriters tenant during discovery and define the complete export list before extraction begins. Any delays in accessing Report Writer or building the correct report templates extend the project timeline directly.

  • Custom field discovery requires HR Admin permission level

    Custom fields on employee and candidate profiles in Checkwriters are created at the company level and viewed per record, but accessing the full custom field registry requires HR Admin-level permissions. During migration scoping, we request admin-level access to the Checkwriters tenant so we can enumerate all active custom field definitions before mapping them to Crelate's schema. If the customer cannot provide admin-level access, the custom field enumeration is incomplete and we flag any unmapped fields in the migration report with a manual-entry recommendation.

  • Mid-payroll-cycle cutover can leave Checkwriters in an error state

    Checkwriters enforces that all errors on the Review and Submit page must be corrected before a payroll batch can be submitted. If we are migrating mid-payroll-cycle and Checkwriters has existing payroll errors, the HR Admin must resolve those errors before the next payroll run. We flag any active error state in the current payroll batch during discovery and coordinate the cutover date to fall between completed payroll runs where possible. If cutover must occur mid-cycle, we ensure the destination is fully configured to receive all active payroll items before the cutover is finalized.

  • Onboarding task history has no export path and does not reconstruct

    Completed onboarding task records and document signature status in Checkwriters are stored in a format that has no documented export mechanism. The onboarding data cannot be migrated into Crelate's onboarding module as structured records. We extract document files from the Checkwriters Document Center and attach them to the corresponding Crelate Person record, but the step-completion workflow history is lost. We document this data loss explicitly in the migration report and recommend that the customer's recruiting admin reviews the Crelate onboarding template library to rebuild applicable workflows post-migration.

  • Performance review content cannot be migrated

    Performance review templates, writing-assist suggestions, and completed review records in Checkwriters are stored in a proprietary format tied to the review workflow engine. There is no publicly documented export endpoint for this data. We do not attempt an automated migration that would produce incomplete or corrupted records. We flag this to customers upfront during discovery scoping and recommend a parallel manual review process in the destination performance management tool rather than an automated transfer. This is a hard limitation of the source platform, not a mapping challenge.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Checkwriters to Crelate data migration

  1. Discovery and recruiting module scoping

    We audit the Checkwriters tenant to identify whether the Recruiting and Applicant Tracking upgrade is active, enumerate active job postings, candidate records, applications, and any documents attached to recruiting records. We request HR Admin-level access to the Checkwriters tenant during this phase to enumerate custom field definitions that require elevated permissions to discover. The discovery output is a written migration scope that explicitly defines what migrates to Crelate (ATS data) and what remains in Checkwriters or another HRMS (HR and payroll data). We confirm the parallel-system strategy with the customer's team before extraction begins.

  2. Data extraction via Report Writer and admin-assisted export

    We coordinate with the customer's Checkwriters HR Admin to extract recruiting data through the Report Writer module. We define the report types, field selections, and date ranges for each export (jobs, candidates, applications, notes, documents) before running. Because Checkwriters has no public API, each data type requires a separate Report Writer build-and-export cycle. We sequence exports starting with the foundational records (jobs, candidates) before dependent records (applications, notes). Document files are extracted separately from the Document Center and matched to their candidate records by employee or candidate ID.

  3. Crelate sandbox configuration and mapping validation

    We configure a Crelate sandbox environment with the customer's Crelate tenant credentials. We pre-create all custom fields on the relevant Crelate core records (People, Organizations, Opportunities) based on the custom field inventory extracted from Checkwriters. We map each Checkwriters field to its Crelate equivalent, validate data types and picklist values, and run a test import of a representative sample. The customer's recruiting lead spot-checks the mapped records against the Checkwriters source and signs off the mapping before production migration begins.

  4. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency sequence: Job Posts first (no dependencies), then Organizations from any employer data attached to candidates, then People (candidates), then Applications linked to People and Job Posts, then Notes and File Attachments linked to the correct parent records. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Because Checkwriters exports are CSV-based rather than API-driven, we handle chunking manually and validate record counts per export file before loading into Crelate.

  5. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We schedule the cutover between completed payroll cycles where possible to avoid mid-payroll conflicts in Checkwriters. After the migration run completes, we deliver a final reconciliation report comparing Checkwriters source record counts to Crelate destination record counts. We conduct a spot-check of 25-50 migrated records with the customer's recruiting lead and document any discrepancies. We deliver a written inventory of Checkwriters onboarding workflows and recruiting automations that require manual rebuild in Crelate because they do not migrate as code. We do not rebuild these automations inside the migration scope.

  6. Parallel system management and post-migration handoff

    After cutover, the customer maintains Checkwriters access for all HR and payroll data, including any payroll history required for compliance and year-end reporting. Crelate becomes the system of record for recruiting. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve any record-matching discrepancies surfaced by the recruiting team during their first active week in Crelate. We do not provide ongoing post-migration admin support, training, or workflow rebuild as standard scope; these are separate engagements.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Checkwriters logo

Checkwriters

Source

Strengths

  • Dedicated human support team based in Massachusetts, reachable by phone and email without navigating a bot or IVR
  • All-in-one HR, payroll, time tracking, and benefits administration under a single vendor for mid-market organizations
  • Built-in compliance tracking for FMLA, ADA, I-9, OSHA, and multi-state tax jurisdictions
  • Employee self-service portal covering pay stubs, W-2s, time-off requests, and benefits enrollment
  • Tiered upgrade model lets organizations start with core HR and add applicant tracking, performance reviews, and advanced benefits as needed

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented API or developer portal — integrations rely on the growing list of pre-built connectors only
  • Pricing is opaque and quote-based with no self-service pricing page, making competitive evaluation difficult
  • Performance review module content cannot be exported, limiting migration completeness for organizations with review history
  • Interface is considered dated by some users, particularly the time-entry and payroll-review workflows
  • Limited compensation management features in base tiers — advanced compensation planning is an additional cost upgrade
Crelate logo

Crelate

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM in a single platform reduces data synchronization overhead for recruiting teams.
  • Fast setup with guided implementation reported as a significant time saver for small teams.
  • Transparent per-seat pricing without surprise fees at the base tier.
  • Flexible custom field configuration across core objects without developer dependency.
  • Export capability supports up to 15,000 records per operation for Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limit of 120 requests per minute restricts bulk migration throughput.
  • Custom field cap of 20 per entity requires field consolidation for complex recruiting schemas.
  • All advanced features (Activities, Activity Forms, Core Record Field customization) are tier-gated add-ons.
  • Customer service responsiveness receives consistent negative feedback in reviews.
  • Resume parsing quality trails competitors and generates support requests.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Checkwriters and Crelate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Checkwriters: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Checkwriters doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Checkwriters to Crelate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Checkwriters to Crelate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Checkwriters to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Checkwriters to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Standard ATS migrations covering jobs, candidates, applications, and notes land between four and six weeks when the customer can provide timely Report Writer exports and the custom field inventory is complete. Migrations that include onboarding document extraction, multiple job board distribution histories, or complex custom field structures move to eight to twelve weeks because of extended Report Writer coordination, custom field enumeration, and parallel system configuration requirements.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Checkwriters.
Land in Crelate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day