Project Management migration

Migrate from SMART Project Control to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between SMART Project Control and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

SMART Project Control logo

SMART Project Control

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

29%

4 of 14

objects map 1:1 between SMART Project Control and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from SMART Project Control to Trello is a directional migration that trades a purpose-built scheduling engine for a visual Kanban surface. SMART Project Control organizes work under Programs and Portfolios, breaks it into WBS hierarchies, and calculates critical path, float, and earned value across Activities and Baselines. Trello has no scheduling engine, no WBS object, no native resource pool, and no earned value engine. We migrate what can map — Projects to boards, Activities to cards, Resources to board members, Dependencies to card links, and the latest approved Baseline as a static template board — and we flag everything that requires a separate reporting tool or manual rebuild. The migration extracts from Oracle's Functional Setup Manager framework, which requires offering-scoped access and implementation-level provisioning before scoping begins.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

SMART Project Control logo

SMART Project Control

What's pushing teams away

  • SmartPM is an analytics overlay, not a scheduling engine — teams that want to do the actual CPM planning inside one tool still need P6, MS Project, Asta, or Phoenix and end up evaluating integrated all-in-one alternatives.
  • Verticalized to commercial construction — non-construction project portfolios get little value from the construction-specific metrics (SPI, compression, critical path delays in CPM terms).
  • $12K-$25K annual pricing is fair for portfolios of 50+ projects but expensive for small contractors with under 10 active jobs.
  • Schedule data must come from one of the supported scheduling tools — teams running niche or in-house scheduling engines have no clean ingest path.
  • Smaller market presence than Oracle Primavera Unifier or Procore — buyers comparing against enterprise PM suites face fewer reference customers and a thinner ecosystem.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How SMART Project Control objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a SMART Project Control object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

SMART Project Control

Program

maps to

Trello

Workspace or Board Group

lossy
Fully supported

SMART Programs act as top-level grouping containers for related Projects. Trello has no native Program object, but Workspace-level boards or a dedicated Program overview board with links to individual project boards serves as the equivalent. We preserve Program names and descriptions as board metadata and flag that rollup reporting across Programs requires a separate reporting layer.

SMART Project Control

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

SMART Projects map directly to Trello boards. Project name, description, planned start and finish dates, and status migrate as board metadata. We create one board per Project and apply the Project status as a board label or checklist. Any project-level custom fields from SMART map to board-level custom fields on the destination board.

SMART Project Control

Baseline

maps to

Trello

Board (static reference)

lossy
Fully supported

The latest approved Baseline migrates as a separate read-only reference board with card names suffixed by [BASELINE] and planned dates frozen at the snapshot. Secondary Baselines migrate as attachments on each card referencing the SMART baseline name and snapshot timestamp. Baselines are stored as static records because Trello has no scheduling engine to recalculate them against a current schedule.

SMART Project Control

Activity

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

SMART Activities are the core scheduling unit and map directly to Trello cards. Activity name, planned start and finish dates, duration, calendar assignment, and WBS code migrate as card name, due date, description, and custom fields. Activity status (Not Started, In Progress, Completed, On Hold, Cancelled) maps to list names on the destination board. We preserve the original Activity ID from SMART as a custom field for traceability.

SMART Project Control

WBS Element

maps to

Trello

Card naming convention + Labels

lossy
Fully supported

Work Breakdown Structure elements define hierarchical accountability in SMART. Trello has no WBS object, so we express the hierarchy through a card naming convention (WBS code as prefix, e.g., 1.2.3 Activity Name) and optionally use Labels for WBS level grouping. Any element-level custom properties from SMART migrate as card custom fields. Advanced WBS dependency or rollup logic cannot be rebuilt in Trello without a third-party Power-Up.

SMART Project Control

Resource

maps to

Trello

Board Member

1:1
Fully supported

SMART Resources (labor, material, equipment) with roles, rates, and unit-of-measure migrate as Trello board members. Resource names and roles map to member display names; rates and cost-per-use store as custom fields on the member or as board-level reference fields. Trello has no native resource pool or capacity planning view, so resource leveling and utilization reporting from SMART do not migrate.

SMART Project Control

Assignment

maps to

Trello

Card Assignee + Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Activity-to-Resource assignments in SMART map to card assignees in Trello (for labor assignments) and to card custom fields for material and equipment references. Planned units and labor hours from SMART assignment records store as custom fields on each card. The assignment dates come from the parent Activity date range. Capacity planning and resource utilization percentages do not survive the migration.

SMART Project Control

Predecessor-Successor Relationship

maps to

Trello

Card Link

lossy
Fully supported

SMART predecessor-successor logic (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish, and lag) migrates as Trello card links (one card linked to another) and a custom field expressing the relationship type and lag days. Trello card links do not support Start-to-Start or Finish-to-Finish variants natively, so these are stored as custom fields with the relationship type noted.

SMART Project Control

Custom Fields

maps to

Trello

Card Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

SMART custom activity, project, and resource fields export with their current values and types. We map text to Trello text fields, dates to Trello date fields, numbers to Trello number fields, and picklists to Trello dropdown fields. Multi-select picklists map to Trello multi-select if the Standard or Premium tier is in use. Custom field mapping requires explicit instructions from the customer during scoping to ensure picklist values, date formats, and field ownership are preserved.

SMART Project Control

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Document, image, and file attachments on SMART Activities, Projects, and Resources migrate as Trello card attachments stored in Trello's native attachment system. Standard plan attachments are limited to 250MB per file; customers on Standard or Premium must verify that no single SMART attachment exceeds this threshold before migration. Files exceeding the limit require a shared link or a separate document management system as the destination.

SMART Project Control

Activity Note / Comment

maps to

Trello

Card Comment or Checklist Item

lossy
Fully supported

SMART Activity notes and stakeholder comments migrate as Trello card comments with the original author and timestamp preserved where the export provides this metadata. Long-form notes with structured content (tables, embedded images) flatten to card descriptions or checklist items with a note that formatting requires manual reformatting post-migration.

SMART Project Control

Critical Path and Float

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields (static reference only)

lossy
Mapping required

SMART critical path flags and float values are derived from the CPM calculation engine. Trello has no scheduling engine, so these values cannot be recalculated post-import. We preserve the critical path flag (Yes/No) and float days as static custom fields on each card. If the customer requires ongoing critical path tracking, we recommend a separate scheduling tool or a Trello Power-Up with CPM capability as a post-migration addition.

SMART Project Control

S-Curve and Progress Curve

maps to

Trello

Attachment or Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

SMART cumulative S-curves and progress curves are time-phased data rows exported as tabular records. On import, we attach the source S-curve export as a CSV or PDF attachment to the project board or to a representative card, and convert key curve values (planned value at reporting date, earned value at reporting date) to custom fields where these can be expressed as single-point references. The graphical S-curve shape does not reproduce natively in Trello.

SMART Project Control

Cost Breakdown Structure

maps to

Trello

Labels or Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

SMART Cost Breakdown Structure levels and cost accounts have no native Trello equivalent. We map CBS levels and cost account codes to Trello Labels (for categorical grouping) or to custom fields on each card, but time-phased cost distribution (weekly or monthly cost buckets) flattens to a single static value or attaches as a reference document. Budget tracking and cost variance reporting require a separate tool or spreadsheet post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

SMART Project Control logo

SMART Project Control gotchas

High

No publicly documented migration or export API

Medium

Offering-scoped exports block multi-offering implementations

Medium

Earned Value metrics require manual recalculation post-migrate

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Critical path, float, and CPM calculations do not survive in Trello

    SMART Project Control's core value is its integrated CPM engine that calculates the critical path and float for every Activity based on predecessor-successor logic, durations, and calendars. Trello is a Kanban board with no scheduling engine and no native representation of predecessor relationships that drives automated critical path computation. We preserve the latest calculated critical path and float values as static custom fields on each card, but these become historical reference values. Any resequencing or schedule update in Trello does not trigger a new critical path calculation. Teams that need ongoing CPM analysis must maintain a separate scheduling tool or document this limitation explicitly before migration.

  • Earned value metrics recalculate with a different engine post-migrate

    SMART Project Control stores Planned Value, Earned Value, Schedule Variance, and Cost Variance as derived metrics calculated from the baseline, actual progress, and resource assignments. Trello has no earned value engine. We migrate the latest calculated EV values as static custom fields on each card for reference, but Trello's own calculations (if any reporting Power-Up is added) will produce different numbers because it lacks SMART's EV formula engine. We flag each EV custom field explicitly so the customer's PMO can validate and document the divergence post-cutover. If EV reporting must continue, we recommend pairing Trello with a reporting layer outside the platform.

  • Oracle Functional Setup Manager export requires offering-scoped provisioning

    SMART Project Control does not publish a public REST or bulk export API. Data extraction depends on Oracle's Functional Setup Manager configuration package framework, which operates per offering. Implementations with more than one Oracle offering require separate implementation projects for each offering to generate ordered export packages. The customer must provision the necessary Oracle roles and implementation project access before FlitStack AI scoping begins. This is a pre-scoping step that adds preparation time not counted in the standard migration timeline. Multi-offering implementations may require an additional one to two weeks of Oracle provisioning work.

  • Cost breakdown structures and S-curves lose time-phased granularity

    SMART's Cost Breakdown Structure supports multi-level cost coding and time-distributed cost data (weekly or monthly buckets). Trello has no native CBS object and no time-phased cost reporting. We flatten CBS levels to Labels or custom fields on each card, and S-curve time-phased data converts to a single static reference attachment or a single-point cost custom field per card. Teams that rely on SMART's cost reporting for budget tracking, cash flow forecasting, or earned value cost variance will need to rebuild these reports in a separate financial reporting tool or a spreadsheet. We document the original CBS hierarchy and cost distribution structure in the migration handoff for the customer's admin to use as a reference.

  • Trello API and plan tier constrain what migrates in bulk

    Trello's REST API supports board, list, card, member, and custom field operations but has rate limits that require batch processing for large migrations. Additionally, custom fields require Trello Standard tier or above; free-tier workspaces cannot receive custom field data during import. If the destination Trello workspace is on the Free plan, we must upgrade at least to Standard before migration or store custom field values as card descriptions instead, which reduces searchability and reporting capability. We coordinate plan tier verification during the approach phase and flag any free-tier constraint before record import begins.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful SMART Project Control to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and Oracle provisioning review

    We audit the source SMART Project Control instance for Programs, Projects, Activities, Resources, WBS elements, Baselines, CBS structures, custom fields, and attachment volume. We verify that the customer has Oracle Functional Setup Manager access, has provisioned the necessary roles for configuration package export, and has identified any multi-offering Oracle implementation that will require separate export packages. We also confirm the destination Trello workspace tier (Free, Standard, Premium, Enterprise) because custom field support and API rate limits differ by tier. The discovery output is a written scope document with record counts, export package inventory, and any Oracle provisioning gaps.

  2. Trello workspace and board architecture design

    We design the destination Trello structure: one workspace per SMART Program or organizational grouping, one board per SMART Project, list names mapped from SMART Activity statuses (Not Started, In Progress, Completed, On Hold), WBS codes expressed as card name prefixes, and critical path and float stored as custom fields on each Activity card. We create a reference Baseline board with cards frozen at the approved snapshot dates. We pre-create custom fields in Trello matching each SMART custom property type before any data import begins.

  3. Export extraction and transform

    We extract data from SMART Project Control using Oracle's configuration package export or direct database export, depending on what the customer's Oracle provisioning enables. We transform the export into Trello-compatible JSON: Projects become board creation calls, Activities become card creation calls with parent board ID and list ID resolved, Resources become workspace member invitations and board member assignments, and custom fields populate during card creation. We apply the WBS naming convention during transform and attach the CBS hierarchy documentation to each board as a reference card.

  4. Sandbox validation and reconciliation

    We run a trial migration into a test Trello workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager and PMO lead review board structure, card naming, custom field values, and critical path reference fields, spot-checking 25-50 cards against the source SMART records. Any WBS naming corrections, list structure changes, or custom field type adjustments happen in this phase before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration and delta freeze

    We run the production migration in dependency order: Programs (as workspace-level board groups), Projects (as boards), Lists (as Trello lists per project status), Resources (as board members), Activities (as cards with assignees, dates, custom fields, and predecessor card links), Attachments (as card attachments with size verified against Trello's 250MB limit), Baseline board (as a separate read-only board), and CBS documentation (as a board-level reference card). We freeze SMART writes during cutover and run a final delta pass for any records modified during the migration window.

  6. Handoff, validation, and CPM rebuild guidance

    We deliver a migration summary with record counts per board, a reconciliation report comparing source and destination record totals, and an explicit inventory of what could not migrate: critical path calculations, earned value metrics, time-phased cost data, and CBS rollup reporting. We provide a written reference document for the customer's PMO to use as the basis for rebuilding cost and earned value reports in a separate tool. We support a one-week post-cutover validation window for the customer's team to report any card or attachment discrepancies.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

SMART Project Control logo

SMART Project Control

Source

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for schedule-critical industries with integrated critical path method calculations
  • Groups work under Programs and Portfolios for enterprise-wide visibility and rollup reporting
  • Supports baseline management for schedule change tracking and earned value analysis
  • Provides forecasting and bottleneck alerting to surface delays before they cascade
  • Integrates with Oracle Cloud infrastructure for enterprise SSO and role-based access control

Weaknesses

  • No public REST or bulk export API — data extraction depends on Oracle's Functional Setup Manager framework
  • Limited community presence and few independent reviews, making feature verification harder pre-migration
  • Primarily Oracle Cloud-centric — self-hosted or hybrid deployments have fewer migration tool options
  • Custom field and CBS structure variations between implementations require bespoke mapping work
  • Steep learning curve for teams without prior project controls or Primavera-style scheduling experience
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across SMART Project Control and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    SMART Project Control: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    SMART Project Control doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your SMART Project Control to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about SMART Project Control to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during SMART Project Control to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your SMART Project Control to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for straightforward cases with fewer than 500 Activities, a single Program, and no multi-level CBS or S-curve data. Migrations with multiple Oracle offerings requiring separate export packages, large WBS trees exceeding 2,000 Activities, or cost breakdown structures that must be documented in the handoff move to eight to fourteen weeks. The Oracle Functional Setup Manager provisioning step (step one of the approach) is not counted in the standard migration timeline and is owned by the customer's Oracle admin.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from SMART Project Control.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day