Project Management migration

Migrate from Synergy to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Synergy and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Synergy logo

Synergy

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Synergy and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Synergy and Trello occupy opposite ends of the project management complexity spectrum. Synergy is an AEC-built platform with nested Job Structures, deep folder hierarchies, permission inheritance, custom field schemas, and QuickBooks financial sync. Trello is an Atlassian Kanban tool built around Boards, Lists, and Cards with a simpler data model that caps folders at the Board level and does not support native permission inheritance per card. We resolve this architectural gap by extracting Synergy's full Job Structure as a written manifest, flattening the folder hierarchy into Trello Board names and List titles, and mapping Synergy Tasks to Trello Cards with checklist sub-items. Custom fields migrate to Trello's Custom Fields feature (available from Standard tier onward), but field types like Synergy's currency and multi-select dropdown map to Trello's text and select equivalents with type notation preserved in the field label. We do not migrate Synergy Workflows, Reports, or Job Structure permission assignments as these have no Trello equivalent; we deliver a written manifest of these objects for your admin to rebuild using Trello's Butler rules or Power-Ups post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Synergy logo

Synergy

What's pushing teams away

  • Custom reporting produces inconsistent results and unreliable data, forcing teams to manually cross-check financial summaries against exported spreadsheets rather than trusting the built-in reports.
  • The user interface is widely described as unintuitive and complex, with a steep learning curve that frustrates new users and requires significant internal training investment to achieve basic competency.
  • Sync with QuickBooks Online can break silently when chart of accounts structures diverge between systems, leading to miscategorized expenses that are difficult to trace back and reconcile without dedicated accounting review.
  • Support response times are inconsistent, with some customers reporting multi-day delays on critical issues and a perceived gap between the quality of documentation and the depth of assistance available for edge cases.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Synergy objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Synergy object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Synergy

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Projects map 1:1 to Trello Boards. The Project name becomes the Board title, Project description migrates to the Board description field, and Project creation timestamp is preserved. If Synergy Projects contain sub-Projects or Jobs that behave as sub-projects, these become separate Boards linked by a Board reference custom field we add to both. Synergy's template associations are not carried forward; we document which source template each Board originated from in the project manifest.

Synergy

Job Structure

maps to

Trello

Lists

1:many
Mapping required

The Synergy Job Structure (folder layouts, naming rules, and folder-level permissions) does not map directly to any Trello object. We extract the full Job Structure as a manifest document, identify the top-level folder layer, and transform that layer into Trello Lists within each Board. Nested sub-folders are represented as child Card groups or as separate Boards linked via cross-reference fields. Permission assignments from Synergy folder-level access do not migrate; we note which Synergy roles and user groups had access to each folder for manual Trello Board member assignment post-migration.

Synergy

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Tasks map 1:1 to Trello Cards. Task name becomes the Card title, Task description migrates to the Card description (with HTML stripped to Trello markdown), Task status maps to the Card's List position within the Board, and Task assignees map to Card Members. Task dependencies in Synergy (predecessor/successor relationships) are not natively supported in Trello; we represent these as a linked-card custom field (dependency_card_id) and recommend a Power-Up like Dependency Dashboard or Correlations for visual dependency tracking post-migration.

Synergy

Task Hierarchy (sub-tasks)

maps to

Trello

Checklist Items

1:many
Fully supported

Synergy Tasks that contain sub-tasks (WBS-style task breakdown) map to Trello Cards with Checklist items. The parent task becomes the Card; each child task becomes a Checklist item with its own name, assignee, and due date. This is a structural approximation: Trello does not support sub-task assignees independent of the parent card assignee, so we add the sub-task assignee as a note within the Checklist item title. Sub-tasks with due dates are represented as Checklist items with a due date annotation in the item title.

Synergy

Custom Fields

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Synergy text, number, date, and dropdown custom fields map to Trello Custom Fields of the corresponding type. Multi-select dropdown maps to Trello multi-select with a note that the Standard $5 tier is required for Custom Fields. Currency fields in Synergy map to Trello number fields with a currency label appended to the field name (e.g., 'Budget (USD)') because Trello has no native currency field type. We snapshot the full Synergy custom field schema before migration to capture null fields, then populate null values with type-appropriate defaults in Trello so the schema remains complete across both platforms.

Synergy

File Attachments

maps to

Trello

Card Attachments

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy files attached to Tasks and Jobs migrate as Card Attachments in Trello. We transfer the binary content for each file using Trello's attachments endpoint. File names, descriptions, and upload timestamps migrate as attachment metadata. Version history (change records tracking who modified a file and when) does not have a Trello equivalent; we include a file version manifest document listing all version history for each file as a downloadable artifact for the customer's records. Synergy's 12d Model project files are transferred as binary attachments without any format conversion.

Synergy

Comments

maps to

Trello

Card Actions (Comments)

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Task comments and issue notes migrate to Trello Card comments. The comment author maps to the Trello Card member if a matching Trello user exists; otherwise, the comment author name is preserved as text in the comment body. Comment timestamps are preserved as the comment post date. Synergy's internal change records (who created or modified a Job, Task, or File and when) do not migrate as native Trello comments; these are included in the project manifest as a supplementary data artifact.

Synergy

Contact

maps to

Trello

Board Member or Card Member

lossy
Fully supported

Synergy Contacts do not have a native Trello equivalent. Trello uses Members at the Board or Card level rather than a dedicated Contact object. We handle this in two passes: first, we extract all Synergy Contacts and match them by email against Trello workspace members; matches become Board Members with their Trello role set by Synergy role (Admin maps to Trello Board Admin, Team Member maps to Board Normal). Unmatched Contacts are listed in the Contact Manifest with their role, contact info, and Synergy project associations for the customer to assign in Trello post-migration.

Synergy

Team (Groups)

maps to

Trello

Board Teams (Workspace Members)

lossy
Fully supported

Synergy Teams define group-level permissions and role assignments across Projects and Jobs. Trello does not have a native Team concept at the project level; workspace membership is the only grouping mechanism. We extract the Synergy team roster for each Project and map it to Trello Board members. If a Synergy team had folder-level permissions, we flag those in the Job Structure manifest so the customer can apply Board-level member access appropriately. Synergy team role hierarchies (Project Manager, Architect, Contractor) are preserved as label color codes or a custom label field on Cards for reference.

Synergy

Issue Types

maps to

Trello

Labels

lossy
Fully supported

Synergy Issue Types (e.g., Change Request, Punch List Item, RFIs, Submittals) define the category of tracking items within a Project. Trello Labels serve a similar categorization role at the Card level. We map each Synergy Issue Type to a Trello Label with a consistent color assignment. If there are more than 950 Synergy Issue Type instances across the workspace (Trello's per-board label limit), we consolidate to a smaller set of parent categories and note the breakdown in the manifest.

Synergy

Associations

maps to

Trello

Card Links (Related Cards)

1:1
Mapping required

Synergy Associations link Jobs, Tasks, and other objects across the system to form cross-reference relationships. Trello does not have native cross-board card references. For intra-board associations (Card to Card within the same Board), we use the Card Link Power-Up or create a custom 'Related Cards' field containing the linked Card's URL. For inter-board associations (Card to Card across different Boards), we use a custom field 'Related Board' with the target Board name and Card ID. We extract the full association manifest from Synergy and rebuild it as a link map document and as inline card references where the destination Trello workspace supports the Power-Up.

Synergy

Reports

maps to

Trello

None

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy's built-in project and financial reports do not migrate. The reporting engine's calculations and grouping logic are opaque and tied to Synergy-specific data structures that have no Trello equivalent. We export the underlying raw data (Project summaries, Task status, financial fields) as a CSV artifact for the customer to import into a BI tool (Google Sheets, Power BI, or Tableau) or rebuild using Trello's board analytics or a third-party reporting Power-Up. This is documented in the handoff package as a separate reporting rebuild task.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Synergy logo

Synergy gotchas

High

Only non-empty custom fields appear in API output

High

Public API lacks endpoints for Contacts and Activities

Medium

Job Structure complexity varies by firm configuration

Medium

Custom reports may not translate to destination platforms

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Synergy API omits null custom fields silently

    Synergy's API returns only non-empty custom fields in Project and Task responses, omitting any custom field that has no value entirely. Trello Custom Fields, once defined on a Board, expect every Card to present a value (even if empty). If we migrate Cards without first snapshotting the full custom field schema from Synergy, Cards will arrive in Trello with inconsistent field sets and gaps in the schema that are difficult to diagnose post-migration. We prevent this by running a full schema export from Synergy before any record extraction, capturing every defined custom field name and type regardless of whether it has values. We then pre-define the matching Custom Fields in Trello before Card migration begins, populating null values with type-appropriate defaults so the schema is complete and consistent across all migrated Cards.

  • Synergy Contacts and Activities lack API endpoints

    Synergy's public developer API documents Projects, Tasks, and custom field filtering but does not expose Contacts or Activities as addressable endpoints. Any migration touching these objects must rely on Synergy's native import/export JSON bundle, which auto-collects associated groups and attributes but offers no granular filtering or incremental sync capability. We scope Contacts and Activities as batch imports using the bundled JSON format and advise customers to validate record counts against the source export manifest before cutover. Because there is no API-driven way to verify incremental changes between scoping and migration, we recommend freezing Synergy writes during the final delta window.

  • Trello API rate limits constrain batch write throughput

    Trello's REST API enforces 300 requests per 10 seconds per API key and 100 requests per 10 seconds per token, with a further 100 requests per 900 seconds on the members endpoint. For migrations involving thousands of Cards, Custom Field values, and Attachments, these limits directly constrain throughput. We implement request batching, exponential backoff on 429 responses, and token-level request tracking to stay within limits without retries that inflate migration time. Customers migrating from Synergy workspaces with over 5,000 Tasks and 20 Projects should expect the API write phase to run across multiple sessions to comply with Trello's rate limit headers.

  • Synergy Job Structure does not map to Trello permission model

    Synergy's Job Structure includes folder-level permission assignments tied to individual user roles and team groups. Trello applies member access at the Board level only; there is no per-card, per-list, or per-folder permission model. Migrations that include confidential project data (common in AEC for bidding information, client financials, and internal cost reviews) require manual review of which Board members should have access in Trello. We extract the full permission matrix from Synergy's Job Structure manifest and deliver it alongside the migration so the customer's admin can configure Board membership and privacy settings (private Boards, invite-only Boards) before go-live.

  • Synergy Workflows and Reports do not migrate

    Synergy Workflows (approval chains, resource assignments, and status transition automations) and built-in Reports are platform-native features with no Trello equivalent. We do not migrate them as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active Synergy Workflow and Report with its configuration, trigger conditions, and expected outputs. For Workflows, we recommend Butler rules (Trello's native automation) or a Power-Up like Unito or Placker as rebuild candidates. For Reports, we export the underlying data as a structured CSV so the customer can rebuild summaries in a BI tool. This handoff is included in the project manifest delivered at cutover.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Synergy to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and Trello tier selection

    We audit the source Synergy workspace across Projects, Tasks, Job Structure depth, custom field schemas, file attachment volumes, Contact counts, and active Workflows and Reports. We pair this with a Trello tier review: Free covers up to 10 Boards per workspace and is suitable for small teams with basic needs; Standard ($5/user/mo) unlocks unlimited Boards and Custom Fields; Premium ($10/user/mo) adds unlimited automation via Butler and multiple Views (Calendar, Timeline, Dashboard); Enterprise ($17.50/user/mo) adds organization-wide permissions and board visibility controls. If the migration requires Custom Fields, we confirm the destination workspace is on Standard or above before migration design begins.

  2. Schema snapshot and Job Structure extraction

    We run a full schema export from Synergy capturing every custom field name, type, and default value, including fields currently set to null. We simultaneously extract the full Job Structure as a manifest document including folder hierarchy depth, naming rules, permission assignments, and Issue Type taxonomy. This dual extract runs against the Synergy import/export tool (not the API) to capture the complete configuration that the API alone would omit. The output is a Job Structure manifest and a Custom Field Schema map that we use to pre-configure Trello Boards before any record migration.

  3. Board and List design in Trello

    We create Trello Boards for each Synergy Project, pre-define Custom Fields on each Board matching the captured schema, and configure Labels mapping to Synergy Issue Types. We then create Lists within each Board representing the top-level Job Structure folder layer from Synergy. We use a sandbox Trello workspace to validate the Board structure with a representative sample of Cards before running the full migration. This step also includes setting up Board member invitations for each Synergy Contact that maps to a Trello user, and configuring private Board visibility for any Projects flagged as sensitive in the Synergy permission manifest.

  4. Record migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in this order: (1) Board creation and Custom Field pre-definition, (2) Card creation with descriptions, assignees, and due dates, (3) Checklist items from Synergy sub-tasks, (4) Custom Field values on Cards, (5) Card Attachments via Trello attachments API with batch chunking and rate-limit handling, (6) Card comments via the Card actions API, (7) Card label assignment from Synergy Issue Type mapping. We use Trello's REST API with exponential backoff and batch chunking throughout. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  5. Cutover, delta sync, and handoff

    We freeze Synergy writes during the final migration window, run a delta migration of any records modified during the window, and validate the Trello destination against the Synergy source by spot-checking 30-50 Cards for field completeness, attachment presence, and comment integrity. We deliver the Job Structure manifest, Workflow and Report inventory, and Contact reconciliation list as the handoff package. We support a five-business-day hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Synergy Workflows as Butler rules or Power-Up automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Synergy logo

Synergy

Source

Strengths

  • Combines project management, CRM, and financial sync in one platform for AEC-specific workflows
  • Highly configurable workflows, custom fields, and naming rules for complex project hierarchies
  • 12d Model project support with native file and version management for civil engineering deliverables
  • QuickBooks Online add-on enables direct AP/AR and financial data exchange without re-entry
  • Import/export tool bundles job structures, permissions, and file versions into a portable package

Weaknesses

  • Custom reporting produces inconsistent results and unreliable data, requiring manual cross-checking
  • User interface is unintuitive with a steep learning curve and significant training requirements
  • Public API lacks documented endpoints for Contacts, Teams, Activities, and Attributes
  • Contact support relies on native import/export JSON format rather than a REST API
  • No publicly documented API rate limits, auth methods, or bulk endpoint specifications
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Synergy and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Synergy: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Synergy doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Synergy to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Synergy to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Synergy to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Synergy to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 20 Projects and 2,000 Tasks with a straightforward Job Structure (three or fewer folder levels) and under 50 custom fields. Migrations with deep nested Job Structures, over 50 custom fields, file attachment volumes exceeding 10,000 records, or multiple Synergy tenants move to eight to twelve weeks because of the manifest work, schema snapshot, and Trello API batch chunking required to stay within rate limits.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Synergy.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day