Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Synergy and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
Synergy
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
7 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Synergy and Trello.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Synergy and Trello occupy opposite ends of the project management complexity spectrum. Synergy is an AEC-built platform with nested Job Structures, deep folder hierarchies, permission inheritance, custom field schemas, and QuickBooks financial sync. Trello is an Atlassian Kanban tool built around Boards, Lists, and Cards with a simpler data model that caps folders at the Board level and does not support native permission inheritance per card. We resolve this architectural gap by extracting Synergy's full Job Structure as a written manifest, flattening the folder hierarchy into Trello Board names and List titles, and mapping Synergy Tasks to Trello Cards with checklist sub-items. Custom fields migrate to Trello's Custom Fields feature (available from Standard tier onward), but field types like Synergy's currency and multi-select dropdown map to Trello's text and select equivalents with type notation preserved in the field label. We do not migrate Synergy Workflows, Reports, or Job Structure permission assignments as these have no Trello equivalent; we deliver a written manifest of these objects for your admin to rebuild using Trello's Butler rules or Power-Ups post-migration.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Synergy object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Synergy
Project
Trello
Board
1:1Synergy Projects map 1:1 to Trello Boards. The Project name becomes the Board title, Project description migrates to the Board description field, and Project creation timestamp is preserved. If Synergy Projects contain sub-Projects or Jobs that behave as sub-projects, these become separate Boards linked by a Board reference custom field we add to both. Synergy's template associations are not carried forward; we document which source template each Board originated from in the project manifest.
Synergy
Job Structure
Trello
Lists
1:manyThe Synergy Job Structure (folder layouts, naming rules, and folder-level permissions) does not map directly to any Trello object. We extract the full Job Structure as a manifest document, identify the top-level folder layer, and transform that layer into Trello Lists within each Board. Nested sub-folders are represented as child Card groups or as separate Boards linked via cross-reference fields. Permission assignments from Synergy folder-level access do not migrate; we note which Synergy roles and user groups had access to each folder for manual Trello Board member assignment post-migration.
Synergy
Task
Trello
Card
1:1Synergy Tasks map 1:1 to Trello Cards. Task name becomes the Card title, Task description migrates to the Card description (with HTML stripped to Trello markdown), Task status maps to the Card's List position within the Board, and Task assignees map to Card Members. Task dependencies in Synergy (predecessor/successor relationships) are not natively supported in Trello; we represent these as a linked-card custom field (dependency_card_id) and recommend a Power-Up like Dependency Dashboard or Correlations for visual dependency tracking post-migration.
Synergy
Task Hierarchy (sub-tasks)
Trello
Checklist Items
1:manySynergy Tasks that contain sub-tasks (WBS-style task breakdown) map to Trello Cards with Checklist items. The parent task becomes the Card; each child task becomes a Checklist item with its own name, assignee, and due date. This is a structural approximation: Trello does not support sub-task assignees independent of the parent card assignee, so we add the sub-task assignee as a note within the Checklist item title. Sub-tasks with due dates are represented as Checklist items with a due date annotation in the item title.
Synergy
Custom Fields
Trello
Custom Fields
1:1Synergy text, number, date, and dropdown custom fields map to Trello Custom Fields of the corresponding type. Multi-select dropdown maps to Trello multi-select with a note that the Standard $5 tier is required for Custom Fields. Currency fields in Synergy map to Trello number fields with a currency label appended to the field name (e.g., 'Budget (USD)') because Trello has no native currency field type. We snapshot the full Synergy custom field schema before migration to capture null fields, then populate null values with type-appropriate defaults in Trello so the schema remains complete across both platforms.
Synergy
File Attachments
Trello
Card Attachments
1:1Synergy files attached to Tasks and Jobs migrate as Card Attachments in Trello. We transfer the binary content for each file using Trello's attachments endpoint. File names, descriptions, and upload timestamps migrate as attachment metadata. Version history (change records tracking who modified a file and when) does not have a Trello equivalent; we include a file version manifest document listing all version history for each file as a downloadable artifact for the customer's records. Synergy's 12d Model project files are transferred as binary attachments without any format conversion.
Synergy
Comments
Trello
Card Actions (Comments)
1:1Synergy Task comments and issue notes migrate to Trello Card comments. The comment author maps to the Trello Card member if a matching Trello user exists; otherwise, the comment author name is preserved as text in the comment body. Comment timestamps are preserved as the comment post date. Synergy's internal change records (who created or modified a Job, Task, or File and when) do not migrate as native Trello comments; these are included in the project manifest as a supplementary data artifact.
Synergy
Contact
Trello
Board Member or Card Member
lossySynergy Contacts do not have a native Trello equivalent. Trello uses Members at the Board or Card level rather than a dedicated Contact object. We handle this in two passes: first, we extract all Synergy Contacts and match them by email against Trello workspace members; matches become Board Members with their Trello role set by Synergy role (Admin maps to Trello Board Admin, Team Member maps to Board Normal). Unmatched Contacts are listed in the Contact Manifest with their role, contact info, and Synergy project associations for the customer to assign in Trello post-migration.
Synergy
Team (Groups)
Trello
Board Teams (Workspace Members)
lossySynergy Teams define group-level permissions and role assignments across Projects and Jobs. Trello does not have a native Team concept at the project level; workspace membership is the only grouping mechanism. We extract the Synergy team roster for each Project and map it to Trello Board members. If a Synergy team had folder-level permissions, we flag those in the Job Structure manifest so the customer can apply Board-level member access appropriately. Synergy team role hierarchies (Project Manager, Architect, Contractor) are preserved as label color codes or a custom label field on Cards for reference.
Synergy
Issue Types
Trello
Labels
lossySynergy Issue Types (e.g., Change Request, Punch List Item, RFIs, Submittals) define the category of tracking items within a Project. Trello Labels serve a similar categorization role at the Card level. We map each Synergy Issue Type to a Trello Label with a consistent color assignment. If there are more than 950 Synergy Issue Type instances across the workspace (Trello's per-board label limit), we consolidate to a smaller set of parent categories and note the breakdown in the manifest.
Synergy
Associations
Trello
Card Links (Related Cards)
1:1Synergy Associations link Jobs, Tasks, and other objects across the system to form cross-reference relationships. Trello does not have native cross-board card references. For intra-board associations (Card to Card within the same Board), we use the Card Link Power-Up or create a custom 'Related Cards' field containing the linked Card's URL. For inter-board associations (Card to Card across different Boards), we use a custom field 'Related Board' with the target Board name and Card ID. We extract the full association manifest from Synergy and rebuild it as a link map document and as inline card references where the destination Trello workspace supports the Power-Up.
Synergy
Reports
Trello
None
1:1Synergy's built-in project and financial reports do not migrate. The reporting engine's calculations and grouping logic are opaque and tied to Synergy-specific data structures that have no Trello equivalent. We export the underlying raw data (Project summaries, Task status, financial fields) as a CSV artifact for the customer to import into a BI tool (Google Sheets, Power BI, or Tableau) or rebuild using Trello's board analytics or a third-party reporting Power-Up. This is documented in the handoff package as a separate reporting rebuild task.
| Synergy | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Board1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Job Structure | Lists1:many | Mapping required | |
| Task | Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task Hierarchy (sub-tasks) | Checklist Items1:many | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields | Custom Fields1:1 | Mapping required | |
| File Attachments | Card Attachments1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comments | Card Actions (Comments)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Contact | Board Member or Card Memberlossy | Fully supported | |
| Team (Groups) | Board Teams (Workspace Members)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Issue Types | Labelslossy | Fully supported | |
| Associations | Card Links (Related Cards)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Reports | None1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Synergy gotchas
Only non-empty custom fields appear in API output
Public API lacks endpoints for Contacts and Activities
Job Structure complexity varies by firm configuration
Custom reports may not translate to destination platforms
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and Trello tier selection
We audit the source Synergy workspace across Projects, Tasks, Job Structure depth, custom field schemas, file attachment volumes, Contact counts, and active Workflows and Reports. We pair this with a Trello tier review: Free covers up to 10 Boards per workspace and is suitable for small teams with basic needs; Standard ($5/user/mo) unlocks unlimited Boards and Custom Fields; Premium ($10/user/mo) adds unlimited automation via Butler and multiple Views (Calendar, Timeline, Dashboard); Enterprise ($17.50/user/mo) adds organization-wide permissions and board visibility controls. If the migration requires Custom Fields, we confirm the destination workspace is on Standard or above before migration design begins.
Schema snapshot and Job Structure extraction
We run a full schema export from Synergy capturing every custom field name, type, and default value, including fields currently set to null. We simultaneously extract the full Job Structure as a manifest document including folder hierarchy depth, naming rules, permission assignments, and Issue Type taxonomy. This dual extract runs against the Synergy import/export tool (not the API) to capture the complete configuration that the API alone would omit. The output is a Job Structure manifest and a Custom Field Schema map that we use to pre-configure Trello Boards before any record migration.
Board and List design in Trello
We create Trello Boards for each Synergy Project, pre-define Custom Fields on each Board matching the captured schema, and configure Labels mapping to Synergy Issue Types. We then create Lists within each Board representing the top-level Job Structure folder layer from Synergy. We use a sandbox Trello workspace to validate the Board structure with a representative sample of Cards before running the full migration. This step also includes setting up Board member invitations for each Synergy Contact that maps to a Trello user, and configuring private Board visibility for any Projects flagged as sensitive in the Synergy permission manifest.
Record migration in dependency order
We run production migration in this order: (1) Board creation and Custom Field pre-definition, (2) Card creation with descriptions, assignees, and due dates, (3) Checklist items from Synergy sub-tasks, (4) Custom Field values on Cards, (5) Card Attachments via Trello attachments API with batch chunking and rate-limit handling, (6) Card comments via the Card actions API, (7) Card label assignment from Synergy Issue Type mapping. We use Trello's REST API with exponential backoff and batch chunking throughout. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.
Cutover, delta sync, and handoff
We freeze Synergy writes during the final migration window, run a delta migration of any records modified during the window, and validate the Trello destination against the Synergy source by spot-checking 30-50 Cards for field completeness, attachment presence, and comment integrity. We deliver the Job Structure manifest, Workflow and Report inventory, and Contact reconciliation list as the handoff package. We support a five-business-day hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Synergy Workflows as Butler rules or Power-Up automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.
Platform deep dives
Synergy
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Synergy and Trello.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Synergy: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Synergy doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Synergy to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Synergy to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Synergy
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.