Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Planview ProjectPlace and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
Planview ProjectPlace
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
11 of 14
objects map 1:1 between Planview ProjectPlace and Trello.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Planview ProjectPlace is an enterprise collaborative work management platform built around Workspaces, nested Gantt schedules, and multi-view project visualization; Trello is an Atlassian Kanban-first tool organized around Boards, Lists, and Cards with a free tier for small teams and paid tiers adding automation, admin control, and enterprise scale. The structural gap between these platforms is significant: ProjectPlace's Gantt task-dependency tree, Work Plan scheduling logic, and per-feature pricing model have no direct Trello equivalent, which means migration requires explicit decisions about what date relationships to preserve, how to model milestones as Trello Labels or due dates, and how to carry custom fields forward through Power-Ups. We resolve the date-recalculation drift problem by snapshotting the live schedule before export, reconstruct the dependency graph using Trello's Card Relations Power-Up, and enumerate the full status taxonomy per Workspace for column mapping. We do not migrate Workflows, ProjectPlace's built-in automations, or AI scheduling rules as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Trello Butler or a connected automation layer.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Planview ProjectPlace object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Planview ProjectPlace
Workspace
Trello
Workspace (Trello Enterprise) or Organization
1:1ProjectPlace Workspaces are the top-level container, analogous to Trello Boards at the project level or Trello Enterprise Organizations for portfolio grouping. For single-Workspace migrations, we map Workspace directly to a Trello Board. For multi-Workspace organizations, we map each Workspace to a Trello Organization with Boards beneath it, preserving workspace descriptions, member lists, and visibility settings at the time of export. Trello free tier supports one Workspace; Enterprise or Standard tier is required for multi-board Organization structures.
Planview ProjectPlace
Task (Activity)
Trello
Card
1:1ProjectPlace Tasks and Activities map to Trello Cards within a List. Assignee, due date, start date, description, and checklist items migrate directly. The task hierarchy (parent-child subtasks) maps to Trello Cards with parent-card Checklist items or Card Relations Power-Up for flat structures. Status from ProjectPlace maps to the Trello List position; we enumerate every distinct status value per Workspace during scoping and map each to a List name. Watch for the date recalculation behavior: we freeze task dates by snapshotting the live calculated schedule before export, then replay the date tree at the destination preserving the upstream dependency structure.
Planview ProjectPlace
Kanban Board
Trello
Board
1:1ProjectPlace Kanban boards within Workspaces map directly to Trello Boards. Column names, card assignments, and card-level metadata migrate as-is. We preserve the board's card ordering within each column. If the ProjectPlace board has more than one swimlane view (e.g., by assignee or status), we flag this as a List-splitting decision for the customer's admin during scoping since Trello does not support swimlanes natively.
Planview ProjectPlace
Gantt Chart (Work Plan)
Trello
Board + Card Relations Power-Up
lossyProjectPlace Gantt charts are derived from task start/end dates and dependency links. Trello has no native Gantt view. We preserve the schedule hierarchy and dependency links by mapping tasks to Cards with due dates representing the Work Plan end date, then reconstructing the dependency graph using Trello's Card Relations Power-Up (Successor/Predecessor links). Milestone markers from the Gantt become Cards with a Milestone label and a fixed due date. The customer should enable the Card Relations Power-Up before migration begins; we document the dependency chain in a CSV alongside the migrated Cards for manual verification.
Planview ProjectPlace
Milestone
Trello
Card with Label
1:1ProjectPlace Milestones are standalone schedule markers that can be linked to multiple tasks. We map milestone names and dates to Trello Cards with a Milestone label, a pinned due date, and a Card Description noting the linked tasks. We flag any milestones that were unanchored by downstream date changes in ProjectPlace before export so the customer's PM can validate the corrected date in Trello.
Planview ProjectPlace
Document
Trello
Card Attachment or External Link
1:1ProjectPlace stores documents within Workspaces. We export document metadata (name, uploader, upload date, URL) and catalog the attachment references. Binary file blobs require a separate file transfer step; we orchestrate parallel file migration alongside the data migration and link each file to the corresponding Card as an attachment or as a labeled external link if the file is hosted in a connected cloud storage service.
Planview ProjectPlace
User (Team Member)
Trello
Trello Member
1:1ProjectPlace user accounts map to Trello Members by email address match. We preserve user names, email addresses, and Workspace membership. Trello's admin roles (Workspace Admin, Board Member, Observer) do not have a direct ProjectPlace equivalent; we map ProjectPlace Workspace Admins to Trello Workspace Admins and standard members to Board Members by default, flagging any exceptions for the customer's admin to confirm. Role-based permissions and custom ProjectPlace role configurations do not migrate cleanly and require manual reconfiguration in Trello Workspace settings.
Planview ProjectPlace
Custom Field
Trello
Custom Field Power-Up
1:1ProjectPlace per-Workspace custom fields have no native Trello equivalent at the free tier. Trello's Custom Fields Power-Up (available on Standard and above) supports text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox, and label types. We enumerate the full custom field taxonomy during scoping, map each to the closest Trello Custom Field type, and pre-configure the Custom Fields Power-Up on each destination Board before Card import. Dropdown-type custom fields in ProjectPlace become Trello dropdown Custom Fields with the same options list preserved. Custom fields that have no Trello type equivalent (e.g., formula fields) are flagged for manual re-creation as Calculated Fields or as Description text.
Planview ProjectPlace
Time Entry
Trello
Card Checklist Item or Custom Field
1:1ProjectPlace includes built-in task-level time tracking. Trello has no native time tracking feature. We export time entries (hours logged, date, user attribution) and map them to Trello Cards as a dedicated Time Log checklist item within each Card, or as a numeric Custom Field if the Custom Fields Power-Up is active. Reporting aggregations (e.g., total hours per project, per user) are not carried forward; the customer's admin rebuilds time reports in Trello using a connected time-tracking Power-Up or an external tool like Everhour.
Planview ProjectPlace
Comment (Conversation)
Trello
Card Comment
1:1ProjectPlace task and board discussions migrate as Trello Card Comments with the original text, author, and timestamp preserved. Nested reply threads and @mention formatting flatten into a flat comment stream because Trello does not support threaded comments natively. We flag any @mentions that reference inactive or non-provisioned users so they can be resolved post-migration.
Planview ProjectPlace
Attachment
Trello
Card Attachment
1:1File attachments on ProjectPlace tasks and documents require a separate blob transfer step. We catalog attachment references and filenames during the schema scan, orchestrate parallel file migration alongside data migration, and link each file to the corresponding Trello Card as an attachment. If the file source URL is no longer accessible, we flag the attachment as pending and note it in the migration report for the customer's admin to resolve.
Planview ProjectPlace
Agile Board (Sprint/Iteration)
Trello
Board or List
lossyProjectPlace Agile boards with sprints map to Trello Boards with Lists representing sprint stages (e.g., Sprint Backlog, In Progress, Done). Sprint names, start/end dates, and board assignments migrate as Card labels and due dates. We create a dedicated Sprint Start and Sprint End checklist item on each Card to carry forward the sprint timing metadata. Burndown data does not carry forward; the customer rebuilds velocity calculations in Trello using a reporting Power-Up like Corwise or a connected analytics tool.
Planview ProjectPlace
Status and Label
Trello
List or Label
lossyProjectPlace custom status values and color-coded labels vary by Workspace. We enumerate the full status taxonomy during scoping and map each to either a Trello List (for workflow-stage statuses) or a Trello Label (for categorical tags). The customer chooses the mapping strategy during scoping. Any ProjectPlace status values that have no Trello equivalent are flagged in the migration scope document for manual resolution.
Planview ProjectPlace
Workload View
Trello
Board Member Assignment Report
1:1ProjectPlace's workload visualization aggregates task assignments per user across all Workspaces. We export the underlying task-assignee data as a CSV during migration so that workload balance can be reconstructed in Trello by filtering Cards by Member. Trello has no native cross-board workload view; the customer uses a reporting Power-Up or exports the member-assignment CSV for offline analysis.
| Planview ProjectPlace | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workspace | Workspace (Trello Enterprise) or Organization1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task (Activity) | Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Kanban Board | Board1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Gantt Chart (Work Plan) | Board + Card Relations Power-Uplossy | Fully supported | |
| Milestone | Card with Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Document | Card Attachment or External Link1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User (Team Member) | Trello Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field Power-Up1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Card Checklist Item or Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment (Conversation) | Card Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Card Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Agile Board (Sprint/Iteration) | Board or Listlossy | Fully supported | |
| Status and Label | List or Labellossy | Fully supported | |
| Workload View | Board Member Assignment Report1:1 | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Planview ProjectPlace gotchas
Out-of-the-box sync field set is extremely limited
API rate limit of 25 req/s is org-global, not per-user
Date recalculation causes milestone drift
CSV import validates WBS references strictly
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and Workspace audit
We audit every ProjectPlace Workspace in the source tenant: task count, board count, sprint count, custom field definitions per Workspace, milestone count, attachment volume, and user roster. We extract the status taxonomy per Workspace to build the List/Label mapping schema. We identify any ProjectPlace automations, Workflow Rules, and AI scheduling rules for the automation inventory document. We confirm the destination Trello tier (free, Standard, Premium, or Enterprise) based on whether custom fields and multi-board Organization structures are in scope.
Date freeze and schedule snapshot
Before any export, we coordinate a read-only migration window with the customer's ProjectPlace admin. We run a full schedule snapshot via the ProjectPlace API that captures the current calculated task dates, milestone dates, and dependency chain before any further recalculation can occur. This snapshot becomes the source-of-truth for the migration and prevents milestone drift between the discovery phase and the export phase. We disable any automated scheduling rules that could change dates during the export window.
Schema design and Trello destination setup
We design the Trello destination structure: one Board per ProjectPlace Workspace (or one Organization with multiple Boards for multi-Workspace organizations), with Lists mapped from ProjectPlace status values and Labels mapped from ProjectPlace custom tags. We pre-configure the Custom Fields Power-Up on each Board with field names, types, and options matched to the ProjectPlace custom field definitions. We configure the Card Relations Power-Up for Gantt dependency reconstruction. We provision Trello Members by matching ProjectPlace user emails to invited Trello accounts.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a test Trello Workspace or Organization using production-like data volume. The customer's PM lead reconciles record counts (Workspaces, Cards, Milestones, Labels, Members), spot-checks 25-50 Cards against the ProjectPlace source for data accuracy, and validates the List/Label taxonomy mapping. Any status values or custom fields that were missed during discovery are added to the mapping before production migration begins. The customer signs off the sandbox results before we proceed to production.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in order: Members (invited and provisioned), Boards (created with Lists and Labels), Cards (with Card Relations for dependencies), Milestones (as labeled Cards with due dates), Comments, Attachments (parallel file transfer), and Time Entries (as checklist items or Custom Fields). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We replay the frozen schedule snapshot so that Card due dates reflect the ProjectPlace calculated dates at freeze time, not the current live state.
Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff
We freeze ProjectPlace writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Trello as the active PM tool. We deliver the automation inventory document enumerating every ProjectPlace Workflow and automation rule with a Trello Butler equivalent or Power-Up recommendation. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the team. We do not rebuild ProjectPlace automations as Trello Butler rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.
Platform deep dives
Planview ProjectPlace
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Planview ProjectPlace and Trello.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Planview ProjectPlace: 25 requests per second, org-global quota not per-user.
Data volume sensitivity
Planview ProjectPlace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview ProjectPlace to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Planview ProjectPlace to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Planview ProjectPlace
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.