Project Management migration

Migrate from Planview ProjectPlace to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Planview ProjectPlace and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Planview ProjectPlace logo

Planview ProjectPlace

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

79%

11 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Planview ProjectPlace and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Planview ProjectPlace is an enterprise collaborative work management platform built around Workspaces, nested Gantt schedules, and multi-view project visualization; Trello is an Atlassian Kanban-first tool organized around Boards, Lists, and Cards with a free tier for small teams and paid tiers adding automation, admin control, and enterprise scale. The structural gap between these platforms is significant: ProjectPlace's Gantt task-dependency tree, Work Plan scheduling logic, and per-feature pricing model have no direct Trello equivalent, which means migration requires explicit decisions about what date relationships to preserve, how to model milestones as Trello Labels or due dates, and how to carry custom fields forward through Power-Ups. We resolve the date-recalculation drift problem by snapshotting the live schedule before export, reconstruct the dependency graph using Trello's Card Relations Power-Up, and enumerate the full status taxonomy per Workspace for column mapping. We do not migrate Workflows, ProjectPlace's built-in automations, or AI scheduling rules as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Trello Butler or a connected automation layer.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Planview ProjectPlace logo

Planview ProjectPlace

What's pushing teams away

  • Work Plan scheduling feels slow and unintuitive when building complex schedules; adding multiple related items degrades performance, per G2 reviews of the related Planview AdaptiveWork product.
  • Date auto-recalculation in project plans causes milestone dates to drift unexpectedly when upstream tasks change, frustrating PMs managing fixed deliverables, per community forum reports.
  • The out-of-the-box sync to Planview Portfolios exports only a very small field set, forcing organizations with advanced reporting needs to build custom API tooling or accept data gaps, per Planview community documentation.
  • License-tier reporting restrictions mean some users cannot access reports even in read-only mode depending on their assigned role, per G2 reviews of Planview AdaptiveWork.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Planview ProjectPlace objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Planview ProjectPlace object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Planview ProjectPlace

Workspace

maps to

Trello

Workspace (Trello Enterprise) or Organization

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Workspaces are the top-level container, analogous to Trello Boards at the project level or Trello Enterprise Organizations for portfolio grouping. For single-Workspace migrations, we map Workspace directly to a Trello Board. For multi-Workspace organizations, we map each Workspace to a Trello Organization with Boards beneath it, preserving workspace descriptions, member lists, and visibility settings at the time of export. Trello free tier supports one Workspace; Enterprise or Standard tier is required for multi-board Organization structures.

Planview ProjectPlace

Task (Activity)

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Tasks and Activities map to Trello Cards within a List. Assignee, due date, start date, description, and checklist items migrate directly. The task hierarchy (parent-child subtasks) maps to Trello Cards with parent-card Checklist items or Card Relations Power-Up for flat structures. Status from ProjectPlace maps to the Trello List position; we enumerate every distinct status value per Workspace during scoping and map each to a List name. Watch for the date recalculation behavior: we freeze task dates by snapshotting the live calculated schedule before export, then replay the date tree at the destination preserving the upstream dependency structure.

Planview ProjectPlace

Kanban Board

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Kanban boards within Workspaces map directly to Trello Boards. Column names, card assignments, and card-level metadata migrate as-is. We preserve the board's card ordering within each column. If the ProjectPlace board has more than one swimlane view (e.g., by assignee or status), we flag this as a List-splitting decision for the customer's admin during scoping since Trello does not support swimlanes natively.

Planview ProjectPlace

Gantt Chart (Work Plan)

maps to

Trello

Board + Card Relations Power-Up

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Gantt charts are derived from task start/end dates and dependency links. Trello has no native Gantt view. We preserve the schedule hierarchy and dependency links by mapping tasks to Cards with due dates representing the Work Plan end date, then reconstructing the dependency graph using Trello's Card Relations Power-Up (Successor/Predecessor links). Milestone markers from the Gantt become Cards with a Milestone label and a fixed due date. The customer should enable the Card Relations Power-Up before migration begins; we document the dependency chain in a CSV alongside the migrated Cards for manual verification.

Planview ProjectPlace

Milestone

maps to

Trello

Card with Label

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Milestones are standalone schedule markers that can be linked to multiple tasks. We map milestone names and dates to Trello Cards with a Milestone label, a pinned due date, and a Card Description noting the linked tasks. We flag any milestones that were unanchored by downstream date changes in ProjectPlace before export so the customer's PM can validate the corrected date in Trello.

Planview ProjectPlace

Document

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment or External Link

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace stores documents within Workspaces. We export document metadata (name, uploader, upload date, URL) and catalog the attachment references. Binary file blobs require a separate file transfer step; we orchestrate parallel file migration alongside the data migration and link each file to the corresponding Card as an attachment or as a labeled external link if the file is hosted in a connected cloud storage service.

Planview ProjectPlace

User (Team Member)

maps to

Trello

Trello Member

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace user accounts map to Trello Members by email address match. We preserve user names, email addresses, and Workspace membership. Trello's admin roles (Workspace Admin, Board Member, Observer) do not have a direct ProjectPlace equivalent; we map ProjectPlace Workspace Admins to Trello Workspace Admins and standard members to Board Members by default, flagging any exceptions for the customer's admin to confirm. Role-based permissions and custom ProjectPlace role configurations do not migrate cleanly and require manual reconfiguration in Trello Workspace settings.

Planview ProjectPlace

Custom Field

maps to

Trello

Custom Field Power-Up

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace per-Workspace custom fields have no native Trello equivalent at the free tier. Trello's Custom Fields Power-Up (available on Standard and above) supports text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox, and label types. We enumerate the full custom field taxonomy during scoping, map each to the closest Trello Custom Field type, and pre-configure the Custom Fields Power-Up on each destination Board before Card import. Dropdown-type custom fields in ProjectPlace become Trello dropdown Custom Fields with the same options list preserved. Custom fields that have no Trello type equivalent (e.g., formula fields) are flagged for manual re-creation as Calculated Fields or as Description text.

Planview ProjectPlace

Time Entry

maps to

Trello

Card Checklist Item or Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace includes built-in task-level time tracking. Trello has no native time tracking feature. We export time entries (hours logged, date, user attribution) and map them to Trello Cards as a dedicated Time Log checklist item within each Card, or as a numeric Custom Field if the Custom Fields Power-Up is active. Reporting aggregations (e.g., total hours per project, per user) are not carried forward; the customer's admin rebuilds time reports in Trello using a connected time-tracking Power-Up or an external tool like Everhour.

Planview ProjectPlace

Comment (Conversation)

maps to

Trello

Card Comment

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace task and board discussions migrate as Trello Card Comments with the original text, author, and timestamp preserved. Nested reply threads and @mention formatting flatten into a flat comment stream because Trello does not support threaded comments natively. We flag any @mentions that reference inactive or non-provisioned users so they can be resolved post-migration.

Planview ProjectPlace

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

File attachments on ProjectPlace tasks and documents require a separate blob transfer step. We catalog attachment references and filenames during the schema scan, orchestrate parallel file migration alongside data migration, and link each file to the corresponding Trello Card as an attachment. If the file source URL is no longer accessible, we flag the attachment as pending and note it in the migration report for the customer's admin to resolve.

Planview ProjectPlace

Agile Board (Sprint/Iteration)

maps to

Trello

Board or List

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Agile boards with sprints map to Trello Boards with Lists representing sprint stages (e.g., Sprint Backlog, In Progress, Done). Sprint names, start/end dates, and board assignments migrate as Card labels and due dates. We create a dedicated Sprint Start and Sprint End checklist item on each Card to carry forward the sprint timing metadata. Burndown data does not carry forward; the customer rebuilds velocity calculations in Trello using a reporting Power-Up like Corwise or a connected analytics tool.

Planview ProjectPlace

Status and Label

maps to

Trello

List or Label

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectPlace custom status values and color-coded labels vary by Workspace. We enumerate the full status taxonomy during scoping and map each to either a Trello List (for workflow-stage statuses) or a Trello Label (for categorical tags). The customer chooses the mapping strategy during scoping. Any ProjectPlace status values that have no Trello equivalent are flagged in the migration scope document for manual resolution.

Planview ProjectPlace

Workload View

maps to

Trello

Board Member Assignment Report

1:1
Mapping required

ProjectPlace's workload visualization aggregates task assignments per user across all Workspaces. We export the underlying task-assignee data as a CSV during migration so that workload balance can be reconstructed in Trello by filtering Cards by Member. Trello has no native cross-board workload view; the customer uses a reporting Power-Up or exports the member-assignment CSV for offline analysis.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Planview ProjectPlace logo

Planview ProjectPlace gotchas

High

Out-of-the-box sync field set is extremely limited

Medium

API rate limit of 25 req/s is org-global, not per-user

Medium

Date recalculation causes milestone drift

Low

CSV import validates WBS references strictly

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • ProjectPlace date recalculation changes milestone dates before export

    ProjectPlace automatically rebalances downstream task and milestone dates when upstream tasks change. PMs report milestone dates 'randomly change' without clear explanation in the UI. We freeze the task date relationships before export by snapshotting the current calculated schedule, then replay the date tree at the destination preserving the upstream dependency structure. If the customer needs the date chain frozen before scoping begins, we coordinate a read-only export window and advise against making schedule changes in ProjectPlace during the migration freeze period.

  • Trello has no native Gantt chart or dependency recalculation engine

    ProjectPlace Gantt charts with task dependencies and date auto-adjustment have no direct Trello equivalent. Trello does not support native predecessor/successor dependency tracking or automatic downstream date recalculation. We reconstruct the dependency graph using Trello's Card Relations Power-Up and preserve calculated dates as explicit Card due dates. Any dependency that relies on ProjectPlace's recalculation logic will become a static date in Trello; the customer's PM must verify milestone due dates post-migration and adjust manually if upstream tasks change after cutover.

  • ProjectPlace's OTB sync exports a very limited field set

    Planview's own community documentation confirms that the standard sync to Planview Portfolios exports only a very small default field set. We bypass the out-of-the-box sync entirely and query the full ProjectPlace API surface directly during migration, mapping all available fields to the destination schema. However, any custom fields that exist only in Workspace-specific configurations and are not exposed via the API are flagged during scoping and may require supplemental manual export from Planview support before migration begins.

  • Custom fields require a paid Trello tier

    Trello's Custom Fields Power-Up, required to carry forward ProjectPlace per-Workspace custom fields, is only available on Standard ($6/user/month) and above. Free-tier Trello organizations cannot host custom fields natively. We confirm the destination Trello tier during scoping and advise the customer to upgrade before migration begins if custom field carry-forward is required. If the customer stays on the free tier, we map custom fields to Card Description text or Labels as a fallback, with a documented field inventory for post-migration manual recreation.

  • Time entries and reporting aggregations do not migrate

    ProjectPlace's built-in time tracking per task produces log entries that Trello does not natively store or aggregate. We export time entries as checklist items or Custom Field values on Cards, but Trello has no native time-reporting view. The customer's admin must select and configure a time-tracking Power-Up (e.g., Everhour, Planyo, TimeCamp) post-migration to recreate project-level and user-level time reports. Any ProjectPlace time-reporting dashboards or billing summaries do not migrate and must be rebuilt from scratch.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Planview ProjectPlace to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and Workspace audit

    We audit every ProjectPlace Workspace in the source tenant: task count, board count, sprint count, custom field definitions per Workspace, milestone count, attachment volume, and user roster. We extract the status taxonomy per Workspace to build the List/Label mapping schema. We identify any ProjectPlace automations, Workflow Rules, and AI scheduling rules for the automation inventory document. We confirm the destination Trello tier (free, Standard, Premium, or Enterprise) based on whether custom fields and multi-board Organization structures are in scope.

  2. Date freeze and schedule snapshot

    Before any export, we coordinate a read-only migration window with the customer's ProjectPlace admin. We run a full schedule snapshot via the ProjectPlace API that captures the current calculated task dates, milestone dates, and dependency chain before any further recalculation can occur. This snapshot becomes the source-of-truth for the migration and prevents milestone drift between the discovery phase and the export phase. We disable any automated scheduling rules that could change dates during the export window.

  3. Schema design and Trello destination setup

    We design the Trello destination structure: one Board per ProjectPlace Workspace (or one Organization with multiple Boards for multi-Workspace organizations), with Lists mapped from ProjectPlace status values and Labels mapped from ProjectPlace custom tags. We pre-configure the Custom Fields Power-Up on each Board with field names, types, and options matched to the ProjectPlace custom field definitions. We configure the Card Relations Power-Up for Gantt dependency reconstruction. We provision Trello Members by matching ProjectPlace user emails to invited Trello accounts.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Trello Workspace or Organization using production-like data volume. The customer's PM lead reconciles record counts (Workspaces, Cards, Milestones, Labels, Members), spot-checks 25-50 Cards against the ProjectPlace source for data accuracy, and validates the List/Label taxonomy mapping. Any status values or custom fields that were missed during discovery are added to the mapping before production migration begins. The customer signs off the sandbox results before we proceed to production.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in order: Members (invited and provisioned), Boards (created with Lists and Labels), Cards (with Card Relations for dependencies), Milestones (as labeled Cards with due dates), Comments, Attachments (parallel file transfer), and Time Entries (as checklist items or Custom Fields). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We replay the frozen schedule snapshot so that Card due dates reflect the ProjectPlace calculated dates at freeze time, not the current live state.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze ProjectPlace writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Trello as the active PM tool. We deliver the automation inventory document enumerating every ProjectPlace Workflow and automation rule with a Trello Butler equivalent or Power-Up recommendation. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the team. We do not rebuild ProjectPlace automations as Trello Butler rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Planview ProjectPlace logo

Planview ProjectPlace

Source

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and unlimited team members on a single flat plan eliminates per-seat billing surprises as teams scale.
  • Kanban boards, Gantt charts, Agile sprints, and workload views cover the full spectrum of project visualization styles in one product.
  • AI-assisted task scheduling and intelligent work management help surface bottlenecks and rebalance workloads across the portfolio.
  • Native mobile apps for iOS and Android keep distributed teams engaged with real-time status updates and task management.
  • Broad integration ecosystem including Microsoft Viva Goals OKR linking, SharePoint, Box, and Google G Suite provides extension pathways.

Weaknesses

  • Out-of-the-box sync to Planview Portfolios is limited to a very small field set, requiring custom API work for comprehensive portfolio reporting.
  • Complex schedule building in the Work Plan view is reported as slow and unintuitive by enterprise users managing multi-dependency timelines.
  • Per-feature rather than per-seat pricing means costs scale with use-case complexity rather than team headcount, which can disadvantage feature-heavy organizations.
  • Date auto-recalculation behavior is not always predictable, leading to milestone drift that requires manual lock-down to prevent.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Planview ProjectPlace and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Planview ProjectPlace: 25 requests per second, org-global quota not per-user.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Planview ProjectPlace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Planview ProjectPlace to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Planview ProjectPlace to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview ProjectPlace to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Planview ProjectPlace to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Small migrations with up to 3 Workspaces and 2,000 tasks land between three and five weeks. Mid-size migrations with Gantt dependency graphs, time entry carry-forward, per-Workspace custom field mapping, and multiple Agile boards move to seven to ten weeks because of the date-freeze work, dependency resolution, and Trello Power-Up configuration. Timeline depends on data volume, schema complexity, and how quickly the customer's admin approves the sandbox sign-off.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Planview ProjectPlace.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day