Project Management migration

Migrate from Planview ProjectPlace to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Planview ProjectPlace and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Planview ProjectPlace logo

Planview ProjectPlace

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

64%

9 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Planview ProjectPlace and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Planview ProjectPlace to Asana is primarily a structural consolidation: ProjectPlace's Workspaces, Kanban boards, Gantt views, and Agile sprints all map to Asana's Project-centric data model, but the two platforms handle dependency chains, milestone anchoring, and time tracking differently. ProjectPlace automatically recalculates downstream dates when upstream tasks shift, a behavior Asana does not replicate; we freeze the current calculated schedule at export time and replay it as static start/end dates in Asana's Timeline so milestone anchors are preserved. Time entries are a full-migration object in ProjectPlace but have no native equivalent in Asana — we map them to task-level notes with hours and user attribution. Custom fields migrate as typed fields (text, number, enum) but the custom field definitions must exist in the destination workspace before values can be written, which requires a pre-import schema build. Automations and workload view aggregations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana's rule builder.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Planview ProjectPlace logo

Planview ProjectPlace

What's pushing teams away

  • Work Plan scheduling feels slow and unintuitive when building complex schedules; adding multiple related items degrades performance, per G2 reviews of the related Planview AdaptiveWork product.
  • Date auto-recalculation in project plans causes milestone dates to drift unexpectedly when upstream tasks change, frustrating PMs managing fixed deliverables, per community forum reports.
  • The out-of-the-box sync to Planview Portfolios exports only a very small field set, forcing organizations with advanced reporting needs to build custom API tooling or accept data gaps, per Planview community documentation.
  • License-tier reporting restrictions mean some users cannot access reports even in read-only mode depending on their assigned role, per G2 reviews of Planview AdaptiveWork.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Planview ProjectPlace objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Planview ProjectPlace object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Planview ProjectPlace

Workspace

maps to

Asana

Team + Project

1:many
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Workspaces map to Asana Teams as the organizational unit and Asana Projects as the project container. We map Workspace-level settings, description, and start date to the Project. Member lists migrate as Project members with the Asana Team as the parent grouping. Organizations with more than 50 active Workspaces may prefer to map each Workspace to a standalone Asana Project without Team grouping; we confirm the preferred structure during scoping.

Planview ProjectPlace

Task (Activity)

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Activities map directly to Asana Tasks with assignees, due dates, status, and subtask hierarchy preserved. Subtasks in ProjectPlace map to Asana subtasks. Assignee resolution uses email matching against the Asana destination workspace. Any Activity without a matching Asana user is flagged in the reconciliation report for the customer's admin to provision before import.

Planview ProjectPlace

Kanban Board

maps to

Asana

Board View / Section

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Kanban boards map to Asana's Board view within each Project. Board columns map to Asana Sections or custom columns if the customer uses an integration. Card-level metadata (card name, description, assignee, due date, labels) migrates as task fields. Card ordering within each column is preserved as section ordering in Asana. Note that Asana Board view is view-level only; there is no separate card object separate from Task.

Planview ProjectPlace

Gantt Dependency

maps to

Asana

Task Dependency

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Gantt task dependencies (finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, start-to-finish) map to Asana dependencies using the Asana Tasks API dependency endpoints. We freeze the current calculated dependency chain before export because ProjectPlace's automatic date recalculation would otherwise replay the recalculation at the destination incorrectly. Start and end dates replay as static values in Asana's Timeline. Any circular dependency detected in ProjectPlace is flagged for manual resolution before migration.

Planview ProjectPlace

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace milestones map to Asana Milestones. We freeze milestone dates before export to prevent ProjectPlace's downstream recalculation logic from unanchoring fixed dates during the migration window. Milestone name, date, and associated tasks migrate. Tasks linked to milestones in ProjectPlace are associated with the corresponding Asana Milestone via the milestone association field.

Planview ProjectPlace

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace per-Workspace custom fields map to Asana custom fields. We enumerate the full custom field taxonomy during scoping, map each ProjectPlace field type (text, number, date, enum) to the matching Asana custom field type, and pre-create field definitions in the destination Asana workspace before any task values are written. OTB sync field limitations in ProjectPlace mean we must query the full API surface directly rather than relying on any standard export; any custom fields not exposed via API are flagged for supplemental manual export from Planview support.

Planview ProjectPlace

User (Team Member)

maps to

Asana

Member

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace user accounts map to Asana workspace members by email address. User display name and email migrate. Role-based permissions in ProjectPlace may not have a direct Asana analog; we flag permission gaps and recommend a post-migration review of Asana project member roles and guest access settings.

Planview ProjectPlace

Document

maps to

Asana

Attachment / Project Description

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace documents stored within Workspaces — including file name, uploader, upload date, and URL — migrate as Asana Attachments. Binary file blobs require a separate file transfer step; we catalog attachment references and filenames during the schema scan and orchestrate parallel file migration alongside the object migration. Project-level documents migrate to the Asana Project description or as pinned attachments.

Planview ProjectPlace

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Task Subtask or Note

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace task-level time entries (hours logged, date, user attribution) migrate as Asana Task-level custom fields (time logged) or as structured subtasks with a note containing hours and date. Asana has no native time tracking object; the customer chooses the carry-forward strategy during scoping. Reporting aggregations from ProjectPlace time logs are not transferred and must be reconstructed in Asana's reporting module or via a time-tracking integration.

Planview ProjectPlace

Comment (Conversation)

maps to

Asana

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace task-level comments and board conversations migrate as Asana Comments on tasks. Author, timestamp, and comment text are preserved. Nested reply threads in ProjectPlace flatten into a linear comment sequence in Asana. @mention formatting is stripped during migration because Asana @mentions resolve against its own user table.

Planview ProjectPlace

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Task-level file attachments in ProjectPlace migrate as Asana Attachments on the corresponding task. We catalog attachment references and filenames during the schema scan, then orchestrate parallel file transfer alongside the object migration. Attachments larger than 100 MB are flagged for chunked upload via the Asana Attachments API.

Planview ProjectPlace

Agile Board (Sprint / Iteration)

maps to

Asana

Project Section + Tags

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectPlace Agile boards with sprint cycles map to Asana Projects using Sections to represent sprints or using the Portfolio's sprint-tracking view. Sprint names, start and end dates, and backlog items migrate as tasks with section membership. Velocity and burndown data from ProjectPlace are not carried forward; Asana calculates its own velocity once the team begins using the sprint structure. The customer chooses whether to use Asana native portfolios or a lighter section-based approach during scoping.

Planview ProjectPlace

Status and Label

maps to

Asana

Tag

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectPlace custom status values and color-coded labels per Workspace are enumerated during scoping and mapped to Asana Tags. Tag color is preserved where Asana supports it. Any status value without a direct Asana tag equivalent is flagged for the customer's admin to review and assign.

Planview ProjectPlace

Workload View data

maps to

Asana

Custom Portfolio or Report

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectPlace's workload visualization aggregates task assignments per user across all Workspaces. We export the underlying task-assignee data so workload balance can be reconstructed at the destination using Asana's Portfolio view or a custom report. The aggregated workload percentages themselves are not transferable and must be recalculated in Asana's reporting layer.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Planview ProjectPlace logo

Planview ProjectPlace gotchas

High

Out-of-the-box sync field set is extremely limited

Medium

API rate limit of 25 req/s is org-global, not per-user

Medium

Date recalculation causes milestone drift

Low

CSV import validates WBS references strictly

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Milestone date drift from ProjectPlace auto-recalculation

    ProjectPlace automatically rebalances downstream milestone dates when any upstream task's dates change. This behavior means the milestone dates visible at migration discovery may differ from the dates at export time if any team member has edited a predecessor task during the migration window. We freeze the entire task dependency and date tree before export by snapshotting the current calculated schedule, then replay the date tree in Asana as static start and end dates on tasks and milestones. Without this freeze step, migrated milestone dates in Asana can appear inconsistent with the team's intended delivery timeline.

  • Asana requires custom field definitions before values can be written

    Asana's API returns a 400 error if a task is submitted with a custom field value for a field that does not exist in the destination workspace (documented in the Asana developer forum with the error: 'Custom field with ID X is not on given object'). We pre-create every ProjectPlace custom field definition in Asana — including text, number, enum, and date types — before any task import begins. This requires a schema-build phase that adds 3-5 business days to the migration timeline for customers with complex custom field taxonomies.

  • ProjectPlace API rate limit is org-global at 25 req/s

    ProjectPlace's API enforces a shared rate limit of 25 requests per second applied at the organization level, not per-user. Bulk exports against Workspaces with thousands of tasks can exhaust this quota mid-export, triggering throttling errors that interrupt the migration. We pace export queries to stay under the 25 req/s ceiling, distributing load across off-peak windows for organizations with more than 50 active Workspaces. For accounts with extremely large task volumes, we segment export by Workspace and stagger API calls to avoid throttling.

  • Asana does not have a native time tracking object

    ProjectPlace includes built-in task-level time entries with hours logged, date, and user attribution as a first-class object. Asana has no equivalent native time tracking object. Time entries can be carried forward as custom fields on tasks or as structured notes, but they will not appear in a native Asana time tracking report. If the customer's team relies on time entry data for billing, resource planning, or utilization reporting, we recommend selecting the carry-forward strategy during scoping (custom field versus structured note) and planning for a post-migration time-tracking integration such as Toggl, Harvest, or a native Asana time app if that capability is required.

  • Automations and workload view aggregations do not migrate

    ProjectPlace Workflows, Agile board configurations, and workload view aggregation rules are built on ProjectPlace-specific automation logic that has no direct equivalent in Asana's rule builder. We deliver a written inventory of every active ProjectPlace automation — including trigger conditions, assigned actions, and affected boards or Workspaces — for the customer's admin to rebuild as Asana rules. Workload view data is exported as task-assignee data but the aggregated workload visualization percentages are not transferable; the customer reconstructs workload reporting using Asana's Portfolio view or a third-party reporting integration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Planview ProjectPlace to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and workspace inventory

    We audit every active ProjectPlace Workspace: task counts, milestone counts, Gantt dependency depth, custom field definitions (with explicit confirmation that OTB sync exports only a limited set, requiring direct API queries), Agile board configurations, and user membership lists. We pair this with an Asana workspace audit confirming the destination edition (Free, Premium, or Advanced) and whether Portfolio access is available for sprint tracking. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object and a confirmation of which ProjectPlace automations require a rebuild inventory.

  2. Schema pre-build in Asana

    Before any data migrates, we pre-create every custom field definition from ProjectPlace in the destination Asana workspace using the Asana Custom Fields API. We also configure project structure (Teams, Projects, Sections representing sprints) and load the Gantt dependency tree with date-freeze logic. This step validates that Asana's schema can represent all ProjectPlace field types and is a prerequisite for all subsequent import phases. Any custom field not exposed via ProjectPlace's API is flagged for a supplemental manual export from Planview support before this phase begins.

  3. Milestone date freeze and dependency tree snapshot

    We take a snapshot of the entire task dependency tree — including all calculated start and end dates, milestone anchors, and Gantt dependency links — before the migration window opens. ProjectPlace's auto-recalculation is suspended during this snapshot to prevent date drift. The frozen dependency tree is stored as the migration source-of-truth so that Asana receives the schedule as the team intended rather than as it would be recalculated during export. Circular dependencies are identified and flagged for manual resolution.

  4. User reconciliation and member provisioning

    We extract every distinct ProjectPlace user referenced on tasks, milestones, and comments and match by email against the destination Asana workspace member list. Any ProjectPlace user without a matching Asana member is added to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. Migration cannot proceed past this step because task assignee references require resolved Asana user IDs. We also confirm that the migration user has Asana API access with project creation permissions.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Asana Teams and Projects first, then Tasks with assignee and custom field values resolved (custom fields exist from the schema pre-build phase), then Milestones with frozen dates, then Gantt dependencies via the Asana dependency API, then Comments, then Attachments, then Agile board sprint data as Section membership. Time entries are imported last as custom field values or structured notes depending on the carry-forward strategy chosen at scoping. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze ProjectPlace writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any tasks modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We validate record counts, spot-check milestone dates against the frozen dependency snapshot, and confirm custom field completeness on a random sample. We deliver the automation and workload-view inventory document to the customer's admin team and support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild ProjectPlace automations as Asana rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Planview ProjectPlace logo

Planview ProjectPlace

Source

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and unlimited team members on a single flat plan eliminates per-seat billing surprises as teams scale.
  • Kanban boards, Gantt charts, Agile sprints, and workload views cover the full spectrum of project visualization styles in one product.
  • AI-assisted task scheduling and intelligent work management help surface bottlenecks and rebalance workloads across the portfolio.
  • Native mobile apps for iOS and Android keep distributed teams engaged with real-time status updates and task management.
  • Broad integration ecosystem including Microsoft Viva Goals OKR linking, SharePoint, Box, and Google G Suite provides extension pathways.

Weaknesses

  • Out-of-the-box sync to Planview Portfolios is limited to a very small field set, requiring custom API work for comprehensive portfolio reporting.
  • Complex schedule building in the Work Plan view is reported as slow and unintuitive by enterprise users managing multi-dependency timelines.
  • Per-feature rather than per-seat pricing means costs scale with use-case complexity rather than team headcount, which can disadvantage feature-heavy organizations.
  • Date auto-recalculation behavior is not always predictable, leading to milestone drift that requires manual lock-down to prevent.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Planview ProjectPlace and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Planview ProjectPlace: 25 requests per second, org-global quota not per-user.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Planview ProjectPlace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Planview ProjectPlace to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Planview ProjectPlace to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview ProjectPlace to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Planview ProjectPlace to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations with fewer than 10,000 tasks across fewer than 20 Workspaces and no complex Gantt dependency chains typically complete in three to five weeks. Migrations with large milestone counts, complex dependency trees requiring date-freeze logic, extensive custom field taxonomies, or time entry carry-forward move to seven to twelve weeks because of the schema pre-build phase, milestone date freeze verification, and bulk dependency import via the Asana API.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Planview ProjectPlace.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day