HRMS migration

Migrate from Martian Logic to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Martian Logic and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Martian Logic logo

Martian Logic

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

69%

9 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Martian Logic and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

6-10 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Martian Logic and Bullhorn serve different operational models. Martian Logic is a full HRIS built around a position-centric data model where org charts, compensation, and employment changes derive from Position relationships rather than standalone objects. Bullhorn is a recruitment CRM and ATS with no native payroll, no org chart, and no HRMS core — it is purpose-built for staffing agencies managing candidates, clients, jobs, and placements. Migrating from Martian Logic to Bullhorn requires reconstructing the position hierarchy as a custom object, splitting the Martian Logic Employee record into Bullhorn Candidate and ClientContact based on current employment status, and mapping onboarding e-form JSON payloads field-by-field into Bullhorn Custom Objects (limited to 2-10 depending on Bullhorn edition). Integration Connector configurations, workflow automation, and payroll push mappings do not migrate; we document them for manual rebuild in Bullhorn. Bullhorn's documented REST API and 24x7 support infrastructure make it a viable destination for staffing-first organisations leaving an all-in-one HRIS whose recruitment module is secondary to its core HRMS capabilities.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Martian Logic logo

Martian Logic

What's pushing teams away

  • Steep learning curve and complex configuration requirements mean that small HR teams often lack the internal resources to fully implement all modules
  • Lack of transparent public pricing means procurement cycles are slow, and unexpected costs surface during implementation when module gating becomes clear
  • Internal employee reviews reveal a company culture and leadership style that some customers worry may translate into unpredictable product support and roadmap direction
  • Limited third-party reviews on G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius make independent vendor assessment difficult compared to well-reviewed competitors like BambooHR or Employment Hero
  • API documentation is sparse and not publicly detailed, making technical teams uncertain about integration capabilities before committing

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Martian Logic objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Martian Logic object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Martian Logic

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate and ClientContact

1:many
Fully supported

Martian Logic Employees with an active employment status and a history of recruitment activity map to Bullhorn Candidate records. Employees with no recruitment activity but an ongoing employment relationship map to Bullhorn ClientContact records if they represent client organisations, or remain as Candidate records with a custom employment_status__c field. We split on the Martian Logic employment status property and the presence of ATS conversion events. The original Employee record ID is preserved as ml_employee_id__c on the Bullhorn record for audit reconciliation.

Martian Logic

Candidate (ATS module)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Martian Logic's ATS Candidates — records in the recruitment pipeline before or after conversion — map directly to Bullhorn Candidate. We extract candidate status history, application dates, interview scores, and source attribution from the Martian Logic ATS module and map these to Bullhorn's Candidate status, dateAdded, candidateSource, and custom rating fields. If the candidate was converted in Martian Logic, the conversion event is preserved as a note and the converted flag is set on the Bullhorn Candidate.

Martian Logic

Position

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Position__c

1:1
Fully supported

Martian Logic Positions are first-class objects linked to employees, driving the org chart and compensation. Bullhorn has no native position entity. We create a Position__c custom object (via Bullhorn Support ticket before migration) and map Position ID, title, department, level, FTE status, and the direct supervisor position ID. The position-to-position reporting chain is walked during extraction to reconstruct the full hierarchy, then written as parent_Position__c lookup references in Bullhorn. Bullhorn Enterprise and Front Office Growth editions allow up to 10 custom objects; Position__c consumes one slot.

Martian Logic

Org Chart

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Position__c (hierarchy)

lossy
Mapping required

The Martian Logic org chart is a derived view of Position relationships, not a standalone object. We walk the Position-to-Position reporting chain during extraction, resolve any archived or soft-deleted positions (orphaned nodes), and build the hierarchy as parent_Position__c lookups in the Position__c custom object. If positions have been improperly terminated in Martian Logic, orphaned nodes are flagged in the discovery report for the customer to resolve before migration.

Martian Logic

Compensation / Remuneration Records

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Compensation__c

1:1
Mapping required

Martian Logic Compensation is stored within or linked to Positions via the Role and Remuneration Library — base salary, allowances, pay frequency, and effective dates. Bullhorn has no native compensation object. We create a Compensation__c custom object with fields for base_salary__c, pay_frequency__c, effective_date__c, allowance_type__c, and allowance_amount__c, linked to the Position__c custom object. If multiple compensation records exist per position (historical changes), all effective-dated records are migrated with a compensation_effective_from__c field.

Martian Logic

Onboarding Packs / E-forms

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object (per pack configuration)

1:many
Mapping required

E-forms completed during onboarding are stored as JSON payloads per employee. Field names, types, and mandatory/optional status differ per employer pack configuration — there is no fixed schema. We parse each payload individually during extraction and map each field to Bullhorn custom object fields. Multiple pack configurations result in multiple custom objects, each mapped to the Candidate record via lookup. Field types (date, text, checkbox, dropdown) are matched to Bullhorn edit types during schema creation. This mapping consumes custom object slots; Bullhorn ATS Growth is capped at 2 custom objects, making migrations with three or more e-form packs only viable on Bullhorn ATS, Core, or Enterprise tiers.

Martian Logic

Employment Changes

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: EmploymentChange__c

1:1
Mapping required

Change of Staff Conditions records are effective-dated transactions with change type, old value, new value, and reason. Martian Logic stores these as a transaction log per employee. Bullhorn has no native employment history object. We create an EmploymentChange__c custom object with fields for change_type__c, old_value__c, new_value__c, effective_date__c, reason__c, and a Candidate lookup. All change records are migrated as a flat per-employee change log. The customer should decide whether to display this as a dedicated tab in Bullhorn or keep it as an internal reference.

Martian Logic

Recruitment Requisitions

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Mapping required

Martian Logic Requisition Workflow records (hiring requests before candidate assignment) map to Bullhorn JobOrder. We extract requisition title, requesting manager, approved headcount, status, and date created. Open requisitions become Bullhorn JobOrder records with status = Open; closed requisitions are migrated as historical records with status = Closed. The job title maps to title, and the requesting manager maps to the Bullhorn User lookup by email match.

Martian Logic

Performance Reviews

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: PerformanceReview__c

1:1
Mapping required

Martian Logic Performance Review templates and completed reviews are stored against employees. Bullhorn has no native performance management object. We create a PerformanceReview__c custom object with fields for review_cycle__c, template_name__c, rating__c, goals__c, reviewer__c, and Candidate lookup. Mapping to Bullhorn is constrained by the destination's review template model; we document the review cycle structure and note that rebuilding review templates in Bullhorn requires the customer's admin to configure a new workflow or use a third-party performance module.

Martian Logic

Payroll Integrations

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Documentation (no data migration)

lossy
Mapping required

Integration Connectors in Martian Logic push employee data to third-party payroll systems and store field-to-field mapping configurations. These connector mappings are Martian Logic configuration artefacts and do not export from the platform. We document every active connector's mapping during discovery — source field, destination system, destination field — and deliver this as a written connector inventory for the customer's admin to manually re-establish in their target payroll system. We do not migrate payroll integration field mappings as data.

Martian Logic

Compliance Records

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Compliance__c

1:1
Mapping required

Martian Logic Compliance modules track regulatory requirements and attestations per employee — certification status, expiry dates, and attestation records. We create a Compliance__c custom object with fields for compliance_type__c, status__c, expiry_date__c, last_attested_date__c, and Candidate lookup. Bullhorn has no native compliance enforcement mechanism; migrated compliance status and expiry dates are stored as reference data, and the customer should configure renewal alerts in Bullhorn workflows or a separate compliance tool post-migration.

Martian Logic

Employee Self-Service Access

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields on Candidate

1:1
Mapping required

ESS access levels and role permissions are stored per employee or per role in Martian Logic. Bullhorn uses a role-based permissions model tied to Bullhorn User records, which is separate from Candidate records. We export ESS access levels and role assignments as custom fields on the Candidate record (ess_access_level__c, bullhorn_role_mapping__c) for reference. Bullhorn's access control logic is rebuilt by the customer's admin as part of the Bullhorn setup — we do not migrate ESS roles as Bullhorn roles because the permission models are not equivalent.

Martian Logic

Candidate (before conversion)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Lead

1:1
Fully supported

Martian Logic Candidates that exist in the ATS pipeline before conversion but represent prospects rather than placed or employed individuals map to Bullhorn Lead records if the customer uses Bullhorn's Lead object for early-stage pipeline tracking. The mapping uses the Martian Logic candidate status at extraction time: pre-conversion statuses map to Lead, post-conversion statuses map to Candidate. Lead scores and source attribution from Martian Logic migrate to Bullhorn Lead custom fields.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Martian Logic logo

Martian Logic gotchas

High

No publicly documented API endpoint reference

Medium

Onboarding e-form payloads are configuration-dependent JSON

Medium

Position hierarchy drives the org chart, not a standalone object

Medium

Payroll integration field mappings must be re-created in the destination

Low

No bulk export tool — employee data export mirrors candidate export

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Bullhorn custom object limits may constrain onboarding e-form migration

    Bullhorn caps custom objects at 2 for ATS Growth, 2 for Bullhorn ATS, and 10 for Front Office Growth and Enterprise editions, each with 55 fields. Martian Logic onboarding e-form packs are stored as configuration-dependent JSON with no fixed field count — a single organisation may have four or five different e-form pack types, each requiring its own custom object in Bullhorn. We audit the active e-form pack count during discovery and flag the constraint. Migrations with more than two e-form pack types require the customer to upgrade to Bullhorn Enterprise or to consolidate multiple packs into a single custom object using section-header groupings, which we document as a mapping decision before migration.

  • Martian Logic has no publicly documented API

    Martian Logic does not publish a public API endpoint reference, OpenAPI spec, or described rate limits. The developer portal exists but available endpoints, authentication scheme, and API capabilities are not externally documented. We work around this by using Martian Logic's Integration Connector push-form mechanism and direct database export tools where available. During scoping, we request API access credentials and test connectivity before confirming a migration approach. If API access is not granted, we fall back to admin-interface export and cross-reference with Integration Connector payloads to build a complete data picture.

  • Bullhorn has no native org chart or position entity

    Martian Logic's position-centric model means the org chart, reporting chains, and compensation are all derived from Position relationships. Bullhorn has no native position, department hierarchy, or org chart object. We must explicitly reconstruct the Position hierarchy as a custom object with parent-lookup references, which consumes a custom object slot. If the organisation has a complex position archive (archived, merged, or renamed positions), orphaned nodes in the hierarchy must be identified and either cleaned up in Martian Logic before migration or flagged as broken references in the Bullhorn reconstruction.

  • Onboarding e-form JSON payloads have no fixed schema

    E-forms in Martian Logic onboarding packs store field values as a JSON payload that varies by pack configuration. There is no fixed schema — field names, types, and mandatory/optional status differ per employer. We parse each payload individually during the extraction phase and build a custom field mapping per pack rather than applying a universal transform. If the employer has modified e-form packs over time, multiple payload schemas may coexist for the same pack type, requiring version-by-version parsing.

  • Integration Connector field mappings must be manually rebuilt

    Martian Logic Integration Connectors store field-to-field mappings between Martian Logic fields and the destination payroll system's fields. These mappings are configuration artefacts that do not export from the platform. We document every active connector's mapping during discovery — source field, destination system, destination field — and deliver this as a written connector inventory. The equivalent configuration must be manually rebuilt in the target HRMS or payroll system by the customer's admin post-migration. We do not migrate integration connector field mappings as data.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Martian Logic to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and data audit

    We audit the Martian Logic instance across active modules (Core HR, ATS, Onboarding, Performance, Compliance), custom field count on Employee and Position objects, e-form pack configuration inventory, Integration Connector list, and employment change record volume. We pair this with a Bullhorn edition assessment: Bullhorn ATS Growth (2 custom objects), Bullhorn ATS or Core (2 custom objects), or Front Office Growth/Enterprise (10 custom objects). The discovery output is a written migration scope, a Bullhorn edition recommendation, and a Bullhorn Support ticket list for custom object creation.

  2. Position hierarchy extraction and orphaned node cleanup

    We walk the Martian Logic Position-to-Position reporting chain manually (Martian Logic has no dedicated org chart API) to reconstruct the full hierarchy before any record migration begins. We identify archived or soft-deleted positions that create orphaned nodes and flag these for the customer's HR admin to resolve in Martian Logic before extraction. The cleaned position list becomes the basis for the Position__c custom object schema in Bullhorn, including parent_Position__c lookup references.

  3. E-form payload parsing and custom object schema design

    We parse each onboarding e-form pack's JSON payload individually, extract all field names and types, and map them to Bullhorn custom object field definitions. If the e-form pack count exceeds the customer's Bullhorn edition custom object limit, we document consolidation options (section-header groupings, multi-use fields) and the customer chooses a strategy before schema creation. Bullhorn Support tickets are submitted for each custom object; Bullhorn sets up the custom object schema, then we validate the field list and data types before importing any Candidate records.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Bullhorn Sandbox or staging environment using production-like data volume. The customer's HR and recruitment leads reconcile record counts across all object types, spot-check 25-50 random Candidate and Position records against the Martian Logic source, and verify the Position hierarchy renders correctly in Bullhorn as a custom object list view. Any schema corrections, field mapping adjustments, or orphaned position resolutions happen in this phase. Sign-off on the sandbox migration is required before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Position__c custom object (hierarchy established first, with parent lookups resolved), then Employee-to-Candidate and Employee-to-ClientContact split (using employment status and ATS conversion event as split criteria), Compensation__c records linked to Position__c, EmploymentChange__c linked to Candidate, Compliance__c linked to Candidate, Onboarding e-form custom objects linked to Candidate, Recruitment Requisitions mapped to JobOrder, and Performance Reviews mapped to PerformanceReview__c. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze Martian Logic writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record for recruitment operations. We deliver the Integration Connector inventory document, the Workflow and Automation rebuild guide (these do not migrate as code), and the Bullhorn role-permission rebuild guide for ESS access levels. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Bullhorn ESS access levels and role permissions are rebuilt by the customer's Bullhorn admin post-migration as a separate configuration task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Martian Logic logo

Martian Logic

Source

Strengths

  • All-in-one platform covering recruitment, onboarding, core HR, performance, and payroll from a single vendor and invoice
  • Australian compliance built in, including Single Touch Payroll and APAC regulatory requirements out of the box
  • Integration Connectors provide automated data push to payroll and HRMS systems without manual export/import cycles
  • Position-centric data model creates a self-healing org chart and consistent employee-position relationships across all modules
  • Mobile-first employee self-service portal accessible via web and native mobile, reducing HR admin overhead

Weaknesses

  • No publicly available pricing page, requiring sales contact for every evaluation and creating procurement friction
  • Sparse public API documentation and limited developer community make technical integration uncertain before purchase
  • Complex configuration requirements mean implementation timelines are longer than simpler SMB-focused alternatives
  • Limited third-party reviews and ratings on major platforms compared to competitors, reducing independent due diligence options
  • Internal company culture concerns documented in employee reviews may signal risks to product support quality and roadmap stability
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Martian Logic and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Martian Logic and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Martian Logic and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Martian Logic: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Martian Logic doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Martian Logic to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Martian Logic to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Martian Logic to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Martian Logic to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between six and ten weeks for organisations under 500 employees with one or two e-form pack configurations and no performance review history. Migrations with multiple e-form pack types (requiring more than two custom objects), archived position cleanup, large Compensation Library records, or multi-region employment data move to fourteen to eighteen weeks because each e-form pack requires individual JSON parsing and schema creation, and position hierarchy reconstruction must be completed before employee record migration begins.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Martian Logic.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day