Project Management migration

Migrate from TimeLog to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TimeLog and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

TimeLog logo

TimeLog

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between TimeLog and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from TimeLog to Asana is a shift from a PSA platform with integrated billing to a standalone project management tool. TimeLog structures work as Projects containing Activities with time entries and billing rates; Asana uses a flatter Projects-and-Tasks model without native invoicing or salary administration. We map the Projects-to-Asana-Projects hierarchy directly, flatten Activities to Tasks (preserving the parent-child relationship via sections or subtasks), and transfer time entries to the Asana Timesheets and Budgets add-on if the customer licenses it. Billing rates from TimeLog Activities migrate as custom number fields on Asana tasks. TimeLog salary data and fixed-price vs time-and-material rate types require manual review post-migration because TimeLog's Starter tier excludes salary administration and Asana has no billing object. We do not migrate Workflows or Automation rules from TimeLog; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TimeLog logo

TimeLog

What's pushing teams away

  • Users report that the reporting interface has a steep learning curve, with multiple reports available but not all of them easy to navigate or find.
  • Integration limitations with other software are cited as a drawback, making it difficult to connect TimeLog with tools outside its native ecosystem.
  • Some users find the reporting features incomplete or lacking in certain areas, despite the volume of available reports.
  • Companies seeking to consolidate onto a different PSA platform often cite the desire for better third-party integrations as a reason for switching.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How TimeLog objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a TimeLog object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TimeLog

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

TimeLog Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We transfer project name, description, status (active/archived), start and end dates, and customer association. The customer reference from TimeLog maps to an Asana custom field (Customer dropdown or text) on the project because Asana has no native Customer object. Custom project-level fields migrate to Asana custom fields on the project record.

TimeLog

Activity

maps to

Asana

Task

1:many
Fully supported

TimeLog Activities nested under Projects map to Asana Tasks within the corresponding Project. The project-activity hierarchy is preserved by creating each Activity as a top-level Task in Asana, with the Activity rate, budget type, and billing method transferred as custom fields on the task. If Activities contain sub-Activities, the sub-Activities become Asana Subtasks. Customers should decide during scoping whether to use Asana Sections to represent Activity groupings.

TimeLog

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Time Entry (Timesheets add-on)

1:1
Fully supported

TimeLog Time Entries (date, hours, billable flag, description, employee attribution) map to Asana Timesheets entries if the customer licenses the Timesheets and Budgets add-on. We link each timesheet entry to the Asana Task that corresponds to the source Activity. Billable/non-billable flags map to the billable toggle in Asana Timesheets. If the Timesheets add-on is not licensed, time entries migrate as custom fields on the corresponding Tasks as a text-based log, which does not support the same reporting model.

TimeLog

Employee

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

TimeLog Employees map to Asana Users by email address match. We extract employee name, email, role, department, and billing rate. The billing rate transfers to an Asana custom field on the user profile or as a project-level rate field depending on the customer's rate model. Salary administration data is not migrated because it is gated behind TimeLog Professional and Enterprise tiers and Asana has no compensation object; this data requires a separate HRMS if needed.

TimeLog

Customer

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (project-level)

1:1
Fully supported

TimeLog Customers (billing entities) have no direct Asana equivalent. We migrate Customer records as a reference table and then populate an Asana custom field (dropdown or text) on each Project with the Customer name. Customer contact details (billing address, currency settings) migrate to a Project custom field or to a companion spreadsheet for reference during invoicing in a separate tool. This is a known gap that customers should plan for when adopting Asana as a replacement for TimeLog's billing workflow.

TimeLog

Invoice

maps to

Asana

Not available in Asana

1:1
Fully supported

TimeLog Invoices and Invoice Lines cannot migrate to Asana because Asana has no invoicing object. We export invoice headers and line items as a CSV and deliver a written mapping to the customer's preferred accounting tool (QuickBooks, Xero, Harvest Invoice, or similar). Invoice status (paid/unpaid/overdue) can be preserved as a custom field on the related Project if the customer requests it, but this requires manual post-migration configuration.

TimeLog

Expense

maps to

Asana

Custom Field or attachment

1:1
Fully supported

TimeLog Expense records (amount, date, category, billable flag) migrate as custom fields on the corresponding Asana Project or Task. Expense attachments (receipts) migrate as Asana attachments linked to the project. Asana has no native expense tracking object; customers using TimeLog's expense workflow should evaluate an integrated expense tool post-migration.

TimeLog

Resource Allocation

maps to

Asana

Custom Field or Workload view

1:1
Fully supported

TimeLog resource allocations (Employee-to-Project hours or percentage assignments) migrate as custom number fields on Asana Projects and Tasks, enabling the Asana Workload view to display capacity if the customer licenses it. Allocations tied to specific date ranges transfer to the task start and due dates. This mapping is approximate because TimeLog's allocation model (hours vs percentage) may not align 1:1 with Asana's capacity-based model.

TimeLog

Rate and Price List

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (task-level or project-level)

lossy
Fully supported

TimeLog Activity rates (hourly, fixed, milestone) and customer-specific pricing migrate to Asana custom number fields on Tasks. Fixed-price and time-and-material rate types migrate as a text field (Rate Type) paired with the rate value, since Asana has no native rate type concept. Customers with complex multi-tier pricing should review rate mappings post-migration because the flat custom field structure in Asana may not capture the full pricing model.

TimeLog

Custom Field (Project/Activity)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

TimeLog custom fields on Projects and Activities migrate to Asana custom fields on the corresponding Project or Task object. We extract field definitions during discovery and create matching custom fields in Asana before migration. Field types (text, number, date, dropdown) map to Asana field types by type equivalence. Custom field values are migrated as available; post-migration validation is required to catch any schema mismatches between the exported definition and the destination field definition.

TimeLog

Salary Administration

maps to

Asana

Not available in Asana

1:1
Mapping required

Salary administration data is gated behind TimeLog Professional and Enterprise tiers and may not exist in Starter-tier accounts. Where salary records are present, they do not migrate because Asana has no compensation object. We flag the presence or absence of salary data during scoping and deliver it as a CSV export for import into a separate HRMS if required. This object requires a dedicated HR platform for ongoing management post-migration.

TimeLog

Reporting Data

maps to

Asana

Not available in Asana

1:1
Not supported

TimeLog reporting views are generated dynamically from transactional data and are not stored as independent objects. We do not migrate saved report definitions or custom report configurations. The underlying transactional data (Projects, Activities, Time Entries) is available in Asana, and the customer rebuilds reports using Asana's reporting views (Dashboard, Portfolio, Workload) or a connected BI tool.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TimeLog logo

TimeLog gotchas

Medium

Tier-gated features create migration scope ambiguity

Medium

Fixed-price vs time-and-material billing requires rate mapping

Low

Custom fields schema differs from standard object export

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Asana has no native time tracking; Timesheets add-on is paid

    TimeLog's core value is native time tracking tied to Activities with billable flags and rate associations. Asana does not include time tracking in its Free or Premium plans; the Timesheets and Budgets add-on is a separate paid license. Agencies migrating from TimeLog report that Asana's native time tracking capabilities are insufficient without Everhour, Clockify, or another third-party integration. We migrate time entries to the Timesheets and Budgets add-on if the customer licenses it, but the reporting model differs. Customers without the add-on receive time entries as text fields, which does not support automated timesheets or budget tracking.

  • Invoicing and billing have no Asana equivalent

    TimeLog's invoicing engine generates invoices from time entries and expenses tied to Activities and Customers. Asana has no invoicing object and no billing workflow. We export invoice data as a CSV with line items and deliver a written mapping to the customer's preferred accounting tool. Customers who rely on TimeLog's billing workflows (fixed-price budgets, milestone invoicing, time-and-material billing) must evaluate a separate accounting or invoicing tool post-migration. This is a structural gap, not a data migration limitation.

  • Activity flattening can disrupt project structure

    TimeLog Activities nested under Projects carry their own rate, budget type, and billing method. Asana Tasks do not have a native rate or billing method field. We map these to custom fields, but the hierarchical relationship between Activities and their parent Projects does not map 1:1 to Asana's flat task list model. Teams that use Activity-level billing extensively may find that the Asana task structure requires redesign to accommodate rate tracking without losing task-level detail. We recommend a scoping session specifically for Activity-level billing models.

  • TimeLog Starter tier excludes salary data

    TimeLog's Starter tier at €13 per user explicitly excludes salary administration. When migrating out of TimeLog, we cannot determine whether salary data exists in the account without explicit scope confirmation. Customers on Starter tiers do not have salary records to migrate, but the object schema may appear to exist in the database. We verify the active tier and confirm which objects are populated before defining migration scope, so that customers do not pay for salary data migration that yields no records.

  • Asana CSV export caps at 2,000 rows from search results

    Asana imposes a 2,000-row limit on CSV exports from search results and a 140,000-row limit on direct project exports. Large migration scopes (over 100,000 time entries or tasks) may require chunked export strategies using the Asana API rather than the CSV importer. We use the Asana REST API with pagination for record counts exceeding these thresholds. This affects large historical migrations more than incremental migrations.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TimeLog to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and tier verification

    We audit the source TimeLog account across tier (Starter/Professional/Enterprise), project count, activity count, time entry volume, employee count, and active rate types. We specifically verify whether salary administration data is present by checking the active tier. We pair this with a review of Asana workspace structure and licensing (Free/Premium/Advanced) and confirm whether the Timesheets and Budgets add-on is included in the destination scope. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a list of objects confirmed present, and an Asana licensing recommendation.

  2. Schema design and custom field provisioning

    We design the Asana destination schema before any data moves. This includes creating custom fields for Customer (dropdown on Projects), Rate Type (text on Tasks), Rate Value (number on Tasks), Billable (checkbox on Tasks), and any TimeLog custom fields that do not map to native Asana fields. We configure the Timesheets and Budgets add-on settings if licensed. Schema is provisioned in the Asana workspace before migration begins, using the Asana API for custom field creation.

  3. Project and task hierarchy mapping

    We map the TimeLog Projects-to-Activities hierarchy to Asana Projects and Tasks. The mapping strategy (Activities as top-level tasks vs. using Asana Sections for Activity groupings) is confirmed during scoping. We apply rate types, billing methods, and budget types as custom fields on each task. The mapping output is a written schema map showing the relationship between each TimeLog object and its Asana destination, reviewed and signed off before migration begins.

  4. User reconciliation and member provisioning

    We extract every distinct TimeLog Employee referenced on time entries, project assignments, and allocations. We match by email against the Asana workspace members. Employees without a matching Asana user go to a reconciliation queue; the customer's Asana admin provisions any missing members before record import resumes. Owner assignments on projects and tasks are resolved using the same mapping.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (validated against the provisioning queue), Projects (with Customer custom field populated), Tasks (with Activity rate and billing fields populated), Time Entries (to Timesheets add-on or as custom fields), Expenses (as project or task custom fields), and Resource Allocations (as custom fields or workload data). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Invoice data is exported as CSV and handed off separately.

  6. Cutover, validation, and Workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze TimeLog writes during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window. We validate a sample of migrated records against the source and confirm task-to-project linkages are intact. We deliver a written inventory of TimeLog Workflows and Automation rules requiring rebuild in Asana Rules or a third-party automation tool. We do not rebuild TimeLog Workflows as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's admin team using the handoff inventory.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TimeLog logo

TimeLog

Source

Strengths

  • Integrates time tracking, project management, resource planning, and invoicing in one platform
  • Intuitive user interface praised across multiple review sources
  • Responsive customer success team with rapid inquiry response times
  • Supports both time-and-material and fixed-price billing models
  • Regular feature releases based on user feedback and requests

Weaknesses

  • Reporting interface is difficult to navigate with a steep learning curve
  • Limited third-party integrations compared to standalone tools
  • Custom field management requires manual post-migration review
  • Some users report the reporting feature set as incomplete for advanced needs
  • Salary administration and advanced automation gated behind higher pricing tiers
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TimeLog and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TimeLog: Not publicly documented as a numeric ceiling; TimeLog commits to keeping a given API version functional for three years from its release date..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    TimeLog doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your TimeLog to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TimeLog to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TimeLog to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TimeLog to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 500 projects, 5,000 activities, and 50,000 time entries with no complex billing structures. Migrations with large historical time entry volumes (over 100,000 entries), multi-tier rate models across fixed-price and time-and-material billing, or destination workspaces requiring extensive custom field schema move to seven to twelve weeks because of rate mapping complexity and the Timesheets add-on configuration scope.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TimeLog.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day