Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TimeLog and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
TimeLog
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
9 of 12
objects map 1:1 between TimeLog and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from TimeLog to Asana is a shift from a PSA platform with integrated billing to a standalone project management tool. TimeLog structures work as Projects containing Activities with time entries and billing rates; Asana uses a flatter Projects-and-Tasks model without native invoicing or salary administration. We map the Projects-to-Asana-Projects hierarchy directly, flatten Activities to Tasks (preserving the parent-child relationship via sections or subtasks), and transfer time entries to the Asana Timesheets and Budgets add-on if the customer licenses it. Billing rates from TimeLog Activities migrate as custom number fields on Asana tasks. TimeLog salary data and fixed-price vs time-and-material rate types require manual review post-migration because TimeLog's Starter tier excludes salary administration and Asana has no billing object. We do not migrate Workflows or Automation rules from TimeLog; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a TimeLog object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
TimeLog
Project
Asana
Project
1:1TimeLog Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We transfer project name, description, status (active/archived), start and end dates, and customer association. The customer reference from TimeLog maps to an Asana custom field (Customer dropdown or text) on the project because Asana has no native Customer object. Custom project-level fields migrate to Asana custom fields on the project record.
TimeLog
Activity
Asana
Task
1:manyTimeLog Activities nested under Projects map to Asana Tasks within the corresponding Project. The project-activity hierarchy is preserved by creating each Activity as a top-level Task in Asana, with the Activity rate, budget type, and billing method transferred as custom fields on the task. If Activities contain sub-Activities, the sub-Activities become Asana Subtasks. Customers should decide during scoping whether to use Asana Sections to represent Activity groupings.
TimeLog
Time Entry
Asana
Time Entry (Timesheets add-on)
1:1TimeLog Time Entries (date, hours, billable flag, description, employee attribution) map to Asana Timesheets entries if the customer licenses the Timesheets and Budgets add-on. We link each timesheet entry to the Asana Task that corresponds to the source Activity. Billable/non-billable flags map to the billable toggle in Asana Timesheets. If the Timesheets add-on is not licensed, time entries migrate as custom fields on the corresponding Tasks as a text-based log, which does not support the same reporting model.
TimeLog
Employee
Asana
User
1:1TimeLog Employees map to Asana Users by email address match. We extract employee name, email, role, department, and billing rate. The billing rate transfers to an Asana custom field on the user profile or as a project-level rate field depending on the customer's rate model. Salary administration data is not migrated because it is gated behind TimeLog Professional and Enterprise tiers and Asana has no compensation object; this data requires a separate HRMS if needed.
TimeLog
Customer
Asana
Custom Field (project-level)
1:1TimeLog Customers (billing entities) have no direct Asana equivalent. We migrate Customer records as a reference table and then populate an Asana custom field (dropdown or text) on each Project with the Customer name. Customer contact details (billing address, currency settings) migrate to a Project custom field or to a companion spreadsheet for reference during invoicing in a separate tool. This is a known gap that customers should plan for when adopting Asana as a replacement for TimeLog's billing workflow.
TimeLog
Invoice
Asana
Not available in Asana
1:1TimeLog Invoices and Invoice Lines cannot migrate to Asana because Asana has no invoicing object. We export invoice headers and line items as a CSV and deliver a written mapping to the customer's preferred accounting tool (QuickBooks, Xero, Harvest Invoice, or similar). Invoice status (paid/unpaid/overdue) can be preserved as a custom field on the related Project if the customer requests it, but this requires manual post-migration configuration.
TimeLog
Expense
Asana
Custom Field or attachment
1:1TimeLog Expense records (amount, date, category, billable flag) migrate as custom fields on the corresponding Asana Project or Task. Expense attachments (receipts) migrate as Asana attachments linked to the project. Asana has no native expense tracking object; customers using TimeLog's expense workflow should evaluate an integrated expense tool post-migration.
TimeLog
Resource Allocation
Asana
Custom Field or Workload view
1:1TimeLog resource allocations (Employee-to-Project hours or percentage assignments) migrate as custom number fields on Asana Projects and Tasks, enabling the Asana Workload view to display capacity if the customer licenses it. Allocations tied to specific date ranges transfer to the task start and due dates. This mapping is approximate because TimeLog's allocation model (hours vs percentage) may not align 1:1 with Asana's capacity-based model.
TimeLog
Rate and Price List
Asana
Custom Field (task-level or project-level)
lossyTimeLog Activity rates (hourly, fixed, milestone) and customer-specific pricing migrate to Asana custom number fields on Tasks. Fixed-price and time-and-material rate types migrate as a text field (Rate Type) paired with the rate value, since Asana has no native rate type concept. Customers with complex multi-tier pricing should review rate mappings post-migration because the flat custom field structure in Asana may not capture the full pricing model.
TimeLog
Custom Field (Project/Activity)
Asana
Custom Field
lossyTimeLog custom fields on Projects and Activities migrate to Asana custom fields on the corresponding Project or Task object. We extract field definitions during discovery and create matching custom fields in Asana before migration. Field types (text, number, date, dropdown) map to Asana field types by type equivalence. Custom field values are migrated as available; post-migration validation is required to catch any schema mismatches between the exported definition and the destination field definition.
TimeLog
Salary Administration
Asana
Not available in Asana
1:1Salary administration data is gated behind TimeLog Professional and Enterprise tiers and may not exist in Starter-tier accounts. Where salary records are present, they do not migrate because Asana has no compensation object. We flag the presence or absence of salary data during scoping and deliver it as a CSV export for import into a separate HRMS if required. This object requires a dedicated HR platform for ongoing management post-migration.
TimeLog
Reporting Data
Asana
Not available in Asana
1:1TimeLog reporting views are generated dynamically from transactional data and are not stored as independent objects. We do not migrate saved report definitions or custom report configurations. The underlying transactional data (Projects, Activities, Time Entries) is available in Asana, and the customer rebuilds reports using Asana's reporting views (Dashboard, Portfolio, Workload) or a connected BI tool.
| TimeLog | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Activity | Task1:many | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Time Entry (Timesheets add-on)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Employee | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Customer | Custom Field (project-level)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Invoice | Not available in Asana1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Expense | Custom Field or attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Resource Allocation | Custom Field or Workload view1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Rate and Price List | Custom Field (task-level or project-level)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field (Project/Activity) | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Salary Administration | Not available in Asana1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Reporting Data | Not available in Asana1:1 | Not supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
TimeLog gotchas
Tier-gated features create migration scope ambiguity
Fixed-price vs time-and-material billing requires rate mapping
Custom fields schema differs from standard object export
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and tier verification
We audit the source TimeLog account across tier (Starter/Professional/Enterprise), project count, activity count, time entry volume, employee count, and active rate types. We specifically verify whether salary administration data is present by checking the active tier. We pair this with a review of Asana workspace structure and licensing (Free/Premium/Advanced) and confirm whether the Timesheets and Budgets add-on is included in the destination scope. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a list of objects confirmed present, and an Asana licensing recommendation.
Schema design and custom field provisioning
We design the Asana destination schema before any data moves. This includes creating custom fields for Customer (dropdown on Projects), Rate Type (text on Tasks), Rate Value (number on Tasks), Billable (checkbox on Tasks), and any TimeLog custom fields that do not map to native Asana fields. We configure the Timesheets and Budgets add-on settings if licensed. Schema is provisioned in the Asana workspace before migration begins, using the Asana API for custom field creation.
Project and task hierarchy mapping
We map the TimeLog Projects-to-Activities hierarchy to Asana Projects and Tasks. The mapping strategy (Activities as top-level tasks vs. using Asana Sections for Activity groupings) is confirmed during scoping. We apply rate types, billing methods, and budget types as custom fields on each task. The mapping output is a written schema map showing the relationship between each TimeLog object and its Asana destination, reviewed and signed off before migration begins.
User reconciliation and member provisioning
We extract every distinct TimeLog Employee referenced on time entries, project assignments, and allocations. We match by email against the Asana workspace members. Employees without a matching Asana user go to a reconciliation queue; the customer's Asana admin provisions any missing members before record import resumes. Owner assignments on projects and tasks are resolved using the same mapping.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (validated against the provisioning queue), Projects (with Customer custom field populated), Tasks (with Activity rate and billing fields populated), Time Entries (to Timesheets add-on or as custom fields), Expenses (as project or task custom fields), and Resource Allocations (as custom fields or workload data). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Invoice data is exported as CSV and handed off separately.
Cutover, validation, and Workflow rebuild handoff
We freeze TimeLog writes during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window. We validate a sample of migrated records against the source and confirm task-to-project linkages are intact. We deliver a written inventory of TimeLog Workflows and Automation rules requiring rebuild in Asana Rules or a third-party automation tool. We do not rebuild TimeLog Workflows as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's admin team using the handoff inventory.
Platform deep dives
TimeLog
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TimeLog and Asana.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
TimeLog: Not publicly documented as a numeric ceiling; TimeLog commits to keeping a given API version functional for three years from its release date..
Data volume sensitivity
TimeLog doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TimeLog to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your TimeLog to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave TimeLog
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.