Project Management migration

Migrate from iPlan to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between iPlan and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

iPlan logo

iPlan

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

69%

9 of 13

objects map 1:1 between iPlan and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

iPlan stores project data in an enterprise portfolio hierarchy with built-in earned-value metrics, timesheet-linked billing, and resource capacity scheduling. Asana uses a flat project-and-task model with Teams as the organizational unit, dependency tracking via the Asana API, and workload management from Advanced tier upward. There is no native earned-value reporting or timesheet tracking in Asana's base tiers. We preserve earned-value variance metrics as custom fields on Projects, translate iPlan resource schedules to Asana workload assignments, reconstruct milestone timelines as Asana Milestones, and flag any billing or timesheet records that require manual reconciliation after migration. Custom workflow automation rules in iPlan's proprietary format do not migrate; we deliver a written specification of every rule for your Asana admin to rebuild in Asana Rules. Reports and dashboards also do not migrate because they rely on iPlan's visualization schema; we provide a data export so dashboards can be rebuilt in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

iPlan logo

iPlan

What's pushing teams away

  • Enterprise pricing and licensing costs become prohibitive as organizations scale project count and team size.
  • Limited third-party integrations with popular development, design, and communication tools restricts ecosystem connectivity.
  • Complex administrative configuration requires dedicated IT resources to maintain and customize the platform effectively.
  • Infrequent interface updates and dated UX create friction for teams accustomed to modern SaaS design patterns.
  • Support response times and escalation processes frustrate organizations with critical production issues.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How iPlan objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a iPlan object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

iPlan

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

iPlan Projects export with status, start/end dates, budget, owner, and portfolio hierarchy. We map each project to an Asana Project, preserve the project name and description, set the start_date and due_date from iPlan's planned dates, and assign the project to the corresponding Asana Team. If the iPlan project has a parent portfolio, we note the hierarchy for reconstruction in Asana Portfolios (Advanced+) or as a project-grouping structure in Sections.

iPlan

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

iPlan Tasks map to Asana Tasks with name, notes (description), start_date, due_date, completion status, and priority preserved. Assignee resolves by matching the iPlan resource email to an Asana user. Custom task fields (dropdown, numeric, text) map to Asana custom fields created during schema design. Dependencies between tasks are recorded as dependencies in Asana using the /tasks/{gid}/addDependencies endpoint, preserving predecessor-successor relationships from iPlan's dependency chain.

iPlan

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

iPlan Milestones map to Asana Milestones attached to the parent Project. Target dates transfer as the milestone due_date. We flag any milestone with no linked tasks during scoping so the customer can decide whether to attach a task before migration. Milestones without a parent project reference are mapped to a catch-all project flagged for manual reassignment.

iPlan

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:many
Fully supported

iPlan Subtasks export as child Tasks in Asana. We create each subtask as a separate Task and attach it to the parent Task using the subtasks relationship in Asana's API. If the destination Asana workspace has subtasks disabled or uses sections for the same purpose, we flatten subtasks into a flat task list with a parent_task_gid custom field for reference.

iPlan

Resource

maps to

Asana

User + Workload assignment

1:1
Fully supported

iPlan Resources (employee database) export with name, role, and availability schedules. We map each iPlan Resource to an Asana User by email address. Availability schedules do not transfer directly since Asana does not have a native resource calendar; we document the availability data in a custom field on the User record (e.g., capacity_percent__c) and flag that workload visualization requires the Asana Advanced tier. Resource allocation percentages per project transfer to task assignments with percent_complete values.

iPlan

Timesheet

maps to

Asana

Custom time-tracking fields

lossy
Fully supported

Asana does not include native timesheet tracking in Starter or Advanced tiers without the Time Tracking add-on. We map iPlan timesheet hours to a custom field on Tasks (e.g., hours_logged__c as a number field) and preserve the original date, project reference, and task linkage as metadata. If the customer purchases the Asana Time Tracking add-on, we can remap to native time entries. Timesheet records with orphaned project references are flagged in the reconciliation report for manual resolution.

iPlan

Custom Fields

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

iPlan custom fields on Projects and Tasks require explicit field-type mapping during scoping. Dropdown, numeric, and text fields map directly to equivalent Asana custom field types. Formula and rollup fields from iPlan are recreated as read-only custom fields in Asana using numeric or text type. Multi-select fields from iPlan map to Asana enum (multi-select) custom fields. We pre-create all custom fields in the destination Asana workspace before data import.

iPlan

Earned-Value Metrics

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields on Project

lossy
Fully supported

iPlan's earned-value metrics (EAC, VAC, CPI, SPI) derive from timesheet data and are stored as project-level calculated values. We extract these metrics as numeric custom fields on the Asana Project (e.g., earned_value__c, actual_cost__c, schedule_variance__c) so that historical project performance data is not lost. Asana does not have native EVM; these fields are preserved for reporting but require manual formula setup in Asana Dashboards if the customer wants automated variance visualization.

iPlan

Knowledge Base

maps to

Asana

Project descriptions + Sections

1:1
Mapping required

iPlan Knowledge articles export as structured text with category assignments. We import article text into Asana Project descriptions or Section descriptions within the corresponding project, preserving file attachments as links. Category taxonomy from iPlan maps to Asana Tags for cross-project discoverability. We flag articles with no project linkage for assignment during scoping.

iPlan

Attachments

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Mapping required

File attachments associated with iPlan Projects, Tasks, or Knowledge articles are extracted and uploaded to the corresponding Asana Task or Project using the Asana Attachments API. We preserve original filenames, upload timestamps, and content types. Attachments over 100 MB are noted separately since Asana's per-file limit is 100 MB for standard uploads.

iPlan

Billing Records

maps to

Asana

Custom fields (reconciliation required)

lossy
Mapping required

iPlan billing and financial tracking data exports but has no native equivalent in Asana. We preserve billing amounts, currency, and invoice status as custom fields on the Project record (e.g., budget_amount__c, billed_amount__c, billing_status__c). Actual invoice generation and payment tracking require an external accounting tool or a manual reconciliation process post-migration.

iPlan

Workflow Automation Rules

maps to

Asana

Rules (written specification only)

1:1
Fully supported

iPlan workflow rules encode business logic in a proprietary format that cannot be directly exported. We perform a rules audit during scoping, capture each rule's trigger, conditions, and actions as a human-readable specification document, and provide a recommended equivalent using Asana Rules syntax. The customer's Asana admin rebuilds the automations using Asana's native Rules builder post-migration. We do not migrate rules as code.

iPlan

Reports and Analytics

maps to

Asana

Dashboards (rebuild required)

1:1
Not supported

iPlan report configurations and dashboards use a proprietary visualization schema that cannot be transferred. We export the underlying data (project metrics, task counts, milestone data, earned-value figures) to CSV and JSON so that Asana Dashboards can be rebuilt with equivalent views. The rebuild is outside migration scope and can be handled by the customer's PMO team or a FlitStack AI follow-on engagement.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

iPlan logo

iPlan gotchas

High

Limited public API documentation creates migration extraction challenges

Medium

Custom workflow automation does not export in portable format

Medium

Earned-value and billing data depend on timesheet integrity

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • iPlan has no public API; extraction relies on export utilities

    iPlan does not publish a comprehensive public API reference. During migration scoping, we perform schema discovery through available export utilities and sample data probing. Customers must provide direct database access or approved export files for complete data extraction. We flag any data objects not reachable through documented export paths before migration begins. This is a high-severity gotcha because the extraction phase often takes longer than anticipated, particularly for organizations with large timesheet archives or complex custom field configurations.

  • Custom workflow automation does not export in portable format

    iPlan workflow rules encode business logic in a proprietary format that cannot be directly transferred to Asana Rules. We capture the rule conditions and actions as human-readable specifications during scoping, then deliver a written automation inventory with recommended Asana Rules equivalents. Your admin rebuilds the automations in Asana's Rules builder. Migrations that skip this step arrive in Asana without the business logic that governed task assignments, notifications, and status transitions in iPlan.

  • Asana has no native timesheet or billing module

    iPlan's timesheet and billing records derive from hours logged against tasks. Asana does not include native timesheet tracking in Starter or Advanced tiers without the paid Time Tracking add-on, and there is no billing or invoice module at any tier. We preserve timesheet hours as custom fields and flag billing records for manual reconciliation. If the customer requires ongoing time tracking, the Asana Time Tracking add-on must be purchased before migration.

  • Resource scheduling maps to workload, not a resource database

    iPlan's resource management includes an employee database with capacity scheduling and availability curves. Asana's resource view is limited to workload assignments on tasks from the Advanced tier upward, and there is no dedicated resource database or capacity forecasting. We translate iPlan resource availability to task assignment percentages and note that capacity planning with cross-project visibility requires a third-party tool or the Asana Resource Management add-on.

  • Earned-value metrics require manual rebuild in Asana dashboards

    iPlan's earned-value metrics (SPI, CPI, EAC, VAC) are preserved as custom fields on migrated Projects, but the automated variance tracking and chart visualization in iPlan's reporting module do not transfer. We export the underlying data so that Asana Dashboards can be rebuilt with equivalent charts. The rebuild requires the customer's admin to set up Asana formulas or export to a BI tool. We do not build the dashboards as part of standard migration scope.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful iPlan to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and extraction scoping

    We audit the iPlan environment through available export utilities, sample data probing, and direct customer data files. We catalog Projects, Tasks, Milestones, Resources, Timesheets, custom fields, knowledge-base articles, attachments, and workflow rules. We identify any data objects that cannot be reached through standard export paths and request direct database access or supplementary files from the customer. The discovery output is a written scope document listing every migratable object, the estimated record counts, and any extraction limitations that require customer action before migration begins.

  2. Schema design and custom field pre-creation

    We design the Asana workspace schema before any data moves. This includes creating all custom fields (numeric, text, enum, multi-enum) on the Projects and Tasks that will receive iPlan earned-value metrics, timesheet hours, and billing fields. We create the Teams that correspond to iPlan portfolio or department groupings. We document the resource-to-user email mapping and flag any iPlan resources without a corresponding Asana user for customer provisioning. Workflow rule specifications are captured in a separate automation inventory document during this phase.

  3. Dependency and milestone mapping

    We extract iPlan's task dependency chains and milestone-to-task linkages during this phase. Dependencies are recorded as predecessor-successor pairs using Asana's dependency API format. Milestone dates and associated tasks are mapped so that Asana Milestones are created against the correct parent Projects. Any circular dependency detected in the iPlan export is flagged for the customer's PMO to resolve before migration.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Asana workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's PM lead reconciles record counts (Projects in, Tasks in, Milestones in, Resources mapped, attachments uploaded), spot-checks 25-50 records against the iPlan source, and reviews the custom field values for accuracy. The automation inventory is delivered and reviewed during this phase. Any mapping corrections are made before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Projects first (as containers), then Milestones, then Tasks (with subtask nesting), then subtask attachments, then Resource assignments (resolving User by email), then custom field data (earned-value metrics, timesheet hours, billing fields), then Knowledge articles, then attachments. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next begins. The automation inventory and report data export are delivered alongside the migration.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze iPlan writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the workflow automation specification document to the customer's admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild iPlan Workflows as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

iPlan logo

iPlan

Source

Strengths

  • End-to-end project lifecycle coverage from requirements through delivery and billing.
  • Built-in earned-value metrics for tracking schedule and cost performance automatically.
  • Resource management with employee database and capacity scheduling.
  • Multi-project portfolio visibility with cross-project dependency tracking.
  • Pre-loaded editable project plan template library for rapid project initiation.

Weaknesses

  • Proprietary data export formats with limited documented API access.
  • Dated user interface compared to modern SaaS competitors.
  • Complex administration requiring dedicated IT resources for customization.
  • Limited marketplace of third-party integrations with common productivity tools.
  • Infrequent platform updates and slower feature development cycle.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across iPlan and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    iPlan: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    iPlan doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your iPlan to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about iPlan to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during iPlan to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your iPlan to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for organizations under 300 projects and 15,000 tasks with no complex earned-value metric preservation or knowledge-base scope. Migrations with large resource databases (500+ resources), timesheet archives, 20+ custom fields, or a knowledge-base migration (50+ articles) extend to seven to eleven weeks. The extraction phase is the most variable step because iPlan's limited API access means data is often pulled from export files rather than automated API calls.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from iPlan.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day