Project Management migration

Migrate from SP Project Tracker to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between SP Project Tracker and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

SP Project Tracker logo

SP Project Tracker

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between SP Project Tracker and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from SP Project Tracker to Trello is a structural migration that must account for two fundamental platform differences: SP Project Tracker has no public API so all extraction runs through CSV export, and Trello uses a Kanban board-list-card hierarchy that does not have native subtask or time-tracking objects. We begin every migration by extracting Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Time Entries, Team Members, and Attachments from SP Project Tracker's CSV exports, reconstructing subtask parent-child relationships from flat parent_task_id rows, and resolving owner assignments against the Team Members export to prevent orphaned cards. Trello Boards map from Projects, Trello Cards from Tasks, and Trello Checklist items from Subtasks. Time entries migrate as card Custom Fields (Power-Up required on Standard and above) or as checklist items with hour totals in the item name if the Custom Fields Power-Up is unavailable. We do not migrate SP Project Tracker workflows or automations; we deliver a written inventory of any configured rules for the customer's admin to rebuild in Trello Butler or a Power-Up.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

SP Project Tracker logo

SP Project Tracker

What's pushing teams away

  • No documented public API, which blocks automation and forces teams to manually export and re-enter data as the organization scales.
  • Lacks advanced project management features such as Gantt charts, resource management, or dependency tracking that growing teams eventually require.
  • Limited collaboration features compared to modern alternatives, leading teams to outgrow the platform as remote and distributed work becomes standard.
  • Performance or reliability concerns emerge at scale, with some users reporting the platform becomes sluggish with larger project portfolios.
  • Support responsiveness and product development pace lag behind faster-moving competitors, leaving customers without critical updates or fixes.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How SP Project Tracker objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a SP Project Tracker object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

SP Project Tracker

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker Projects map 1:1 to Trello Boards. Project name becomes Board name. Project description migrates to the Board description field. Project status (active, archived) maps to Board closed state in Trello: active projects become open boards, archived projects become closed boards. Project start and end dates have no native Trello Board field; if the customer requires them, we store them in the Board description or a Custom Field Power-Up (Standard tier and above). Custom fields on SP Project Tracker Projects migrate as Board-level Custom Fields if the Power-Up is enabled, or we document them as a follow-on configuration step.

SP Project Tracker

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker Tasks map 1:1 to Trello Cards within a Board. The task name becomes the card title. Task description (plain text or rich text) migrates to the card description. Task assignee maps to Trello Card Members by email cross-reference against the Team Members export. Due date maps directly to the card due date field. Priority (Low, Medium, High, Critical) maps to Trello Labels: we create labeled columns named to match the priority scheme (e.g., Priority: High with red label). The completion percentage has no native Trello card field; we either close completed cards (status = Done list) or store the percentage in a Custom Field if available.

SP Project Tracker

Subtask

maps to

Trello

Checklist Item

1:many
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker subtasks are stored as flat CSV rows with a non-null parent_task_id field. We detect subtask rows by identifying records where parent_task_id is populated, group them by parent_task_id, then create a Trello Checklist on the corresponding parent Card with each subtask name as a checklist item. Completed subtasks are marked as checked. This reconstruction is performed before any Trello card creation in dependency order: parent cards first, then subtask checklist population. If the subtask count per parent exceeds 200, we chunk the checklist creation to avoid Trello API payload limits. Trello does not support nested checklists (checklist items with their own sub-items); we flatten to one level.

SP Project Tracker

Time Entry

maps to

Trello

Custom Field or Checklist Item

lossy
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker time entries attach hours, a date, and optionally a note to a task. Trello has no native time-tracking object. On Standard tier and above with the Custom Fields Power-Up enabled, we create a Number Custom Field on each card named Total Hours and populate it with the summed time-entry hours. Individual time-entry records (date + hours + note) are stored as a structured text Custom Field named Time Log or, if that is not feasible, as a single-line checklist item with the format 'Date: HH:MM - note'. On the free tier with no Custom Fields Power-Up, time-entry totals are stored as checklist items and the customer accepts the reduced visibility of the data. We flag this constraint during scoping and the customer chooses the approach before migration begins.

SP Project Tracker

Team Member

maps to

Trello

Board Member

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker Team Members are referenced by display name and email in tasks and time entries. We extract the Team Members CSV, then resolve each assignee and owner by email match against Trello workspace members. If a Trello member with a matching email exists, we assign the card to that member. If no match exists, we create a placeholder Trello member using the email and display name and place the unresolved assignment in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision the account before final card assignment. A confirmed Owner reconciliation list is a prerequisite before the production card import phase begins.

SP Project Tracker

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker attachments are stored as file references or blobs attached to tasks or projects. We download each file using authenticated access to the SP Project Tracker file store (requiring temporary elevated credentials during the attachment phase), then upload to the corresponding Trello Card via the Trello API. File name and original URL are preserved in a card comment for audit. We validate each SP Project Tracker attachment URL resolves to a downloadable file before queuing for re-upload. Trello API limits attachment uploads to 10MB per file on the free and Standard tiers; Enterprise raises this to 250MB. Files exceeding the destination tier limit are flagged and held for customer decision (compress, skip, or upgrade). We log any orphaned attachments where the parent task or project no longer exists.

SP Project Tracker

Comment

maps to

Trello

Card Comment

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker task comments migrate as Trello Card comments, preserving the comment body and the original author display name and timestamp. Trello comments are flat (no threaded nesting); SP Project Tracker comment threading is flattened to chronological order. If the comment references a subtask or attachment by internal ID, we replace the ID with the migrated Trello Card or checklist link. Comments on archived tasks migrate to the corresponding closed Trello Card with the original timestamp preserved.

SP Project Tracker

Tag

maps to

Trello

Label

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker tags are flat string labels applied to tasks. Each unique tag becomes a Trello Label on the Board, with a color auto-assigned by Trello or specified by the customer during scoping. Tag names with spaces or special characters are slugified to Trello label-safe format. A label named after the original tag is applied to the corresponding Trello Card. If the customer has defined a color convention for tags (e.g., red for blockers, green for features), we replicate it as label colors on the Board. Tags that exist on no cards after migration are pruned from the Board label list.

SP Project Tracker

Custom Field

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker custom fields are stored as key-value property bags at the project or task level. We extract all distinct key-value pairs, identify the destination field type (text, number, date, checkbox, dropdown), and configure the corresponding Custom Field on the Trello Board via the Custom Fields Power-Up API. This Power-Up is available from Trello Standard tier ($5 per user per month); the free tier does not support Custom Fields. During scoping we confirm whether the customer has Standard or above and whether the Custom Fields Power-Up is installed. Custom fields without a Trello equivalent are stored as structured text fields or documented as unmapped properties requiring post-migration manual entry.

SP Project Tracker

Project Status

maps to

Trello

Board Closed State

lossy
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker project status values (active, on hold, completed, archived) have no direct Trello Board equivalent. We map active and on-hold projects to open Boards, completed and archived projects to closed Boards. The customer confirms the status-to-state mapping during scoping. If the customer uses additional status values (e.g., planning, review), we apply a default mapping (planning = open, review = open) and flag any unmapped statuses for manual review after migration.

SP Project Tracker

Task Status

maps to

Trello

List Position

lossy
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker task completion status (percentage complete, open, closed) maps to Trello card list membership and closed state. Tasks at 100% complete migrate to the Board list named Done, To Review, or Closed (customer-configured). Tasks under 100% complete migrate to list positions within the active workflow lists. We extract the list names from the destination Trello Board during scoping and confirm the mapping with the customer's admin before migration begins. If the source task has a deadline and the destination Board has a Calendar Power-Up, due-date labels are visible on the calendar view.

SP Project Tracker

Activity Log

maps to

Trello

Card Actions

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker records task-level activity history (status changes, assignment changes, comment activity). Trello Card actions are automatically recorded by the platform (card moved, card archived, member added, due date set). We do not migrate the historical activity log as structured records. However, we preserve significant state changes as Trello Card comments with a 'Migrated from SP Project Tracker:' prefix and the original timestamp, giving future reviewers a chronological audit trail without relying on Trello's native action log. Card creation and modification timestamps reflect migration time, not the original SP Project Tracker creation date.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

SP Project Tracker logo

SP Project Tracker gotchas

High

No public API requires export-first migration

High

Owner assignment drops during bulk CSV export

Medium

Attachment URLs become inaccessible after export

Medium

Subtask hierarchy flattened in CSV output

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • No SP Project Tracker API means export-first extraction

    SP Project Tracker publishes no public REST API or documented export endpoints. Every migration must begin with CSV exports of Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Time Entries, Team Members, and Attachments pulled independently. We reconcile cross-references (task-to-project, subtask-to-parent, time-entry-to-task) in our staging environment before any Trello board creation. If the customer has more than 50,000 rows across exports, we chunk the data into staged passes and validate referential integrity at each pass. The absence of an API also means there is no way to run a delta sync after initial extraction; we freeze SP Project Tracker writes during the cutover window and run one final export to capture any last-minute changes.

  • Assignee field drops email and ID in bulk CSV export

    SP Project Tracker's CSV export of Tasks sometimes renders the owner or assignee field as a display name only, without an associated email address or user ID. This makes deterministic matching against Trello workspace members unreliable. We detect unresolved assignee names by comparing the exported assignee against the Team Members export (which does include email) and flag each one. Customers must confirm user mapping decisions before we commit card assignments in Trello. Tasks landing with no confirmed assignee are placed in an unassigned queue; the customer's admin resolves them after migration. This step routinely adds one to two days to the project timeline and must not be skipped.

  • Trello free tier caps boards at 10 per Workspace

    The Trello free plan limits each Workspace to 10 boards. SP Project Tracker customers with more than 10 active projects will exceed this limit immediately after migration. We flag any customer with more than 8 source projects during scoping to allow time for Trello Standard tier upgrade ($5 per user per month) before migration begins. Trello Standard and above have no per-Workspace board limit. The upgrade decision affects pricing and must be confirmed before the Board creation phase.

  • Time entries have no native Trello destination

    SP Project Tracker natively stores time entries with hours, dates, and notes per task. Trello has no native time-tracking object. On Trello Standard and above with the Custom Fields Power-Up, we store hours totals as Number Custom Fields and individual entries as structured text. On the free tier with no Custom Fields Power-Up, time-entry data must be stored as checklist items or dropped with a documented exclusion list. We confirm the destination tier and Power-Up availability during scoping so that the customer can upgrade if needed before migration. Time-entry data that the customer considers non-negotiable must be flagged before we begin; we cannot retroactively add Custom Fields Power-Up data after the migration window.

  • Subtask hierarchy flattens in SP Project Tracker CSV export

    SP Project Tracker exports subtasks as a flat list of rows, each containing a parent_task_id column that references the owning task. Trello has no cross-card parent-child hierarchy; subtasks map to checklist items on the parent card only. We detect subtask rows by checking for non-null parent_task_id values, reconstruct the hierarchy in memory, create the parent Trello Cards first, then populate each parent's checklist with the child subtask items. Completed subtasks are marked checked. Trello checklists do not support nested items; any subtask that has its own children in the source flattens to one level. We validate the reconstructed checklist counts against the source subtask row count before closing the migration and flag any parent_task_id references that point to tasks that were not exported.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful SP Project Tracker to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and CSV export

    We request CSV exports of all SP Project Tracker object types: Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Time Entries, Team Members, Attachments, and Tags. We audit the row counts, identify any empty or malformed exports, and check for the presence of the parent_task_id column in the subtask export. We confirm the SP Project Tracker Workspace or instance URL for attachment access and request temporary elevated credentials for the attachment download phase. We also confirm the destination Trello Workspace URL and verify the Trello tier and Custom Fields Power-Up installation during this phase. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object type, user reconciliation list, and a go/no-go decision on time-entry handling based on Trello tier.

  2. User reconciliation and Trello member mapping

    We extract the distinct assignee and owner names from the Tasks export and cross-reference them against the Team Members export (which includes email) and against the Trello Workspace member list. We produce a reconciliation spreadsheet with three columns: SP Project Tracker display name, resolved email, Trello member match (found/not found). For each unresolved name, we either ask the customer's admin to provision a Trello account with the matching email or ask the admin to confirm a manual reassignment to an existing Trello member. We do not begin card import until the reconciliation list is fully confirmed. This step typically takes one to two business days depending on how many team members need provisioning.

  3. Trello Board and list structure creation

    We create Trello Boards from SP Project Tracker Projects in dependency order: Boards first, then Lists (workflow stages such as To Do, In Progress, Done), then Board-level Labels. We apply the customer's confirmed list name mapping during this phase. If the destination Trello Workspace has existing boards, we confirm naming conventions to avoid conflicts. Board-level Custom Fields are created if the Custom Fields Power-Up is installed. Lists are created in the customer's specified order; Trello does not natively enforce a fixed list sequence, but Butler rules can be configured post-migration to enforce list flow.

  4. Card import with parent-card-first sequencing

    We import Trello Cards in two passes. The first pass creates all parent cards (tasks with no parent_task_id) with title, description, due date, member assignment (from the confirmed user list), label application, and URL attachment (downloaded from SP Project Tracker). The second pass, which runs after the first pass completes and all card IDs are confirmed in Trello, adds Checklist items to each parent card by matching subtask parent_task_id to the Trello card ID. Time entries are added as Custom Fields (if Power-Up is available) or as checklist items (if not). Each pass emits a row-count reconciliation report. Cards with unresolved assignees are created in a dedicated Unassigned list for post-migration manual assignment.

  5. Attachment download and Trello re-upload

    We download attachments from SP Project Tracker using authenticated access, validate each URL resolves to a downloadable file, and log any broken or inaccessible URLs. We then upload each file to the corresponding Trello Card via the Trello API attachment endpoint. Files exceeding the destination tier size limit (10MB free/Standard, 250MB Enterprise) are flagged and held. A card comment is added to each card with an attachment migration log noting the original file name, source URL, and upload timestamp. Orphaned attachments (parent task deleted before migration) are logged to a separate report and excluded from upload.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze SP Project Tracker writes during the cutover window, run a final delta export to capture any last-minute changes, and apply them to the destination Trello boards. We perform a final reconciliation pass comparing source record counts to destination card, checklist, attachment, and comment counts. We deliver a written migration report with record counts, unmapped objects, and any data excluded due to size or format constraints. We also deliver a written automation inventory: SP Project Tracker workflows, rules, or automations are documented with their trigger, conditions, and actions, with Trello Butler equivalents noted where applicable. We do not rebuild SP Project Tracker automations as Trello Butler rules; that is a separate engagement. We offer a 5-business-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

SP Project Tracker logo

SP Project Tracker

Source

Strengths

  • Native SharePoint/Office 365 deployment means data lives inside the customer tenant — backups, security, and compliance inherit from Microsoft 365 rather than a separate SaaS vendor.
  • No-code, fully customisable by SharePoint power users — lists, views, and templates are SharePoint primitives so admins can extend the data model without buying developer time.
  • Perpetual licence option ($1,500 for a single site with unlimited users) is cheaper at scale than per-user SaaS PMs for organisations already running SharePoint on-premise.
  • Multiple views (Gantt, Task, Activities, Status, Super View) and reusable project templates support both rollup and drill-down without switching tools.
  • Collaboration artefacts (documents, discussions, email correspondence) attach directly to projects through standard SharePoint integrations, leveraging Outlook and Teams that the org already runs.

Weaknesses

  • Tied to SharePoint — customers on Google Workspace, Notion, or pure-SaaS PM stacks cannot adopt it.
  • Feature ceiling is the SharePoint list model; teams needing complex dependencies, resource levelling, or portfolio-grade reporting outgrow it.
  • No public REST API beyond what SharePoint itself exposes; integrations rely on Microsoft Graph / SharePoint REST against the underlying lists, not a SP-Project-Tracker-specific endpoint.
  • Limited public review footprint compared with Microsoft Project, Smartsheet, Asana, or Monday.
  • Power-user customisation power cuts both ways — without governance, each project site drifts to its own field set, complicating cross-project reporting and migrations.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 5 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across SP Project Tracker and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    5 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    SP Project Tracker: Bounded by SharePoint and Microsoft Graph throttling policies (per-tenant resource units; documented by Microsoft). SP Project Tracker itself imposes no separate quota..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    SP Project Tracker exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your SP Project Tracker to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about SP Project Tracker to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during SP Project Tracker to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your SP Project Tracker to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations with fewer than 3,000 tasks, 10 projects, and clean CSV exports typically complete in two to three weeks. Migrations with high subtask density, more than 500 attachments, user reconciliation queues exceeding 20 unresolved names, or time-entry-to-custom-field conversion work extend to four to six weeks. The user reconciliation step alone routinely adds one to two days because SP Project Tracker CSV exports sometimes drop email addresses from the assignee field, requiring manual confirmation from the customer before we can assign Trello card members.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from SP Project Tracker.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day