Project Management migration

Migrate from .STUDIO to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between .STUDIO and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

.STUDIO logo

.STUDIO

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

80%

8 of 10

objects map 1:1 between .STUDIO and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from .STUDIO to Jira is a structural migration that restructures the way work is organized. .STUDIO uses a Client-Project hierarchy where projects contain task lists and time trackers; Jira uses Projects as top-level containers holding Issues (Stories, Tasks, Bugs, Epics) organized into Sprints or Kanban boards. We map .STUDIO projects directly to Jira projects, .STUDIO tasks to Jira issues, and .STUDIO clients to a custom Client field on Jira issues or a dedicated client project for cross-project reference. Time entries carry over as Worklog records with the rounding behavior explicitly checked during scoping because .STUDIO defaults to 6-minute increments while Jira stores raw seconds. Custom fields require pre-migration schema alignment because .STUDIO's per-workspace custom field definitions do not map to Jira's project-context custom field model without explicit field-type translation. Workflows, automations, and project templates do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Jira's workflow designer.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

.STUDIO logo

.STUDIO

What's pushing teams away

  • Customers expecting a PM tool will find Studio.com is not a PM product, requiring re-discovery of the actual vendor.
  • Consumer-coaching positioning is misaligned with B2B PM evaluation criteria typically applied in this catalog.
  • No published pricing, API documentation, or enterprise feature set on the studio.com property.
  • Limited public review footprint as a workplace tool — most public mentions are of consumer-app reviews.
  • If the customer migrates to or from a true PM product called .STUDIO, that vendor's documentation must be sourced separately.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How .STUDIO objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a .STUDIO object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

.STUDIO

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

.STUDIO projects map directly to Jira projects as the top-level container. The project name, description, status, start date, and end date transfer as standard Jira project metadata. Each Jira project requires a project template (Scrum Software, Kanban Software, or Business) selected during schema setup; we map the customer's .STUDIO project type to the nearest Jira template during scoping. Projects with multiple task lists may be split into multiple Jira projects if the customer uses separate projects for distinct workflows rather than a single project with issue types.

.STUDIO

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue (Story, Task, Bug)

1:1
Fully supported

.STUDIO tasks map to Jira issues of the appropriate type. We use a configurable mapping: tasks with a story-like description (client deliverables, milestones) map to Jira Story; tasks with a clear action item map to Jira Task; tasks flagged as bugs map to Jira Bug. Assignee, due date, estimated hours, status, and description migrate directly. Jira's Summary field takes the task name; Description takes the task body with basic formatting preserved. Parent-child task hierarchy in .STUDIO maps to Jira's subtask or linked issue model depending on the depth.

.STUDIO

Client

maps to

Jira

Custom Field (Client) or Project

lossy
Fully supported

.STUDIO clients are separate records linked to projects. Jira has no native client object, so we create a custom field (Client__c or labeled as Client) on the Jira project and populate it with the client company name or contact name from .STUDIO. For cross-project client reference, we create a dedicated Jira project named after the client and link all client-related issues to it via issue links. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping. Client contact details (email, phone, address) are stored as custom fields on the client-linked issue or in a Confluence space configured as the client extranet.

.STUDIO

Time Entry

maps to

Jira

Worklog

1:1
Fully supported

Time entries in .STUDIO map to Jira Worklog records on the migrated issues. Each worklog carries the original duration (converted from .STUDIO's 0.1-hour increments to seconds for Jira's raw-second format), the date, the user who logged the time, and the notes field. We flag the rounding behavior during scoping: .STUDIO rounds to the nearest 6-minute increment by default, while Jira stores raw seconds. The customer chooses whether to preserve the rounded values or re-import raw durations if the source platform supports it. Billable flag and hourly rate from .STUDIO do not map to Jira native fields; we store them as custom fields on the worklog or the issue for downstream billing integration.

.STUDIO

Team Member / User

maps to

Jira

User

1:1
Fully supported

User records from .STUDIO (name, email, role, hourly rate) map to Jira users. We match by email against the Jira destination site's user directory. Users without a matching Jira account go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import. Hourly rate migrates as a custom field on the Jira user profile (if the Jira Workforce Management app is in use) or remains as a custom field on the project for reference. Jira requires an active user license for each assignee; we flag any inactive .STUDIO users so the admin can choose whether to provision a Jira account.

.STUDIO

Custom Field

maps to

Jira

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

.STUDIO per-workspace custom field definitions vary across the platform, including text, number, date, dropdown, and multi-select types. We read the active custom field schema at .STUDIO export time and generate a field map before migration begins. Jira custom fields are configured per project with an issue-type context, so we pre-create the Jira custom field with the matching type (Text Field, Number Field, Date Picker, Select List, Labels for multi-select). Formula fields or cross-field dependencies from .STUDIO do not map directly; we store the computed value as a static custom field and note that Jira Automation or a post-migration script can reproduce the formula logic.

.STUDIO

Tag

maps to

Jira

Labels

1:1
Fully supported

Tags in .STUDIO are flat string labels applied to tasks and projects. Jira's Labels field accepts multiple labels as a text array, so we split comma-separated .STUDIO tags and upsert them as Jira labels. Labels that represent a category rather than a free-text tag can be mapped to a Jira Select List (single-choice) or Labels field (multi-choice) depending on the use case, decided during scoping. Jira labels are project-scoped by default; global labels require the Labels SM app or equivalent.

.STUDIO

Attachment

maps to

Jira

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

File attachments from .STUDIO are exported with their parent record context (filename, URL, size, MIME type). We re-attach files to the migrated Jira issue using the Jira REST API's attachment endpoint. Files over 10MB or unsupported MIME types (executable files, certain binary formats) are flagged during the manifest review and excluded from the automated migration; the customer receives a manifest of excluded files for manual handling. Jira Cloud has a 10MB attachment limit per file; Jira Data Center allows configurable limits up to 50MB.

.STUDIO

Comment

maps to

Jira

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Task comments in .STUDIO migrate to Jira issue comments with author, timestamp, and text body preserved. Jira's comment format accepts plain text and basic wiki-style formatting. If .STUDIO comments contain @-mentions or formatted blocks, we convert them to plain text with the mention preserved as a text reference. Comment threading in .STUDIO (if present) is flattened into sequential comments on the Jira issue. Rich media attachments within comments are exported separately and re-attached to the issue.

.STUDIO

Template

maps to

Jira

Project Template

lossy
Fully supported

Project and task templates from .STUDIO store the template structure (task names, descriptions, estimated hours, assignee roles) as reusable blueprints. We export the template schema as a structured JSON manifest rather than populating Jira project templates, because Jira's built-in project templates (Scrum, Kanban, Bug Tracking) differ architecturally. The manifest lists each template with its tasks, custom fields, and default values so the customer's admin can use Jira's project template feature or a third-party template app (Structure for Jira, Project Template for Jira) to recreate the blueprint.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

.STUDIO logo

.STUDIO gotchas

High

API lacks bulk export endpoint

Medium

Project budget fields are not always populated

Medium

Custom field schema varies per workspace

Low

Time entry rounding behavior differs between platforms

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • .STUDIO lacks a bulk export API

    .STUDIO exposes a REST API for individual record CRUD but does not offer a bulk export or batch endpoint. We paginate through records sequentially with cursor-based pagination and configurable page sizes. For workspaces with thousands of tasks, this causes long export windows, and rate-limited responses during the export phase require retry logic. We implement exponential backoff and chunked extraction to handle this. Jira's import side is straightforward via REST API or CSV; the bottleneck is entirely on the .STUDIO export side. Customers should plan for extended export time on large workspaces.

  • Jira workflow and issue type schemes require pre-configuration

    Jira projects use three layered schemes that must be configured before data import: Issue Type Scheme (which issue types are available), Workflow Scheme (which workflows apply to which issue types), and Screen Scheme (which fields display during creation and editing). Importing issues before these schemes are in place causes issues to appear with incorrect types, blank fields, or validation errors. We configure all three schemes in a Jira Sandbox before production migration, match them to the migrated issue type mapping, and validate that the issue types appear correctly in the project before cutover.

  • Sprint and backlog history does not carry over

    .STUDIO does not expose a Sprint concept, so task lists and task groupings are the only work-organization structure available. When migrating to Jira, the customer's task lists map to the Jira project's initial backlog rather than a reconstructed sprint history. If the customer has been tracking time-boxed work periods in .STUDIO (even informally), we note this in the scoping manifest and advise that Jira Sprint history begins fresh on day one. Teams that need historical velocity data should set a baseline sprint velocity in Jira during the first sprint rather than trying to backfill it from .STUDIO data.

  • Custom field type translation loses formula and dependency logic

    .STUDIO custom fields include formula fields referencing other custom fields and conditional display logic that Jira cannot natively reproduce. Jira's custom fields are key-value data fields without cross-field formulas or conditional visibility rules (those require Jira Automation or third-party apps like ScriptRunner). We read the .STUDIO custom field schema at export time and flag any formula fields. For formula fields, we compute the static value at migration time and store it in a plain-text Jira custom field, with a note that the customer can rebuild the formula logic using Jira Automation or a post-migration script if needed.

  • Comments with rich media and threading do not fully translate

    .STUDIO task comments may contain @-mentions, formatted text blocks, embedded images, and threaded replies. Jira comments accept plain text and basic wiki formatting. Embedded images are exported as separate file attachments and re-attached to the issue. @-mentions are preserved as text strings rather than active Jira user links unless the mentioned user has a Jira account and the mention is re-resolved post-migration. Threaded comment structures are flattened into sequential comments. Customers receive a comment migration manifest noting which comments had rich content and what was lost in the translation so they can decide whether manual reconstruction is necessary.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful .STUDIO to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the .STUDIO workspace across projects, tasks, clients, time entries, custom field definitions, team members, and attachment volume. We identify the Jira destination site and edition (Jira Software Standard at $7.91/user, or Data Center for on-premise compliance requirements). The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing every object to migrate, the Jira project structure (one Jira project per .STUDIO project or a consolidated structure), the custom field map, the time entry rounding decision, and the client-field strategy. We also flag any .STUDIO templates, automations, or workflows for the customer's admin to rebuild.

  2. Jira schema configuration

    We configure Jira before any data moves. This includes creating the Jira projects (mapped from .STUDIO projects), configuring the Issue Type Scheme with Story, Task, Bug, and Epic types, setting up the Workflow Scheme with the default Jira software workflow, creating custom fields that mirror .STUDIO's custom field schema with appropriate Jira field types, and configuring the Screen Scheme to display the correct fields during issue creation and editing. We configure this in a Jira Sandbox first for validation, then deploy to production. The Jira admin grants the migration user the necessary permissions (Browse Projects, Create Issues, Edit Issues, Worklog) before we begin the migration run.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the Jira Sandbox using production-like data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (Projects in, Issues in, Worklogs in, Comments in), spot-checks 25-50 random issues against the .STUDIO source for field accuracy and attachment presence, and validates that the Jira issue types, workflows, and custom fields appear correctly. Any mapping corrections are documented and applied to the production migration script before the live run. The sandbox run also surfaces any Jira permission gaps or validation rule rejections that need admin adjustment.

  4. User provisioning and owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct .STUDIO team member referenced on tasks, time entries, and comments and match by email against the Jira destination site's user directory. Users without a matching Jira account are listed in a reconciliation queue. The customer's Jira admin provisions the missing users and assigns the appropriate Jira product access (Jira Software, Jira Service Management, or both). Migration cannot proceed past this step for tasks that have assignee references, because Jira requires a valid user for the Assignee field on issue creation.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in dependency order: Jira Projects and Issue Type Scheme (schema deployed), then Users (provisioned, not migrated), then Issues (Tasks, Stories, Bugs) with AssigneeId, Due Date, and custom fields resolved, then Worklogs linked to the migrated issues, then Comments, then Attachments via the Jira attachment API, then Labels mapped from .STUDIO tags. Custom fields from .STUDIO formulas are computed as static values and inserted as plain-text Jira custom fields. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze .STUDIO writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then mark Jira as the system of record. We validate the final record counts, spot-check 10-20 issues for data integrity, and deliver the Template Inventory document listing every .STUDIO template with its structure for manual recreation. We do not rebuild .STUDIO automations or workflows as Jira workflows inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task. We support a five-business-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised during the first week of Jira use.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

.STUDIO logo

.STUDIO

Source

Strengths

  • All-in-one workspace combining project boards, time tracking, and client management
  • Clean interface purpose-built for creative and design agencies
  • Includes built-in invoicing and proposal tools for client-facing work
  • Supports resource planning with team availability and capacity views
  • Offers white-labeling options for agencies delivering client portals

Weaknesses

  • Limited native integrations compared to mainstream PM tools
  • API documentation is sparse, making custom integrations difficult
  • Mobile app features lag behind the web experience
  • Reporting and analytics are basic without advanced BI export
  • No built-in resource management beyond simple capacity views
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across .STUDIO and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    .STUDIO: Not applicable.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    .STUDIO doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your .STUDIO to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about .STUDIO to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during .STUDIO to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your .STUDIO to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 5,000 tasks, 500 projects, and no complex custom field schemas. Migrations with large time entry histories (over 50,000 worklogs), elaborate custom field definitions, or multiple Jira projects with distinct issue type schemes move to seven to twelve weeks because of Jira scheme configuration, custom field type translation, and Sandbox validation cycles. The Jira export side (.STUDIO's lack of a bulk API) adds overhead that increases with record volume.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from .STUDIO.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day