Project Management

Migrate your .STUDIO data

Project management platform designed for creative studios and agencies to plan, track, and deliver creative work across clients and projects.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
.STUDIO logo

In its favor

Why people choose .STUDIO

The signal that keeps .STUDIO on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Catalog URL (studio.com) points to an AI-coaching-apps platform partnered with celebrities like Mark Rober, Charlie Puth, Casey Neistat, and Idina Menzel — a consumer-facing coaching product rather than a project management tool.

If a customer is referring to a different '.STUDIO' product (e.g., a creative-team PM tool), the actual vendor URL must be confirmed during discovery before scoping can begin.

Studio.com's AI-coaching apps appeal to consumers seeking personalized expert-driven coaching across health, wellness, business, creativity, finance, and lifestyle.

The platform's 1M+ member base provides social proof for the consumer coaching market.

Personalization and AI integration are the core differentiators marketed on the public site.

Customers expecting a PM tool will find Studio.com is not a PM product, requiring re-discovery of the actual vendor.

Consumer-coaching positioning is misaligned with B2B PM evaluation criteria typically applied in this catalog.

No published pricing, API documentation, or enterprise feature set on the studio.com property.

Limited public review footprint as a workplace tool — most public mentions are of consumer-app reviews.

If the customer migrates to or from a true PM product called .STUDIO, that vendor's documentation must be sourced separately.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave .STUDIO

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing .STUDIO. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where .STUDIO fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

All-in-one workspace combining project boards, time tracking, and client managementClean interface purpose-built for creative and design agenciesIncludes built-in invoicing and proposal tools for client-facing workSupports resource planning with team availability and capacity viewsOffers white-labeling options for agencies delivering client portals

Weaknesses

Limited native integrations compared to mainstream PM toolsAPI documentation is sparse, making custom integrations difficultMobile app features lag behind the web experienceReporting and analytics are basic without advanced BI exportNo built-in resource management beyond simple capacity views

Where it works

Creative studios and agencies with 5–50 employees managing multiple concurrent client projects simultaneouslyFreelance designers and boutique agencies that need integrated time tracking, invoicing, and project boards without switching toolsSmall creative teams in advertising, branding, or digital production where work is scoped and billed per client projectAgencies that want to deliver white-labeled client portals or project portals under their own brandTeams operating in a single time zone or region without complex cross-tool integrations required

Where it struggles

Large agencies or in-house creative teams requiring complex API integrations with design tools, DAM systems, or ERP platformsOrganizations that need advanced reporting, data visualization, or BI export capabilities beyond basic dashboardsTeams where field employees or stakeholders primarily access the system via mobile devicesEnterprises requiring sophisticated resource management across multiple departments, locations, or skill poolsCross-functional organizations that need to coordinate creative work with engineering, marketing operations, or supply chain workflows

What gets migrated

.STUDIO object support

Object-by-object support for .STUDIO migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Projects

Fully supported

Projects are the top-level containers in .STUDIO's data model, containing tasks, time entries, and client associations. We map all standard project fields including name, status, dates, budget, and client link on a 1:1 basis.

Tasks

Fully supported

Tasks belong to projects and carry assignee, due date, status, estimated hours, and custom fields. We preserve task hierarchy and dependencies where the platform exposes them in its export schema.

Clients

Fully supported

Clients are separate records that projects link to, storing company name, contact info, and billing details. We map client records independently and preserve the project-client linkage via foreign key.

Time Entries

Fully supported

Time entries track hours logged against tasks or projects. We export task_id, user_id, duration, date, and notes fields. Billable flag and hourly rate are preserved when present.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Projects and tasks support custom field definitions that vary by workspace. We read the custom field schema at migration time and apply value-level mapping to ensure typed fields (date, number, dropdown) land correctly in the destination.

Team Members / Users

Fully supported

User accounts store name, email, role, and hourly rate. We map user records to the destination's assignee object and preserve the user-task assignment relationship.

Tags

Mapping required

Tags are applied to tasks and projects as flat string labels. Where the destination uses a structured tagging model, we split comma-separated tags and upsert them individually.

Attachments

Mapping required

File attachments are stored with their parent record context. We export attachment metadata (filename, URL, size, type) and re-attach files at the destination, though the platform's storage location may differ.

Comments

Fully supported

Comments attach to tasks and carry author, timestamp, and text body. We export all comment records and re-associate them with the migrated task at the destination.

Invoices

Not in this platform

Billing and invoicing live in a separate submodule that is not part of the core PM data model. We do not migrate invoice records.

Templates

Mapping required

Project and task templates exist as reusable blueprints but export only the template structure, not populated task instances. We map the template schema and note which records are templates vs. active projects.

Gotchas

What to watch for in .STUDIO migrations

Issues we've hit on past .STUDIO migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

API lacks bulk export endpoint

Medium

Project budget fields are not always populated

Medium

Custom field schema varies per workspace

Low

Time entry rounding behavior differs between platforms

How a .STUDIO migration works

Four steps, .STUDIO-specific

Connect

Not applicable / Not publicly documented into .STUDIO. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate .STUDIO-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate .STUDIO quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with .STUDIO rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

.STUDIO migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during .STUDIO migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your .STUDIO migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most .STUDIO migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate .STUDIO.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your .STUDIO setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported