Project Management migration

Migrate from Artemis 7 to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Artemis 7 and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Artemis 7 logo

Artemis 7

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Artemis 7 and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Artemis 7 to Microsoft Project is a data-only migration with two compounding challenges: there is no public API on the source side, so we extract from structured export files, and Artemis 7 custom fields are defined per-project rather than globally, requiring consolidation before they can load into Microsoft Project's project-level custom field model. We reconstruct parent-child task hierarchies using summary tasks and WBS codes, convert resource allocation percentages to hours against project calendars, and map Gantt dependencies to Microsoft Project's dependency types with explicit customer confirmation on any non-standard types. Attachment URLs are not portable and are delivered as a flag list for manual re-upload. We do not migrate workflows, reporting templates, or SharePoint task list configurations; these are delivered as a written handoff inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild. Most migrations complete in two to three weeks for straightforward portfolios and six to ten weeks for enterprise-scale multi-project structures.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Artemis 7 logo

Artemis 7

What's pushing teams away

  • Customers migrate to modern PPM platforms (Planview, Broadcom Clarity, ChangePoint, Smartsheet, Monday) when their Aurea entitlement leaves them on legacy versions without compelling new-feature releases.
  • Aurea's acquisition model concentrates many legacy enterprise tools into one portfolio and customers report concerns about long-term roadmap investment in any single product line.
  • No publicly indexed API documentation, complicating integration with modern devops and finance toolchains.
  • Sales-led pricing with no published tiers makes it hard to benchmark cost against newer per-user PPM vendors.
  • Limited public review footprint (very few G2/Capterra reviews and minimal community discussion) makes peer due diligence difficult.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Artemis 7 objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Artemis 7 object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Artemis 7

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Projects map directly to Microsoft Project plan files (.mpp) or Project Online/Project for the Web projects. The Project Name, description, status, start date, and finish date transfer as core plan properties. For Project Online and Project for the Web, we create the project first and use the project ID as the parent reference for all subordinate records.

Artemis 7

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Tasks map to Microsoft Project Tasks with the parent-child hierarchy reconstructed using summary tasks and WBS codes. Subtasks with a parent reference in Artemis 7 become child tasks under the corresponding summary task in Microsoft Project. Task Name, Start, Finish, Duration, Percent Complete, and Priority migrate directly. We flag any Artemis 7 tasks with missing start dates for manual date assignment during migration review.

Artemis 7

Milestone

maps to

Microsoft Project

Milestone Task

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Milestones map to Microsoft Project Tasks with Duration set to zero days, which automatically displays them as milestone diamonds on the Gantt chart. The milestone name and due date transfer to Task Name and Finish Date respectively. Milestone-level custom fields map to Microsoft Project task custom fields.

Artemis 7

Resource

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Resource records contain user name, role, and availability expressed as a percentage. Microsoft Project uses hours-based resource capacity calculated from the project calendar. We apply a ratio-based conversion using the project's working calendar: an Artemis 7 resource assigned at 50 percent availability to a 40-hour task becomes 20 hours of assignment in Microsoft Project. We flag any resources without a named User assignment for the customer's admin to provision in the resource sheet.

Artemis 7

Task Assignment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 task assignments (task tied to a resource) map to Microsoft Project Assignments with Work (hours) calculated from the Artemis 7 allocation percentage and task duration. Assignment start and finish dates derive from the parent task schedule. We use the project calendar to convert Artemis 7 allocation percentages to Microsoft Project hours so that resource leveling in the destination produces correct results.

Artemis 7

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment Actual Work

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Time Entries record hours logged against a task and user. We map them to Microsoft Project Assignment Actual Work. Billable flags and billing rates in Artemis 7 require explicit customer confirmation because Microsoft Project does not have native billing rate fields; these values can map to custom fields on the assignment or task if the customer has a custom field slot available.

Artemis 7

Custom Field

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Artemis 7 custom fields exist per-project and are not centrally managed. This is the most common source of migration errors. We consolidate all unique custom field names across active projects, flag duplicate field names with conflicting data types for customer resolution, and map each to a Microsoft Project custom field. The customer confirms the target field name and type during scoping before any load begins.

Artemis 7

Gantt Dependency

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 stores task dependencies as relationship metadata (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish). Microsoft Project supports the same four dependency types with explicit start-variant and finish-variant options for FS and FF. We map each Artemis 7 dependency type to its Microsoft Project equivalent and flag any unsupported relationship types with a severity note. Finish-to-Start is the default when an Artemis 7 dependency type cannot be determined.

Artemis 7

Attachment URL

maps to

Microsoft Project

Flag List (Manual Re-Upload Required)

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 stores file attachments as URLs pointing to its own internal file service. These URLs expire or break when a user account is deprovisioned. We do not include attachment URLs in the migrated dataset. We deliver a structured flag list of all attachment references with the owning project, task, and file name so the customer's admin can manually re-upload to Microsoft Project's document attachment feature or a linked SharePoint document library.

Artemis 7

Risk Register

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Custom Fields or Flag List

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 risk and issue records contain name, description, owner, likelihood, impact, and status fields. Microsoft Project does not have a native risk object, so risks map to task-level notes or to a custom fields block on the project summary task if the customer defines risk tracking fields. We deliver risks and issues as a structured CSV alongside the migration for the customer's admin to recreate in their preferred risk tracking tool or within Microsoft Project custom fields.

Artemis 7

Calendar

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Calendar

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 project calendars define working days and hours that drive task scheduling. We map these to Microsoft Project Calendars attached to the project plan. Non-standard working patterns (compressed weeks, part-time resources) convert to Microsoft Project calendar exception entries. Standard Monday-Friday 9am-5pm calendars require no conversion.

Artemis 7

Baseline Data

maps to

Microsoft Project

Baseline Fields

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 baselines are stored as portfolio-level snapshots and may not expose individual task baseline fields in a portable format. We map whatever baseline fields are present in the export (baseline start, baseline finish, baseline cost) to Microsoft Project BL1 baseline fields and flag the remainder for customer review. If no structured baseline export is available, we document this gap in the handoff inventory.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Artemis 7 logo

Artemis 7 gotchas

High

No documented public API for Artemis 7

High

Attachment URLs are platform-bound and non-portable

Medium

Custom fields are per-project, not global

Low

Minimal review footprint limits evidence base

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Artemis 7 has no documented public API

    Our research found no API endpoint, API key management, or developer documentation for Artemis 7 PM. All data extraction requires structured CSV exports or manual report generation from the Artemis 7 interface. We ask customers to provide a full export during scoping, validate column header consistency across pages, and warn them if exports from different projects use different field names for the same data. Inconsistencies between exports are the primary source of data loss risk in this migration pair.

  • Custom fields are per-project in Artemis 7

    Unlike platforms with a global custom field registry, Artemis 7 allows custom fields to be defined independently per project. During scoping we ask the customer to identify all active projects and consolidate unique custom field names across them. The most common issue is duplicate field names with different data types across projects—for example, a custom field called Priority stored as text in Project A and as a number in Project B. We flag these conflicts for customer resolution before any data loads into Microsoft Project.

  • Attachment URLs are platform-bound and non-portable

    Artemis 7 stores file attachments as URLs referencing its own internal file storage. These URLs break when the Artemis 7 instance is decommissioned or when user accounts are deprovisioned. We do not include attachment URLs in the migrated dataset. We deliver a structured list of every attachment reference with project name, task name, and file name so the customer's admin can re-upload to Microsoft Project's native attachment feature or a linked SharePoint document library.

  • Dependency types require explicit customer confirmation

    Artemis 7 stores Gantt dependencies with relationship metadata. Microsoft Project supports Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, and Start-to-Finish with explicit start or finish variants. Non-standard or unknown dependency types from Artemis 7 require customer confirmation on how to map them before migration. We provide a pre-migration dependency audit report and ask the customer to approve the mapping for any non-Finish-to-Start dependencies before cutover.

  • Microsoft Project file version compatibility must be confirmed

    Microsoft Project saves files in versioned MPP formats. Project Professional 2019 and later cannot open files saved by Project 2013 or earlier without compatibility pack installation. If the customer is migrating to an older Microsoft Project version, we confirm the file save format during scoping. For cloud destinations (Project Online, Project for the Web), this is not a concern because they use a different data store.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Artemis 7 to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and export extraction

    We audit the source Artemis 7 environment across all active projects, collecting the project list, task hierarchy depth, resource count, custom field definitions per project, time entry volume, and dependency types. We then extract structured export files and validate column header consistency across all project exports. Any inconsistencies trigger a remediation request before the mapping phase begins. This phase typically takes one to two weeks depending on export complexity.

  2. Custom field consolidation

    We extract all unique custom field names across all active Artemis 7 projects and build a consolidated inventory grouped by data type. Duplicate field names with conflicting data types are flagged with the project name and field type for each variant. We present this inventory to the customer and ask them to confirm the target Microsoft Project custom field name, data type, and display position for each unique field before any load begins.

  3. Dependency and baseline audit

    We audit all Gantt dependencies across the export files, recording the dependency type for each predecessor-successor pair. Non-Finish-to-Start dependencies are listed in a pre-migration dependency report for customer approval. We also audit any available baseline data fields and document gaps between what Artemis 7 exports and what Microsoft Project's baseline fields can hold.

  4. Sandbox validation migration

    We run a validation migration using the consolidated exports into a Microsoft Project file opened in Project Professional or into a Project Online test site. We validate task hierarchy reconstruction, dependency linking, resource assignment conversion, custom field population, and milestone display. The customer reviews a sample of migrated projects against the source and signs off before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Project plans first, then Tasks with WBS hierarchy and summary task structure, then Milestones, then Resources, then Assignments, then Custom Fields, then Dependencies, then Time Entries. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Any record errors are logged and reprocessed in a subsequent pass before cutover.

  6. Cutover and handoff

    We perform a final validation of ten to fifteen randomly selected projects against the Artemis 7 source data. We deliver the attachment re-upload checklist, the risk and issue flag list, and the baseline gap document. We deliver a written inventory of reporting templates, custom views, and any project-level workflows or macros in Artemis 7 for the customer's admin to rebuild. We provide a one-week post-migration support window for reconciliation issues and do not include post-migration admin rebuild of Microsoft Project workflows or macros in the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Artemis 7 logo

Artemis 7

Source

Strengths

  • Covers the full project lifecycle from planning through delivery within a single interface
  • Includes resource allocation, budget tracking, and risk management as standard features
  • Offers Kanban boards alongside traditional Gantt and list views
  • Supports client-facing portals for stakeholder visibility
  • Integrates with email and calendar systems for task notifications

Weaknesses

  • Almost no publicly available customer reviews, making independent validation difficult
  • No published API documentation or developer portal for programmatic access
  • Feature set appears modest compared to established PM platforms like Asana, Monday, or Smartsheet
  • Limited information available on data export formats and migration tooling
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Artemis 7 and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Artemis 7: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Artemis 7 doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Artemis 7 to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Artemis 7 to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Artemis 7 to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Artemis 7 to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and three weeks for portfolios under 50 projects with straightforward task hierarchies, standard custom fields, and no complex resource pools. Migrations with 50 or more projects, deep WBS hierarchies, enterprise resource pools, multi-phase structures, or extensive custom field consolidation move to six to ten weeks because of the consolidation, dependency mapping, and validation effort required.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Artemis 7.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day