Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Comidor and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.
Comidor
Source
Microsoft Project
Destination
Compatibility
3 of 10
objects map 1:1 between Comidor and Microsoft Project.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
4-8 weeks
Overview
Comidor and Microsoft Project are structurally different tools. Comidor is a low-code BPM and automation platform where project work lives as Issues inside Apps and Workflows; Microsoft Project is a scheduling and portfolio management tool where project work lives as tasks inside .mpp or cloud-based project plans. There is no documented Comidor REST API, so all record extraction relies on CSV exports from the Comidor UI, which limits what migrates automatically and increases the manual extraction effort on the source side. We extract Comidor Issues (with hierarchy), Custom User Fields, Files, and User-Team assignments from CSV, map them into Microsoft Project task structures, and import via MPP or Project Online API. Workflows modeled in BPMN 2.0 do not migrate because Microsoft Project does not have a native workflow execution engine. We deliver a written BPMN configuration package and a rebuild guide for Power Automate so the customer's project manager or IT admin can reconstitute automated routing post-migration. Knowledge Base articles feed Comidor's Leia chatbot and are flagged for manual reconnection at the destination.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Comidor object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Comidor
Issue
Microsoft Project
Task
1:1Comidor Issues map to Microsoft Project tasks. The Issue title becomes Task Name; estimated effort or story points become Work (hours); due date maps to Finish date; priority maps to Priority (1-10 scale). If Issues have parent-child nesting, we preserve the hierarchy as summary tasks with WBS numbering. The migration requires the customer to export Issues via Comidor's CSV export function; we transform the CSV into an MPP-compatible XML or CSV interchange format and import through Project desktop or Project Online API.
Comidor
Issue Custom User Fields
Microsoft Project
Task Custom Fields
lossyComidor Custom User Fields defined globally and attached to Issues transfer as named custom fields on the Microsoft Project task. We extract the field definition (label, type, picklist values if applicable) from the Comidor UI during scoping, then create equivalent custom fields in the destination Project plan using the Field Mapping dialog in Project Desktop or the Project Online REST API. Any picklist-based Custom User Field maps to a custom text or flag field in Project if no equivalent type exists.
Comidor
User / Team
Microsoft Project
Resource
1:1Comidor Users and Teams assigned to Issues map to Microsoft Project named resources. We extract the user roster from Comidor during scoping, map each Comidor User to a Project resource with a calendar (Standard is default; the customer's admin updates individual resource calendars post-migration for vacation and availability). Teams in Comidor map to resource groups in Project. If a Comidor Issue has no assignee, we assign it to a placeholder resource and flag for the customer to reassign.
Comidor
File / Document
Microsoft Project
Hyperlink or Document Repository
lossyComidor files and documents attached to Issues migrate as hyperlinks pointing to the original file location in Comidor's file storage during migration, with a note that the customer's admin must move the actual file assets to SharePoint or a designated document management system post-migration. Comidor's file export must be performed manually by the customer before migration begins. We do not extract binary file content; we extract URLs and file metadata only.
Comidor
Workflow (BPMN 2.0)
Microsoft Project
Power Automate (separate rebuild)
lossyComidor Workflows modeled in BPMN 2.0 are not migratable as code. Microsoft Project has no native workflow execution engine. We extract the full workflow configuration as a structured BPMN package (including conditions, gateways, assigned roles, and escalation paths) and deliver it as a written document with recommended Power Automate triggers and actions for each workflow step. The customer's admin rebuilds automated routing and approval chains in Power Automate post-migration. This is documented separately from the data migration scope.
Comidor
Knowledge Base
Microsoft Project
SharePoint or Teams Wiki (manual)
lossyComidor Knowledge Base articles export as text records with category assignments. Article-to-chatbot associations (Leia AI configuration) cannot be extracted and are not migratable. We deliver the article content as a structured CSV with category metadata. The customer's admin imports articles into a SharePoint library or Teams Wiki manually. If the Knowledge Base was used as a reference source for Issues, we flag which articles are referenced so they can be relinked post-migration.
Comidor
App configuration
Microsoft Project
Project Plan structure
lossyComidor Apps define the data structure and UI for a business process. Each App that contains Issues maps to a separate Microsoft Project plan or a subproject within a master project. We document the App structure (forms, fields, related objects) during scoping and map it to the equivalent Project plan structure (task fields, custom fields, resource assignments). Apps without Issues (standalone data collection apps, RPA configurations) are documented as out-of-scope with a recommendation for SharePoint Lists, Dataverse, or Power Apps as alternatives.
Comidor
User Forms
Microsoft Project
Custom Fields (no equivalent form engine)
lossyComidor User Forms (data entry interfaces with conditional logic) do not have a Microsoft Project equivalent. We extract form definitions as structured schema documentation, including field types, picklist values, and conditional show/hide rules. This becomes part of the Power Apps rebuild guide for the customer's admin if the forms represent business process data entry that must be preserved.
Comidor
Process Scheduling
Microsoft Project
Not migratable
1:1Comidor Process Scheduling defines recurring workflow executions and automated Issue creation on a cron-like schedule. This is an execution configuration, not a data record, and is excluded from migration scope. The customer documents recurring project kickoff or status workflows during scoping and rebuilds them as Power Automate scheduled flows post-migration.
Comidor
Contacts and Accounts
Microsoft Project
Resource Notes or SharePoint Contacts list
lossyComidor Contacts and Accounts map to Microsoft Project resources as extended resource properties (Name, Initials, Group, Email). We extract the contact roster during scoping and create resource records with email addresses so that the Project Online integration can resolve assignment notifications through Microsoft 365. Full CRM-level contact data (addresses, deal associations) does not apply in a project scheduling context and is noted as out-of-scope.
| Comidor | Microsoft Project | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Issue Custom User Fields | Task Custom Fieldslossy | Fully supported | |
| User / Team | Resource1:1 | Fully supported | |
| File / Document | Hyperlink or Document Repositorylossy | Fully supported | |
| Workflow (BPMN 2.0) | Power Automate (separate rebuild)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Knowledge Base | SharePoint or Teams Wiki (manual)lossy | Mapping required | |
| App configuration | Project Plan structurelossy | Fully supported | |
| User Forms | Custom Fields (no equivalent form engine)lossy | Mapping required | |
| Process Scheduling | Not migratable1:1 | Not supported | |
| Contacts and Accounts | Resource Notes or SharePoint Contacts listlossy | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Comidor gotchas
No public REST API or documented export endpoints
Per-user tiered licensing gates module access
Custom User Fields are globally scoped and cross-referenced
Knowledge Base content tied to Leia chatbot must be manually reconnected
Microsoft Project gotchas
Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner
Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling
Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client
Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365
Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Comidor extraction checklist and manual export
We provide the customer with a structured extraction checklist covering Issues (with all Custom User Fields), Users and Teams, Files and Documents, Knowledge Base articles, App configurations, and Workflow definitions. The customer's Comidor admin performs manual CSV and file exports from the Comidor UI. We review the exported CSVs for column completeness, nested hierarchy representation, and Custom User Field inclusion before proceeding. Any missing columns or records require re-export before transformation begins.
Microsoft Project environment assessment
We assess whether the destination is Microsoft Project for Desktop (MPP files, local storage) or Project Plan 3/5 (cloud, Project Online API). The assessment covers existing Project plans, resource pools, custom field definitions, and any Power Automate environment the customer uses. If the customer is migrating to Project for Desktop, we plan for XML or CSV interchange format import. If migrating to Project Online, we use the Project Online REST API. The assessment also covers whether the customer needs a Master Project structure for multiple Comidor Apps.
Schema design and Issue-to-Task mapping
We design the Microsoft Project plan structure based on the Comidor App hierarchy. Each Comidor App becomes a Project plan (or a subproject in a master plan). Comidor Issues become tasks with WBS numbering derived from Issue parent-child relationships. Custom User Fields map to named Project custom fields (Text, Flag, Number, or Date types chosen based on the source field type). Resource assignments map from Comidor User and Team records to Project named resources with group assignments.
CSV transformation and test import
We transform the Comidor CSV exports into Microsoft Project-compatible format (MPP XML or CSV interchange) using custom transformation scripts. The scripts apply the mapping rules for field names, types, hierarchy, and resource assignments. We run a test import into a development Project plan (desktop or sandbox Project Online environment) to validate that task names, dates, durations, assignments, and custom fields import correctly. Any mapping errors are corrected and the test is re-run before proceeding to production import.
Production import and reconciliation
We run the production import into the customer's live Project environment. For Project for Desktop, we deliver an MPP file with all tasks, custom fields, resources, and assignments; for Project Online, we import via the REST API. We reconcile record counts (total tasks, tasks with assignments, tasks with custom fields, tasks with attachments/hyperlinks) against the source CSVs and produce a reconciliation report. Any records that did not import are flagged with the reason and re-imported in a corrective pass.
Automation handoff and Power Automate rebuild guide
We deliver the Workflow configuration package (BPMN documentation, trigger conditions, gateway logic, assigned roles) and the Power Automate rebuild guide to the customer's admin team. The guide maps each Comidor Workflow step to a Power Automate trigger and action, with notes on how to handle conditional routing, escalation assignments, and deadline-based reminders. We do not rebuild workflows inside the migration scope. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation questions but do not provide post-migration Power Automate development as standard scope.
Platform deep dives
Comidor
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Microsoft Project
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Comidor and Microsoft Project.
Object compatibility
1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Comidor: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Comidor doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Comidor to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Comidor to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Comidor
Other ways to arrive at Microsoft Project
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.