Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Tidy Build and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.
Tidy Build
Source
Jira
Destination
Compatibility
11 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Tidy Build and Jira.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from Tidy Build to Jira is a schema translation, not a record copy. Tidy Build is a construction job-costing platform built around Projects, Quotes, Materials, Suppliers, and Purchase Orders with cost-centre tracking from estimate to close. Jira is an agile issue-tracking and project-management platform built around Projects, Issues (Epics, Stories, Tasks, Bugs), Sprints, and Boards. The two platforms share only the concept of a Project as a top-level container; every other Tidy Build object requires deliberate mapping to a Jira-native equivalent or a custom field strategy. Quotes, Material Items, Suppliers, and Purchase Orders have no native Jira type. We resolve these by mapping Quotes to a custom Issue Type (e.g. Quote) with a lifecycle status field, Materials to Jira Products with a custom cost-field, and Suppliers to Jira user accounts or Contacts depending on the Jira edition. Tidy Build API access must be confirmed and enabled before migration begins; this is not automatic and requires a Tidy International activation step that we handle on the customer's behalf.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Tidy Build object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Tidy Build
Project
Jira
Project
1:1Tidy Build Projects map to Jira Projects as the top-level container. We preserve the project name, status (Active, On Hold, Closed), project group assignment, cost centres, and budget metadata as Jira Project fields or custom fields on a configuration issue within the project. Jira Project key prefixes are assigned during schema setup, and the Tidy Build project identifier is preserved in a custom Jira field for traceability.
Tidy Build
Quote
Jira
Issue (custom Issue Type: Quote)
1:1Tidy Build Quotes have no native Jira equivalent. We create a custom Issue Type named Quote in the target Jira project with a custom status field replicating Quote lifecycle states (Draft, Sent, Approved, Lost). The quote total, line items, and pricing tier migrate as Jira fields. If Jira Service Management is present, Service Desk request types can also serve as the Quote container. The mapping is 1:1 with lifecycle state preserved as a custom field rather than a native Jira workflow status.
Tidy Build
Customer
Jira
Account or Contact
1:1Tidy Build Customers migrate to Jira as Accounts (if Jira Software Premium with Assets is present) or as Jira user accounts with a Customer designation. Address, contact details, and billing information transfer to custom fields on the Jira user record or to a dedicated Customer Issue Type. Customer-specific material pricing tiers from Tidy Build become custom fields on the migrated record.
Tidy Build
Supplier
Jira
Contact or Jira User
1:1Tidy Build Suppliers have no native Jira type. We map them to Jira user accounts with a Supplier designation or to a Contact Issue Type depending on the Jira edition. Supplier contact information, lead times, and procurement notes migrate as custom fields. The link between a Supplier and their associated Material Items is preserved via Jira issue links or a custom lookup field on the Product record.
Tidy Build
Material Item
Jira
Product2 (via Jira Product Catalogue)
1:1Tidy Build Material Items map to Jira Products with a flat material hierarchy. Subcategories and multi-level pricing structures are flattened to a single product hierarchy level per Jira's catalogue model. Material cost, pricing levels (retail, trade, wholesale), and location assignments transfer to Jira custom fields on the Product. Jira Product Catalogue is available on Software Premium and above; on lower tiers we map Materials to Issues with a Material Type designation and preserve the hierarchy in a custom parent-link field.
Tidy Build
Task
Jira
Issue (Task or Subtask)
1:1Tidy Build Tasks and Subtasks map directly to Jira Issue (type Task) and Jira Issue (type Subtask) respectively. Status, assignee (via User mapping), due date, description, and any Tidy Build Task Assignments migrate. Where Subtasks exist as a separate API object in Tidy Build, we maintain the parent-child relationship via Jira's issue-link or parent-link field. Jira Subtask must be enabled on the target project before this mapping runs.
Tidy Build
Times (Time Entries)
Jira
Worklog
1:1Tidy Build Time Entries map to Jira Worklog records attached to the target Issue. Date, duration, billable/non-billable flag, and charge rate transfer as Worklog fields. The Tidy Build time profile (hourly rate) is preserved in a custom Issue field or the Jira User's time-tracking configuration. Jira time-tracking must be enabled on the target project. If the destination Jira edition does not include time-tracking, Times migrate as Task records with date and duration fields.
Tidy Build
Expense
Jira
Issue (custom Issue Type: Expense)
1:1Tidy Build Expenses linked to Projects map to Jira Issues of a custom Expense type. Amount, category (expense type), date, description, and approval status transfer as Jira fields. Attachments on Tidy Build expenses export as Jira attachments and re-attach to the corresponding Expense issue. The link to the originating Project is preserved via Jira project context or a custom Project lookup field on the Expense issue.
Tidy Build
Purchase Order
Jira
Issue (custom Issue Type: Purchase Order)
1:1Tidy Build Purchase Orders have no native Jira equivalent. We create a custom Issue Type named Purchase Order with custom fields for supplier reference, line items (as a text or table field), quantities, and approval status. The open/closed PO status from Tidy Build maps to Jira Issue status (Open/Done). Supplier linkage is resolved via the Supplier mapping. PO PDFs and attachments migrate as Jira attachments to the PO issue.
Tidy Build
Sales Record
Jira
Issue (type Task or Story)
1:1Tidy Build Sales Records aggregate invoiced work against a Project. We map these to Jira Issues (type Task or Story depending on the customer's Jira project convention) with custom fields carrying the sales amount, line items, and associated project reference. The link to the originating Tidy Build Project is preserved in a Jira custom field for reporting against the original project structure.
Tidy Build
User
Jira
User
1:1Tidy Build Users map to Jira user accounts resolved by email address. The Manager vs Team role designation from Tidy Build is preserved as a custom Jira user property (e.g. tidy_role__c) so the destination Jira admin can replicate the access model using Jira's group membership and project roles. Any Tidy Build User without a matching Jira account is held in a reconciliation queue for the admin to provision before record migration resumes.
Tidy Build
Custom Fields
Jira
Custom Fields
lossyTidy Build custom fields on Projects and Materials are detected via the API schema at scoping and pre-created in the target Jira project as typed custom fields before any data import begins. Field types (text, number, date, picklist) are mapped to equivalent Jira field types. Tidy-specific picklist options are pre-loaded as Jira custom field options. Validation rules and required-field enforcement are temporarily relaxed during migration load and reinstated after validation sign-off.
| Tidy Build | Jira | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Quote | Issue (custom Issue Type: Quote)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Customer | Account or Contact1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Supplier | Contact or Jira User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Material Item | Product2 (via Jira Product Catalogue)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Issue (Task or Subtask)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Times (Time Entries) | Worklog1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Expense | Issue (custom Issue Type: Expense)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Purchase Order | Issue (custom Issue Type: Purchase Order)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Sales Record | Issue (type Task or Story)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields | Custom Fieldslossy | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Tidy Build gotchas
API must be enabled per organisation before migration
User-role tier limits affect migration scoping
No publicly documented API rate limits for bulk extraction
Jira gotchas
Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration
Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms
Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin
Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption
Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Pre-migration audit and API activation
We audit the source Tidy Build account across all active Projects, Quotes, Material Items, Suppliers, Tasks, Time Entries, Expenses, Purchase Orders, Sales Records, and Users. We confirm whether the Developer API is active; if not, we request activation with Tidy International on the customer's behalf. We also probe API rate-limit behaviour with a low-concurrency extraction run to calibrate our extraction thread count. The audit output is a written migration scope covering object counts, custom field definitions, attachment volume and size distribution, and a preliminary Jira schema design specifying custom issue types, custom fields, and project configuration.
Jira destination schema design
We design the Jira destination schema in the target Jira site or Sandbox. This includes creating custom Issue Types for Quote, Expense, and Purchase Order; configuring Product Catalogue or an equivalent custom-field strategy for Materials; defining custom fields for cost-centre data, budget metadata, and Tidy Build identifiers; and establishing Jira Projects with appropriate issue-type schemes and permission models. If the Jira site uses a team-managed project structure, we assess whether a company-managed structure better supports the migrated data and flag this as a configuration decision for the customer.
Sandbox migration and mapping validation
We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox environment using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager or operations lead reviews migrated records across each object type, spot-checks 25-50 records against the Tidy Build source, and validates that Quote lifecycle states, Material pricing levels, and Project cost-centre data are correctly represented in Jira custom fields. Any field mapping corrections, custom field type changes, or issue-type adjustments are made in Sandbox before production migration begins. The customer signs off on the mapping before we proceed.
User reconciliation and provisioning
We extract every distinct Tidy Build User referenced across Tasks, Time Entries, and Expense records and match by email against the destination Jira site's user directory. Any Tidy Build User without a matching Jira account enters a reconciliation queue. The customer's Jira admin provisions missing users and assigns them to the appropriate Jira groups and project roles. Manager vs Team role designations from Tidy Build are preserved as custom user properties so the admin can map them to Jira group membership. Migration of record assignments cannot proceed until all referenced users have Jira accounts.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in dependency order: Jira Projects first (establishing the top-level container and project metadata), then Material Items and Suppliers (for Product and Contact lookups), then Quotes, Expenses, and Purchase Orders (as custom Issue Types with custom fields), then Tasks and Subtasks (with parent-child link resolution), then Time Entries (as Jira Worklog), then Expenses and Sales Records. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Jira API write calls use Jira-tier-appropriate concurrency with exponential backoff on 429 responses. Tidy Build extraction uses low-concurrency polling tuned from the scoping probe.
Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff
We freeze Tidy Build writes during the cutover window and run a final delta migration of any records modified since the initial production migration run. We then enable Jira as the system of record and deliver the Automation and Rule Inventory document to the customer's Jira admin. The inventory lists every Tidy Build rule and every existing Jira Automation rule with the rule's intent, trigger, and conditions translated to Jira Automation syntax. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the team. We do not rebuild Tidy Build rules as Jira Automation within the migration scope; that is documented separately for the customer's admin or an Atlassian partner.
Platform deep dives
Tidy Build
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Jira
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Tidy Build and Jira.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Tidy Build: Not publicly documented. Tidy International does not publish per-endpoint quotas in the open developer docs; in practice rate limits are confirmed once the integration is enabled on a customer tenant..
Data volume sensitivity
Tidy Build doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Tidy Build to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Tidy Build to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Tidy Build
Other ways to arrive at Jira
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.