Project Management migration

Migrate from Huly to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Huly and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Huly logo

Huly

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Huly and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Huly to Asana is a structural migration that requires flattening Huly's workspace hierarchy (Workspaces holding multiple Spaces) into Asana's Organization-Team-Project model. Huly Spaces map directly to Asana Projects, but Huly's task type inheritance rules and custom process states require pre-migration configuration of Asana custom fields. GitHub-synced Pull Requests are treated as a distinct task type with separate metadata migration. We flag attachment-heavy spaces during scoping so customers can select an appropriately sized Asana plan. Huly's chat messages, action items, and wiki pages migrate as task comments and descriptions. We do not migrate Huly automations, Inbox rules, or document editing state; these require manual rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Huly logo

Huly

What's pushing teams away

  • UI can feel clunky during document editing sessions, with reviewers noting friction when writing longer-form content in the platform.
  • Limited third-party integrations beyond GitHub compared to established PM tools, creating gaps when teams need CRM, finance, or HR system connections.
  • Self-hosting requires ongoing Docker/MongoDB maintenance, which can become a burden for teams without dedicated DevOps resources.
  • Steeper learning curve due to Huly's opinionated workspace hierarchy (workspaces above spaces) that differs from how teams structure Jira or Linear projects.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Huly objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Huly object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Huly

Workspace

maps to

Asana

Organization + Team

lossy
Fully supported

Huly's top-level Workspace maps to an Asana Organization. If the Huly workspace contains multiple independent business units, we create separate Asana Organizations or Teams within a single Organization based on the customer's preference. Workspace-level settings (visibility, member list) migrate as Organization settings and Team membership. The key migration decision is whether to preserve Huly's multi-workspace structure as multiple Asana Teams or consolidate into a single organization structure.

Huly

Space

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Huly Spaces map directly to Asana Projects. Space type settings (Classic project, any custom space types) are preserved in the project description or a custom project field. Space-level permissions migrate as Asana project team membership. Sections within the Huly Space map to Asana Sections within the destination project. If the Huly Space uses a custom process workflow, we create a custom field in Asana to capture the original process state names.

Huly

Issue

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Huly Issues map to Asana Tasks within the corresponding project. Assignee, priority, labels, and custom field values migrate directly. Huly's process state (Backlog, Todo, In Progress, Done) maps to Asana's task completion status (completed or not) plus an optional custom field capturing the original state name. Custom properties attached to the issue migrate as custom fields on the Asana task. Due dates and start dates migrate as Due Date and Start Date on the task.

Huly

Task Type (Custom)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field Template

lossy
Fully supported

Huly's custom task types each carry their own set of process states and custom properties. We create a custom field in Asana capturing the original Huly task type name, and per-type custom fields map to Asana custom fields of equivalent type (text, number, date, single-select, multi-select). Process states unique to each task type migrate as custom single-select fields. The customer defines which task type becomes the default for each project during scoping.

Huly

Pull Request (GitHub-synced)

maps to

Asana

Task with GitHub Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Huly Pull Request task type records migrate to Asana Tasks with a custom field capturing the original PR number, PR URL, merge state (Open, Merged, Closed), and branch name. The GitHub commit graph itself does not migrate; GitHub remains the source of truth for PR history. We preserve the task-level PR metadata so that Asana tasks retain the GitHub context. If the team uses GitHub's native integration with Asana, we configure it post-migration and link the migrated tasks.

Huly

Wiki Page (Document)

maps to

Asana

Task Description or Attachment

1:many
Fully supported

Huly wiki pages inside Spaces are rich-text collaborative documents. We export page content as structured HTML and attach it to the corresponding Asana project as a pinned description or as a document attachment. For wiki pages that represent project briefs, requirements, or specs, we create an Asana task with the page content in the description and the page title as the task name. Embedded images and attachments within wiki pages are extracted as separate files and reattached to the parent task or project.

Huly

Chat Message (Inbox)

maps to

Asana

Task Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Huly Inbox chat messages and threaded discussions are exported with sender metadata, timestamp, and message body. We attach each message thread as a comment on the corresponding Asana task (identified by topic association in Huly). Action items extracted from chat messages are created as separate tasks in the relevant project with the original assignee preserved. Message threading structure is flattened to chronological comment order since Asana comments do not support nested reply threads.

Huly

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Task with Due Date or Portfolio Goal

1:1
Fully supported

Huly Milestones group issues toward a common deadline or deliverable. We create an Asana task for each milestone with the milestone name and target date, marking it as a milestone task in Asana's milestone view. If the customer uses Asana Portfolios, we add the milestone task to the relevant portfolio. Milestone-to-issue associations migrate as subtasks or section labels under the milestone task so the grouping relationship is preserved.

Huly

Label / Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Huly labels with color metadata migrate to Asana Tags with the same color assignments. Labeled issues are tagged in Asana with the migrated tag. If a Huly label represents a category used across multiple task types, the tag is applied universally in Asana. We inventory all label names during discovery to identify any naming conflicts with existing Asana tags in the destination organization.

Huly

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Task Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Files attached to issues, wiki pages, or chat messages are downloaded from Huly's storage and reattached to their parent Asana task during migration. Huly's storage billing is based on attachment size (10GB on Common, 100GB on Rare, 1TB on Epic, maximum on Legendary); we inventory total attachment volume during scoping so customers can verify that their Asana plan storage allocation accommodates the migrated files. Attachments exceeding Asana's per-file size limits are flagged for alternative handling.

Huly

Action Item

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Action Items in Huly are workflow tasks captured within chat conversations. We extract action item text, assignee, and completion status and create corresponding Asana tasks in the relevant project. The original action item text and source message context are included in the task description. Completion status migrates as task completion in Asana. If the action item references a specific issue or document, we link the new task to that migrated record.

Huly

User / Member

maps to

Asana

User (Member)

1:1
Fully supported

Huly workspace members and their role assignments (owner, member) are mapped to Asana Organization members. Email addresses and display names migrate to the Asana user profile. Archived members in Huly are created as inactive users in Asana or held in a reconciliation queue for the admin to resolve. Role-based access differences between Huly and Asana (Huly's owner/member model vs Asana's admin/member/guest model) are mapped during discovery and applied as the customer specifies.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Huly logo

Huly gotchas

High

Projects invisible after failed migration attempts

Medium

Storage vs. object count billing distinction

Medium

Task type inheritance creates schema complexity

Low

No native accounts object for CRM-style records

Low

GitHub PR sync creates duplicate task types

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Huly workspace hierarchy flattens into Asana's three-level model

    Huly structures content as Workspaces above Spaces, with Spaces potentially containing sub-spaces or nested sections. Asana uses a flat Organization-Team-Project-Section model with no native equivalent to a Workspace-level container. We handle this by promoting Huly Workspaces to Asana Organizations or by creating Teams within a single Asana Organization. Teams that have deeply nested Huly structures (more than two levels of Spaces) should document their intended Asana structure before migration begins, as re-hierarchizing after data is migrated is time-consuming.

  • Custom task types require pre-migration custom field configuration

    Huly workspaces with multiple custom task types store different process states and custom properties per type. Asana has a single task object with custom fields. We create custom fields in Asana capturing the original task type name and type-specific properties before migration, and we run per-type mapping tables during the migration phase. Workspaces with five or more custom task types require extended discovery to map each state machine correctly; skipping this step results in merged state values across different task types.

  • Huly stores no native accounts or contacts object

    Teams that use Huly for CRM-style workflows (hiring pipelines, customer records, partner tracking) store this data in custom fields or as document objects within Spaces. There is no native accounts or contacts object to map. We identify these patterns during discovery and remap the data to Asana Projects (for pipelines) or custom fields on tasks (for individual records). Any existing Huly CRM-style data requires explicit customer guidance on the appropriate Asana structure before migration executes.

  • Attachment-heavy workspaces require storage planning

    Huly bills storage based on attachments (documents, images, videos) but not on Huly objects. A workspace can have unlimited issues without storage impact. Asana's storage is included at the org level and not separately metered per project for most plans, but the migrated file attachments consume the organization's storage quota. We inventory total attachment volume during scoping and flag workspaces that exceed 500 MB of attachments so customers can verify their Asana plan storage capacity or archive legacy files before migration.

  • GitHub PR task type creates separate migration scope

    When Huly is connected to GitHub, it creates a distinct Pull Request task type alongside the default Issue type, with properties including PR number, PR URL, branch name, and merge state that do not exist on standard Huly issues. We migrate PR task metadata as Asana task custom fields. However, the GitHub commit graph, branch relationships, and CI/CD pipeline state remain in GitHub and do not migrate. Teams relying on Huly's GitHub PR sync should reconfigure the Asana GitHub integration post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Huly to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and workspace health check

    We audit the Huly source workspace across all Spaces, task types, process state configurations, custom properties, labels, milestones, wiki pages, and Inbox message volume. We run a health check on the Huly database (or cloud export) to confirm no corruption from prior failed migration attempts, which can leave partial schema upgrades that make projects and issues invisible. We inventory total attachment volume and flag any CRM-style data patterns stored in custom fields or document objects. The discovery output is a written migration scope document identifying every object type, record count, and structural decision required for the Asana destination.

  2. Asana organization design and custom field configuration

    We design the Asana destination structure: Organization setup, Teams mapped from Huly Workspaces, and Projects mapped from Huly Spaces. We create all custom fields in Asana before any data import, including task type fields (capturing the original Huly task type name), custom process state fields (mapping Huly state names to Asana-compatible options), and any fields derived from Huly custom task properties. Custom field types are matched (text, number, date, single-select, multi-select) to their Huly equivalents. This step runs in an Asana Sandbox org first for validation.

  3. User reconciliation and member provisioning

    We extract every distinct Huly workspace member and map their email address and display name to an Asana Organization member. Archived Huly members are held in a reconciliation queue for the customer admin to decide whether to provision them as inactive Asana users. Role mappings (Huly owner to Asana admin, Huly member to Asana member) are applied per the customer's preference. Migration cannot proceed to project creation until all active member records have a corresponding Asana user.

  4. Sandbox migration and mapping validation

    We run a full migration into an Asana Sandbox using production-like data volumes. The customer reconciles record counts (Spaces mapped to Projects, issues mapped to tasks, wiki pages migrated, chat messages extracted) and spot-checks 25-50 records against the Huly source for field accuracy, attachment integrity, and label consistency. Any custom field mapping corrections, task type assignments, or structural changes happen in the Sandbox before production migration begins. This step prevents rework in the production environment.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We execute production migration in record-dependency order: Organization and Teams first, then Projects, then custom field definitions, then Tasks (issues mapped to tasks with custom field values), wiki pages as pinned task descriptions or attachments, milestones as milestone tasks, labels as tags, attachments extracted and reattached to parent tasks, and chat messages as task comments. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We use Asana's REST API with rate-limit handling and exponential backoff for all inserts.

  6. Cutover, delta migration, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze Huly write access during the cutover window, run a final delta migration capturing any records modified during the migration phase, then set Asana as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of all migrated automations, Inbox rules, and workspace-level configurations requiring manual rebuild in Asana. This document includes each automation's trigger, conditions, and recommended Asana Rules equivalent. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Huly automations or Inbox rules as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's admin or a separate Asana implementation engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Huly logo

Huly

Source

Strengths

  • Combines task management, real-time chat, video calling, and document editing in a single platform.
  • Open-source codebase (hcengineering/platform on GitHub) with full self-hosting capability.
  • GitHub integration syncs issues and pull requests automatically for software development workflows.
  • Unlimited users and unlimited Huly objects on all pricing tiers.
  • Resource-based pricing for cloud plans (storage, network, compute) rather than per-seat.

Weaknesses

  • Limited third-party integrations beyond GitHub compared to established project management tools.
  • MongoDB backend on self-hosted deployments requires DevOps maintenance overhead.
  • UI and UX can feel clunky during document editing, per user reviews.
  • Less mature ecosystem and community compared to Jira, Linear, or Asana.
  • Self-hosted deployment requires manual Docker and database management.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Huly and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Huly: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Huly doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Huly to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Huly to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Huly to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Huly to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for workspaces under 5,000 issues, no more than three custom task types, and under 200 wiki pages. Migrations with multiple custom task types, large attachment libraries (over 50 GB), extensive wiki page inventories exceeding 200 documents, or active Inbox chat threads requiring comment extraction extend to five to eight weeks because of the per-type custom field mapping work, file download and re-upload, and chat context extraction.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Huly.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day