HRMS migration

Migrate from Aperio to Crelate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Aperio and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.

Aperio logo

Aperio

Source

Crelate

Destination

Crelate logo

Compatibility

33%

4 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Aperio and Crelate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

6-10 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Aperio structures performance management around review cycles, goal hierarchies, and competency frameworks. Crelate is a recruiting ATS built around candidates, job orders, and opportunities with a 20-field-per-entity custom field limit. These different object models mean the migration is a translation exercise rather than a direct record copy. We migrate employee core data, goal parent-child relationships, and review metadata into Crelate Contacts with custom fields and tags, and we flag which Crelate custom fields are consumed by each review or goal attribute. We do not migrate review templates, competency libraries, or development plan structures as code. We deliver a written inventory of every Aperio template and workflow that requires rebuild as Crelate activity forms, tags, and administrative configurations. The absence of an Aperio API means timelines run 30-40 percent longer than API-based migrations of comparable record counts.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Aperio logo

Aperio

What's pushing teams away

  • Some customers report outgrowing Aperio as their organization scales, finding it better suited to smaller or mid-market teams than to complex enterprise structures.
  • Organizations seeking a broader HR platform eventually migrate away because Aperio focuses specifically on performance management rather than covering payroll, recruiting, or onboarding.
  • Customers sometimes cite limited awareness or marketing reach as a reason they struggled to get full value from the platform, suggesting adoption challenges.
  • Companies that need deep integrations with adjacent HR systems find Aperio's ecosystem narrower than competitors, prompting a move to platforms with more native connectors.

Choosing

Crelate logo

Crelate

What's pulling them in

  • Affordable per-seat pricing with transparent tiers makes Crelate accessible for small-to-mid staffing firms evaluating ATS platforms for the first time.
  • Fast implementation reported by customers—some describe getting live in a matter of minutes with support team assistance.
  • Unified ATS + CRM in a single product eliminates the need to buy and synchronize separate recruiting and sales tools.
  • Flexible custom fields across Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities allow recruiting teams to capture firm-specific data without developer involvement.
  • Positive reviews highlight the product's intuitive interface and functional breadth for teams that need recruiting workflows without enterprise overhead.

Object mapping

How Aperio objects map to Crelate

Each row shows how a Aperio object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Aperio

Employee

maps to

Crelate

Contact

1:1
Fully supported

Aperio employee records map directly to Crelate Contacts. We extract name fields, title, department, manager relationship, and hire date from the CSV export and load them into the corresponding Crelate Contact fields. The manager relationship resolves as a Contact lookup by email. Employee IDs are preserved in a custom field aperio_employee_id__c for reconciliation. Resume or profile attachments attach via ContentDocumentLink to the Contact record after import.

Aperio

Goal

maps to

Crelate

Contact (custom fields + tags)

lossy
Fully supported

Aperio goals lack a native Crelate equivalent. We map the goal title, description, status, and target date to Crelate Contact custom fields (up to the 20-field limit). Goal content that exceeds the field cap migrates as a Crelate Tag on the Contact. We extract goal_id and parent_goal_id pairs from the CSV to identify orphaned or circular references before loading, and flag any unreconciled goals for the customer admin.

Aperio

Goal (hierarchy)

maps to

Crelate

Contact (tag structure)

1:1
Fully supported

Aperio goal hierarchies flatten to parent_goal_id in the CSV export. We reconstruct the hierarchy by grouping goals by parent_goal_id and tagging child goals on the parent Contact as a related tag with a goal_rank prefix (e.g., 'G1_child_1', 'G1_child_2') so the relationship is recoverable in Crelate without native hierarchy support.

Aperio

Performance Review

maps to

Crelate

Contact (custom fields + activity form responses)

lossy
Fully supported

Aperio performance reviews are cycle-based records with ratings, reviewer comments, and competency scores. We map review date, overall rating, and status to Cperio Contact custom fields. Detailed competency ratings and free-text comments exceed Crelate's 20-field limit on Contacts; we store these as Crelate Activity Forms linked to the Contact with a custom activity type 'Performance Review' and field mappings copying responses to Contact columns. Review cycles are preserved as Tags on the Contact (e.g., 'Review_2024_Q4').

Aperio

Review Template

maps to

Crelate

Activity Form

lossy
Fully supported

Aperio review templates define competency sections, rating scales, and mandatory fields. Crelate has no native review template object, but activity forms with field mappings provide a structural equivalent. We export template definitions and deliver a written field map documenting each Aperio competency and rating scale with its recommended Crelate Activity Form question and Contact field pairing. The customer's admin builds the form in Crelate from this reference.

Aperio

Competency

maps to

Crelate

Activity Form (question library)

lossy
Fully supported

Aperio competency libraries are referenced within reviews and templates. Crelate has no native competency library. We export competency definitions and their rating scales and deliver a written competency reference document mapped to the Activity Form questions and field mappings where they should land in Crelate. The customer's admin rebuilds the competency library as part of their activity form setup.

Aperio

Development Plan

maps to

Crelate

Contact (tags + notes)

lossy
Fully supported

Aperio development plans track growth actions tied to employees and review outcomes. Crelate has no development plan object. We extract plan records with milestones and timelines from the CSV and map plan titles and key milestones to Crelate Contact tags. Detailed plan content migrates as a Note on the Contact with the plan body preserved in rich text. Goal links are handled through the goal mapping described above.

Aperio

Department

maps to

Crelate

Contact (tag) + Company

many:1
Fully supported

Aperio departments represent the organizational hierarchy with parent-child relationships. Crelate's org model is company-based rather than department-based. We map each Aperio department to a Crelate Contact tag (e.g., 'Dept_Engineering', 'Dept_Sales') and optionally to a Crelate Company record if the customer wants to represent internal cost centers as Company entities. The department hierarchy does not have a direct Crelate equivalent; we document the hierarchy as a reference structure for the customer admin.

Aperio

Job Title

maps to

Crelate

Contact (custom field)

1:1
Fully supported

Aperio job titles are associated with employees and used as criteria within review templates. Crelate has no native job title library. We export the full job title roster and map titles to a custom field job_title__c on the Contact record. Titles that appear in multiple Aperio contexts (review criteria, competency weighting) are noted in the job title reference document delivered alongside the migration.

Aperio

Review Cycle

maps to

Crelate

Contact (tag)

1:many
Fully supported

Aperio review cycles are temporal containers that batch related reviews with start and end dates. Crelate has no cycle object. We extract cycle metadata and apply a tag to each Contact that participated in the cycle (e.g., 'Cycle_2024_H1'). Cycle dates and status are preserved in a custom field last_review_cycle__c on the Contact for reporting purposes.

Aperio

Custom Field (on Reviews, Goals, Plans)

maps to

Crelate

Contact (custom field) or Tag

lossy
Fully supported

Aperio supports custom fields on Reviews, Goals, and Development Plans with picklist and multi-select values. We identify all active custom fields during discovery, export their value sets, and map them to Crelate Contact custom fields by type. Fields that exceed Crelate's 20-field limit per entity are mapped to Crelate Tags. Where Aperio picklist values differ from any Crelate target field, we flag the discrepancy for customer resolution before loading.

Aperio

Owner

maps to

Crelate

User

1:1
Fully supported

Aperio owner assignments on reviews, goals, and plans reference manager or HR admin users. We extract distinct owner IDs from the CSV and match by email against the Crelate destination User table. Owners without a matching Crelate User are held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import completes.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Aperio logo

Aperio gotchas

High

No public API means CSV-only migration exports

Medium

Goal parent-child hierarchies export as flat records

Medium

Custom fields require manual value-set mapping

Crelate logo

Crelate gotchas

High

120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations

High

20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions

Medium

15,000-record export ceiling on single operations

Medium

Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate

Low

API key is a querystring parameter, not a header

Pair-specific challenges

  • Crelate's 20-field per-entity limit constrains review and goal data

    Crelate caps custom fields at 20 per entity type (Contact, Company, Opportunity). Aperio performance reviews, goals, and development plans routinely exceed this limit with competency ratings, development milestones, goal metrics, and reviewer comments. We identify every active Aperio custom field during scoping, rank them by usage frequency, and allocate the 20 slots to the highest-priority attributes. Overflow fields migrate as Crelate Tags on the Contact with structured naming (e.g., 'Review_Custom_NPS_Score') or as Note attachments with full detail preserved. There is no Crelate workaround for custom objects or unlimited fields.

  • Aperio has no API; CSV-only export extends timelines

    Aperio provides no public REST or bulk API. Every migration relies on CSV exports generated from within the application, which imposes column limits, requires manual field selection, and prevents delta-sync or incremental load strategies. We extract all available CSV fields during discovery, run multiple validation passes to catch encoding issues and missing parent references, and load into Crelate's REST API at 120 requests per minute with chunking and exponential backoff. Migration timelines for this reason run 30-40 percent longer than API-to-API migrations of comparable record counts.

  • Aperio department hierarchies have no Crelate equivalent

    Aperio structures organizations around departments with parent-child relationships that roll up through a hierarchy. Crelate is built around Companies with a subsidiary model that does not map cleanly to internal cost centers or HR departments. We map Aperio departments to Contact tags and optionally to Company records, but the hierarchical rollup relationship does not transfer. We deliver a written department structure document showing the original hierarchy for the customer's admin to configure manually in Crelate if reporting by department is required.

  • Goal parent-child hierarchies flatten in CSV and require reconstruction

    Aperio supports nested goal structures where child goals roll up to parent goals. CSV exports present these as flat records with a parent_goal_id column that does not self-describe the relationship or indicate root vs. leaf nodes. We extract goal_id and parent_goal_id pairs, detect circular references and orphaned children, and reconstruct the hierarchy in Crelate as structured tags on the parent Contact. Any records with unresolved parent references are flagged for the customer's admin to resolve before the migration closes.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Aperio to Crelate data migration

  1. Discovery and CSV extraction

    We audit the Aperio instance across all active objects: employee profiles, goal records with parent-child links, review cycle history, competency libraries, development plans, and custom field definitions on each object type. We extract all available CSV exports with full column sets and run a data quality assessment to identify missing parent references, orphaned child goals, and fields with no values across all records. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a record-count matrix by object, and a custom field inventory with value-set samples for picklist mapping.

  2. Schema design and field allocation

    We design the Crelate destination schema within the 20-field per-entity constraint. We allocate custom Contact fields to the highest-priority Aperio attributes based on usage frequency, flagging overflow fields for tag-based migration. We configure Crelate Activity Forms to receive review and competency data where field slots are exhausted, and set up the field mappings that copy activity form responses to Contact columns. We create the activity type and form structure in a Crelate sandbox for validation before production.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Crelate sandbox using production-equivalent record volumes. The customer's recruiting or HR lead spot-checks 25-50 migrated Contacts against the Aperio source, validates goal hierarchy tag naming, reviews activity form responses, and confirms that review cycle tags are correctly applied. We reconcile record counts and field values and correct any mapping errors before scheduling the production migration window.

  4. Owner reconciliation and User provisioning

    We extract every distinct Aperio owner referenced on review, goal, and development plan records and match by email against the Crelate destination User table. Any owner without a matching Crelate User is held in a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions missing Users before the production migration begins. Migration cannot complete past this step because Contact OwnerId references must be satisfied at insert time.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration through Crelate's REST API at 120 requests per minute with batch chunking and exponential backoff. The sequence is: Contacts (with core fields, job title, department tags, and goal hierarchy tags), Activity Forms for review data, Notes for development plan content, and review cycle tags applied last. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Goal hierarchy reconstruction runs as a post-processing step against the goal_id and parent_goal_id pairs extracted during discovery.

  6. Cutover, validation, and template rebuild handoff

    We freeze Aperio access during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window. We validate goal hierarchy tags, review cycle tags, and activity form data in Crelate and resolve any remaining reconciliation issues in a one-week hypercare window. We deliver a written inventory of every Aperio review template, competency library, and development plan structure that requires rebuild in Crelate Activity Forms, along with field mapping documentation. We do not rebuild these as Crelate configurations; that work falls to the customer's admin or a Crelate implementation partner.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Aperio logo

Aperio

Source

Strengths

  • Purpose-built performance review cycle management with structured goal-setting and competency frameworks
  • Real-time alerts and dashboards give managers continuous visibility rather than batched quarterly reviews
  • Mid-market pricing and onboarding model that avoids the complexity of enterprise HR suite configuration
  • Structured development planning linked to review outcomes supports retention conversations
  • CSV-based data export enables migration scoping without relying on API integrations

Weaknesses

  • No documented public API, requiring CSV exports and manual field mapping for all migrations
  • Mid-market focus means limited enterprise features that larger organizations require as they scale
  • Focused narrowly on performance management rather than covering recruiting, onboarding, or payroll
  • Custom fields and goal hierarchies require careful manual mapping work during migration
  • Limited integration ecosystem compared to broader HR suites with native connector marketplaces
Crelate logo

Crelate

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM in a single platform reduces data synchronization overhead for recruiting teams.
  • Fast setup with guided implementation reported as a significant time saver for small teams.
  • Transparent per-seat pricing without surprise fees at the base tier.
  • Flexible custom field configuration across core objects without developer dependency.
  • Export capability supports up to 15,000 records per operation for Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limit of 120 requests per minute restricts bulk migration throughput.
  • Custom field cap of 20 per entity requires field consolidation for complex recruiting schemas.
  • All advanced features (Activities, Activity Forms, Core Record Field customization) are tier-gated add-ons.
  • Customer service responsiveness receives consistent negative feedback in reviews.
  • Resume parsing quality trails competitors and generates support requests.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Aperio and Crelate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Aperio: Not publicly documented — no published API surface, so rate limits are not specified externally..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Aperio doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Aperio to Crelate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Aperio to Crelate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Aperio to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Aperio to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Standard migrations under 5,000 employees with no complex goal hierarchies and limited custom fields complete in six to ten weeks. Migrations with large goal hierarchies, active review cycle history, or high custom field density on reviews and development plans move to ten to sixteen weeks. The Aperio CSV-only export constraint adds 30-40 percent to the timeline compared to API-based migrations of similar scope.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Aperio.
Land in Crelate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day