Project Management migration

Migrate from Huly to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Huly and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

Huly logo

Huly

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Huly and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Huly to Jira is a structural migration that begins with rethinking the workspace hierarchy. Huly places workspaces above spaces, while Jira uses projects as the top-level container with no intermediate workspace layer. We resolve this during scoping by mapping each Huly workspace to one or more Jira projects based on team boundaries and access control requirements. Custom task types in Huly carry their own process state configurations; we enumerate all task types during discovery and build per-type mapping tables before executing the migration. Huly's GitHub-synced Pull Request task type has no Jira equivalent, so we migrate PR metadata (PR number, merge state, review status) as structured custom fields on Jira issues and document GitHub as the authoritative source for the commit graph. Huly chat messages have no native Jira analog; we export them as structured JSON for the customer to onboard into their chosen communication tool. Jira's native sprint planning, time tracking, and release versioning features are not available in Huly, making Jira the destination for any teams that require structured agile workflows.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Huly logo

Huly

What's pushing teams away

  • UI can feel clunky during document editing sessions, with reviewers noting friction when writing longer-form content in the platform.
  • Limited third-party integrations beyond GitHub compared to established PM tools, creating gaps when teams need CRM, finance, or HR system connections.
  • Self-hosting requires ongoing Docker/MongoDB maintenance, which can become a burden for teams without dedicated DevOps resources.
  • Steeper learning curve due to Huly's opinionated workspace hierarchy (workspaces above spaces) that differs from how teams structure Jira or Linear projects.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How Huly objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a Huly object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Huly

Workspace

maps to

Jira

Project (or Project Group)

1:many
Fully supported

Huly workspaces are the top-level container holding multiple spaces. Jira has no workspace layer above projects, so we map each Huly workspace to one or more Jira projects based on team boundaries, access control requirements, and the customer's preferred project structure. If the customer uses workspaces to represent business units (e.g., Serenity, Bebop, Falcon), we create separate Jira projects per workspace and map the Huly workspace name to the Jira project key and description. Projects are the first objects created because all downstream issues reference their parent project.

Huly

Space (Classic Project)

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Huly's default 'Classic project' space type maps directly to a Jira project. The space configuration, including space type settings and member list, migrates to Jira project settings and project role memberships. If multiple Huly spaces belong to the same workspace and should share a Jira project, we consolidate them under a single project key and use Jira components to distinguish between the original spaces.

Huly

Issue

maps to

Jira

Issue

1:1
Fully supported

Huly's default Issue task type maps directly to Jira Issue. Assignee, priority, labels, due date, description (rich text), and custom fields migrate. The Huly process state (Backlog, Todo, In Progress, Done) maps to Jira status values (To Do, In Progress, Done) configured as a Jira Workflow. Huly's issue number is preserved in a custom field huly_issue_number__c for traceability.

Huly

Issue (GitHub-synced Pull Request)

maps to

Jira

Issue (custom fields)

lossy
Fully supported

Huly's GitHub Pull Request task type has distinct properties (PR number, merge state, review status) that have no Jira equivalent. We migrate PR metadata as structured custom fields on Jira issues: huly_pr_number__c (number), huly_pr_state__c (text: Open, Merged, Closed), huly_pr_reviewers__c (multi-user), and huly_merge_commit_sha__c (text). The actual GitHub commit graph, branch history, and CI status remain in GitHub and are referenced via links on the Jira issue. GitHub Integration for Jira or similar Atlassian Marketplace apps can re-link commits to migrated Jira issues post-migration.

Huly

Task Type (Custom)

maps to

Jira

Issue Type

lossy
Fully supported

Huly custom task types each carry their own set of process states. We enumerate all custom task types during discovery, map each type's state machine to a Jira Workflow and Status configuration, and assign each type to a Jira Issue Type (Bug, Story, Epic, Task) or a custom Issue Type if the destination Jira allows it. Per-type state mapping tables are built before any issue data migrates. Jira's Workflow schemes control which workflow applies to each Issue Type per project.

Huly

Wiki Page

maps to

Jira

Confluence Page

1:1
Fully supported

Huly wiki pages migrate to Confluence pages inside a designated Confluence space. Content blocks, embedded links, and collaboration metadata transfer. Huly's document hierarchy (folders, nested pages) maps to Confluence page hierarchy. Embedded images and file attachments migrate as Confluence attachments. Jira Software projects can be linked to Confluence spaces for requirements and documentation co-location. Jira does not have a native documentation feature; Confluence requires a separate license.

Huly

Inbox / Chat Message

maps to

Jira

(no native equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Huly Inbox messages and threaded discussions have no direct Jira or Confluence equivalent. We export message text, sender metadata, timestamps, and threading structure as structured JSON for the customer to review. Threading metadata (reply-to chains, reaction counts) is preserved in the export but cannot be rendered natively in Jira. Customers typically onboard this data into Atlassian Loom, Slack, or Microsoft Teams post-migration. Chat messages are flagged as non-migratable in the scope document with the export provided as a data archive.

Huly

Milestone

maps to

Jira

Version (Release)

1:1
Fully supported

Huly Milestones group issues toward a common goal or deadline. We map Milestones to Jira Versions (also called Releases), preserving the target date as the Version release date and the milestone description as the Version description. Issues associated with a milestone are linked via the Fix Version field in Jira. Version-level burndown and release reports in Jira provide equivalent progress tracking.

Huly

Action Item

maps to

Jira

Sub-task

1:1
Fully supported

Huly Action Items are tasks captured within conversations, carrying assignee, due date, and completion status. We migrate Action Items as Jira Sub-tasks linked to their parent Jira Issue. The action item text becomes the sub-task summary, assignee maps directly, and completion status maps to the Done status in the sub-task workflow. Action items without a clear parent issue are escalated to the customer's PM for manual parent assignment before migration.

Huly

Label

maps to

Jira

Label

1:1
Fully supported

Huly labels with color metadata migrate to Jira Labels. Jira labels are single-word tags stored as a multi-select list on each issue. We preserve the Huly label name and color metadata in a custom field huly_label_color__c for reference. Jira labels are not colored natively; the color field is informational only.

Huly

Attachment

maps to

Jira

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Files attached to issues, wiki pages, or chat messages migrate as Jira attachments on the corresponding issue or Confluence page. Huly cloud storage limits apply to attachments only (not to Huly objects); Jira Cloud attachments are subject to Jira site storage limits. We flag attachment-heavy records during scoping and recommend sizing the Jira site storage plan appropriately. Jira Cloud individual attachment size limit is 10 MB on free plans and 256 MB on paid plans; Huly attachment sizes are preserved during transfer subject to these limits.

Huly

User / Workspace Member

maps to

Jira

Jira User

1:1
Fully supported

Huly workspace members and their roles (owner, member) map to Jira users and project role memberships. Email addresses and display names resolve to Jira user accounts. Active vs. archived status is preserved. Huly has no separate 'groups' object; Jira groups are created during migration based on Huly team or workspace membership patterns. Jira requires each migrating user to have an active Jira account or to be provisioned by an admin before record migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Huly logo

Huly gotchas

High

Projects invisible after failed migration attempts

Medium

Storage vs. object count billing distinction

Medium

Task type inheritance creates schema complexity

Low

No native accounts object for CRM-style records

Low

GitHub PR sync creates duplicate task types

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • Huly workspace hierarchy has no Jira equivalent

    Huly organizes data as Workspaces > Spaces > Issues, with workspaces acting as a container above projects. Jira has no workspace layer; projects are the top-level entity. Teams that use Huly workspaces to represent business units or divisions must decide during scoping whether to map each workspace to a separate Jira project, consolidate multiple workspaces under one project, or use Jira's project categories and components for grouping. This decision affects issue key structure, permissions, and reporting. We resolve the mapping strategy during the discovery phase before any data extraction begins.

  • Huly chat messages have no native Jira destination

    Huly's Inbox holds real-time chat messages and threaded discussions linked to issues and projects. Jira Software does not have a native messaging or chat feature. Chat message text can be exported as structured JSON, but the threaded context and issue-linked conversations cannot be rendered inside Jira. Teams relying on Huly chat for project communication need to adopt Atlassian Loom, Confluence comments, or a third-party tool (Slack, Microsoft Teams) post-migration. We provide the chat export as a data archive and flag it as non-migratable in the scope document.

  • Huly has no native sprint planning feature

    Huly lacks native sprint boards, backlog velocity tracking, and sprint burndown charts that agile teams require. Jira's sprint functionality has no equivalent in Huly, meaning any sprint data generated post-migration in Jira will be new and not carry historical sprint velocity or burndown from Huly. We flag this gap during scoping and recommend that customers document their current Huly sprint velocity and cycle time metrics before migration begins if historical agile metrics are needed for reporting continuity.

  • GitHub PR task type creates data without Jira parallel

    When Huly is connected to GitHub, it creates a separate Pull Request task type with properties (PR number, merge state, review status, branch name) that have no native Jira equivalent. We migrate PR metadata as structured custom fields on Jira issues, but the GitHub commit graph, branch history, and CI status remain in GitHub. Jira's Git Integration for Jira (Atlassian Marketplace) can re-link GitHub commits to migrated Jira issues post-migration if installed, but PR-as-issue data does not map one-to-one. We document the migration of PR metadata and flag GitHub as the authoritative source for commit-level traceability.

  • Huly storage billing does not apply to objects

    Huly bills cloud storage based on attachments (documents, images, videos) but NOT on Huly objects like issues, wiki pages, or chat messages. Jira Cloud bills storage against the site's total storage allocation, which covers attachments, backups, and exported data. During migration scoping, we inventory attachment-heavy spaces and the total attachment volume to help the customer select an appropriately sized Jira Cloud storage plan. Jira Cloud free plan includes 2 GB; paid plans scale from there.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Huly to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and workspace-project mapping

    We audit the source Huly instance across all workspaces, spaces, custom task types, issue counts, wiki page volume, attachment storage consumption, GitHub integration status, and user list. We pair this with a Jira edition decision: Free for small teams under 10 users, Standard ($7.50/user/mo) for basic project management, Premium ($15/user/mo) for native sprint planning and analytics, or Enterprise ($36.50/user/mo) for large-scale deployments. The discovery output is a written scope with the workspace-to-project mapping strategy and per-task-type state mapping tables. Any Huly data stored in custom fields for CRM-style workflows is identified here.

  2. Schema design and Jira configuration

    We configure the destination Jira site. This includes provisioning Jira projects (one per Huly workspace or consolidated per scoping decision), Jira Issue Types matching Huly task types, Jira Workflows for each task type's state machine, custom fields (huly_issue_number__c, huly_pr_number__c, huly_label_color__c, and any custom fields from Huly), Jira Labels synced from Huly label definitions, Jira Versions created for Huly Milestones with target dates, and Confluence spaces created for Huly wiki pages if Confluence is included in the customer's Jira plan. Schema is validated in a Jira Sandbox or test project before production migration begins.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Jira test environment using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager reconciles record counts (issues in, labels in, wiki pages in, milestones in), spot-checks 25-50 random issues against the Huly source, and validates the workspace-project mapping and custom field values. Jira workflow transitions are tested manually. Any mapping corrections, missing custom fields, or incorrect status mappings are fixed in the destination before production migration begins. Confluence page hierarchy is reviewed for content accuracy.

  4. User provisioning and permissions mapping

    We extract every distinct Huly workspace member and map them to Jira user accounts by email. Huly owner and member roles are mapped to Jira project roles (Administrators, Members, Viewers). Any Huly member without a matching Jira account is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's Jira admin to provision. Jira groups are created based on Huly team or workspace membership patterns. Migration cannot proceed past issue import until all referenced assignees have Jira accounts.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects and Issue Types (schema, created first), Jira Versions from Huly Milestones, Jira Users (validated from provisioning step), Jira Issues with all standard and custom fields, Jira Labels applied to migrated issues, Jira Sub-tasks from Huly Action Items, Confluence spaces and pages from Huly wiki pages, Attachments on Jira issues and Confluence pages (with Jira site storage monitored), and Huly chat export as JSON archive. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Jira Bulk API and REST API are used with rate-limit handling and batch chunking for large issue volumes.

  6. Cutover, validation, and post-migration handoff

    We freeze Huly writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We validate issue counts, attachment integrity, label application, and Confluence page structure. We deliver the chat export JSON, the Workflow inventory (for any Huly-process-configured workflows, documented for manual rebuild), and the GitHub PR metadata mapping notes. Jira automations, Jira Service Management request types, and Confluence Space permissions require manual configuration post-migration. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Huly logo

Huly

Source

Strengths

  • Combines task management, real-time chat, video calling, and document editing in a single platform.
  • Open-source codebase (hcengineering/platform on GitHub) with full self-hosting capability.
  • GitHub integration syncs issues and pull requests automatically for software development workflows.
  • Unlimited users and unlimited Huly objects on all pricing tiers.
  • Resource-based pricing for cloud plans (storage, network, compute) rather than per-seat.

Weaknesses

  • Limited third-party integrations beyond GitHub compared to established project management tools.
  • MongoDB backend on self-hosted deployments requires DevOps maintenance overhead.
  • UI and UX can feel clunky during document editing, per user reviews.
  • Less mature ecosystem and community compared to Jira, Linear, or Asana.
  • Self-hosted deployment requires manual Docker and database management.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Huly and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Huly: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Huly doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Huly to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Huly to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Huly to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Huly to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for instances under 5,000 issues, one workspace, and no Confluence wiki page migration. Migrations with multiple workspaces, six or more custom task types, large attachment volumes (over 50 GB), or wiki page migration to Confluence move to seven to twelve weeks because of per-task-type state mapping work, Confluence space configuration, and attachment chunking.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Huly.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day