Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Huly and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.
Huly
Source
Jira
Destination
Compatibility
9 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Huly and Jira.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Huly to Jira is a structural migration that begins with rethinking the workspace hierarchy. Huly places workspaces above spaces, while Jira uses projects as the top-level container with no intermediate workspace layer. We resolve this during scoping by mapping each Huly workspace to one or more Jira projects based on team boundaries and access control requirements. Custom task types in Huly carry their own process state configurations; we enumerate all task types during discovery and build per-type mapping tables before executing the migration. Huly's GitHub-synced Pull Request task type has no Jira equivalent, so we migrate PR metadata (PR number, merge state, review status) as structured custom fields on Jira issues and document GitHub as the authoritative source for the commit graph. Huly chat messages have no native Jira analog; we export them as structured JSON for the customer to onboard into their chosen communication tool. Jira's native sprint planning, time tracking, and release versioning features are not available in Huly, making Jira the destination for any teams that require structured agile workflows.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Huly object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Huly
Workspace
Jira
Project (or Project Group)
1:manyHuly workspaces are the top-level container holding multiple spaces. Jira has no workspace layer above projects, so we map each Huly workspace to one or more Jira projects based on team boundaries, access control requirements, and the customer's preferred project structure. If the customer uses workspaces to represent business units (e.g., Serenity, Bebop, Falcon), we create separate Jira projects per workspace and map the Huly workspace name to the Jira project key and description. Projects are the first objects created because all downstream issues reference their parent project.
Huly
Space (Classic Project)
Jira
Project
1:1Huly's default 'Classic project' space type maps directly to a Jira project. The space configuration, including space type settings and member list, migrates to Jira project settings and project role memberships. If multiple Huly spaces belong to the same workspace and should share a Jira project, we consolidate them under a single project key and use Jira components to distinguish between the original spaces.
Huly
Issue
Jira
Issue
1:1Huly's default Issue task type maps directly to Jira Issue. Assignee, priority, labels, due date, description (rich text), and custom fields migrate. The Huly process state (Backlog, Todo, In Progress, Done) maps to Jira status values (To Do, In Progress, Done) configured as a Jira Workflow. Huly's issue number is preserved in a custom field huly_issue_number__c for traceability.
Huly
Issue (GitHub-synced Pull Request)
Jira
Issue (custom fields)
lossyHuly's GitHub Pull Request task type has distinct properties (PR number, merge state, review status) that have no Jira equivalent. We migrate PR metadata as structured custom fields on Jira issues: huly_pr_number__c (number), huly_pr_state__c (text: Open, Merged, Closed), huly_pr_reviewers__c (multi-user), and huly_merge_commit_sha__c (text). The actual GitHub commit graph, branch history, and CI status remain in GitHub and are referenced via links on the Jira issue. GitHub Integration for Jira or similar Atlassian Marketplace apps can re-link commits to migrated Jira issues post-migration.
Huly
Task Type (Custom)
Jira
Issue Type
lossyHuly custom task types each carry their own set of process states. We enumerate all custom task types during discovery, map each type's state machine to a Jira Workflow and Status configuration, and assign each type to a Jira Issue Type (Bug, Story, Epic, Task) or a custom Issue Type if the destination Jira allows it. Per-type state mapping tables are built before any issue data migrates. Jira's Workflow schemes control which workflow applies to each Issue Type per project.
Huly
Wiki Page
Jira
Confluence Page
1:1Huly wiki pages migrate to Confluence pages inside a designated Confluence space. Content blocks, embedded links, and collaboration metadata transfer. Huly's document hierarchy (folders, nested pages) maps to Confluence page hierarchy. Embedded images and file attachments migrate as Confluence attachments. Jira Software projects can be linked to Confluence spaces for requirements and documentation co-location. Jira does not have a native documentation feature; Confluence requires a separate license.
Huly
Inbox / Chat Message
Jira
(no native equivalent)
1:1Huly Inbox messages and threaded discussions have no direct Jira or Confluence equivalent. We export message text, sender metadata, timestamps, and threading structure as structured JSON for the customer to review. Threading metadata (reply-to chains, reaction counts) is preserved in the export but cannot be rendered natively in Jira. Customers typically onboard this data into Atlassian Loom, Slack, or Microsoft Teams post-migration. Chat messages are flagged as non-migratable in the scope document with the export provided as a data archive.
Huly
Milestone
Jira
Version (Release)
1:1Huly Milestones group issues toward a common goal or deadline. We map Milestones to Jira Versions (also called Releases), preserving the target date as the Version release date and the milestone description as the Version description. Issues associated with a milestone are linked via the Fix Version field in Jira. Version-level burndown and release reports in Jira provide equivalent progress tracking.
Huly
Action Item
Jira
Sub-task
1:1Huly Action Items are tasks captured within conversations, carrying assignee, due date, and completion status. We migrate Action Items as Jira Sub-tasks linked to their parent Jira Issue. The action item text becomes the sub-task summary, assignee maps directly, and completion status maps to the Done status in the sub-task workflow. Action items without a clear parent issue are escalated to the customer's PM for manual parent assignment before migration.
Huly
Label
Jira
Label
1:1Huly labels with color metadata migrate to Jira Labels. Jira labels are single-word tags stored as a multi-select list on each issue. We preserve the Huly label name and color metadata in a custom field huly_label_color__c for reference. Jira labels are not colored natively; the color field is informational only.
Huly
Attachment
Jira
Attachment
1:1Files attached to issues, wiki pages, or chat messages migrate as Jira attachments on the corresponding issue or Confluence page. Huly cloud storage limits apply to attachments only (not to Huly objects); Jira Cloud attachments are subject to Jira site storage limits. We flag attachment-heavy records during scoping and recommend sizing the Jira site storage plan appropriately. Jira Cloud individual attachment size limit is 10 MB on free plans and 256 MB on paid plans; Huly attachment sizes are preserved during transfer subject to these limits.
Huly
User / Workspace Member
Jira
Jira User
1:1Huly workspace members and their roles (owner, member) map to Jira users and project role memberships. Email addresses and display names resolve to Jira user accounts. Active vs. archived status is preserved. Huly has no separate 'groups' object; Jira groups are created during migration based on Huly team or workspace membership patterns. Jira requires each migrating user to have an active Jira account or to be provisioned by an admin before record migration.
| Huly | Jira | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workspace | Project (or Project Group)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Space (Classic Project) | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Issue | Issue1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Issue (GitHub-synced Pull Request) | Issue (custom fields)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Task Type (Custom) | Issue Typelossy | Fully supported | |
| Wiki Page | Confluence Page1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Inbox / Chat Message | (no native equivalent)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Milestone | Version (Release)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Action Item | Sub-task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Label | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User / Workspace Member | Jira User1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Huly gotchas
Projects invisible after failed migration attempts
Storage vs. object count billing distinction
Task type inheritance creates schema complexity
No native accounts object for CRM-style records
GitHub PR sync creates duplicate task types
Jira gotchas
Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration
Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms
Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin
Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption
Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and workspace-project mapping
We audit the source Huly instance across all workspaces, spaces, custom task types, issue counts, wiki page volume, attachment storage consumption, GitHub integration status, and user list. We pair this with a Jira edition decision: Free for small teams under 10 users, Standard ($7.50/user/mo) for basic project management, Premium ($15/user/mo) for native sprint planning and analytics, or Enterprise ($36.50/user/mo) for large-scale deployments. The discovery output is a written scope with the workspace-to-project mapping strategy and per-task-type state mapping tables. Any Huly data stored in custom fields for CRM-style workflows is identified here.
Schema design and Jira configuration
We configure the destination Jira site. This includes provisioning Jira projects (one per Huly workspace or consolidated per scoping decision), Jira Issue Types matching Huly task types, Jira Workflows for each task type's state machine, custom fields (huly_issue_number__c, huly_pr_number__c, huly_label_color__c, and any custom fields from Huly), Jira Labels synced from Huly label definitions, Jira Versions created for Huly Milestones with target dates, and Confluence spaces created for Huly wiki pages if Confluence is included in the customer's Jira plan. Schema is validated in a Jira Sandbox or test project before production migration begins.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Jira test environment using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager reconciles record counts (issues in, labels in, wiki pages in, milestones in), spot-checks 25-50 random issues against the Huly source, and validates the workspace-project mapping and custom field values. Jira workflow transitions are tested manually. Any mapping corrections, missing custom fields, or incorrect status mappings are fixed in the destination before production migration begins. Confluence page hierarchy is reviewed for content accuracy.
User provisioning and permissions mapping
We extract every distinct Huly workspace member and map them to Jira user accounts by email. Huly owner and member roles are mapped to Jira project roles (Administrators, Members, Viewers). Any Huly member without a matching Jira account is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's Jira admin to provision. Jira groups are created based on Huly team or workspace membership patterns. Migration cannot proceed past issue import until all referenced assignees have Jira accounts.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects and Issue Types (schema, created first), Jira Versions from Huly Milestones, Jira Users (validated from provisioning step), Jira Issues with all standard and custom fields, Jira Labels applied to migrated issues, Jira Sub-tasks from Huly Action Items, Confluence spaces and pages from Huly wiki pages, Attachments on Jira issues and Confluence pages (with Jira site storage monitored), and Huly chat export as JSON archive. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Jira Bulk API and REST API are used with rate-limit handling and batch chunking for large issue volumes.
Cutover, validation, and post-migration handoff
We freeze Huly writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We validate issue counts, attachment integrity, label application, and Confluence page structure. We deliver the chat export JSON, the Workflow inventory (for any Huly-process-configured workflows, documented for manual rebuild), and the GitHub PR metadata mapping notes. Jira automations, Jira Service Management request types, and Confluence Space permissions require manual configuration post-migration. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues.
Platform deep dives
Huly
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Jira
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Huly and Jira.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Huly: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Huly doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Huly to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Huly to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Huly
Other ways to arrive at Jira
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.